search
Back to results

Phlebotomy to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections (PRICE)

Primary Purpose

Liver Neoplasms, Hepatectomy

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Phlebotomy
Citrated whole blood collection bag
Sponsored by
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Liver Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient being considered for a major elective liver resection will be considered for trial enrollment. Patients who are undergoing a concurrent additional abdominal or thoracic procedure (eg. colonic resection) will also be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal of blood products
  • Active cardiac conditions: unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV; worsening or new-onset heart failure), significant arrhythmias, severe valvular disease
  • History of significant cerebrovascular disease
  • Renal dysfunction (patients with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min)
  • Abnormal coagulation parameters (INR >1.5 not on warfarin and/or platelets count <100 X109/L )
  • Evidence of hepatic metabolic disorder (bilirubin >35 umol/L)
  • Presence of active infection
  • Preoperative autologous blood donation
  • Hemoglobin <100 g/L

Sites / Locations

  • The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Phlebotomy

Control

Arm Description

For patients randomized to phlebotomy, the intervention will consist of the standard of care (low CVP surgery), plus whole blood phlebotomy. Blood will be collected in citrated whole blood collection bag.

Standard of care (low CVP surgery). In this arm, standard anesthesia will be maintained.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels
Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.
Trial Feasibility
Trial accrual

Secondary Outcome Measures

Blood Product Transfusion Rates
Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality
Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)
Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)

Full Information

First Posted
July 23, 2015
Last Updated
February 23, 2021
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02548910
Brief Title
Phlebotomy to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections
Acronym
PRICE
Official Title
The PRICE Trial: Phlebotomy Resulting in Controlled Hypovolemia to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Major liver resection is associated with substantial intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a significant factor of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. The purpose of this study is to use whole blood phlebotomy to decrease the central venous pressure, resulting in a state of relative hypovolemia. It is hypothesized that this intervention will lead to a decrease in blood loss at the time of liver resection.
Detailed Description
Major liver resection is associated with significant intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a key determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. Whole blood phlebotomy is a simple intervention, whose aim is to decrease the central venous pressure yielding a state of relative hypovolemia and thus lead to decreased blood loss. Small studies, mostly from the liver transplant literature, would suggest that phlebotomy with controlled hypovolemia can result in decreased blood loss and blood transfusion. Since blood loss is an important issue in liver surgery, and the benefits of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia are unknown in liver resection patients, a rigorously conducted trial in a representative population of patients undergoing liver resection is warranted, and feasible. In this proposal, it is hypothesized that by the use of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia, it is possible to decrease blood loss and blood transfusions. To test this hypothesis the investigators plan to randomly allocate participants to phlebotomy plus standard of care or to standard of care. Participants will be those patients undergoing elective major liver resection at the Ottawa Hospital for any indication. The primary outcome will be intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include transfusion requirements, perioperative morbidity and mortality, safety, physiologic parameters, and feasibility elements. A total of 62 patients will be randomized. The efficacy of phlebotomy in terms of blood loss prevention will be assessed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Neoplasms, Hepatectomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phlebotomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
For patients randomized to phlebotomy, the intervention will consist of the standard of care (low CVP surgery), plus whole blood phlebotomy. Blood will be collected in citrated whole blood collection bag.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard of care (low CVP surgery). In this arm, standard anesthesia will be maintained.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Phlebotomy
Intervention Description
A central venous catheter will be inserted for every patient to measure central venous pressure, as is the standard of care in elective liver surgery. Strict aseptic technique will be maintained. A total volume of whole blood of 7-10 mL per kg of body weight will be removed, as tolerated. The volume of removed blood will not be replaced by intravenous fluid administration. Collected blood will be transfused back at the end of the liver parenchymal transection, or within 8 hours of collection.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Citrated whole blood collection bag
Intervention Description
Transfusion Medicine will send the requested number of whole blood collection bags labelled with the patient's name and MRN. These whole blood collection bags are used in standard practice for collection of whole blood.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels
Description
Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.
Time Frame
1 week prior to surgery (hemoglobin level), and day two of post-op (hemoglobin again).
Title
Trial Feasibility
Description
Trial accrual
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Blood Product Transfusion Rates
Time Frame
Will be measured in the operating room and in the first postoperative week
Title
Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality
Time Frame
Postoperative setting up to 30 days following surgery
Title
Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)
Time Frame
Will be measured in the operating room
Title
Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)
Time Frame
Will be measured in the operating room

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Any patient being considered for a major elective liver resection will be considered for trial enrollment. Patients who are undergoing a concurrent additional abdominal or thoracic procedure (eg. colonic resection) will also be included. Exclusion Criteria: Age <18 years Pregnancy Refusal of blood products Active cardiac conditions: unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV; worsening or new-onset heart failure), significant arrhythmias, severe valvular disease History of significant cerebrovascular disease Renal dysfunction (patients with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min) Abnormal coagulation parameters (INR >1.5 not on warfarin and/or platelets count <100 X109/L ) Evidence of hepatic metabolic disorder (bilirubin >35 umol/L) Presence of active infection Preoperative autologous blood donation Hemoglobin <100 g/L
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume Martel, MD, MSc, FRCSC, FACS
Organizational Affiliation
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17457160
Citation
Hashimoto T, Kokudo N, Orii R, Seyama Y, Sano K, Imamura H, Sugawara Y, Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M. Intraoperative blood salvage during liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):686-91. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000255562.60215.3b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19150318
Citation
Alkozai EM, Lisman T, Porte RJ. Bleeding in liver surgery: prevention and treatment. Clin Liver Dis. 2009 Feb;13(1):145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2008.09.012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24449171
Citation
Huntington JT, Royall NA, Schmidt CR. Minimizing blood loss during hepatectomy: a literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;109(2):81-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23455. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22404261
Citation
McNally SJ, Revie EJ, Massie LJ, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):236-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00433.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12368667
Citation
Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):397-406; discussion 406-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15383797
Citation
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK, Yeung C, Wong J. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):698-708; discussion 708-10. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141195.66155.0c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23426338
Citation
Andreou A, Aloia TA, Brouquet A, Dickson PV, Zimmitti G, Maru DM, Kopetz S, Loyer EM, Curley SA, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. Margin status remains an important determinant of survival after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1079-88. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318283a4d1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19953711
Citation
Sima CS, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Elkin E, Fischer M, Wuest D, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, Gonen M. Predicting the risk of perioperative transfusion for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):914-21. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b7fad3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25881789
Citation
Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Hall BL, Bilimoria K, Cohen M, Ko C, Pitt H, Pawlik TM. Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database. J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 15;196(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20216483
Citation
Massicotte L, Perrault MA, Denault AY, Klinck JR, Beaulieu D, Roy JD, Thibeault L, Roy A, McCormack M, Karakiewicz P. Effects of phlebotomy and phenylephrine infusion on portal venous pressure and systemic hemodynamics during liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Apr 27;89(8):920-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d7c40c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31965573
Citation
Martel G, Baker L, Wherrett C, Fergusson DA, Saidenberg E, Workneh A, Saeed S, Gadbois K, Jee R, McVicar J, Rao P, Thompson C, Wong P, Abou Khalil J, Bertens KA, Balaa FK. Phlebotomy resulting in controlled hypovolaemia to prevent blood loss in major hepatic resections (PRICE-1): a pilot randomized clinical trial for feasibility. Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):812-823. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11463. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27712877
Citation
Rekman J, Wherrett C, Bennett S, Gostimir M, Saeed S, Lemon K, Mimeault R, Balaa FK, Martel G. Safety and feasibility of phlebotomy with controlled hypovolemia to minimize blood loss in liver resections. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):650-657. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Phlebotomy to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs