search
Back to results

AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL) (AMPEL)

Primary Purpose

Strabismic Amblyopia

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
crowded drawing task
uncrowded drawing task
Sponsored by
University of Basel
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Strabismic Amblyopia

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 8 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: children aged 4-8 years with

  • strabismic amblyopia
  • cycloplegic refraction corrected at least 3 months prior to enrolment
  • Reliable test results for two previous examinations
  • absence of ocular conditions other than strabismus, amblyopia and corrected refractive error

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to perform reliably when examined
  • inability to draw
  • unstable visual results on 2 previous examinations

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    crowded drawing task

    uncrowded drawing task

    Arm Description

    children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under crowded viewing conditions.

    children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under uncrowded viewing conditions

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Crowding Ratio (CR)
    CR= Ratio of crowded versus uncrowded visual acuity. This is compared pre to post treatment

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    hand-eye coordination
    Outcome of a Beery test

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 16, 2015
    Last Updated
    June 21, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Basel
    Collaborators
    University Medical Center Nijmegen
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02555384
    Brief Title
    AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL)
    Acronym
    AMPEL
    Official Title
    Improving Visual Functions in Young Children With Amblyopia Through Perceptual Learning
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    Inclusion and Exclusion criteria too stringent, no patient coluld be recruited
    Study Start Date
    January 2020 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 30, 2020 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 30, 2020 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Basel
    Collaborators
    University Medical Center Nijmegen

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Amblyopia, affects 4% of the population. In the presence of a normal retina and optic nerve, the visual cortex does not develop normally secondary to the amblyopic eye being at a disadvantage in the sensitive period such as in strabismus. Amblyopia is associated with visuospatial disorders, and poor to absent stereopsis. Amblyopia is treated by occlusion of the non- amblyopic eye in childhood. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of perceptual learning (PL), that is a training of visual drawing tasks (12 sessions of 30 Minutes duration) with crowding (c) for children with amblyopia compared to an amblyopic control group with a placebo drawing task. Arm 1: Crowded (PLc)- Training with small spacing Arm 2: Uncrowded (PLu)- Training with large spacing Prior to this, a small group will help optimize parameters such as contrast and distance of visual objects presented
    Detailed Description
    Outcome(s): Primary endpoints: improvement of amblyopia,crowding ratio (CR) and visual acuity before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months Secondary outcome: hand-eye coordination, evaluated with the Beery VMI test before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months Tertiary outcome over 6 years of age: macular structure measured with the OCT before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months Study design: Cohort study, randomised controlled trial, single blind, active control, parallel groups Inclusion / Exclusion criteria: 20 Children included to optimize test criteria (high vs low contrast and spacing). 40 Children for 2-armed study. Measurements and procedures: 12 sessions (2x per week for 6 weeks, 30 Minutes each) where drawing tasks are performed during their occlusion time. Arm 1: Crowded - task with small spacing Arm 2: Uncrowded task with large spacing. Prior to this, a small group will help optimize parameters such as contrast and distance of visual objects presented The following parameters are evaluated at onset, at week 7 and at 6 months: visual acuity with and without crowding, the Berry Test and in children over 6 years of age, if possible: a reading task and OCT. Statistical Considerations: Patients will be randomized by letting a computer program perform the assignment of children in a certain training group. However, some restrictions will be inserted on the amount of randomization: equal number of children in our training groups, age- and acuity matched groups, equal patching times. The analysis is aimed at answering the primary question: Can the training reduce crowding and improve visual acuity in children with amblyopia? In order to answer this question, a repeated measures ANOVA is conducted in which the crowding ratio (CR) before and after training will be entered as a within-subjects variable (2 levels: CR pre, and CR post/VA pre, VA post). Training group will be entered as a between subjects variable (2 levels: control and experimental). If there is an interaction effect, post hoc ANOVA's will be conducted to disentangle the effect of training on the CR within training groups. A secondary question is: Can the training improve hand-eye coordination in children with amblyopia. To this regard the results of the Beery VMI test are being evaluated with a repeated measures ANOVA. Sample size Calculation. As the crowding ratio (CR) is to be expected more important than VA, only this parameter will be powered. Main parameter for the power calculation will be the difference (CRd) of the CR at the end of the intervention period compared to the CR at screening. A CR decrease of 0.3 between "control" and "learning" group is assumed to be of clinical relevance. The population standard deviation (SD) of CR is assumed to be 0.33. Assuming a moderate correlation coefficient of 0.5 between timepoints, the within subject SD is calculated as sqrt(0.33*0.33*0.5)=0.23. Therefore the SD of CRd is sqrt(2)*0.23=0.33. [Details are described in Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials,Steven A . Julious,Chapman and Hall/CRC 2009]. Based on a sample size of 20 subjects for each study group, there is a power of 88% to detect a CRd decrease of 0.3. This calculation is based on a one-sided T-test (alpha=5%). GCP Statement: This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP or ISO EN 14155 (as far as applicable) as well as all national legal and regulatory requirements.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Strabismic Amblyopia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    crowded drawing task
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under crowded viewing conditions.
    Arm Title
    uncrowded drawing task
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under uncrowded viewing conditions
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    crowded drawing task
    Intervention Description
    Marking inverted signs on a sheet where symbols are presented close to one another
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    uncrowded drawing task
    Intervention Description
    Marking inverted signs on a sheet where there is a larger distance between symbols
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Crowding Ratio (CR)
    Description
    CR= Ratio of crowded versus uncrowded visual acuity. This is compared pre to post treatment
    Time Frame
    7 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    hand-eye coordination
    Description
    Outcome of a Beery test
    Time Frame
    7 weeks
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    longterm effect on CR
    Description
    CR Follow up 6 months after end of drawing training
    Time Frame
    7 months
    Title
    macular structure
    Description
    comparison of macular optical coherence tomography scan pre and post training
    Time Frame
    7 weeks and 7 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    4 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    8 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: children aged 4-8 years with strabismic amblyopia cycloplegic refraction corrected at least 3 months prior to enrolment Reliable test results for two previous examinations absence of ocular conditions other than strabismus, amblyopia and corrected refractive error Exclusion Criteria: inability to perform reliably when examined inability to draw unstable visual results on 2 previous examinations
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe, Prof. med.
    Organizational Affiliation
    University Basel, Eye Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23950157
    Citation
    Huurneman B, Boonstra FN, Cox RF, van Rens G, Cillessen AH. Perceptual learning in children with visual impairment improves near visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 17;54(9):6208-16. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12220.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs