search
Back to results

A Dose-Finding Study of GSK2894512 Cream in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

Primary Purpose

Dermatitis, Atopic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GSK2894512 1% Cream
GSK2894512 0.5% Cream
Vehicle cream
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dermatitis, Atopic focused on measuring Vehicle-Controlled, GSK2894512, Double blind, Dose-finding, Atopic Dermatitis

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 65 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female between 12 and 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent
  • Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis according to Hanifin and Rajka criteria and having active inflammation.
  • Body surface area involvement >=5% and <=35%, excluding scalp, at Screening and Baseline.
  • An IGA of atopic dermatitis score of >=3 at Baseline.
  • At least one target lesion that measure at least 3 centimetre (cm) х 3 cm in size at Screening and Baseline and must be representative of the subject's disease state, but not located on the hands, feet, or genitalia.
  • A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative urine human chorionic gonadotrophin test), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Non-reproductive potential defined as: 1) Pre-menopausal females with one of the following procedures documented: tubal ligation; hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion; hysterectomy; bilateral oophorectomy. 2) Post-menopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol levels consistent with menopause and falling into the central laboratory's postmenopausal reference range is confirmatory). Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt are required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment; Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the modified list of highly effective methods for avoiding pregnancy in females of reproductive potential from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until after the last dose of study medication and completion of the follow-up visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable course of atopic dermatitis (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator over the previous 4 weeks prior to Baseline.
  • Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases: 1) Immunocompromized (eg, lymphoma, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome) or have a history of malignant disease within 5 years before the baseline visit; 2) Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 4 weeks before the baseline visit; 3) Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral (eg, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, chicken pox) skin infection within 1 week before the baseline visit; 4) Any other concomitant skin disorder (eg, generalized erythroderma such as Netherton's Syndrome, or psoriasis); pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise subject safety; 5) Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classical areas of involvement such as the face or the folds; 6) Other types of eczema.
  • A history or ongoing serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the subject's completion of the study.
  • Known hypersensitivity to study treatment excipients.
  • Current or chronic history of liver disease, known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones), presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or positive hepatitis C antibody test result within 3 months of screening.
  • Liver function tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=2x upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin >1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35%).
  • QTc >=450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc >=480 msec for subjects with bundle branch block.

NOTES: The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF), with machine over-read. The QTc should be based on a single ECG obtained over a brief recording period. If QTc is outside of the threshold value, triplicate ECGs may be performed with the QTc values averaged.

  • Ultraviolet (UV) light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation (eg, sunlight or tanning booth) within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the subject's atopic dermatitis.
  • Used any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before the baseline visit: 12 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) - biologic agents (eg, 18 weeks for omalizumab); 8 weeks - cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (eg, mycophenolate or tacrolimus); 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs; 2 weeks - topical treatments: corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or coal tar (on the body); 2 weeks - immunizations; sedating antihistamines (non sedating antihistamines are permitted); 1 week - topical antibiotics, antibacterial cleansing body wash/soap or diluted sodium hypochlorite "bleach" baths.
  • Participated in a clinical study and received an investigational product within the following time period prior to the baseline visit: 4 weeks, 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer).
  • History of alcohol or other substance abuse within the last 2 years.
  • Participated in a previous study using GSK2894512 (or WBI-1001).

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

GSK2894512 1% cream twice daily

GSK2894512 1% cream once daily

GSK2894512 0.5% cream twice daily

GSK2894512 0.5% cream once daily

Vehicle cream twice daily

Vehicle cream once daily

Arm Description

Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 1% (10 milligram per gram [mg/g]) topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 1% (10 mg/g) topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 0.5% (5 mg/g) topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 0.5% (5 mg/g) topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Subjects will apply a thin layer of vehicle topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Subjects will apply a thin layer of vehicle topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Have an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear (0 or 1) at Week 12 and a Minimum 2 Grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. The percentage of participants who have an IGA score of clear or almost clear at Week 12 and a minimum 2 grade improvement from Baseline to Week 12 in IGA score was presented. . The analysis was performed on ITT Population which comprised of all randomized participants.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Itch/Pruritus (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) Score
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in weekly average of daily itch/pruritus based on the NRS was presented using mean and standard deviation (SD). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose weekly average value minus Baseline value.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Itch/Pruritus NRS Score
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Mean percent change in weekly average of daily itch/pruritus based on the NRS was presented using mean and SD from Baseline to Week 12. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose weekly average value minus Baseline value.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Minimum 3- Point Improvement in Itch/Pruritus (NRS) From Baseline to Each Study Visit
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Percentage of participants who achieved a minimum 3-point improvement in itch/pruritus (NRS) from Baseline to each study visit were measured. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale (0 [absent] to 3 [severe]) for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Body area involvement ranged from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). Total EASI score was calculated as a sum of scores of all 4 specified body region. Range for EASI total score is 0 (absent) to 72 (severe). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Mean change from Baseline was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale (0 [absent] to 3 [severe]) for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Body area involvement ranged from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). Total EASI score was calculated as a sum of scores of all 4 specified body region. Range for EASI total score is 0 (absent) to 72 (severe). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Mean percent change from Baseline was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Percentage of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Each Visit
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants with a minimum 2-grade improvement in IGA score from Baseline at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and early withdrawal (EW) visit was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 at Each Visit
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants with an IGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Percentage of Participants With >=50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in EASI
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Percentage of participants with >=50 percent improvement in EASI score from Baseline to Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW were presented and statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Percentage of Participants With >=75 Percent Improvement From Baseline in EASI
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Percentage of participants with >=75 percent improvement in EASI score from Baseline to Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW were presented and statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Severity Score (TSS)
A target lesion of at least 3 centimeter square (cm^2) was selected at Baseline. The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with higher values indicating greater severity of symptoms. TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean change from Baseline in TSS at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in TSS
A target lesion of at least 3 cm^2 was selected at Baseline. The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) , with higher values indicating greater severity of symptoms. TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean percent change from Baseline in TSS at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual Signs of TSS
The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) and TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean change from Baseline in individual signs of TSS was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. If the participant had more than 3 missing days during the week, then the weekly average was not calculated and treated as missing data and excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Individual Signs of TSS
The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) and TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean percent change from Baseline in individual signs of TSS was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. NA indicates that data were not available. If the participant had more than 3 missing days during the week, then the weekly average was not calculated and treated as missing data and excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (Percent BSA)
The extent of BSA affected by AD is a general indicator of disease severity and the assessment of BSA with AD was performed separately for four body surface regions: the head (h), the upper extremities (u), the trunk (t) and the lower extremities (l), corresponding to 10, 20, 30, and 40 percent of the total body area, respectively. Mean change from Baseline in percent BSA was presented using mean and SD at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Mean Change From Baseline in IGA Score
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. Score ranges from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a severe disease. Mean change from Baseline in IGA score was presented using mean and SD at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Percentage of Participants Who Have an IGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear (0 or 1) and a Minimum 2 Grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Each Study Visit
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants who have an IGA score of clear or almost clear and a minimum 2 grade improvement from Baseline to each study visit in IGA score was presented. The statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model with covariates for dose, frequency of administration, and study day as well as a dose by frequency interaction term. The analysis was performed on ITT Population which comprised of all randomized participants. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category title).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect, other situations and is associated with liver injury or impaired liver function. Treatment emergent AEs (TEAE) is defined as AE occurred on or after study treatment start date and on or before last visit. Number of participants with AEs and serious TEAEs were presented. The analysis was performed on Safety population which comprised of all participants who receive at least one dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Reported Tolerability Score of 0 to 4 Over Time
Participants were asked to use a 5-point tolerability scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) to assess the presence and degree of burning/stinging and itching at the application sites that has generally been experienced following application of the study treatment. The score represented an 'average' across all application sites. A score of 3 or 4 was reported as an AE. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Total Protein
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in albumin and total protein values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk.Phosph.), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in Alk.phosph., ALT, AST and GGT values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Direct and Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in direct and total bilirubin, creatinine and urate values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in calcium, chloride, CO2, glucose, potassium, sodium and BUN values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Number of Participants With Chemistry Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included alk.phosph., ALT, AST, bilirubin, calcium, CO2, creatinine, glucose and potassium. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelet, Leukocytes Count
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelet and leukocytes and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in hematocrit and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in hemoglobin and MCHC and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in MCH and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in MCV and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Count
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in erythrocytes and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelet and leukocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in Total T Lymphocytes (Lympho), B Lympho, Natural Killer (NK) Lymphocytes and Treg (Foxp3) Levels
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in total T lympho, B lympho, T and B NK cells and (Foxp3) values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment. The immunophenotyping parameters included cluster of differentiation (CD)19, CD3, CD3+CD8+, CD3+CD4+, CD16+CD56+, CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127 and T and NK lympho. CD3, CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ were also evaluated by using treg flow cytometry (cyto). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Number of Participants With Immunopheotyping Data Outside the Reference Range
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of immunophenotyping parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 nd any visit post-screen. The immunophenotyping parameters included CD 19, CD3, CD3+CD8+, CD3+CD4+, CD16+CD56+, CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127 and T and NK lympho. CD3, CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ were also evaluated by using treg flow cyto. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobin (Ig) A, IgG and IgM Levels
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in IgA, IgG, IM values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Data Outside the Reference Range
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of immunoglobulin data outside the reference range at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and any visit post-screen. The immunoglobulin parameters included IgA, IgG and Ig M. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Pulse rate were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Change From Baseline in Temperature
Temperature were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of vital signs by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included SBP, DBP and pulse rate. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Single measurements of 12-lead ECGs were obtained at Baseline , Week 1, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), EW and at any time post-screen using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT (QTc). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. For multiple ECGs at one visit, or "Any visit post-screen", a participant was categorized as "Abnormal" if >=1 assessment was abnormal. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2015
Last Updated
October 18, 2017
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02564055
Brief Title
A Dose-Finding Study of GSK2894512 Cream in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Official Title
Study 203121: A Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle-Controlled, Dose-Finding Study of GSK2894512 Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 12, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of two concentrations (0.5 percent [%] and 1%) and two application frequencies (once a day and twice a day) of GSK2894512 cream for the topical treatment in adolescent and adult subjects with atopic dermatitis. Results from this study will be considered when selecting the most appropriate concentration of GSK2894512 cream and application frequency in future clinical studies. This is a multicenter (United States, Canada, and Japan), randomized, double-blind (sponsor-unblind), vehicle-controlled, 6-arm, parallel-group, dose-finding study in adolescent and adult subjects with atopic dermatitis. Two concentrations of GSK2894512 cream (0.5% and 1%) and a vehicle control cream will be equally randomized and evaluated following application to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp) once daily (evening) or twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks. This study will consist of 3 periods: up to 4 weeks screening, 12 weeks double-blind treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment follow-up. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 16 to 20 weeks. Approximately 270 adolescent and adult males and females subjects with atopic dermatitis will be screened in order to have at least 228 randomized subjects (38 subjects for each of the 6 treatment groups) and approximately 204 evaluable subjects overall. Approximately 30 subjects will be randomized in Japan to achieve at least 24 evaluable Japanese subjects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dermatitis, Atopic
Keywords
Vehicle-Controlled, GSK2894512, Double blind, Dose-finding, Atopic Dermatitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
247 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GSK2894512 1% cream twice daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 1% (10 milligram per gram [mg/g]) topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Arm Title
GSK2894512 1% cream once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 1% (10 mg/g) topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Arm Title
GSK2894512 0.5% cream twice daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 0.5% (5 mg/g) topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Arm Title
GSK2894512 0.5% cream once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of GSK2894512 0.5% (5 mg/g) topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Arm Title
Vehicle cream twice daily
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of vehicle topical cream twice daily (morning and evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Arm Title
Vehicle cream once daily
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will apply a thin layer of vehicle topical cream once daily (evening) for 12 weeks, to all atopic dermatitis lesions (except on the scalp).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GSK2894512 1% Cream
Intervention Description
1.0% (10 mg/g) GSK2894512 will be supplied as white to off-white cream to be applied topically
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GSK2894512 0.5% Cream
Intervention Description
0.5% (5 mg/g) GSK2894512 will be supplied as white to off-white cream to be applied topically
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vehicle cream
Intervention Description
White to off-white vehicle cream base to be applied topically
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear (0 or 1) at Week 12 and a Minimum 2 Grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Description
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. The percentage of participants who have an IGA score of clear or almost clear at Week 12 and a minimum 2 grade improvement from Baseline to Week 12 in IGA score was presented. . The analysis was performed on ITT Population which comprised of all randomized participants.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Itch/Pruritus (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) Score
Description
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in weekly average of daily itch/pruritus based on the NRS was presented using mean and standard deviation (SD). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose weekly average value minus Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to Week 12
Title
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Itch/Pruritus NRS Score
Description
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Mean percent change in weekly average of daily itch/pruritus based on the NRS was presented using mean and SD from Baseline to Week 12. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose weekly average value minus Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Minimum 3- Point Improvement in Itch/Pruritus (NRS) From Baseline to Each Study Visit
Description
NRS is a 11-point tool ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) to assess the severity of 11 disease-related signs and symptoms including itching, discoloration, bleeding, oozing, cracking, scaling, flaking, dry/rough, painful, burning, and stinging. Participants were asked to complete the self-administered sign and symptom severity diary containing NRS using a recall period of the past 24 hours. Question 1 of the diary was used to assess itch. Percentage of participants who achieved a minimum 3-point improvement in itch/pruritus (NRS) from Baseline to each study visit were measured. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, early withdrawal (EW) (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
Description
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale (0 [absent] to 3 [severe]) for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Body area involvement ranged from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). Total EASI score was calculated as a sum of scores of all 4 specified body region. Range for EASI total score is 0 (absent) to 72 (severe). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Mean change from Baseline was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Description
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale (0 [absent] to 3 [severe]) for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Body area involvement ranged from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). Total EASI score was calculated as a sum of scores of all 4 specified body region. Range for EASI total score is 0 (absent) to 72 (severe). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Mean percent change from Baseline was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Each Visit
Description
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants with a minimum 2-grade improvement in IGA score from Baseline at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and early withdrawal (EW) visit was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 at Each Visit
Description
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants with an IGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented in the form of mean and SD. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Percentage of Participants With >=50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in EASI
Description
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Percentage of participants with >=50 percent improvement in EASI score from Baseline to Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW were presented and statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Percentage of Participants With >=75 Percent Improvement From Baseline in EASI
Description
The EASI scoring system is a standard clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD that takes into account the overall severity of erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification, as well as the extent of BSA affected with AD. These 4 clinical signs were graded on a 4-point scale for each of the 4 specified body regions (head and neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, and trunk). Percentage of participants with >=75 percent improvement in EASI score from Baseline to Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW were presented and statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Severity Score (TSS)
Description
A target lesion of at least 3 centimeter square (cm^2) was selected at Baseline. The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with higher values indicating greater severity of symptoms. TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean change from Baseline in TSS at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in TSS
Description
A target lesion of at least 3 cm^2 was selected at Baseline. The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) , with higher values indicating greater severity of symptoms. TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean percent change from Baseline in TSS at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual Signs of TSS
Description
The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) and TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean change from Baseline in individual signs of TSS was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. If the participant had more than 3 missing days during the week, then the weekly average was not calculated and treated as missing data and excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Individual Signs of TSS
Description
The severity of the following signs: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting, and scaling was assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) and TSS (maximum score 15) was calculated based on these signs. Mean percent change from Baseline in individual signs of TSS was presented using mean and SD. Baseline value was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. NA indicates that data were not available. If the participant had more than 3 missing days during the week, then the weekly average was not calculated and treated as missing data and excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (Percent BSA)
Description
The extent of BSA affected by AD is a general indicator of disease severity and the assessment of BSA with AD was performed separately for four body surface regions: the head (h), the upper extremities (u), the trunk (t) and the lower extremities (l), corresponding to 10, 20, 30, and 40 percent of the total body area, respectively. Mean change from Baseline in percent BSA was presented using mean and SD at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in IGA Score
Description
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. Score ranges from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a severe disease. Mean change from Baseline in IGA score was presented using mean and SD at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), Week 16 (follow up 2) and EW visit. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to first dose and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to Week 16)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Have an IGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear (0 or 1) and a Minimum 2 Grade Improvement in IGA Score From Baseline to Each Study Visit
Description
The IGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's AD. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity, as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines. IGA is made without reference to previous scores. The percentage of participants who have an IGA score of clear or almost clear and a minimum 2 grade improvement from Baseline to each study visit in IGA score was presented. The statistical analysis was performed using a repeated measures factorial logistic regression model with covariates for dose, frequency of administration, and study day as well as a dose by frequency interaction term. The analysis was performed on ITT Population which comprised of all randomized participants. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category title).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, EW (up to week 16)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect, other situations and is associated with liver injury or impaired liver function. Treatment emergent AEs (TEAE) is defined as AE occurred on or after study treatment start date and on or before last visit. Number of participants with AEs and serious TEAEs were presented. The analysis was performed on Safety population which comprised of all participants who receive at least one dose of study treatment.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Reported Tolerability Score of 0 to 4 Over Time
Description
Participants were asked to use a 5-point tolerability scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) to assess the presence and degree of burning/stinging and itching at the application sites that has generally been experienced following application of the study treatment. The score represented an 'average' across all application sites. A score of 3 or 4 was reported as an AE. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to Week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Total Protein
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in albumin and total protein values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk.Phosph.), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in Alk.phosph., ALT, AST and GGT values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Direct and Total Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in direct and total bilirubin, creatinine and urate values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in calcium, chloride, CO2, glucose, potassium, sodium and BUN values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Chemistry Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included alk.phosph., ALT, AST, bilirubin, calcium, CO2, creatinine, glucose and potassium. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelet, Leukocytes Count
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelet and leukocytes and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in hematocrit and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in hemoglobin and MCHC and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in MCH and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in MCV and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Count
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in erythrocytes and values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment and follow up visit 1 at Week 14. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (week up to 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Importance
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelet and leukocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, early withdrawal, and post screen (up to Week 16)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total T Lymphocytes (Lympho), B Lympho, Natural Killer (NK) Lymphocytes and Treg (Foxp3) Levels
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in total T lympho, B lympho, T and B NK cells and (Foxp3) values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment. The immunophenotyping parameters included cluster of differentiation (CD)19, CD3, CD3+CD8+, CD3+CD4+, CD16+CD56+, CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127 and T and NK lympho. CD3, CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ were also evaluated by using treg flow cytometry (cyto). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week, 4, 8 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Immunopheotyping Data Outside the Reference Range
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of immunophenotyping parameters by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 nd any visit post-screen. The immunophenotyping parameters included CD 19, CD3, CD3+CD8+, CD3+CD4+, CD16+CD56+, CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127 and T and NK lympho. CD3, CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ were also evaluated by using treg flow cyto. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week, 4, 8, 12 and post-screen (up to Week 16)
Title
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobin (Ig) A, IgG and IgM Levels
Description
Blood samples were collected to evaluate change from Baseline in IgA, IgG, IM values at Baseline throughout the 12 weeks of study treatment. Baseline values were taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week, 4, 8 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Data Outside the Reference Range
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of immunoglobulin data outside the reference range at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and any visit post-screen. The immunoglobulin parameters included IgA, IgG and Ig M. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week, 4, 8, 12, post-screen (up to Week 16)
Title
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Description
SBP and DBP were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Description
Pulse rate were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Change From Baseline in Temperature
Description
Temperature were measured from Baseline up to follow up Visit 1 at Week 14 in semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest. The Baseline value was taken at Day 1 and change from Baseline was defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Mean and SD were measured.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of vital signs by Potential Clinical Importance Criteria from Baseline to Week 14, EW and any visit post-screen. The vital signs included SBP, DBP and pulse rate. Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, EW (up to week 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Description
Single measurements of 12-lead ECGs were obtained at Baseline , Week 1, Week 12, Week 14 (follow up 1), EW and at any time post-screen using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT (QTc). Baseline was defined as the latest assessment prior to the first dose. For multiple ECGs at one visit, or "Any visit post-screen", a participant was categorized as "Abnormal" if >=1 assessment was abnormal. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, 12, 14, EW ( up to Week 14), post-screen

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female between 12 and 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis according to Hanifin and Rajka criteria and having active inflammation. Body surface area involvement >=5% and <=35%, excluding scalp, at Screening and Baseline. An IGA of atopic dermatitis score of >=3 at Baseline. At least one target lesion that measure at least 3 centimetre (cm) х 3 cm in size at Screening and Baseline and must be representative of the subject's disease state, but not located on the hands, feet, or genitalia. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative urine human chorionic gonadotrophin test), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Non-reproductive potential defined as: 1) Pre-menopausal females with one of the following procedures documented: tubal ligation; hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion; hysterectomy; bilateral oophorectomy. 2) Post-menopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol levels consistent with menopause and falling into the central laboratory's postmenopausal reference range is confirmatory). Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt are required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment; Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the modified list of highly effective methods for avoiding pregnancy in females of reproductive potential from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until after the last dose of study medication and completion of the follow-up visit. Exclusion Criteria: Unstable course of atopic dermatitis (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator over the previous 4 weeks prior to Baseline. Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases: 1) Immunocompromized (eg, lymphoma, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome) or have a history of malignant disease within 5 years before the baseline visit; 2) Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 4 weeks before the baseline visit; 3) Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral (eg, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, chicken pox) skin infection within 1 week before the baseline visit; 4) Any other concomitant skin disorder (eg, generalized erythroderma such as Netherton's Syndrome, or psoriasis); pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise subject safety; 5) Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classical areas of involvement such as the face or the folds; 6) Other types of eczema. A history or ongoing serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the subject's completion of the study. Known hypersensitivity to study treatment excipients. Current or chronic history of liver disease, known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones), presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or positive hepatitis C antibody test result within 3 months of screening. Liver function tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=2x upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin >1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35%). QTc >=450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc >=480 msec for subjects with bundle branch block. NOTES: The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF), with machine over-read. The QTc should be based on a single ECG obtained over a brief recording period. If QTc is outside of the threshold value, triplicate ECGs may be performed with the QTc values averaged. Ultraviolet (UV) light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation (eg, sunlight or tanning booth) within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the subject's atopic dermatitis. Used any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before the baseline visit: 12 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) - biologic agents (eg, 18 weeks for omalizumab); 8 weeks - cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (eg, mycophenolate or tacrolimus); 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs; 2 weeks - topical treatments: corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or coal tar (on the body); 2 weeks - immunizations; sedating antihistamines (non sedating antihistamines are permitted); 1 week - topical antibiotics, antibacterial cleansing body wash/soap or diluted sodium hypochlorite "bleach" baths. Participated in a clinical study and received an investigational product within the following time period prior to the baseline visit: 4 weeks, 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer). History of alcohol or other substance abuse within the last 2 years. Participated in a previous study using GSK2894512 (or WBI-1001).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Smith
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72916
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93720-2933
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92697
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90045
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oceanside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92056
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92701
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
North Logan
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dundee
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60118
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46256
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66215
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70115
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Andover
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01810
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bay City
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48706
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
West Bloomfield Township
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48322
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fridley
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55432
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Joseph
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64506
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10022
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
High Point
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27262
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45255
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19103
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cranston
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
2910
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29650
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77004
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77056
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78218
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77598
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98101
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Surrey
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V3R 6A7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Markham
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L3P1X2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oakville
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6J 7W5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K2G 6E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Peterborough
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K9J5K2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Richmond Hill
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4B 1A5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2J 1C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Windsor
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N8W 5L7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Drummondville
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J2B 5L4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V4X7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
813-0044
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
819-0373
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
003-0026
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
006-0022
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
211-0063
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
220-0004
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
221-0825
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto
ZIP/Postal Code
861-3101
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
572-0838
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
593-8324
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
133-0057
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
169-0075
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
194-0013
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
203-0003
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Dose-Finding Study of GSK2894512 Cream in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs