search
Back to results

Treatment of Chronic Stroke With IpsiHand

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IpsiHand Device
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Stroke Rehabilitation, BCI, Stroke, Upper Extremity Rehabilitation, paresis, hemiparesis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 88 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 6 months post stroke
  • Modified Ashworth Scale of 1+ or less of elbow flexion in the affected upper extremity
  • Short Blessed Test Score of 8 or less
  • Unstructured Mesulam with 2 or less omissions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Severe spasticity in affected upper extremity
  • Unilateral Visual Inattention (neglect)
  • Contracture(s) in the affected upper extremity
  • Botox injections administered within 9 months
  • Aphasia which limits effective communication

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

IpsiHand

Arm Description

IpsiHand is a device which includes a robotic glove that you wear on your hand and a headset that you wear on your head. The headset picks up your thoughts and sends them to the robotic glove, to control opening and closing of your hand.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia (Lyle, 1981). It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation (Platz, Pinkowski, Kim, di Bella, & Johnson, 2005). The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3) Performs test normally 2) Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1) Performs test partially 0) Can perform no part of test The maximum score achievable on this measure is 57 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
The COPM is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in 5 patient-identified tasks over time. Patients identified 5 functional activities that they wanted to perform more independently or with greater ease. COPM measurements consisted of a semi-structured interview in which patients rated their performance & satisfaction with each activity on an ordinal scale from 1 to 10. A performance score of 1 indicated they are unable to perform identified task, & a score of 10 indicates they are able to complete the functional task as easy as prior to stroke. A satisfaction score of 1 indicated they were not satisfied at all to 10 indicating they are extremely satisfied with how they complete the identified functional task. Patients would rate (5) functional tasks for their performance and satisfaction. Scores were averaged between the scores from the 5 functional activities.

Full Information

First Posted
August 22, 2015
Last Updated
September 14, 2018
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02552368
Brief Title
Treatment of Chronic Stroke With IpsiHand
Official Title
A Brain Computer Interface and Brain-Controlled Stroke Rehabilitation Method Utilizing Electroencephalography in Hemiparetic and Hemiplegic Stroke Patients to Achieve Thought Control of Machines and a Better Understanding of Brain Function
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a functioning and clinically feasible method for restoring function to motor-impaired stroke survivors. This ultimate goal will be approached through two different means. The first method is to develop a functioning brain-computer interface that operates based on cortical activity ipsilateral to an intended movement on the motor-impaired side of the body. And secondly, to develop new methods of rehabilitation that involve stimulating peripheral muscles based upon cortical activity ipsilateral to intended movements. Finally, the study seeks to assess changes in functional connectivity as a result of using a BCI device.
Detailed Description
This study will be carried out in two phases designed to achieve the objectives described above. The first phase will determine the feasibility of recording ipsilateral (contralesional) motor commands and use the signals to control a computer. This phase will involve recording EEG signals during the performance of real and imagined motor movements of both the impaired and non-impaired hand in stroke survivors. After recording the signals and analyzing the data, the signals will be used to try to control a cursor on a computer screen or a robotic hand. The second phase of the study will determine if the BCI system can be used to impact rehabilitation. Motor commands would be performed as in phase 1 to determine the accompanying EEG signals. The EEG signals would then be used to control stimulation of the impaired limb. Rehabilitation would be assessed by examining changes in commonly used functional motor scores. The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a functioning and clinically feasible method for restoring function to motor-impaired stroke survivors. This ultimate goal will be approached through two different means. The first method is to develop a functioning brain-computer interface that operates based on cortical activity ipsilateral to an intended movement on the motor-impaired side of the body. And secondly, to develop new methods of rehabilitation that involve stimulating peripheral muscles based upon cortical activity ipsilateral to intended movements. Finally, the study seeks to assess changes in functional connectivity as a result of using a BCI device.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
Stroke Rehabilitation, BCI, Stroke, Upper Extremity Rehabilitation, paresis, hemiparesis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
23 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
IpsiHand
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
IpsiHand is a device which includes a robotic glove that you wear on your hand and a headset that you wear on your head. The headset picks up your thoughts and sends them to the robotic glove, to control opening and closing of your hand.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
IpsiHand Device
Intervention Description
Once a participant has completed (3) EEG Signal Screens and (2) separate set of baseline measurements, the IpsiHand BCI Device is provided to participants to use a minimum of (5) out of (7) days a week for a total duration of 12 weeks. Participants are seen bi-weekly throughout the duration of the trial to assess affected upper extremity and assess functional impact. At the completion of 12 weeks of device use, the participants complete a set of measurements to assess function of the affected upper extremity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Description
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia (Lyle, 1981). It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation (Platz, Pinkowski, Kim, di Bella, & Johnson, 2005). The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3) Performs test normally 2) Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1) Performs test partially 0) Can perform no part of test The maximum score achievable on this measure is 57 points.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Description
The COPM is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in 5 patient-identified tasks over time. Patients identified 5 functional activities that they wanted to perform more independently or with greater ease. COPM measurements consisted of a semi-structured interview in which patients rated their performance & satisfaction with each activity on an ordinal scale from 1 to 10. A performance score of 1 indicated they are unable to perform identified task, & a score of 10 indicates they are able to complete the functional task as easy as prior to stroke. A satisfaction score of 1 indicated they were not satisfied at all to 10 indicating they are extremely satisfied with how they complete the identified functional task. Patients would rate (5) functional tasks for their performance and satisfaction. Scores were averaged between the scores from the 5 functional activities.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
88 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 6 months post stroke Modified Ashworth Scale of 1+ or less of elbow flexion in the affected upper extremity Short Blessed Test Score of 8 or less Unstructured Mesulam with 2 or less omissions Exclusion Criteria: Dementia Severe spasticity in affected upper extremity Unilateral Visual Inattention (neglect) Contracture(s) in the affected upper extremity Botox injections administered within 9 months Aphasia which limits effective communication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thy Huskey, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28550098
Citation
Bundy DT, Souders L, Baranyai K, Leonard L, Schalk G, Coker R, Moran DW, Huskey T, Leuthardt EC. Contralesional Brain-Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1908-1915. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016304. Epub 2017 May 26.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Treatment of Chronic Stroke With IpsiHand

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs