search
Back to results

Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors (BRBBT)

Primary Purpose

Bone Cyst

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
Sponsored by
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Cyst focused on measuring Bone substitute, benign bone cyst, ceramic, remodelling

Eligibility Criteria

7 Years - 75 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to the hospital for surgical treatment of benign bone lesion requiring bone grafting.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient below 6 years of ageIrreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on coumarin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants;
  • A pre-existing calcium metabolism disorder (e.g. hypercalcemia).

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Other

    Arm Label

    CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER

    Arm Description

    Intraoperativ application of medical device: CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER 5cc/10cc/18cc

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    bone remodeling according to Neer classification
    Evaluate bone healing and remodeling at 12 month by X-ray and CT-scan using Modified Neer classification of radiological results.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    cyst and bone formation volume
    Calculate the pre-operative volume of the cyst, document the volume of product placed into the cyst and the volume of bone formed at 12 months. In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product.
    adverse events
    Assess the safety of CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER as measured by number of any device complaint/Adverse Event and any subsequent surgical procedure.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 30, 2015
    Last Updated
    October 1, 2015
    Sponsor
    Poznan University of Medical Sciences
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02567084
    Brief Title
    Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors
    Acronym
    BRBBT
    Official Title
    A Prospective, Longitudinal Patient Study on CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER in Benign Bone Tumors
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2014 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Poznan University of Medical Sciences

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to assess the ability a injectable bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors.
    Detailed Description
    The aim of the study is to assess the usefulness of injectable bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER) in patients with benign bone tumors. The primary objectives is to: Assess the ability of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors. Assess the safety of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute as measured by device complaint/Adverse Events monitoring and documentation of subsequent surgical procedure. In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product. Benign bone tumors are often treated with intralesional curettage which creates a bone defect that can be filled with e.g. demineralized bone matrix, autologous bone, ceramic bone substitutes or polymethylmetacrylate cement. Autograft has been considered the golden standard because it possesses all three of the essential elements required for an optimal bone graft, but is associated with morbidity at the donor site and is limited in supply. Allograft has been employed as a good alternative to autograft but the concern for potential disease transmission remains. Synthetic bone graft substitutes have been gaining popularity as viable alternatives for void and defect filling eliminating the concerns with autograft and allograft. These synthetic bone substitutes have invariably been based on calcium phosphate and/or calcium sulfate materials which are osteoconductive and facilitate bone remodeling, although side effects such as drainage and wound complications slow remodeling to bone or negligible bone generation have limited their use. Thus, new synthetic bone substitutes with described positive effects in vertebroplasty, osteotomy, and smaller trauma defects merit further investigation also in treatment of larger bone defects. In a prospective series, patients with benign bone tumors were treated by minimal invasive intervention with a bi-phasic and injectable ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT™ BONE VOID FILLER), composed of 60% weight synthetic calcium sulfate (CaS) and 40% weight hydroxyapatite (HA) powder was mixed with a water-soluble radio-contrast agent iohexol (180 mg/ml) to make the material radiopaque. The defects were treated by either mini-invasive surgery (solid tumors) or percutaneous injection (cysts) and followed clinically and radiologically for 12 months. CT scan was performed after 12 months to confirm bone remodeling of the bone substitute. All patients were allowed full weight bearing immediately after surgery.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Bone Cyst
    Keywords
    Bone substitute, benign bone cyst, ceramic, remodelling

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    14 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Intraoperativ application of medical device: CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER 5cc/10cc/18cc
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER
    Intervention Description
    Implantation of bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute to provide bone generation and bone remodeling in patients with benign bone tumors.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    bone remodeling according to Neer classification
    Description
    Evaluate bone healing and remodeling at 12 month by X-ray and CT-scan using Modified Neer classification of radiological results.
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    cyst and bone formation volume
    Description
    Calculate the pre-operative volume of the cyst, document the volume of product placed into the cyst and the volume of bone formed at 12 months. In the case of bone cysts assess the ability of CERAMENT™ |BONE VOID FILLER to transform into bone and possibly induce bone formation in regions of the cyst not filled with the product.
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Title
    adverse events
    Description
    Assess the safety of CERAMENT™|BONE VOID FILLER as measured by number of any device complaint/Adverse Event and any subsequent surgical procedure.
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    7 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    75 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients admitted to the hospital for surgical treatment of benign bone lesion requiring bone grafting. Exclusion Criteria: Patient below 6 years of ageIrreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on coumarin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants; A pre-existing calcium metabolism disorder (e.g. hypercalcemia).
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jacek Kaczmarczyk, Prof.MD,PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Poznan Medical University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    19653053
    Citation
    Mik G, Arkader A, Manteghi A, Dormans JP. Results of a minimally invasive technique for treatment of unicameral bone cysts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2949-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1008-2. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10882465
    Citation
    Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;31(3):389-98. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70158-9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22159859
    Citation
    Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2227-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01513.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22048753
    Citation
    Hinsenkamp M, Muylle L, Eastlund T, Fehily D, Noel L, Strong DM. Adverse reactions and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY. Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):633-41. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1391-7. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12180608
    Citation
    Lee GH, Khoury JG, Bell JE, Buckwalter JA. Adverse reactions to OsteoSet bone graft substitute, the incidence in a consecutive series. Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:35-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24891586
    Citation
    Ferguson JY, Dudareva M, Riley ND, Stubbs D, Atkins BL, McNally MA. The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jun;96-B(6):829-36. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.32756.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21626113
    Citation
    Reppenhagen S, Reichert JC, Rackwitz L, Rudert M, Raab P, Daculsi G, Noth U. Biphasic bone substitute and fibrin sealant for treatment of benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions. Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):139-48. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1282-y. Epub 2011 May 28.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22290129
    Citation
    Fillingham YA, Lenart BA, Gitelis S. Function after injection of benign bone lesions with a bioceramic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):2014-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2251-5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12440503
    Citation
    Petruskevicius J, Nielsen S, Kaalund S, Knudsen PR, Overgaard S. No effect of Osteoset, a bone graft substitute, on bone healing in humans: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Oct;73(5):575-8. doi: 10.1080/000164702321022875.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22440608
    Citation
    Hatten HP Jr, Voor MJ. Bone healing using a bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute demonstrated in human vertebroplasty and with histology in a rabbit cancellous bone defect model. Interv Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;18(1):105-13. doi: 10.1177/159101991201800114. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22391680
    Citation
    Masala S, Nano G, Marcia S, Muto M, Fucci FP, Simonetti G. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture augmentation by injectable partly resorbable ceramic bone substitute (Cerament|SPINESUPPORT): a prospective nonrandomized study. Neuroradiology. 2012 Nov;54(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1016-x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19904822
    Citation
    Abramo A, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tagil M. Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Jan;92(1):281-6. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31524.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24053255
    Citation
    Nilsson M, Zheng MH, Tagil M. The composite of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate: a review of preclinical evaluation and clinical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):675-84. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827529. Erratum In: Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Nov;10(6):857.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18679761
    Citation
    Sung AD, Anderson ME, Zurakowski D, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC. Unicameral bone cyst: a retrospective study of three surgical treatments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct;466(10):2519-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0407-0. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22839754
    Citation
    Cho HS, Seo SH, Park SH, Park JH, Shin DS, Park IH. Minimal invasive surgery for unicameral bone cyst using demineralized bone matrix: a case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 29;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-134.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    2249537
    Citation
    Campanacci M, Capanna R, Fabbri N, Bettelli G. Curettage of giant cell tumor of bone. Reconstruction with subchondral grafts and cement. Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(1 Suppl):212-3. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10429612
    Citation
    Bickels J, Meller I, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM. The role and biology of cryosurgery in the treatment of bone tumors. A review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Jun;70(3):308-15. doi: 10.3109/17453679908997814.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26612576
    Citation
    Kaczmarczyk J, Sowinski P, Goch M, Katulska K. Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 26;16:369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0828-3.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Complete Twelve Month Bone Remodeling With a Bi-phasic Injectable Bone Substitute in Benign Bone Tumors

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs