search
Back to results

Customized Cortical Stimulation Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS)
Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
Sham Motor Cortex Stimulation
Sponsored by
Emory University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Stroke focused on measuring Subacute stroke, Chronic stroke

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for all Participants

  • The ability to provide informed consent
  • Ages 40 to 80 years old
  • Male or female

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Stroke Patients:

  • One cerebral ischemic infarction less than 1 month affecting the primary motor output system of the hand at a cortical (M1) level as defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain
  • Paresis of the hand for more than 3 days after their cerebral infarction

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Subjects:

  • Normal MRI of the brain
  • Normal neuropsychological testing
  • Normal neurological examination

Exclusion Criteria for Stroke Patients:

  • Neurological disorders other than stroke
  • Aphasia that prevents following instructions or inability to communicate effectively with the study team
  • Dementia
  • Moderate or severe depression
  • Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and/or MRI
  • Use of central nervous system (CNS) active drugs that block plasticity

Exclusion Criteria for Healthy Subjects:

  • Neurological Disease
  • Psychiatric Disease
  • Use of CNS active drugs
  • Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and/or MRI

Sites / Locations

  • Center for Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Emory University Hospital
  • Emory University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Stroke Patients

Healthy Controls

Arm Description

Subjects will undergo single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), paired pulse transcranial stimulation (ppTMS), and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at one month and six months post stroke.

Subjects will undergo single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), paired pulse transcranial stimulation (ppTMS), and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at one month and six months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Motor Function Assessed by the Jebsen Test
The Jebsen Test assesses weighted and non-weighted hand function among participants who have had a stroke. Subjects are assessed through writing, turning over 3 by 5 inch cards, picking up small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking checkers, picking up large objects, and picking up large heavy objects. Patients are required to perform all of the subtests with both the right and left hands. Time to complete each task is recorded and normalized to healthy age and sex matched control subjects. The score ranges from 0 to 1 with 0 being normal.
Mean Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitudes Assessed by Stimulus Response Curve (SRC) of the Contralesional M1
Change in mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes at each stimulus intensity will be calculated. The sum of these means is calculated as the area under the curve.
Presence of MEP in Response to TMS of the Ipsilesional M1
The presence of motor evoked potential (MEP) in response to maximum TMS applied to ipsilesional M1 was determined in participants with stroke.
Lesion Volume
Normalized stroke lesion volume was determined at the one-month time point using structural MRI of the brain.
Corticospinal Tract (CST) Lesion
Corticospinal tract (CST) lesion load will be determined at the one-month time point using structural MRI of the brain. The lesion size is expressed as percentage of the entire CST.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Motor Function Assessed by Time to Complete the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Upper extremity motor ability among participants who had a stroke was evaluated with the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The test consists of 17 items (6 joint-segment movements, 9 integrative functional movements and 2 strength items). The items are rated on a 6-point functional ability scale (FAS) where 0 is "no attempt is made to use the more affected arm and 5 is a normal appearance of movement execution. The time taken to complete each task will be recorded up to 120 seconds. The mean time to complete all tasks will be used to evaluate motor ability.
Motor Function Assessed by Grip Strength During the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
During the grip strength assessment of the WMFT, participants grip a dynamometer with as much strength as possible. There are three trials of gripping with a minute rest interval between trials. The mean kilograms of strength exerted during the three trials is calculated.
Use of Paretic Arm Assessed by the Motor Activity Log (MAL)
In stroke patients, the everyday use of the paretic (the more affected) arm will be measured using the Motor Activity Log (MAL). The MAL is a subjective measure of semi- structured interview to examine a) how much and b) how well the subject uses their more-affected arm outside of the laboratory setting. Total scores range from 0 (no use of the more-affected arm) to 5 (use is as good as before stroke).
CST Subpathway Originating in M1 Lesion Load
CST sub M1 lesion volume will be determined at the one- month time point using structural MRI of the brain. The lesion load is expressed as percentage of the entire CST.
Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Activity, Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to determine hand movement related activity in the motor cortex of the brain in all subjects. Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response during execution of the motor task will be compared to rest. The subacute stroke and chronic stroke time points are compared to single study visit of healthy controls.
Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) Measured by Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
SICI in the contralesional M1 will be measured using paired pulse TMS at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2 milliseconds (ms). Cortical stimulation intensity was delivered at 60% and 80% of the motor threshold (MT). SICI is expressed as the ratio between the mean MEP amplitude in response to a single TMS and the mean MEP amplitude in response to a paired pulse TMS. A ratio of 1 means no inhibition, a ratio smaller than 1 means inhibition, and a ratio greater than 1 means facilitation.
Peak Velocity During Wrist Extension Movement
Stroke patients are asked to rapidly execute 7 ballistic wrist extension movements following an auditory cue. A 2-dimensional gyrometer is mounted on the dorsum of the hand to measure wrist extension movements. Electromyography (EMG) activity will be recorded on the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscle, a muscle that supports wrist extension movements.

Full Information

First Posted
September 7, 2015
Last Updated
August 21, 2023
Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02544503
Brief Title
Customized Cortical Stimulation Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
Official Title
Customized Cortical Stimulation Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The study was suspended in 2020 due to COVID-19 safety measures. Follow up with those previously enrolled later resumed, but not all subjects returned due to the ongoing pandemic. The study closed after attempting to obtain as much data as possible.
Study Start Date
November 5, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 4, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 4, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to identify and establish how the area of the brain that controls motor function (motor cortex) of the non-affected hemisphere after stroke might serve as a new target for therapeutic interventions to improve motor performance after stroke.
Detailed Description
It is well known that the motor area of one hemisphere of the brain (motor cortex) controls the movement of the opposite side of the body but the role of the motor cortex in the hemisphere spared by stroke (contralesional motor cortex) in motor performance during post stroke recovery is still unclear. It is also not clear whether the motor cortex of both hemispheres of the brain are involved, as movement becomes more complicated. Currently the role of the motor cortex on the same side of the body (referred to as ipsilateral motor cortex) in hand performance remains controversial. In most patients with stroke, only one side of the brain is affected by the stroke (affected hemisphere) resulting in weakness of half of the body opposite to the side of the stroke. Over the recent years, research has discovered that the side of the brain, that is spared by the stroke (non-affected hemisphere) may support recovery after stroke. However, there is also a question whether the non-affected hemisphere may interfere with the process of recovery. It is currently not known what factors influence the activity of non-affected hemisphere to either support or interfere with the recovery of stroke. A better understanding of those events is critical to development of optimal therapeutic strategies. For example, non-invasive stimulation of specific areas of the non-affected hemisphere may help to improve functional recovery following stroke. The objectives of this study are to define the factors that influence the activity in the non-affected hemisphere to either support or interfere with the recovery after stroke. The researchers will study the area of the brain that controls movements of the non-affected hemisphere as it relates to motor function post-stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a device that allows non-invasive stimulation of the brain. When the brain is stimulated repetitively at a very low rate and low intensity for about 15 minutes, the stimulated brain area becomes less active. This effect lasts 10 minutes and is called a "transient artificial lesion" as it mimics the effects of transiently interfering with the function of the stimulated brain area. The study includes experiments that first identify the extent of stroke and brain areas involved in a motor task using functional MRI of the brain and TMS. The researchers will then determine the functional role of the contralesional motor cortex by studying the effect of low frequency and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of primary motor cortex (M1) on interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) (resting and active) and motor cortex excitability (short interval intracortical excitability and corticospinal excitability) and behavior. The researchers will thereby also identify rTMS protocols that enhance motor performance in stroke patients. In this study the researchers will conduct experiments using repetitive TMS to downregulate the activity of the motor area and measures its effect on activity of motor cortex of both hemispheres. In addition to enrolling participants who have had a stroke, the researchers will enroll healthy participants as this collected data will provide normative values for task related changes in M1s and their interactions - a prerequisite to studying abnormalities in stroke patients during motor recovery. The measurements and interventions will occur at two time points in all participants with stroke (1 and 6 months post-stroke). The data will be compared to the results of healthy age matched controls, assessed at a single time point.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
Subacute stroke, Chronic stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Stroke Patients
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), paired pulse transcranial stimulation (ppTMS), and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at one month and six months post stroke.
Arm Title
Healthy Controls
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), paired pulse transcranial stimulation (ppTMS), and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at one month and six months.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Intervention Description
Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a brief magnetic pulse that is applied through a coil to the section of the head that overlays the motor cortex of the brain. Subjects will be comfortably seated in a dental chair surrounded by a frame that carries a coil holder to assist with the application of TMS to the brain. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be administered at study visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS)
Intervention Description
Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) is two brief sequential magnetic pulses that are applied through a coil to the section of the head that overlays the motor cortex of the brain. Subjects will be comfortably seated in a dental chair surrounded by a frame that carries a coil holder to assist with the application of TMS to the brain. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) will be administered at study visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
Intervention Description
Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a sequence of brief magnetic pulses that are applied at 0.1 Hz frequency at low intensity through an air-cooled coil to the section of the head that overlays the motor cortex of the brain. Subjects will be comfortably seated in a dental chair surrounded by a frame that carries a coil holder to assist with the application of TMS to the brain. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) will be administered at study visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Motor Cortex Stimulation
Intervention Description
Sham motor cortex stimulation will be applied at study visits.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motor Function Assessed by the Jebsen Test
Description
The Jebsen Test assesses weighted and non-weighted hand function among participants who have had a stroke. Subjects are assessed through writing, turning over 3 by 5 inch cards, picking up small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking checkers, picking up large objects, and picking up large heavy objects. Patients are required to perform all of the subtests with both the right and left hands. Time to complete each task is recorded and normalized to healthy age and sex matched control subjects. The score ranges from 0 to 1 with 0 being normal.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Mean Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitudes Assessed by Stimulus Response Curve (SRC) of the Contralesional M1
Description
Change in mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes at each stimulus intensity will be calculated. The sum of these means is calculated as the area under the curve.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke) or single study visit for healthy controls, 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Presence of MEP in Response to TMS of the Ipsilesional M1
Description
The presence of motor evoked potential (MEP) in response to maximum TMS applied to ipsilesional M1 was determined in participants with stroke.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Lesion Volume
Description
Normalized stroke lesion volume was determined at the one-month time point using structural MRI of the brain.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke)
Title
Corticospinal Tract (CST) Lesion
Description
Corticospinal tract (CST) lesion load will be determined at the one-month time point using structural MRI of the brain. The lesion size is expressed as percentage of the entire CST.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motor Function Assessed by Time to Complete the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Description
Upper extremity motor ability among participants who had a stroke was evaluated with the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The test consists of 17 items (6 joint-segment movements, 9 integrative functional movements and 2 strength items). The items are rated on a 6-point functional ability scale (FAS) where 0 is "no attempt is made to use the more affected arm and 5 is a normal appearance of movement execution. The time taken to complete each task will be recorded up to 120 seconds. The mean time to complete all tasks will be used to evaluate motor ability.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Motor Function Assessed by Grip Strength During the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Description
During the grip strength assessment of the WMFT, participants grip a dynamometer with as much strength as possible. There are three trials of gripping with a minute rest interval between trials. The mean kilograms of strength exerted during the three trials is calculated.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Use of Paretic Arm Assessed by the Motor Activity Log (MAL)
Description
In stroke patients, the everyday use of the paretic (the more affected) arm will be measured using the Motor Activity Log (MAL). The MAL is a subjective measure of semi- structured interview to examine a) how much and b) how well the subject uses their more-affected arm outside of the laboratory setting. Total scores range from 0 (no use of the more-affected arm) to 5 (use is as good as before stroke).
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
CST Subpathway Originating in M1 Lesion Load
Description
CST sub M1 lesion volume will be determined at the one- month time point using structural MRI of the brain. The lesion load is expressed as percentage of the entire CST.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke)
Title
Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Activity, Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Description
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to determine hand movement related activity in the motor cortex of the brain in all subjects. Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response during execution of the motor task will be compared to rest. The subacute stroke and chronic stroke time points are compared to single study visit of healthy controls.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke) or single study visit for healthy controls, 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) Measured by Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
Description
SICI in the contralesional M1 will be measured using paired pulse TMS at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2 milliseconds (ms). Cortical stimulation intensity was delivered at 60% and 80% of the motor threshold (MT). SICI is expressed as the ratio between the mean MEP amplitude in response to a single TMS and the mean MEP amplitude in response to a paired pulse TMS. A ratio of 1 means no inhibition, a ratio smaller than 1 means inhibition, and a ratio greater than 1 means facilitation.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke) or single study visit for healthy controls, 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)
Title
Peak Velocity During Wrist Extension Movement
Description
Stroke patients are asked to rapidly execute 7 ballistic wrist extension movements following an auditory cue. A 2-dimensional gyrometer is mounted on the dorsum of the hand to measure wrist extension movements. Electromyography (EMG) activity will be recorded on the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscle, a muscle that supports wrist extension movements.
Time Frame
1 month post-stroke (subacute stroke), 6 months post-stroke (chronic stroke)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for all Participants The ability to provide informed consent Ages 40 to 80 years old Male or female Additional Inclusion Criteria for Stroke Patients: One cerebral ischemic infarction less than 1 month affecting the primary motor output system of the hand at a cortical (M1) level as defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain Paresis of the hand for more than 3 days after their cerebral infarction Additional Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Subjects: Normal MRI of the brain Normal neuropsychological testing Normal neurological examination Exclusion Criteria for Stroke Patients: Neurological disorders other than stroke Aphasia that prevents following instructions or inability to communicate effectively with the study team Dementia Moderate or severe depression Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and/or MRI Use of central nervous system (CNS) active drugs that block plasticity Exclusion Criteria for Healthy Subjects: Neurological Disease Psychiatric Disease Use of CNS active drugs Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and/or MRI
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cathrin Buetefisch, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Emory University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Rehabilitation Medicine
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University School of Medicine
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Customized Cortical Stimulation Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs