Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors (BRBBT)
Primary Purpose
Bone Cyst
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Cyst focused on measuring Bone substitute, benign bone cyst, ceramic, remodelling
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted to the hospital for surgical treatment of benign bone lesion requiring bone grafting.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient below 6 years of ageIrreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on coumarin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants;
- A pre-existing calcium metabolism disorder (e.g. hypercalcemia).
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
Arm Description
Intraoperativ application of medical device: CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER 5cc/10cc/18cc
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
bone remodeling according to Neer classification
Evaluate bone healing and remodeling at 12 month by X-ray and CT-scan using Modified Neer classification of radiological results.
Secondary Outcome Measures
cyst and bone formation volume
Calculate the pre-operative volume of the cyst, document the volume of product placed into the cyst and the volume of bone formed at 12 months.
In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product.
adverse events
Assess the safety of CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER as measured by number of any device complaint/Adverse Event and any subsequent surgical procedure.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02567084
First Posted
September 30, 2015
Last Updated
October 1, 2015
Sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02567084
Brief Title
Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors
Acronym
BRBBT
Official Title
A Prospective, Longitudinal Patient Study on CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER in Benign Bone Tumors
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability a injectable bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors.
Detailed Description
The aim of the study is to assess the usefulness of injectable bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER) in patients with benign bone tumors. The primary objectives is to:
Assess the ability of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors.
Assess the safety of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute as measured by device complaint/Adverse Events monitoring and documentation of subsequent surgical procedure.
In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product.
Benign bone tumors are often treated with intralesional curettage which creates a bone defect that can be filled with e.g. demineralized bone matrix, autologous bone, ceramic bone substitutes or polymethylmetacrylate cement.
Autograft has been considered the golden standard because it possesses all three of the essential elements required for an optimal bone graft, but is associated with morbidity at the donor site and is limited in supply. Allograft has been employed as a good alternative to autograft but the concern for potential disease transmission remains. Synthetic bone graft substitutes have been gaining popularity as viable alternatives for void and defect filling eliminating the concerns with autograft and allograft. These synthetic bone substitutes have invariably been based on calcium phosphate and/or calcium sulfate materials which are osteoconductive and facilitate bone remodeling, although side effects such as drainage and wound complications slow remodeling to bone or negligible bone generation have limited their use. Thus, new synthetic bone substitutes with described positive effects in vertebroplasty, osteotomy, and smaller trauma defects merit further investigation also in treatment of larger bone defects.
In a prospective series, patients with benign bone tumors were treated by minimal invasive intervention with a bi-phasic and injectable ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT™ BONE VOID FILLER), composed of 60% weight synthetic calcium sulfate (CaS) and 40% weight hydroxyapatite (HA) powder was mixed with a water-soluble radio-contrast agent iohexol (180 mg/ml) to make the material radiopaque. The defects were treated by either mini-invasive surgery (solid tumors) or percutaneous injection (cysts) and followed clinically and radiologically for 12 months. CT scan was performed after 12 months to confirm bone remodeling of the bone substitute. All patients were allowed full weight bearing immediately after surgery.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Cyst
Keywords
Bone substitute, benign bone cyst, ceramic, remodelling
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
14 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Intraoperativ application of medical device: CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER 5cc/10cc/18cc
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
Intervention Description
Implantation of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
bone remodeling according to Neer classification
Description
Evaluate bone healing and remodeling at 12 month by X-ray and CT-scan using Modified Neer classification of radiological results.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
cyst and bone formation volume
Description
Calculate the pre-operative volume of the cyst, document the volume of product placed into the cyst and the volume of bone formed at 12 months.
In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery
Title
adverse events
Description
Assess the safety of CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER as measured by number of any device complaint/Adverse Event and any subsequent surgical procedure.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients admitted to the hospital for surgical treatment of benign bone lesion requiring bone grafting.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient below 6 years of ageIrreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on coumarin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants;
A pre-existing calcium metabolism disorder (e.g. hypercalcemia).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacek Kaczmarczyk, Prof.MD,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Poznan Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19653053
Citation
Mik G, Arkader A, Manteghi A, Dormans JP. Results of a minimally invasive technique for treatment of unicameral bone cysts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2949-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1008-2. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10882465
Citation
Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;31(3):389-98. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70158-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22159859
Citation
Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2227-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01513.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22048753
Citation
Hinsenkamp M, Muylle L, Eastlund T, Fehily D, Noel L, Strong DM. Adverse reactions and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY. Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):633-41. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1391-7. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12180608
Citation
Lee GH, Khoury JG, Bell JE, Buckwalter JA. Adverse reactions to OsteoSet bone graft substitute, the incidence in a consecutive series. Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:35-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24891586
Citation
Ferguson JY, Dudareva M, Riley ND, Stubbs D, Atkins BL, McNally MA. The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jun;96-B(6):829-36. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.32756.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21626113
Citation
Reppenhagen S, Reichert JC, Rackwitz L, Rudert M, Raab P, Daculsi G, Noth U. Biphasic bone substitute and fibrin sealant for treatment of benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions. Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):139-48. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1282-y. Epub 2011 May 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22290129
Citation
Fillingham YA, Lenart BA, Gitelis S. Function after injection of benign bone lesions with a bioceramic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):2014-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2251-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12440503
Citation
Petruskevicius J, Nielsen S, Kaalund S, Knudsen PR, Overgaard S. No effect of Osteoset, a bone graft substitute, on bone healing in humans: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Oct;73(5):575-8. doi: 10.1080/000164702321022875.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22440608
Citation
Hatten HP Jr, Voor MJ. Bone healing using a bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute demonstrated in human vertebroplasty and with histology in a rabbit cancellous bone defect model. Interv Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;18(1):105-13. doi: 10.1177/159101991201800114. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22391680
Citation
Masala S, Nano G, Marcia S, Muto M, Fucci FP, Simonetti G. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture augmentation by injectable partly resorbable ceramic bone substitute (Cerament|SPINESUPPORT): a prospective nonrandomized study. Neuroradiology. 2012 Nov;54(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1016-x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19904822
Citation
Abramo A, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tagil M. Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Jan;92(1):281-6. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31524.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24053255
Citation
Nilsson M, Zheng MH, Tagil M. The composite of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate: a review of preclinical evaluation and clinical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):675-84. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827529. Erratum In: Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Nov;10(6):857.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18679761
Citation
Sung AD, Anderson ME, Zurakowski D, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC. Unicameral bone cyst: a retrospective study of three surgical treatments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct;466(10):2519-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0407-0. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22839754
Citation
Cho HS, Seo SH, Park SH, Park JH, Shin DS, Park IH. Minimal invasive surgery for unicameral bone cyst using demineralized bone matrix: a case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 29;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-134.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2249537
Citation
Campanacci M, Capanna R, Fabbri N, Bettelli G. Curettage of giant cell tumor of bone. Reconstruction with subchondral grafts and cement. Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(1 Suppl):212-3. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10429612
Citation
Bickels J, Meller I, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM. The role and biology of cryosurgery in the treatment of bone tumors. A review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Jun;70(3):308-15. doi: 10.3109/17453679908997814.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26612576
Citation
Kaczmarczyk J, Sowinski P, Goch M, Katulska K. Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 26;16:369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0828-3.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs