search
Back to results

3D Augmented Reality Mirror Visual Feedback Applied to the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain.

Primary Purpose

Neuralgia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
3D augmented reality
Sponsored by
Erasme University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuralgia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain in the unilateral upper extremity scored by DN4 questionnaire
  • At least 3 months symptom duration following injury
  • Minimum pain of 40 on a visual analogue scale (VAS);
  • A drug treatment regimen that was stable for at least 2 weeks.
  • Subjects were allowed to participate if they presented with any of the following: (1) A CRPS diagnosis, in accordance with the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria, Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), or spinal cord injury or plexopathy; and (2) an history of being treated before by conventional mirror therapy but, in their case, the mirror therapy failed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral injury,
  • Patients with epilepsy
  • Side effects known to 3D (such as nausea, cephalalgia)
  • Cognitive disorder
  • Poor knowledge of the French language.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Open label

    Arm Description

    3D augmented reality

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
    Visual Analogic Scale assessed pain intensity before and after the intervention. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Neuropathic Pain Assessed With DN4 Questionnaire
    DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions) is a screening tool for neuropathic pain consisting of interview questions (DN4-interview) and physical tests. When the practitioner suspects neuropathic pain, the DN4 questionnaire is useful as a diagnostic tool. This questionnaire is divided into 4 questions representing 10 check items: The practitioner questions the patient himself and completes the questionnaire For each item, he must provide a "yes" or "no" answer At the end of the questionnaire, the practitioner counts the responses, 1 for each "Yes" and 0 for each "no". The sum obtained gives the Patient Score, noted out of 10. If the patient's score is 4/10 or more, the test is positive (sensitivity at 82.9%; specificity at 89.9%) Dn4 questionnaire were completed before and 24 hour after the last session

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 1, 2015
    Last Updated
    August 11, 2020
    Sponsor
    Erasme University Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02582216
    Brief Title
    3D Augmented Reality Mirror Visual Feedback Applied to the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain.
    Official Title
    3D Augmented Reality Mirror Visual Feedback Therapy Applied to the Treatment of Persistent, Unilateral Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain: A Preliminary Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 2013 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Erasme University Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study has two objectives. First, to introduce a new virtual reality method that incorporates the mechanisms used in mirror visual feedback through a three-dimensional (3D) augmented virtual reality system. Second, to evaluate the efficiency of this new method on a convenience sample of patients presenting with unresolved neuropathic pain (CRPS, PLP, plexopathy, stroke) who were not responding adequately to both pharmaceutical management and traditional mirror therapy.
    Detailed Description
    Each patient receives 5 treatment periods over a total period of 1 week, where each treatment period lasts a total of 20 minutes.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Neuralgia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 1, Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    22 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Open label
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    3D augmented reality
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    3D augmented reality
    Intervention Description
    Each treatment period included a 3DARS (3D augmented reality system)training session.All 3DARS training sessions were performed in the same quiet room under the supervision of the same single investigator.The 3DARS training session protocol included two virtual training procedures. The first virtual training procedure consisted of applying a vertical virtual mirror to the display screen, where the non-affected side of the patient's body (such as the right) was symmetrically duplicated by a vertical axis on the affected side (such as the left).The second virtual training procedure consisted of flipping the 3D image horizontally along a vertical axis. This allowed patients to observe the reflection of their non-affected upper extremity as if it was the affected one.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
    Description
    Visual Analogic Scale assessed pain intensity before and after the intervention. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)
    Time Frame
    baseline and week
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Neuropathic Pain Assessed With DN4 Questionnaire
    Description
    DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions) is a screening tool for neuropathic pain consisting of interview questions (DN4-interview) and physical tests. When the practitioner suspects neuropathic pain, the DN4 questionnaire is useful as a diagnostic tool. This questionnaire is divided into 4 questions representing 10 check items: The practitioner questions the patient himself and completes the questionnaire For each item, he must provide a "yes" or "no" answer At the end of the questionnaire, the practitioner counts the responses, 1 for each "Yes" and 0 for each "no". The sum obtained gives the Patient Score, noted out of 10. If the patient's score is 4/10 or more, the test is positive (sensitivity at 82.9%; specificity at 89.9%) Dn4 questionnaire were completed before and 24 hour after the last session
    Time Frame
    1 week
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Questionnaire de Saint-Antoine
    Description
    French adaptation of Melzack's MC Gill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). It is a questionnaire of 61 qualifying words divided into 17 subclasses: 9 sensory, 7 emotional, 1 evaluative. The patient is asked to select the adjectives and then rate them from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). This self-assessment scale allows clinical practice to specify the participation of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. self-questionnaire scoring the sensory and emotional qualities of the pain
    Time Frame
    1 week

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Neuropathic pain in the unilateral upper extremity scored by DN4 questionnaire At least 3 months symptom duration following injury Minimum pain of 40 on a visual analogue scale (VAS); A drug treatment regimen that was stable for at least 2 weeks. Subjects were allowed to participate if they presented with any of the following: (1) A CRPS diagnosis, in accordance with the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria, Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), or spinal cord injury or plexopathy; and (2) an history of being treated before by conventional mirror therapy but, in their case, the mirror therapy failed. Exclusion Criteria: Bilateral injury, Patients with epilepsy Side effects known to 3D (such as nausea, cephalalgia) Cognitive disorder Poor knowledge of the French language.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    3D Augmented Reality Mirror Visual Feedback Applied to the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain.

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs