search
Back to results

REFIT Hearing: Remote Fitting of Hearing Aids (REFITHEARING)

Primary Purpose

Hearing Loss

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Remote fitting
Face to face fitting
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Montpellier
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Hearing Loss focused on measuring hearing loss, hearing aids

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 84 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age limits ≥ 18 et < 85 years
  • User of two hearing aids for more than a year
  • Carriers of adjustable digital hearing aids by means of a software of the usable manufacturer on Windows® PC (in stand-alone or as plug-in in the software NOAH®) to be integrated into the platform AudioProConnect. It is the case of almost all the current hearing aids (Phonak, Starkey, Siemens, Unitron, etc.)
  • Subject able to understand the nature, the aim and the methodology of the study.
  • Affiliation or recipient with the mode of social security.
  • Collection of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fluctuations in the tonal audiometry, defined as variations furthermore of 10 dB of the average hearing loss (Average arithmetic of thresholds in 500, 1000, 2000 et 4000 Hz) Between the last 2 tonal audiometries realized over the previous 2 years
  • Cognitive disorders or severe phasic hampering the understanding of the language or the repetition of the speech (Subject not being capable of participating in a vocal audiometry during the last regulation of its hearing aids)
  • Incapacitated to move in a laboratory of audioprosthesis
  • Fickle bearing of the hearing aid (<6h /day ou < 5day/7)
  • Tip not adapted little finger
  • Presence of plugs of earwax at the time of the tests
  • Patient minor(miner) or protected adults or in the incapacity to give its consent according to the article L1121-8 Of the Public Code of the Health (CSP)
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women according to the article L1121-5 du CSP.
  • Vulnerable people according to the article L1121-6 du CSP.

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital Gui de Chauliac - Service ORL

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

face to face fitting

remote fitting

Arm Description

face to face fitting of hearing aids

remote fitting of hearing aids

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

speech perception
score PBK test

Secondary Outcome Measures

speech in noise audiometry
quality of life
APHAB questionnaire
duration of fitting
daily use of hearing aids

Full Information

First Posted
October 21, 2015
Last Updated
May 18, 2018
Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Collaborators
AudioPro Connect, Alliance Audition Montpellier, Audition Conseil Perpignan, Audition Conseil à Nîmes
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02589561
Brief Title
REFIT Hearing: Remote Fitting of Hearing Aids
Acronym
REFITHEARING
Official Title
REFIT Hearing: Remote Fitting of Hearing Aids
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Collaborators
AudioPro Connect, Alliance Audition Montpellier, Audition Conseil Perpignan, Audition Conseil à Nîmes

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Currently, the fitting of hearing aids is using a computer interface that allows to adjust the gain and compression of acoustic amplification. This adjustment is made face to face, patient and audiologist being located in a soundproof space to test the effectiveness of the hearing aid. However, advances in telemedicine in this context, let consider the possibility of addressing these hearing aids fitting via the same computer interface, but remotely controlled by the hearing care professional. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability to perform these tests no longer in front of the patient settings, but away from it, and without visual and sound contact other than through a computer interface. At the end, this project wants to show that a remote fitting is an acceptable procedure that provides comparable results to-face fitting in terms of speech perception, speech in noise audiometry, hearing loss related quality of life in order to be able to offer this type of strategy.
Detailed Description
Background and rationale: Currently, the fitting of hearing aids is using a computer interface that allows to adjust the gain and compression of acoustic amplification. This adjustment is made face to face, patient and audiologist being located in a soundproof space to test the effectiveness of the hearing aid. However, advances in telemedicine in this context, let consider the possibility of addressing these hearing aids fitting via the same computer interface, but remotely controlled by the hearing care professional. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability to perform these tests no longer in front of the patient settings, but away from it, and without visual and sound contact other than through a computer interface. Objectives Main objective: To show that the remote fitting of hearing aids using the platform developed by AudioProConnect provides speech perception scores similar to those obtained by a face-control, after 5 weeks of use among experienced hearing aid users. Secondary Objectives: To compare the duration and the quality of both types of fitting, speech in noise testing, deafness related quality of life and assess the wearing time of hearing aids. Methods DESIGN: Biomedical research on health product, prospective, multicenter, randomized, and crossover study to assess the remote fitting of hearing aids: Study REFIT-HEARING Study Population: adults with bilateral hearing aids. Inclusion criteria: Patient aged between 18 and 85 years old, with hearing loss and using two hearing aids for more than one year, and compatible with AudioProConnect platform. Exclusion criteria: Patient with fluctuations of pure tone audiometry, cognitive disorders or severe speech disorders. Patient unable to move in an audiology laboratory. Primary Outcome: Evaluation of speech perception score with PBK test free-field at 60 dB. Secondary endpoints: assessment of quality control by measuring the pitch gain, duration of fitting in minutes, speech in noise audiometry, the wearing time of hearing aids in hours, the quality of life related to hearing loss via the APHAB questionnaire. Number of patients: 60 subjects Procedure (number of visits, length of inclusions, duration of follow-up, study schedule patient visits content, brief description of intervention): After the investigator has verified the criteria of inclusion / non inclusion and the subject has signed the written informed consent, the subject will be followed for a period ranging from 2 months to 5 months, during which he attended four visits in a audiology laboratory referenced in this project. During these visits, a fitting of hearing aids face to face or remotely will be realized, and it will be asked to answer a questionnaire to assess quality of life between the two fitting techniques. Study Schedule: Inclusion period: 3 months (M3-M6) Duration of the study for one subject: 2 months to 5 months (M6 to M8 or M6 to M11) Duration statistical analysis / recovery: 3 months (M11-M14) Global Study duration: 14 months Outlook At the end, this project wants to show that a remote fitting provides comparable results to-face fitting in terms of speech perception, in order to be able to offer this type of strategy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hearing Loss
Keywords
hearing loss, hearing aids

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
face to face fitting
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
face to face fitting of hearing aids
Arm Title
remote fitting
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
remote fitting of hearing aids
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Remote fitting
Intervention Description
remote fitting of hearing aids
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Face to face fitting
Intervention Description
face to face fitting of hearing aids
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
speech perception
Description
score PBK test
Time Frame
5 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
speech in noise audiometry
Time Frame
5 months
Title
quality of life
Description
APHAB questionnaire
Time Frame
5 months
Title
duration of fitting
Time Frame
5 months
Title
daily use of hearing aids
Time Frame
5 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
84 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age limits ≥ 18 et < 85 years User of two hearing aids for more than a year Carriers of adjustable digital hearing aids by means of a software of the usable manufacturer on Windows® PC (in stand-alone or as plug-in in the software NOAH®) to be integrated into the platform AudioProConnect. It is the case of almost all the current hearing aids (Phonak, Starkey, Siemens, Unitron, etc.) Subject able to understand the nature, the aim and the methodology of the study. Affiliation or recipient with the mode of social security. Collection of the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Fluctuations in the tonal audiometry, defined as variations furthermore of 10 dB of the average hearing loss (Average arithmetic of thresholds in 500, 1000, 2000 et 4000 Hz) Between the last 2 tonal audiometries realized over the previous 2 years Cognitive disorders or severe phasic hampering the understanding of the language or the repetition of the speech (Subject not being capable of participating in a vocal audiometry during the last regulation of its hearing aids) Incapacitated to move in a laboratory of audioprosthesis Fickle bearing of the hearing aid (<6h /day ou < 5day/7) Tip not adapted little finger Presence of plugs of earwax at the time of the tests Patient minor(miner) or protected adults or in the incapacity to give its consent according to the article L1121-8 Of the Public Code of the Health (CSP) Pregnant or breast-feeding women according to the article L1121-5 du CSP. Vulnerable people according to the article L1121-6 du CSP.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frédéric VENAIL, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Montpellier
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac - Service ORL
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34090
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31694484
Citation
Venail F, Picot MC, Marin G, Falinower S, Samson J, Cizeron G, Balcon M, Blanc D, Bricaud J, Lorenzi A, Ceccato JC, Puel JL. Speech perception, real-ear measurements and self-perceived hearing impairment after remote and face-to-face programming of hearing aids: A randomized single-blind agreement study. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Aug;27(7):409-423. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19883543. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

REFIT Hearing: Remote Fitting of Hearing Aids

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs