search
Back to results

Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Late-Life Depression

Primary Purpose

Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ketamine
Ketamine
Ketamine
Midazolam
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder focused on measuring ketamine, depression, treatment resistant, treatment resistant depression, late life depression, depression in the elderly, geriatric depression

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients, 55 years of age,
  • Participants must fulfill DSM 5 criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (Unipolar), based on a structured diagnostic interview, the DSM 5 M.I.N.I. 7.0
  • Participants must have a history of at least one previous episode of depression prior to the current episode (recurrent MDD) or have chronic MDD (of at least two years' duration),
  • Participants have not responded to two or more adequate trials of FDA-approved antidepressants, determined by Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) criteria.
  • Participants must score 14 or greater on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), and score 27 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),
  • Each participant must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all tests and examinations required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently on fluoxetine,
  • History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or any psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder,
  • Documented history of a psychotic disorder in a first-degree relative,
  • Current diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or eating disorder [bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa],
  • Alcohol or substance use [except nicotine] within the preceding 6 months,
  • Patients with any clinically significant personality disorder that would, in the investigator's judgment, preclude safe study participation,
  • Patients judged to be at serious and imminent suicidal or homicidal risk,
  • Serious, unstable medical illnesses including respiratory [obstructive sleep apnea, or history of difficulty with airway management during previous anesthetics], cardiovascular [including ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension], and neurologic [including history of severe head injury],
  • For study entry, patients must be reasonable medical candidates for ketamine or midazolam infusion, as determined by a board-certified physician co-investigator during study Screening,
  • Clinically significant abnormal findings of laboratory parameters [including urine toxicology screen for drugs of abuse], physical examination, or ECG,
  • Hypertension (systolic BP >160 mm Hg or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg),
  • Patients with one or more 11 seizures without a clear and resolved etiology,
  • Patients starting hormonal treatment (e.g., estrogen) in the 3 months prior to Screening,
  • Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to ketamine, or history of recreational use of phencyclidine (PCP) or ketamine,
  • Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to midazolam,
  • Age-related cognitive decline or mild dementia suggested by a score of < 25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Screening,
  • Patients taking medications with known activity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) or AMPA glutamate receptor [e.g., riluzole, amantadine, lamotrigine, memantine, topiramate, dextromethorphan, D-cycloserine], or the muopioid receptor,
  • Patients taking any of the following medications: St John's Wort, theophylline, tramadol, metrizamide,
  • Patients who demonstrate > 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR score from Screening to Randomization,
  • Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the past 6 months prior to Screening,
  • Patients currently receiving treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS).

Sites / Locations

  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Ketamine 0.10 mg/kg

Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg

Ketamine 0.50 mg/kg

Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg

Arm Description

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either MID 0.03mg/Kg

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Demonstrating at Least a 50% Reduction on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Scores
To determine the best performing intervention among three sub-anesthetic doses of a single ketamine (0.1 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.50 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) in Veterans with LL-TRD as measured by the percentage of participants demonstrating at least a 50% reduction from pre-treatment baseline on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; score range 0 - 60, higher scores meaning more severe depression) scores at 7 days post-infusion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Patients With Continuation From Day 7 to Day 28 Post-infusion of at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS
Patients with a day 7 treatment response (at least a 50% improvement from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) are followed until day 28 post-infusion; day 7 non-responders are not followed. Outcome measure is the percentage of patients who continue to be responder at day 28, and is interpreted as a measure of durability of efficacy.

Full Information

First Posted
June 25, 2015
Last Updated
December 15, 2021
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02556606
Brief Title
Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Late-Life Depression
Official Title
Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Late-Life Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a single infusion of ketamine (KET), to determine which dose is optimal 7 days after infusion using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization, and to learn about how ketamine works in the body and brain in persons with late-life treatment resistant depression.
Detailed Description
Primary Aim: To identify the best performing condition across a single intravenous infusion of ketamine (KET) 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, KET 0.50 mg/kg) and midazolam (MID) 0.03 mg/kg on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) treatment response (at least a 50% improvement in depression from baseline) 7 days after the infusion in up to 72 Veterans with Late-Life Treatment Resistant Depression (LL-TRD) , using a triple blind (patient, rater, anesthesiologist) Bayesian adaptive randomization design. Hypothesis 1: Single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion is superior to KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating > 50% reduction on MADRS scores 7 days post-treatment. Secondary Aim: To evaluate the durability of day 7 treatment response across 3 sub-anesthetic doses of a single KET (0.1 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.50 mg/kg) and MID (0.03 mg/kg) infusion in veterans with LL-TRD during a 4 week follow-up. Hypothesis 2: a single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion will be superior to a single infusion of KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg as measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating > 50% reduction on MADRS scores at 28 days post-infusion. Tertiary Aim: To evaluate the immediate and longer-term safety and tolerability of the most effective KET infusion relative to MID in vets with LL-TRD. Hypothesis 3: KET infusion at the most effective dose will be safe and well tolerated compared to MID, as assessed by psychoactive and general side effect rating scales during and up to 4 weeks post study infusion. Exploratory Aims: To measure the effects of the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on neurocognitive performance. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on peripheral biomarkers of cellular plasticity and inflammation. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on resting-state quantitative electroencephalography.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder
Keywords
ketamine, depression, treatment resistant, treatment resistant depression, late life depression, depression in the elderly, geriatric depression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
We use a Bayesian, adaptive, randomized design initially allocating subjects to 2 arms in a 1:3 ratio: ARM 1: MID 0.03 mg/kg (active placebo); ARM 2: four conditions KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, KET 0.5 mg/kg or MID 0.03 mg/kg. After 1:1:1:1 allocation of the first 20 subjects to ARM 2, Bayesian adaptive randomization may stop for superiority, change randomization ratios and/or prune arms for futility based on the probability of a day 7 treatment response. ARM 1 remains open for allocation to ensure a placebo group sufficiently large for comparison with best dose KET. For analyses, MID of ARM 1 and ARM 2 will be combined so that there are 4 conditions (or arms) for final statistical analyses. We expected to enroll a maximum 72 patients.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ketamine 0.10 mg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg
Arm Title
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg
Arm Title
Ketamine 0.50 mg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg
Arm Title
Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either MID 0.03mg/Kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Intervention Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Intervention Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Intervention Description
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Midazolam
Intervention Description
single 40 min infusion of MID 0.03mg/Kg
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Demonstrating at Least a 50% Reduction on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Scores
Description
To determine the best performing intervention among three sub-anesthetic doses of a single ketamine (0.1 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.50 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) in Veterans with LL-TRD as measured by the percentage of participants demonstrating at least a 50% reduction from pre-treatment baseline on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; score range 0 - 60, higher scores meaning more severe depression) scores at 7 days post-infusion.
Time Frame
Day 7 post-infusion
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Patients With Continuation From Day 7 to Day 28 Post-infusion of at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS
Description
Patients with a day 7 treatment response (at least a 50% improvement from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) are followed until day 28 post-infusion; day 7 non-responders are not followed. Outcome measure is the percentage of patients who continue to be responder at day 28, and is interpreted as a measure of durability of efficacy.
Time Frame
28 days post-infusion follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS)
Description
Change from pre-infusion baseline to end of infusion at 40 minutes after start of infusion on the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS; scale form 0 [no psychosis-like symptoms] to 90 [severe psychosis-like symptoms]) to assess psychosis-like side effect on day of infusion.
Time Frame
Baseline to 40 minutes after start of infusion
Title
Change in Resting-state Quantitative Electroencephalography (EEG) Frontal Gamma Band Power (Log of Microvolt Squared)
Description
Change in EEG frontal gamma power from pre-infusion baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion to assess engagement of the study drug with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
Time Frame
Baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion
Title
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Millimeters of Mercury, mm Hg)
Description
Change in systolic blood pressure from pre-infusion baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion
Time Frame
Baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion
Title
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Millimeters of Mercury, mm Hg)
Description
Change in systolic blood pressure from pre-infusion baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion
Time Frame
Baseline to 30 minutes after start of infusion

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female patients, 55 years of age, Participants must fulfill DSM 5 criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (Unipolar), based on a structured diagnostic interview, the DSM 5 M.I.N.I. 7.0 Participants must have a history of at least one previous episode of depression prior to the current episode (recurrent MDD) or have chronic MDD (of at least two years' duration), Participants have not responded to two or more adequate trials of FDA-approved antidepressants, determined by Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) criteria. Participants must score 14 or greater on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), and score 27 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Each participant must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all tests and examinations required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: Patients currently on fluoxetine, History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or any psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder, Documented history of a psychotic disorder in a first-degree relative, Current diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or eating disorder [bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa], Alcohol or substance use [except nicotine] within the preceding 6 months, Patients with any clinically significant personality disorder that would, in the investigator's judgment, preclude safe study participation, Patients judged to be at serious and imminent suicidal or homicidal risk, Serious, unstable medical illnesses including respiratory [obstructive sleep apnea, or history of difficulty with airway management during previous anesthetics], cardiovascular [including ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension], and neurologic [including history of severe head injury], For study entry, patients must be reasonable medical candidates for ketamine or midazolam infusion, as determined by a board-certified physician co-investigator during study Screening, Clinically significant abnormal findings of laboratory parameters [including urine toxicology screen for drugs of abuse], physical examination, or ECG, Hypertension (systolic BP >160 mm Hg or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg), Patients with one or more 11 seizures without a clear and resolved etiology, Patients starting hormonal treatment (e.g., estrogen) in the 3 months prior to Screening, Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to ketamine, or history of recreational use of phencyclidine (PCP) or ketamine, Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to midazolam, Age-related cognitive decline or mild dementia suggested by a score of < 25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Screening, Patients taking medications with known activity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) or AMPA glutamate receptor [e.g., riluzole, amantadine, lamotrigine, memantine, topiramate, dextromethorphan, D-cycloserine], or the muopioid receptor, Patients taking any of the following medications: St John's Wort, theophylline, tramadol, metrizamide, Patients who demonstrate > 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR score from Screening to Randomization, Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the past 6 months prior to Screening, Patients currently receiving treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sanjay Mathew, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33825765
Citation
Murphy N, Lijffijt M, Ramakrishnan N, Vo-Le B, Vo-Le B, Iqbal S, Iqbal T, O'Brien B, Smith MA, Swann AC, Mathew SJ. Does mismatch negativity have utility for NMDA receptor drug development in depression? Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;44(1):61-73. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1685.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Late-Life Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs