Phase 3 Study of M923 and Humira® in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Primary Purpose
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriasis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
M923
Humira
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis focused on measuring Moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, Psoriasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and comply with the requirements of the study
- Chronic plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months before screening
- Stable plaque psoriasis
- History of receipt of or candidate for therapy.
- Moderate to severe psoriasis at screening and baseline
- Must be willing and able to self-administer SC injections or have a caregiver available to administer injections
- Male participants of childbearing potential must employ a highly effective contraceptive measure
- Female participants must have a negative pregnancy test; are not planning to become pregnant; and must not be lactating. Female participants must also agree to employ a highly effective contraceptive measure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type
- Drug-induced psoriasis.
- Other skin conditions which would interfere with assessment of psoriasis
- Medical conditions other than psoriasis for which systemic corticosteroids were used in the last year prior to screening
- Other inflammatory conditions other than psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis
- Prior use of systemic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, or 2 or more non-TNF biologic therapies
- Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments
- Ongoing use of other non-psoriasis prohibited treatments
- All other prior non-psoriasis concomitant treatments must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks
- Laboratory abnormalities at screening deemed clinically significant by the investigator
- Any condition or illness which in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor poses an unacceptable safety risk
- History of latex allergy
- History of or current signs or symptoms or diagnosis of a demyelinating disorder
- History of or current Class III or IV New York Heart Association congestive heart failure
- Signs, symptoms, or diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloproliferative disorders, or multiple myeloma
- Current malignancy or history of any malignancy except adequately treated or excised non metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ; no more than 3 lifetime basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas permitted
- Chronic infections, recurrent infections; recent infection to be evaluated
- History of or presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or Hepatitis B (HBV) or C virus (HCV)
- History of active tuberculosis (TB) or untreated or inadequately treated latent TB.
- Exposure to an investigational product ≤30 days prior to enrollment or participation in another clinical study during the course of this study
- Participant is a family member or employee of the investigator or site staff or study team
Sites / Locations
- Wallace Medical Group, Inc.
- Encino Research Center
- eStudySite
- eStudySite
- eStudySite
- Shahram Jacobs MD, INC
- Horizons Clinical Research Center, LLC
- Bioclinical Research Alliance; Inc
- Sanitas Reasearch, LLC
- Renstar Medical Research
- Compass Research, LLC
- Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
- Radiant Research; Inc.
- Tufts Medical Center; Inc.
- Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc
- eStudySite
- Radiant Research; Inc.
- Radiant Research, Inc.
- Radiant Clinical Research
- Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
- Radiant Research, Inc.
- Austin Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
- Clinical Trials of Texas; Inc.
- National Clinical Research-Richmond, Inc
- Medical Centre Asklepii, OOD
- DCC Sveti Georgi EOOD
- UMHAT Dr.Georgi Stranski, EAD
- DCC Sv. Georgi, EOOD
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, UMHAT Alexandrovska
- Mediprobe Research Inc
- SKDS Research Inc
- North Bay Dermatology Centre
- Office of Dr. Michael Robern
- The Centre for Dermatology
- London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre
- K Papp Clinical Research Inc
- Dr. David Gratton Dermatologue Inc.
- Recherche GCP Research
- Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain (CRDQ)
- CCBR Czech Prague s.r.o
- Dermatologie - MUDr. HELENA KORANDOVA s.r.o.
- CCBR Czech Brno, s.r.o
- CCBR Czech a.s
- Clintrial s.r.o
- Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady
- Krajska zdravotni a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem Dermatovenerologicke oddeleni
- MUDr. Jaroslav Dragon - Kozni ordinace
- Parnu Hospital
- Vahlberg & Pild OU
- East Tallinn Central Hospital
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation
- Medicum AS
- Kliiniliste Uuringute Keskus (Clinical Research Centre)
- Tartu University Hospital; Dermatology Clinic
- Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
- Klinische Forschunq Schwerin GmbH
- Praxis fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie
- Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden
- Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet
- Clinical Research Hamburg
- Riga 1 st Hospital
- Derma Clinic Riga Ltd
- Health Centre 4
- J. Kisis Ltd
- Health Centre 4
- Ventspils Outpatient Clinic
- Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. S.K.A.
- Poradnia Kardiologiczna Jaroslaw Jurowiecki
- Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o. o. S.K.A. Oddzial w Gdyni
- NZOZ POLIMEDICA FILIA KIELCE (Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej POLIMEDICA)
- Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. SK.A.
- Grazyna Pulka Specjalistyczny Osrodek ALL-MED
- Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej _J.M. Jasnorzewska Sp. Komandytowo-Akcyjna
- Centrum Medyczne Szpital Swietej Rodziny
- NZOZ ALL-MED Centrum Medyczne Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie
- KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Lublin II
- Medicome sp.zoo
- Centrum Badan Klinicznych S.C.
- Ai Centrum Medyczne
- KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Pulawy
- Centrum Medyczne Medyk
- NZOZ Nasz Lekarz
- MTZ Clinical Research Sp z o.o.
- KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Zamosc
- Nzoz Polimedica
- Pedi-Derma s.r.o.
- Derma therapy spol. s.r.o.
- Nemocnica Kosice-Saca, a.s., 1.sukromna nemocnica
- Dema-beauty, s.r.o
- Sanare S.r.o
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Other
Arm Label
M923
Humira
M923 and Humira
Arm Description
Participants assigned to receive M923
Participants assigned to receive Humira
Participants assigned to receive M923 and Humira
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (PASI 75) Scores at Week 16
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 75 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 75% in the Week 16 PASI score compared to the score at Baseline.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Clear or Almost Clear on the Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 16
The sPGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had achieved a clear or almost clear response on the 6-point sPGA scale. The sPGA was the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Overall lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis was assessed at a given time point on a 6-point scale on which 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = very severe.
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 50 Response at Week 16
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 50 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 50% compared to Baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 50 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 50 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 50% compared to Baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 75 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 75% compared to Baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 16
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 90 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 90% compared to Baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 90 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 90% compared to Baseline.
Absolute PASI Score at Baseline
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Absolute PASI Score at Week 16
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Absolute PASI Score at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: (post-Baseline value - Baseline value) / (Baseline value) * 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: (post-Baseline value - Baseline value) / (Baseline value) * 100.
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Baseline
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: DLQI Score at Week 16
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: DLQI Score at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EuroQoL 5-Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at Baseline
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine". Baseline was defined as the last scheduled observation prior to dosing, typically Day 1, predose.
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EQ-5D-5L at Week 16
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine".
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EQ-5D-5L at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine".
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and weight. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Baseline
Laboratory results included hematology [Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Potassium, Urea, Creatinine, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [Specific Gravity] parameters. Laboratory results of a few hematology (Red Blood Cell Count and Monocytes absolute), chemistry (Alkaline Phosphatase, Total bilirubin, Sodium, Chloride, and Albumin), and urinalysis (pH) parameters were not assessed at Baseline and Week 16. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Week 16
Laboratory results included hematology [Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Potassium, Urea, Creatinine, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [Specific Gravity] parameters. Laboratory results of a few hematology (Red Blood Cell Count and Monocytes absolute), chemistry (Alkaline Phosphatase, Total bilirubin, Sodium, Chloride, and Albumin), and urinalysis (pH) parameters were not assessed at Baseline and Week 16. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Laboratory results included hematology [Red Blood Cell Count, Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes absolute, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Total bilirubin, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Urea, Creatinine, Albumin, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [pH and Specific Gravity] parameters. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Baseline
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Week 16
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs are adverse events that occurred during or after study drug administration. For more details on adverse events please refer the safety section.
Pharmacokinetics: Serum Concentrations by Treatment
Serum samples were collected at Baseline (Week 0, perdose), approximately 1 week (peak) after IP administration (Weeks 8 and 16), and 2 weeks after dose administration as a trough sample collected prior to the next dose administration (Weeks 17, 21, 25, 29, 37, 41).
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Baseline
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 16
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 25
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 52 (Completion/Termination Visit)
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Baseline
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 16
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 25
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 52 (Completion/Termination Visit)
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Median Time to Seroconversion
Time to seroconversion (in days) was defined as the time to the observation of the first confirmed positive ADA response. Participants with confirmed positive ADA response at baseline (Week 0 predose) were excluded.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02581345
First Posted
October 19, 2015
Last Updated
October 15, 2018
Sponsor
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02581345
Brief Title
Phase 3 Study of M923 and Humira® in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Official Title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of an Adalimumab Biosimilar (M923) and Humira® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 4, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 4, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a proposed adalimumab biosimilar (M923) and Humira in participants with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriasis
Keywords
Moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, Psoriasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
572 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
M923
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants assigned to receive M923
Arm Title
Humira
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants assigned to receive Humira
Arm Title
M923 and Humira
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants assigned to receive M923 and Humira
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
M923
Other Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Intervention Description
Recombinant human immunoglobulin G subclass 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody specific for human tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Humira
Other Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Intervention Description
Recombinant human immunoglobulin G subclass 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody specific for human tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (PASI 75) Scores at Week 16
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 75 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 75% in the Week 16 PASI score compared to the score at Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Clear or Almost Clear on the Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 16
Description
The sPGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had achieved a clear or almost clear response on the 6-point sPGA scale. The sPGA was the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Overall lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis was assessed at a given time point on a 6-point scale on which 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = very severe.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 50 Response at Week 16
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 50 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 50% compared to Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 50 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 50 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 50% compared to Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 75 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 75% compared to Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 16
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 90 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 90% compared to Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Participants achieving PASI 90 are defined as having an improvement (reduction) of at least 90% compared to Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 52
Title
Absolute PASI Score at Baseline
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Absolute PASI Score at Week 16
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Absolute PASI Score at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: (post-Baseline value - Baseline value) / (Baseline value) * 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 16
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 52 (Follow-Up Visit)
Description
The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, arms, trunk, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and thickness in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no disease to 72 for the most severe disease. Each of the body areas was scored by itself, and then the 4 scores were combined into the final PASI score. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: (post-Baseline value - Baseline value) / (Baseline value) * 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 52
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Baseline
Description
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: DLQI Score at Week 16
Description
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: DLQI Score at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
The DLQI score was calculated by summing the individual scores of each question at a given time point, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. For the analysis of responses, the participant's results were assessed on a scoring scale on which 3 = very much or yes (applicable to question 7 only), 2 = a lot, 1 = a little, 0 = not at all or not relevant. Interpretation of DLQI scoring can be taken as 0 - 1 = no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5 = small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10 = moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20 = very large effect on participant's life, and 21 - 30 = extremely large effect on participant's life.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EuroQoL 5-Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at Baseline
Description
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine". Baseline was defined as the last scheduled observation prior to dosing, typically Day 1, predose.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EQ-5D-5L at Week 16
Description
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine".
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life During Treatment: EQ-5D-5L at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
The EQ-5D-5L health score was measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 = "worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "best health you can imagine".
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs
Description
Vital signs included body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and weight. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Baseline
Description
Laboratory results included hematology [Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Potassium, Urea, Creatinine, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [Specific Gravity] parameters. Laboratory results of a few hematology (Red Blood Cell Count and Monocytes absolute), chemistry (Alkaline Phosphatase, Total bilirubin, Sodium, Chloride, and Albumin), and urinalysis (pH) parameters were not assessed at Baseline and Week 16. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Week 16
Description
Laboratory results included hematology [Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Potassium, Urea, Creatinine, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [Specific Gravity] parameters. Laboratory results of a few hematology (Red Blood Cell Count and Monocytes absolute), chemistry (Alkaline Phosphatase, Total bilirubin, Sodium, Chloride, and Albumin), and urinalysis (pH) parameters were not assessed at Baseline and Week 16. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
Laboratory results included hematology [Red Blood Cell Count, Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count, Mean cell volume, White blood cell count (total leucocytes), Neutrophils absolute, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes absolute, Lymphocytes, Monocytes absolute, Monocytes, Eosinophils absolute, and Eosinophils], chemistry (Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Gamma glutamyl transferase, Total bilirubin, Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Total protein, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Urea, Creatinine, Albumin, Phosphate, Glucose, and Uric acid) and urinalysis [pH and Specific Gravity] parameters. Clinically meaningful changes were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Baseline
Description
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Week 16
Description
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram Parameters at Week 48 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
Clinically significant abnormalities were classified as such by the Investigator and reported as adverse events.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
TEAEs are adverse events that occurred during or after study drug administration. For more details on adverse events please refer the safety section.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Pharmacokinetics: Serum Concentrations by Treatment
Description
Serum samples were collected at Baseline (Week 0, perdose), approximately 1 week (peak) after IP administration (Weeks 8 and 16), and 2 weeks after dose administration as a trough sample collected prior to the next dose administration (Weeks 17, 21, 25, 29, 37, 41).
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 17, 21, 25, 29, 37, and 41
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Baseline
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0)
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 16
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 25
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Time Frame
Week 25
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA at Week 52 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose; if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. The same convention applied for the neutralizing assay results.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Baseline
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0)
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 16
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 25
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
Week 25
Title
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With ADA and nADA by Titer at Week 52 (Completion/Termination Visit)
Description
The M923 confirmation assay was evaluated only if the EU Humira confirmation assay was negative. Overall Result: a participant was considered to be positive if a confirmed positive result was observed at any assay (including predose); if a participant had either a negative result in the screening assay or a positive result at screening followed by a negative result in all confirmation tiers, the overall result was negative. Overall Status: a participant was considered to have developed ADA or neutralizing ADAs if a confirmed positive result was observed at any time during the treatment period inclusive of the predose results; the designation of negative required either a negative screening assay or a negative confirmation result at each sampling time. In confirmed positive samples, an assay was used to determine the relative titer of the ADA; a subsequent neutralizing antibodies assay was used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Median Time to Seroconversion
Description
Time to seroconversion (in days) was defined as the time to the observation of the first confirmed positive ADA response. Participants with confirmed positive ADA response at baseline (Week 0 predose) were excluded.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Must be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and comply with the requirements of the study
Chronic plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months before screening
Stable plaque psoriasis
History of receipt of or candidate for therapy.
Moderate to severe psoriasis at screening and baseline
Must be willing and able to self-administer SC injections or have a caregiver available to administer injections
Male participants of childbearing potential must employ a highly effective contraceptive measure
Female participants must have a negative pregnancy test; are not planning to become pregnant; and must not be lactating. Female participants must also agree to employ a highly effective contraceptive measure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type
Drug-induced psoriasis.
Other skin conditions which would interfere with assessment of psoriasis
Medical conditions other than psoriasis for which systemic corticosteroids were used in the last year prior to screening
Other inflammatory conditions other than psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis
Prior use of systemic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, or 2 or more non-TNF biologic therapies
Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments
Ongoing use of other non-psoriasis prohibited treatments
All other prior non-psoriasis concomitant treatments must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks
Laboratory abnormalities at screening deemed clinically significant by the investigator
Any condition or illness which in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor poses an unacceptable safety risk
History of latex allergy
History of or current signs or symptoms or diagnosis of a demyelinating disorder
History of or current Class III or IV New York Heart Association congestive heart failure
Signs, symptoms, or diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloproliferative disorders, or multiple myeloma
Current malignancy or history of any malignancy except adequately treated or excised non metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ; no more than 3 lifetime basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas permitted
Chronic infections, recurrent infections; recent infection to be evaluated
History of or presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or Hepatitis B (HBV) or C virus (HCV)
History of active tuberculosis (TB) or untreated or inadequately treated latent TB.
Exposure to an investigational product ≤30 days prior to enrollment or participation in another clinical study during the course of this study
Participant is a family member or employee of the investigator or site staff or study team
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Caminis, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Shire
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Wallace Medical Group, Inc.
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Encino Research Center
City
Encino
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91436
Country
United States
Facility Name
eStudySite
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91942
Country
United States
Facility Name
eStudySite
City
Oceanside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92056
Country
United States
Facility Name
eStudySite
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shahram Jacobs MD, INC
City
Sherman Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizons Clinical Research Center, LLC
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bioclinical Research Alliance; Inc
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sanitas Reasearch, LLC
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Renstar Medical Research
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
Compass Research, LLC
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46256
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research; Inc.
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center; Inc.
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc
City
Watertown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02472
Country
United States
Facility Name
eStudySite
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research; Inc.
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45249
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Clinical Research
City
Anderson
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
City
Fountain Inn
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29644
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29650
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
City
Pflugerville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of Texas; Inc.
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Clinical Research-Richmond, Inc
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23294
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical Centre Asklepii, OOD
City
Dupnitsa
ZIP/Postal Code
2600
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
DCC Sveti Georgi EOOD
City
Haskovo
ZIP/Postal Code
6300
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
UMHAT Dr.Georgi Stranski, EAD
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
DCC Sv. Georgi, EOOD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, UMHAT Alexandrovska
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Mediprobe Research Inc
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N5X 2P1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
SKDS Research Inc
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L3Y 5G8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
North Bay Dermatology Centre
City
North Bay
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
P1B 3Z7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Office of Dr. Michael Robern
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K2G 6E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Centre for Dermatology
City
Richmond Hill
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K2G 6E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre
City
Sarnia
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N7T 4X3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
K Papp Clinical Research Inc
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2J 1C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Dr. David Gratton Dermatologue Inc.
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3H 1V4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Recherche GCP Research
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1M 1B1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain (CRDQ)
City
Ste-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V 4X7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CCBR Czech Prague s.r.o
City
Praha 3
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
13000
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Dermatologie - MUDr. HELENA KORANDOVA s.r.o.
City
Olomouc
State/Province
Povel
ZIP/Postal Code
779 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR Czech Brno, s.r.o
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
60200
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR Czech a.s
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
530 02
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Clintrial s.r.o
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Krajska zdravotni a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem Dermatovenerologicke oddeleni
City
Usti nad Labem
ZIP/Postal Code
40113
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MUDr. Jaroslav Dragon - Kozni ordinace
City
Ústí nad Labem
ZIP/Postal Code
400 10
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Parnu Hospital
City
Pärnu
ZIP/Postal Code
80010
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Vahlberg & Pild OU
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10134
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
East Tallinn Central Hospital
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
11312
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
13419
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Medicum AS
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
13619
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Kliiniliste Uuringute Keskus (Clinical Research Centre)
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
50106
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Tartu University Hospital; Dermatology Clinic
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
50417
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
City
Schleswig
State/Province
Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
23538
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinische Forschunq Schwerin GmbH
City
Mecklenburg
State/Province
Vorpommern
ZIP/Postal Code
19055
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01097
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet
City
Frankfurt am Main
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Clinical Research Hamburg
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22143
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Riga 1 st Hospital
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
1001
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Derma Clinic Riga Ltd
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1003
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Health Centre 4
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1003
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
J. Kisis Ltd
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1003
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Health Centre 4
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1013
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Ventspils Outpatient Clinic
City
Ventspils
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-3601
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. S.K.A.
City
Warsaw
State/Province
Mazowieckie
ZIP/Postal Code
01-868
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Poradnia Kardiologiczna Jaroslaw Jurowiecki
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-286
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o. o. S.K.A. Oddzial w Gdyni
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-338
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ POLIMEDICA FILIA KIELCE (Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej POLIMEDICA)
City
Kielce
ZIP/Postal Code
25-364
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. SK.A.
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-002
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Grazyna Pulka Specjalistyczny Osrodek ALL-MED
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-023
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej _J.M. Jasnorzewska Sp. Komandytowo-Akcyjna
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-242
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Szpital Swietej Rodziny
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-302
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ ALL-MED Centrum Medyczne Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
94-048
Country
Poland
Facility Name
KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Lublin II
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-362
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Medicome sp.zoo
City
Oswiecim
ZIP/Postal Code
32-600
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Badan Klinicznych S.C.
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-773
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Ai Centrum Medyczne
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-113
Country
Poland
Facility Name
KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Pulawy
City
Pulawy
ZIP/Postal Code
24-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Medyk
City
Rzeszow
ZIP/Postal Code
35-055
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Nasz Lekarz
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MTZ Clinical Research Sp z o.o.
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-106
Country
Poland
Facility Name
KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Zamosc
City
Zamosc
ZIP/Postal Code
22-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Nzoz Polimedica
City
Zgierz
ZIP/Postal Code
95-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pedi-Derma s.r.o.
City
Kosice
State/Province
Kosicky Kraj
ZIP/Postal Code
04011
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Derma therapy spol. s.r.o.
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
851 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Nemocnica Kosice-Saca, a.s., 1.sukromna nemocnica
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
04015
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Dema-beauty, s.r.o
City
Nitra
ZIP/Postal Code
949 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Sanare S.r.o
City
Svidnik
ZIP/Postal Code
089 01
Country
Slovakia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Phase 3 Study of M923 and Humira® in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs