search
Back to results

Efficacy of Intra-articular Collagen Injection in Patients With Knee Joint Pain Compared to Normal Saline Injection

Primary Purpose

Chondromalacia, Osteoarthritis, Traumatic Arthritis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CartiZol
Normal saline
Sponsored by
Sewon Cellontech Co., Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chondromalacia focused on measuring intra-articular injection, intra-articular collagen injection, collagen, knee joint pain

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Adult patients aged 19 or older 2. Patients with knee joint pain due to chondromalacia, osteoarthritis (OA), or traumatic arthritis (TA) 3. Patients with 3 or lower score in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4. Patients with 40 mm or higher scores in the 100 mm VAS pain scale 5. Patients without significant pathological tests at their screening visit 6. Patients whose medication is confirmed within one week from their study enrolment and who agreed to maintain the medication dose during the study period if they need to keep taking it 7. When combination drugs are administered, considering the period of the drugs remaining in the body, patients who take the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to participating in the trial (based on the screening, if it is confirmed that the patients took the drugs stably for 1 week prior to the screening, at the enrollment for injection, it should be assessed again, and the patients who are confirmed to have taken the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to the trial could be registered).

    8. Patients who, after taking drugs for anesthetic purposes (provided to the subject after the injection) within one week after the intra-articular injection, agreed to take anti-inflammatory agents for no more than 5 consecutive days and for no more than 10 days in a month, and could stop taking the drugs within 2 days after the next visit even if the pain in the observation site becomes severe and thus additional drugs are required.

    9. Patients who agreed to use only the non-drug treatments (i.e., physiotherapy, osteopathy, and chiropractic therapy) allowed by the study investigators (Acupuncture is not allowed.) 10. Patients who agreed to receive the injection only in one knee when they feel pain on both knees (The other knee can be treated with prescribed drugs, but articular injections are not allowed.) 11. Patients or their representative (for adults) who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients or their family members with a history of or an ongoing autoimmune disease 2. Patients with a history of anaphylactic response 3. Patients with hypersensitivity to grafting materials 4. Patients with hypersensitivity to porcine protein 5. Patient with grade 4 in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade 6. Patients with severe effusion 7. Patients who were injured severely or received injection in their affected knee within six months, which would make evaluation of the knee difficult 8. Patients with inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, rupus arthrosis, or psoriatic arthritis 9. Patients who have gout or calcium pyrophosphate (pseudogout) disease that started within six months from the screening visit 10. Patients with a history of radiation therapy or cancer treatment within two years 11. Patients with diabetes 12. Patients with an infection that required hospitalization for antibiotics or the administration of antiseptic agents 13. Patients who have been undergoing adrenocortical hormone therapy 14. Patients with liver, heart, or kidney disease 15. Patients who had been infected with a virus 16. Patients who have a serious health condition that may affect the study results 17. Patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant 18. Patients who are considered inappropriate for participation in this study due to their condition (e.g., a mental illness) based on the investigator's judgment 8-15: The investigator can decide whether or not the patient will be administered the injection.

Sites / Locations

  • Chung-Ang University Hospital
  • Kunkuk University Medical Center
  • Samsung Medical Center
  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
  • The Catholic University of Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Cartizol, collagen injection

Normal Saline injection

Arm Description

Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the intra-articular collagen injection group based on a randomization table.

Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the (placebo) injection group based on a randomization table.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Score change of 100 mm VAS
The difference of the score of the investigational group and the control group at baseline and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Score change of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities)
The difference of the value of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Score change of SF-36 (36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey)
The difference of the value of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Score change of Satisfaction evaluation by patients
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by patients at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
Score change of Satisfaction evaluation by physician in charge
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by clinicians at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
Score change of Physical examination
The difference of the score of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at the times prior to injection, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Score change of 100 mm VAS
The difference of the score of the investigational group and the control group at before injection, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed

Full Information

First Posted
August 31, 2015
Last Updated
August 31, 2015
Sponsor
Sewon Cellontech Co., Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02539095
Brief Title
Efficacy of Intra-articular Collagen Injection in Patients With Knee Joint Pain Compared to Normal Saline Injection
Official Title
A Double-blind, Randomized, Post-marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intra-articular Collagen Injection in Patients With Knee Joint Pain Compared to Normal Saline Injection
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2015 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sewon Cellontech Co., Ltd.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to confirm the superiority of intra-articular collagen injection in patients with knee joint pain compared to the control group. 100mm VAS is used to measure the pain of the subjects 24 weeks after the procedure.
Detailed Description
This study is a double-blind clinical trial. Two hundred subjects has participated in it. The study is explained to the subjects, and they voluntarily choose to participate in it. Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the intra-articular collagen injection group or the normal saline (placebo) injection group based on a randomization table. They are asked to follow the guidelines of the investigators during the study and to visit the hospital five times, including for screening. At each visit, the subjects will undergo an examination with doctors, a medical examination by interview, and a blood test only when it is necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the injection. (*If the subjects performed the screening during the first visit on, the total number of his or her additional visits is four.)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chondromalacia, Osteoarthritis, Traumatic Arthritis
Keywords
intra-articular injection, intra-articular collagen injection, collagen, knee joint pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cartizol, collagen injection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the intra-articular collagen injection group based on a randomization table.
Arm Title
Normal Saline injection
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the (placebo) injection group based on a randomization table.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CartiZol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intra articular collagen injection
Intervention Description
The product, CartiZol, which contains absorbable collagen, is applied on the cartilage defect to stimulate the neovasculization and cell penetration and to assist the natural wound healing process. It supplements the defective or damaged cartilage. Place the needle on the tip of the syringe and inject the product into the articular cavity.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Normal saline
Other Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
Supplementation of fluid and electrolytes (sodium or chlorine deficiency) Diluent for injection solution Place the needle on the tip of the syringe and inject the product into the articular cavity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Score change of 100 mm VAS
Description
The difference of the score of the investigational group and the control group at baseline and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Time Frame
24 weeks after injection
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Score change of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities)
Description
The difference of the value of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Time Frame
at the screening visit and then 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Title
Score change of SF-36 (36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey)
Description
The difference of the value of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Time Frame
at the screening visit and then 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Title
Score change of Satisfaction evaluation by patients
Description
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by patients at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
Time Frame
at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Title
Score change of Satisfaction evaluation by physician in charge
Description
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by clinicians at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
Time Frame
at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Title
Score change of Physical examination
Description
The difference of the score of the affected knee of the investigational group and the control group at the times prior to injection, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Time Frame
at the screening visit and then 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Title
Score change of 100 mm VAS
Description
The difference of the score of the investigational group and the control group at before injection, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after injection will be calculated and analyzed
Time Frame
at the screening visit and then 4 and 12weeks after injection

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult patients aged 19 or older 2. Patients with knee joint pain due to chondromalacia, osteoarthritis (OA), or traumatic arthritis (TA) 3. Patients with 3 or lower score in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4. Patients with 40 mm or higher scores in the 100 mm VAS pain scale 5. Patients without significant pathological tests at their screening visit 6. Patients whose medication is confirmed within one week from their study enrolment and who agreed to maintain the medication dose during the study period if they need to keep taking it 7. When combination drugs are administered, considering the period of the drugs remaining in the body, patients who take the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to participating in the trial (based on the screening, if it is confirmed that the patients took the drugs stably for 1 week prior to the screening, at the enrollment for injection, it should be assessed again, and the patients who are confirmed to have taken the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to the trial could be registered). 8. Patients who, after taking drugs for anesthetic purposes (provided to the subject after the injection) within one week after the intra-articular injection, agreed to take anti-inflammatory agents for no more than 5 consecutive days and for no more than 10 days in a month, and could stop taking the drugs within 2 days after the next visit even if the pain in the observation site becomes severe and thus additional drugs are required. 9. Patients who agreed to use only the non-drug treatments (i.e., physiotherapy, osteopathy, and chiropractic therapy) allowed by the study investigators (Acupuncture is not allowed.) 10. Patients who agreed to receive the injection only in one knee when they feel pain on both knees (The other knee can be treated with prescribed drugs, but articular injections are not allowed.) 11. Patients or their representative (for adults) who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients or their family members with a history of or an ongoing autoimmune disease 2. Patients with a history of anaphylactic response 3. Patients with hypersensitivity to grafting materials 4. Patients with hypersensitivity to porcine protein 5. Patient with grade 4 in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade 6. Patients with severe effusion 7. Patients who were injured severely or received injection in their affected knee within six months, which would make evaluation of the knee difficult 8. Patients with inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, rupus arthrosis, or psoriatic arthritis 9. Patients who have gout or calcium pyrophosphate (pseudogout) disease that started within six months from the screening visit 10. Patients with a history of radiation therapy or cancer treatment within two years 11. Patients with diabetes 12. Patients with an infection that required hospitalization for antibiotics or the administration of antiseptic agents 13. Patients who have been undergoing adrenocortical hormone therapy 14. Patients with liver, heart, or kidney disease 15. Patients who had been infected with a virus 16. Patients who have a serious health condition that may affect the study results 17. Patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant 18. Patients who are considered inappropriate for participation in this study due to their condition (e.g., a mental illness) based on the investigator's judgment 8-15: The investigator can decide whether or not the patient will be administered the injection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Young Wan Moon, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Samsung Medical Cente
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yong In, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Catholic University of Korea
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Han Jun Lee, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kwang Jun Oh, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Kunkuk University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hwa Sung Lee, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Catholic University of Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Chung-Ang University Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Kunkuk University Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Samsung Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Catholic University of Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Intra-articular Collagen Injection in Patients With Knee Joint Pain Compared to Normal Saline Injection

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs