search
Back to results

Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuroma "Stop Neuroma"

Primary Purpose

Neuroma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nerve Capping Device
Sponsored by
Polyganics BV
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuroma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be eligible according to the following criteria:

  1. Subjects who are able to provide a written informed consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation.
  2. Subjects who are > 18 years year old.
  3. Subjects with a diagnosis of symptomatic primary or secondary end-neuroma.
  4. Symptomatic neuroma located on the upper limb between the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints to shoulder.
  5. Symptomatic neuroma confirmed by pain relief following a 10min ±2min nerve block with Xylocaine (Lidocaine) - Pain relief defined as any reduction in VAS questionnaire score.
  6. Subjects with history of pain in the area of the end-neuroma for at least 6-months.
  7. Subjects with a positive Tinel's sign.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation:

  1. Inability to comply with the clinical investigation follow-up or other clinical investigation requirements.
  2. Subjects who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the duration of the clinical investigation or subjects who are not using appropriate birth control.
  3. Subjects who have had historical radiotherapy in the area of the end-neuroma.
  4. Symptomatic neuroma located proximally from the shoulder or distally from MCP joints.
  5. Subjects not willing to follow post-surgery protocols (e.g. avoiding pressure on the implant zone).
  6. Subjects is involved in another pain study.
  7. Subjects who have a known allergy to anesthetic agent or bioresorbable copolyester Poly(68/32[15/85 D/L] Lactide-Ԑ-Caprolactone) (PLCL).
  8. Subjects with a symptomatic neuroma that underwent surgical treatment for pain management on two or more occasions.
  9. Insufficient soft tissue at the end-neuroma site to cover the investigational device.
  10. Immunosuppressed patients, or patients with planned immunosuppressive therapy within 12-month following the study procedure.

Sites / Locations

  • Strasbourg University Hospitals
  • Haga Hospital
  • Albert Schweitzer Hospital
  • UMCG
  • Martini Hospital Groningen
  • MC Groep
  • MUMC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Nerve Capping Device

Arm Description

Implant with the experimental device

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety data (Serious adverse events )
Serious adverse events related to the investigation device as determine by independent expert.
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the end-neuroma pain at 6-week follow-up compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Safety (Rate of serious adverse device effects)
Rate of serious adverse device effects as determined by the physician and independent expert. Reduction of pain caused by symptomatic neuroma after 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the procedure, as compared to pain before the procedure. Improvement of quality of life at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up, as compared to the quality of life before the procedure. ≤20% recurrence of symptomatic neuroma within 12 months. Reduction of pain medication used to treat neuroma pain at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, as compared to the quantity pain medication used for the neuroma pain before the procedure.
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (DN4 score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: DN4 score (10 y/n items characterising pain) compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (Elliot score)
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: Elliot score (5 items rated 0 (no pain) to 4 (pain intolerable)) compared to score at baseline.
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the neuroma pain at 3, 6 and 12 months
Rate of recurrence of symptomatic neuroma
defined as daily pain combined with increased used of pain medication compared to baseline and no improvement in QuickDASH score, but pain is relieved with Xylocaine nerve block.

Full Information

First Posted
August 13, 2015
Last Updated
June 11, 2018
Sponsor
Polyganics BV
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02528266
Brief Title
Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuroma "Stop Neuroma"
Official Title
Open Non-randomized Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Nerve Capping Device to Prevent Neuroma Formation After Traumatic Nerve Section
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Polyganics BV

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is conducted to clinically assess safety and performance of the Polyganics nerve capping device for the treatment of symptomatic neuroma. There is sufficient clinical experience with regard to the safety of the commercially available nerve guide, NEUROLAC®. This new nerve capping device is identical in material and manufacturing. The exception is in design, where NEUROLAC® has two open ends, the nerve capping device has one closed (sealed) end. This study will be conducted to obtain data on the clinical performance of the capping device's ability to isolate the nerve end, resulting in a reduction of pain of experienced from the symptomatic neuroma and prevention of the reoccurrence of a symptomatic neuroma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuroma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nerve Capping Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implant with the experimental device
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nerve Capping Device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety data (Serious adverse events )
Description
Serious adverse events related to the investigation device as determine by independent expert.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Description
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the end-neuroma pain at 6-week follow-up compared to baseline
Time Frame
6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety (Rate of serious adverse device effects)
Description
Rate of serious adverse device effects as determined by the physician and independent expert. Reduction of pain caused by symptomatic neuroma after 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the procedure, as compared to pain before the procedure. Improvement of quality of life at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up, as compared to the quality of life before the procedure. ≤20% recurrence of symptomatic neuroma within 12 months. Reduction of pain medication used to treat neuroma pain at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, as compared to the quantity pain medication used for the neuroma pain before the procedure.
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
3, 6, 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
3, 6, 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (DN4 score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: DN4 score (10 y/n items characterising pain) compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (Elliot score)
Description
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: Elliot score (5 items rated 0 (no pain) to 4 (pain intolerable)) compared to score at baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months
Title
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Description
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the neuroma pain at 3, 6 and 12 months
Time Frame
3, 6, 12 months
Title
Rate of recurrence of symptomatic neuroma
Description
defined as daily pain combined with increased used of pain medication compared to baseline and no improvement in QuickDASH score, but pain is relieved with Xylocaine nerve block.
Time Frame
12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Usability (User Device Handling Questionnaire)
Description
Ease of placement of the device assessed via User Device Handling Questionnaire.
Time Frame
Day 0

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects will be eligible according to the following criteria: Subjects who are able to provide a written informed consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation. Subjects who are > 18 years year old. Subjects with a diagnosis of symptomatic primary or secondary end-neuroma. Symptomatic neuroma located on the upper limb between the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints to shoulder. Symptomatic neuroma confirmed by pain relief following a 10min ±2min nerve block with Xylocaine (Lidocaine) - Pain relief defined as any reduction in VAS questionnaire score. Subjects with history of pain in the area of the end-neuroma for at least 6-months. Subjects with a positive Tinel's sign. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation: Inability to comply with the clinical investigation follow-up or other clinical investigation requirements. Subjects who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the duration of the clinical investigation or subjects who are not using appropriate birth control. Subjects who have had historical radiotherapy in the area of the end-neuroma. Symptomatic neuroma located proximally from the shoulder or distally from MCP joints. Subjects not willing to follow post-surgery protocols (e.g. avoiding pressure on the implant zone). Subjects is involved in another pain study. Subjects who have a known allergy to anesthetic agent or bioresorbable copolyester Poly(68/32[15/85 D/L] Lactide-Ԑ-Caprolactone) (PLCL). Subjects with a symptomatic neuroma that underwent surgical treatment for pain management on two or more occasions. Insufficient soft tissue at the end-neuroma site to cover the investigational device. Immunosuppressed patients, or patients with planned immunosuppressive therapy within 12-month following the study procedure.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Betty IJmker, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Polyganics BV
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Strasbourg University Hospitals
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
F-67493
Country
France
Facility Name
Haga Hospital
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
City
Dordrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3318 AT
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
UMCG
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713GZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Martini Hospital Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9728 NT
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
MC Groep
City
Lelystad
ZIP/Postal Code
8233AA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
MUMC
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
6229 HX
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuroma "Stop Neuroma"

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs