search
Back to results

Adaptive CRT Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony (aCRT-ELSYNC)

Primary Purpose

Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Block

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy
Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Sponsored by
Larisa Tereshchenko
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiomyopathy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a standard class I or class II indications for CRT-P or CRT-D implantation in accordance with ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines (2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities)2.At least 18 years of age at the time of consent
  • Is willing and able to comply with the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic atrial arrhythmias defined as: "Atrial fibrillation is permanent when it has resisted all attempts to restore sinus rhythm or when the physician and patient decide that no such attempt should be made."
  • Patient has ever had a previous or has an existing CRT system, ICD, or pacemaker.
  • GFR <30ml/min
  • Patient has had unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within 30 days prior to study enrollment
  • Patient has primary valvular disease and is indicated for valve repair or replacement
  • Patient is enrolled in ≥1 concurrent studies that would confound the study results (any other interventional trial)
  • Patient is pregnant or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control. All women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test.
  • Patient status post heart transplant
  • Patient has been classified as NYHA functional class IV within 3 months prior to study enrollment
  • concomitant conditions other than cardiac diseases that were associated with a higher likelihood of death during 1 year after enrollment
  • Patient, legal guardian or authorized representative is unable or unwilling to cooperate or give written informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • Oregon Health and Science University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

aCRT Off

aCRT On

Arm Description

The adaptive CRT algorithm will be turned off for the CRT device implanted in the patients in this arm.

The adaptive CRT algorithm will be turned on for the CRT device implanted in the patients in this arm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Regression slope of Electrical dyssynchrony index
Regression slope of Electrical Dyssynchrony Index values measured on epicardial activation map 6 months post-CRT, regressed against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index values measured by ECGi prior CRT.
Difference in regression slopes of SAI QRST against EDI vs. QRS duration against EDI
Difference in regression slopes of SAI QRST against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index vs. QRS duration against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index prior CRT and 6 months post-CRT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Regression slope of surface ECG and intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle and VCG QRS and T loops morphology
Surface ECG and intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle and QRS & T loops morphological characteristics measured 6 months post-CRT regressed against the same measures prior CRT
Clinical Composite Score
End-point adjudication committee will adjudicate all available information and decide whether patient (1) improved; (2) worsened; (3) not changed, based on: 6-minute walk distance change, NYHA class change, heart failure hospitalization, death, CRT removal (or turned OFF), MLHFQ and SF-36 score change, LVEF / LVESV change on echocardiogram
Reverse electrical remodeling
Shortened duration of non-paced QRS complex 6 months post-CRT greater than or equal 10 ms
regression slope of PeRV1 interval
PeRV1 interval measured 6 months post- CRT, regressed against PeRV1 interval measured prior CRT

Full Information

First Posted
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Sponsor
Larisa Tereshchenko
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02543281
Brief Title
Adaptive CRT Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony
Acronym
aCRT-ELSYNC
Official Title
Adaptive CRT Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Larisa Tereshchenko

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to better understand how adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) might benefit patients. aCRT works by sometimes giving stimulation to only the left side of the heart, rather than to both sides, depending on how it senses the heart is functioning. CRT without the adaptive algorithm works by giving stimulation to both sides of the heart. aCRT has already been approved by the FDA and is being used in patients now, but it is not clear which patients it should be used in compared to normal CRT. This study will include patients who are already scheduled to get a CRT device. The investigators will then randomize patients to the aCRT study arm or to the CRT study arm. After 6 months, the investigators will assess the electrical activity of the patients' hearts. After this time, the patient and their doctors will be able to decide if they would like to change the type CRT they have been designated.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Block

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
aCRT Off
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The adaptive CRT algorithm will be turned off for the CRT device implanted in the patients in this arm.
Arm Title
aCRT On
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The adaptive CRT algorithm will be turned on for the CRT device implanted in the patients in this arm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
aCRT
Intervention Description
The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm works by sometimes giving stimulation to only the left side of the heart, rather than to both sides, depending on how it senses the heart is functioning.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
CRT
Intervention Description
CRT without the adaptive algorithm works by giving stimulation to both sides of the heart.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Regression slope of Electrical dyssynchrony index
Description
Regression slope of Electrical Dyssynchrony Index values measured on epicardial activation map 6 months post-CRT, regressed against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index values measured by ECGi prior CRT.
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation
Title
Difference in regression slopes of SAI QRST against EDI vs. QRS duration against EDI
Description
Difference in regression slopes of SAI QRST against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index vs. QRS duration against Electrical Dyssynchrony Index prior CRT and 6 months post-CRT
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Regression slope of surface ECG and intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle and VCG QRS and T loops morphology
Description
Surface ECG and intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle and QRS & T loops morphological characteristics measured 6 months post-CRT regressed against the same measures prior CRT
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation
Title
Clinical Composite Score
Description
End-point adjudication committee will adjudicate all available information and decide whether patient (1) improved; (2) worsened; (3) not changed, based on: 6-minute walk distance change, NYHA class change, heart failure hospitalization, death, CRT removal (or turned OFF), MLHFQ and SF-36 score change, LVEF / LVESV change on echocardiogram
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation
Title
Reverse electrical remodeling
Description
Shortened duration of non-paced QRS complex 6 months post-CRT greater than or equal 10 ms
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation
Title
regression slope of PeRV1 interval
Description
PeRV1 interval measured 6 months post- CRT, regressed against PeRV1 interval measured prior CRT
Time Frame
6 months after device implantation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient has a standard class I or class II indications for CRT-P or CRT-D implantation in accordance with ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines (2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities)2.At least 18 years of age at the time of consent Is willing and able to comply with the protocol Exclusion Criteria: Chronic atrial arrhythmias defined as: "Atrial fibrillation is permanent when it has resisted all attempts to restore sinus rhythm or when the physician and patient decide that no such attempt should be made." Patient has ever had a previous or has an existing CRT system, ICD, or pacemaker. GFR <30ml/min Patient has had unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within 30 days prior to study enrollment Patient has primary valvular disease and is indicated for valve repair or replacement Patient is enrolled in ≥1 concurrent studies that would confound the study results (any other interventional trial) Patient is pregnant or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control. All women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test. Patient status post heart transplant Patient has been classified as NYHA functional class IV within 3 months prior to study enrollment concomitant conditions other than cardiac diseases that were associated with a higher likelihood of death during 1 year after enrollment Patient, legal guardian or authorized representative is unable or unwilling to cooperate or give written informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Larisa Tereshchenko, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34430943
Citation
Haq KT, Rogovoy NM, Thomas JA, Hamilton C, Lutz KJ, Wirth A, Bender AB, German DM, Przybylowicz R, van Dam P, Dewland TA, Dalouk K, Stecker E, Nazer B, Jessel PM, MacMurdy KS, Zarraga IGE, Beitinjaneh B, Henrikson CA, Raitt M, Fuss C, Ferencik M, Tereshchenko LG. Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony (aCRT-ELSYNC): A randomized controlled trial. Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Jun 29;2(4):374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.06.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Adaptive CRT Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs