search
Back to results

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Atabecestat in Participants Who Are Asymptomatic at Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia (EARLY)

Primary Purpose

Asymptomatic Amyloid-positive

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Atabecestat, 5 mg
Atabecestat, 25 mg
Placebo
Sponsored by
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Asymptomatic Amyloid-positive focused on measuring Alzheimer disease, Atabecestat, Dementia

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must have a global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale- (CDR) score of '0' at Screening
  • Participants 60 to 64 years of age must also have 1 of the following 3 conditions: a) a positive family history for dementia (minimum of 1 first degree relative), b) a previously known apolipoprotein E, ε4 allele (APOE ɛ4) genotype, c) a previously known biomarker status demonstrating elevated amyloid accumulation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET)
  • Participant must be able to read and write and must have adequate hearing and visual acuity to complete the psychometric tests. The legally acceptable representative must also be able to read and write
  • Participants must have evidence of amyloid accumulation by means of either: a) low Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) ABeta 1-42 levels at Screening; b) a positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan at Screening (depending on the site's PET capability) by visual read
  • Participant must be otherwise healthy for their age group or medically stable with or without medication on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at Screening or at Baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor and/or memantine at any time during Screening or Day 1 predose
  • Participant has evidence of any brain diseases, other than potential very early signs of Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) (example. mild hippocampal atrophy) or typical age-related changes (e.g. mild white matter hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) or any other abnormality (e.g. folic acid/Vitamin B12 deficiency) that could explain a possible cognitive deficit (including, but not limited to vascular encephalopathy or large strokes (as imaged by cerebral MRI)
  • Participant has any contraindications for MRI (example, prostheses, implants, claustrophobia, pacemaker)
  • Participant has met criteria for dementia or has a brain disorder that can cause dementia
  • Participant has evidence of familial autosomal dominant AD (mutation identified in the family and/or participant prior to randomization)

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Arm Description

Participants will receive one atabecestat, 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Participants will receive one atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Participants will receive one matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
PACC has 4 components: Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (0 (worst)-48 (best recall); Delayed Paragraph Recall test (Range 0 (worst)-25 (best recall); Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale: (ranges 0 [none]-135 [best performance]) and Mini Mental State Examination (Range 0 [worst] - 30 [best performance]). Component scores are transformed using an established normalization method into z-scores. Each of 4 component change scores is divided by baseline sample standard deviation (SD) of that component. These z scores are summed to form the composite score. Thus, a change of 1 baseline standard deviation on each component would correspond to a 4-point change on the composite. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and implies how many SD higher or lower score as compared with baseline score, with increase signifying improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Index (CFI) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
The CFI is a modified version of the Mail-in Cognitive Function Screening Instrument, a participant- and informant-reported outcome measure developed by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS). This assessment includes 15 questions (14 of which contribute to the total score, and 1 additional unscored item) that assess the participant's perceived ability to perform high-level functional tasks in daily-life and sense of overall cognitive functional ability. Study participants and their informants independently rate the participant's abilities. A participant-reported and an informant-reported total score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 14 (yes=1; no=0; maybe=0.5 for each question) with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Instrument (ADCS-ADLPI) Total Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living -Prevention Instrument (ADCS-ADLPI) is a functional measure composed of 18 items that includes 15 activities of daily living rated on a 4-point scale and 3 high level function items. Study participants and their informants independently rate the participant's level of ability (with no difficulty = 3, with some difficulty = 2, with a lot of difficulty = 1, did not do/don't know = 0). Informants are additionally asked to evaluate whether activities were completed less often, required more time to complete, and if any errors were made performing the task. High-level function items are rated as "yes" or "no". The scores range from 0 to 45 with higher scores indicating less impairment. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 15 activities of daily living questions (range: 0-45) with higher scores indicating less impairment.
Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Scale Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
RBANS is 20 to 25 minute battery developed for cognitive assessment, detection, and characterization of dementia. RBANS includes 12 subtests that measure following 5 indices: (1)Attention Index, composed of Digit Span and Coding; (2)Language Index, consisting of Picture Naming and Semantic Fluency subtests; (3)Visuospatial/Construction Index, made up of Figure Copy and Line Orientation subtests; (4)Immediate Memory Index, composed of List Learning and Story Memory subtests, and (5)Delayed Memory Index, consisting of List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, and Figure Recall subtests. Completion of RBANS yields 5 index scores based on participant performance on various subtests, as well as a composite Total Index score for battery. Total index scores range from 40 to 160, and are normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation (SD) of 15. Higher scores indicate less impairment.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
The CDR-SB is an interviewer administered scale and impairment is scored in each of categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18. Higher score indicates severe impairment.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Daily Living Tests (NABDLTs) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
The Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Daily Living Tests (NABDLTs) Score represent a series of performance based measures covering 5 domains (Attention, Memory, Language, Spatial, and Executive function). These are valid, clinically meaningful measures that objectively assess functional deficits. Participant performance scores on NAB subtests are summed, and then normalized to yield an index score. Index scores can range from less than or equal to (< =) 55 to greater than or equal to (> =) 145, and are normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate less impairment.

Full Information

First Posted
October 5, 2015
Last Updated
February 3, 2020
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02569398
Brief Title
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Atabecestat in Participants Who Are Asymptomatic at Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia
Acronym
EARLY
Official Title
A Phase 2b/3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-54861911 in Subjects Who Are Asymptomatic At Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Change in benefit-risk profile for individuals with early sporadic Alzheimer Disease because of elevations in liver enzymes in subjects receiving atabecestat
Study Start Date
October 29, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with atabecestat slows cognitive decline compared with placebo treatment, as measured by a composite cognitive measure, the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC), in amyloid-positive participants who are asymptomatic at risk for developing Alzheimer's dementia.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), multi-center (more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in participants who are asymptomatic and at risk for developing Alzheimer's dementia. The study will consist of a Screening Phase (approximately 90 days), treatment Phase (54 months) and follow-up Phase (7 to 28 days). In treatment Phase eligible Participants will be randomized to receive study drug or placebo once daily for up to 4.5 years. The maximum study duration for a participant will be 58 months. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Asymptomatic Amyloid-positive
Keywords
Alzheimer disease, Atabecestat, Dementia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
557 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive one atabecestat, 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive one atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Arm Title
Group 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive one matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Atabecestat, 5 mg
Intervention Description
One atabecestat, 5 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Atabecestat, 25 mg
Intervention Description
One atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
One matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
PACC has 4 components: Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (0 (worst)-48 (best recall); Delayed Paragraph Recall test (Range 0 (worst)-25 (best recall); Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale: (ranges 0 [none]-135 [best performance]) and Mini Mental State Examination (Range 0 [worst] - 30 [best performance]). Component scores are transformed using an established normalization method into z-scores. Each of 4 component change scores is divided by baseline sample standard deviation (SD) of that component. These z scores are summed to form the composite score. Thus, a change of 1 baseline standard deviation on each component would correspond to a 4-point change on the composite. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and implies how many SD higher or lower score as compared with baseline score, with increase signifying improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Index (CFI) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
The CFI is a modified version of the Mail-in Cognitive Function Screening Instrument, a participant- and informant-reported outcome measure developed by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS). This assessment includes 15 questions (14 of which contribute to the total score, and 1 additional unscored item) that assess the participant's perceived ability to perform high-level functional tasks in daily-life and sense of overall cognitive functional ability. Study participants and their informants independently rate the participant's abilities. A participant-reported and an informant-reported total score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 14 (yes=1; no=0; maybe=0.5 for each question) with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)
Title
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Instrument (ADCS-ADLPI) Total Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living -Prevention Instrument (ADCS-ADLPI) is a functional measure composed of 18 items that includes 15 activities of daily living rated on a 4-point scale and 3 high level function items. Study participants and their informants independently rate the participant's level of ability (with no difficulty = 3, with some difficulty = 2, with a lot of difficulty = 1, did not do/don't know = 0). Informants are additionally asked to evaluate whether activities were completed less often, required more time to complete, and if any errors were made performing the task. High-level function items are rated as "yes" or "no". The scores range from 0 to 45 with higher scores indicating less impairment. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 15 activities of daily living questions (range: 0-45) with higher scores indicating less impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)
Title
Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Scale Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
RBANS is 20 to 25 minute battery developed for cognitive assessment, detection, and characterization of dementia. RBANS includes 12 subtests that measure following 5 indices: (1)Attention Index, composed of Digit Span and Coding; (2)Language Index, consisting of Picture Naming and Semantic Fluency subtests; (3)Visuospatial/Construction Index, made up of Figure Copy and Line Orientation subtests; (4)Immediate Memory Index, composed of List Learning and Story Memory subtests, and (5)Delayed Memory Index, consisting of List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, and Figure Recall subtests. Completion of RBANS yields 5 index scores based on participant performance on various subtests, as well as a composite Total Index score for battery. Total index scores range from 40 to 160, and are normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation (SD) of 15. Higher scores indicate less impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
The CDR-SB is an interviewer administered scale and impairment is scored in each of categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18. Higher score indicates severe impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)
Title
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Daily Living Tests (NABDLTs) Score at Endpoint (Month 24)
Description
The Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Daily Living Tests (NABDLTs) Score represent a series of performance based measures covering 5 domains (Attention, Memory, Language, Spatial, and Executive function). These are valid, clinically meaningful measures that objectively assess functional deficits. Participant performance scores on NAB subtests are summed, and then normalized to yield an index score. Index scores can range from less than or equal to (< =) 55 to greater than or equal to (> =) 145, and are normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate less impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Endpoint (Month 24)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participant must have a global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale- (CDR) score of '0' at Screening Participants 60 to 64 years of age must also have 1 of the following 3 conditions: a) a positive family history for dementia (minimum of 1 first degree relative), b) a previously known apolipoprotein E, ε4 allele (APOE ɛ4) genotype, c) a previously known biomarker status demonstrating elevated amyloid accumulation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET) Participant must be able to read and write and must have adequate hearing and visual acuity to complete the psychometric tests. The legally acceptable representative must also be able to read and write Participants must have evidence of amyloid accumulation by means of either: a) low Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) ABeta 1-42 levels at Screening; b) a positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan at Screening (depending on the site's PET capability) by visual read Participant must be otherwise healthy for their age group or medically stable with or without medication on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at Screening or at Baseline Exclusion Criteria: Participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor and/or memantine at any time during Screening or Day 1 predose Participant has evidence of any brain diseases, other than potential very early signs of Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) (example. mild hippocampal atrophy) or typical age-related changes (e.g. mild white matter hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) or any other abnormality (e.g. folic acid/Vitamin B12 deficiency) that could explain a possible cognitive deficit (including, but not limited to vascular encephalopathy or large strokes (as imaged by cerebral MRI) Participant has any contraindications for MRI (example, prostheses, implants, claustrophobia, pacemaker) Participant has met criteria for dementia or has a brain disorder that can cause dementia Participant has evidence of familial autosomal dominant AD (mutation identified in the family and/or participant prior to randomization)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Sun City
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Downey
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Orange
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
Country
United States
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Lake Worth
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Ocoee
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
The Villages
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Arlington Heights
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Elk Grove Village
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Elkhart
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
City
Westwood
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Bangor
State/Province
Maine
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
City
Amherst
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Orangeburg
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Staten Island
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
Country
United States
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cordova
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
City
Adelaide
Country
Australia
City
Brisbane
Country
Australia
City
Darlinghurst
Country
Australia
City
East Gosford
Country
Australia
City
Heidelberg
Country
Australia
City
Herston
Country
Australia
City
Subiaco
Country
Australia
City
Tarren Point
Country
Australia
City
Waratah
Country
Australia
City
Antwerpen
Country
Belgium
City
Baudour
Country
Belgium
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
City
Liège
Country
Belgium
City
Mons
Country
Belgium
City
Gatineau
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
City
Aalborg
Country
Denmark
City
Ballerup
Country
Denmark
City
København Ø
Country
Denmark
City
Rødovre
Country
Denmark
City
Kuopio N/a
Country
Finland
City
Turku
Country
Finland
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Essen
Country
Germany
City
Halle
Country
Germany
City
Homburg
Country
Germany
City
Kiel
Country
Germany
City
Mannheim
Country
Germany
City
Mittweida
Country
Germany
City
Stuttgart
Country
Germany
City
ULM
Country
Germany
City
Chiba-shi
Country
Japan
City
Fukuoka-shi
Country
Japan
City
Hachioji-shi
Country
Japan
City
Iizuka-shi
Country
Japan
City
Osaka-shi
Country
Japan
City
Shibuya-ku
Country
Japan
City
Shinjuku-ku
Country
Japan
City
Shirakawa
Country
Japan
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Chihuahua
Country
Mexico
City
Monterrey
Country
Mexico
City
San Luis Potosi
Country
Mexico
City
Tlalnepantla de Baz
Country
Mexico
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
City
Breda
Country
Netherlands
City
s-Hertogenbosch
Country
Netherlands
City
Utrecht
Country
Netherlands
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
City
Getxo
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Manresa
Country
Spain
City
San Sebastian
Country
Spain
City
Terrassa
Country
Spain
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
City
Mölndal
Country
Sweden
City
Birmingham
Country
United Kingdom
City
Glasgow
Country
United Kingdom
City
Guildford
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
Country
United Kingdom
City
Plymouth
Country
United Kingdom
City
Swindon
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33464300
Citation
Sperling R, Henley D, Aisen PS, Raman R, Donohue MC, Ernstrom K, Rafii MS, Streffer J, Shi Y, Karcher K, Raghavan N, Tymofyeyev Y, Bogert J, Brashear HR, Novak G, Thipphawong J, Saad ZS, Kolb H, Rofael H, Sanga P, Romano G. Findings of Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Outcomes of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Truncated Randomized Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):293-301. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4857.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Atabecestat in Participants Who Are Asymptomatic at Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs