Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection in Treating Hemophilic Arthropathy
Primary Purpose
Hemophilia, Hemophilic Arthropathy
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection
Hyaluronic Acid Viscosupplementation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemophilia focused on measuring Platelet Rich Plasma, Hemophilia, Hemophilic arthropathy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- hemophilia patients with hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints for at least 6 months
- painful (VAS ≥ 3) hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints after medication
Exclusion Criteria:
- presence of joint infections, any surgery on the joint in preceding 12 months
- intra-articular corticosteroid or HA injection within the past 6 months
- treatment with systemic steroids
- history of rheumatoid arthritis, or gouty arthropathy
- history of chicken or egg allergy
- presence of neoplasm
- use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 5 days before study
- platelet values < 100,000/mm3
- acute hemarthrosis
- paresis, or recent trauma.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
PRP Group
HA Group
Arm Description
single intra-articular injection of 2mL PRP (RegentKit-THT-1, RegenLab SA, Mont-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland)
five weekly intra-articular injections of 2.5 mL of hyaluronate sodium (ARTZDispo, Seikagaku Corporation Japan).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
The pain intensity will be evaluated subjectively on a visual analogue scale (0-10).
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
It consists of 24 items: five pertaining to pain perception, two to stiffness, and 17 to physical function.
Individual scores were then summed to form a raw score ranging from 0 (best) to 2400 (worst). Finally, WOMAC total score normalized between 0 (best) and 100 (worst).
Short Form-36 (SF-36) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
The SF-36 is a 36-item assessment tool that measures eight general health concepts including physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health. Individual scores were then summed to form a total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Ultrasonographic Synovial Thickness (mm) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Synovial thickness (mm) by ultrasonography were evaluated from the lateral, middle, and medial aspects of the anterior suprapatellar recess
Synovial Hyperemia (Score) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Power Doppler assessment of the selected synovial sites was performed with settings standardized to a pulse repetition frequency of 700 Hz. The power Doppler gain was adjusted to a level just below the disappearance of artifacts under the bony cortex.14,15 The intensity of blood flow in the synovium was scored on a semiquantitative scale from 0-3 (grade 0, no intraarticular colour signal; grade 1, up to 3 color signals or 2 single and 1 confluent signal in the intraarticular area; grade 2, greater than grade 1 to <50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals; grade 3, ≥50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals)
Range of Motion (ROM, Degrees) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Hemarthrosis From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Episode(s) of hemarthrosis in the previous one month
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02601170
First Posted
November 7, 2015
Last Updated
August 29, 2020
Sponsor
Tri-Service General Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02601170
Brief Title
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection in Treating Hemophilic Arthropathy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Tri-Service General Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Severe hemophilia is characterized by frequent and lifelong bleeding, with more than 60% of bleeds occurring into joints . Repeated joint bleeding leads to chronic synovitis, cartilage damage and bony destruction. Currently available treatment of hemophilic arthropathy, such as analgesics, NSAIDs, and hyaluronic acid (HA), are predominantly directed toward the symptomatic relief of pain and inflammation, but they do little to reduce joint cartilage degeneration.
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is a simple and minimally invasive method that provides a natural concentrate of autologous growth factors from the blood. This method is now being increasingly applied in clinical practice to treat musculoskeletal disorders, such as tendon repairment and osteoarthritis. To the best of our knowledge, no study applies PRP for arthropathy of knee joint in hemophilia patients. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and duration of benefit of single PRP injection versus five weekly intra-articular injections of HA in patients with hemophilic arthropathy of knee.
Detailed Description
Severe haemophilia is characterized by frequent and lifelong bleeding, with more than 60% of bleeds occurring into joints. Repeated joint bleeding leads to chronic synovitis, cartilage damage and bony destruction, which are associated with limitation of range of motion (ROM), pain, muscle atrophy, functional impairment, and poor quality of life. The knee, elbow, and ankle are the most commonly involved joints and arthropathy could worsen in adolescence or young adulthood. Hemophilic arthropathy is a multifactorial event and there is evidence to suggest that iron may play a major role with release of cytokines such as Interleukin ( IL)-1, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) leading to chronic proliferative synovitis, hypervascularity, and progressive arthropathy. These effects on cartilage and subchondral bone are inflammatory and degenerative in nature and management of chronic hemophilic arthropathy is difficult.
Currently available drugs for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy, such as analgesics, corticosteroids, nonsteroid and steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, and hyaluronic acid (HA), are predominantly directed toward the symptomatic relief of pain and inflammation, but they do little to reduce joint cartilage degeneration.
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is a simple and minimally invasive method that provides a natural concentrate of autologous growth factors from the blood. This method is now being increasingly applied in clinical practice to treat musculoskeletal disorders, such as tendon repairment and osteoarthritis. Growth factors including platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin growth factor (IGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and transforming growth factor beta-1 are believed to be key components of PRP for structural repair. Although comparing PRP with other intra-articular and soft tissue injections has led to conflicting results, it seems that PRP has useful effects on healing and functional improvement of injured tissues. To the best of our knowledge, only one study applies PRP for arthropathy in haemophilia. Teyssler et al reported PRP could reduce pain of chronic ankle synovitis in hemophilia although the small sample size (n=6), short term follow-up and absence of a control group.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) has some role in joint mechanical support and its metabolic effects, which causes endogenous HA synthesis, stimulation of chondrocyte metabolism, synthesis of cartilage matrix components, and inhibition of chondrodegenerative enzymes, as well as inflammatory process. In 1994 Fernandez-Palazzi et al firstly used intra-articular HA injection for haemophiliacs with arthropathy and reported its beneficial effects in 2002. Recently, Carulli et al reported 27 haemophilic patients with a mean seven-year follow-up who had excellent results in terms of pain relief and functional improvement in the knee following treatment with HA injection. Viscosupplementation is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in haemophilic arthropathy of knee in order to delay of surgery.
The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy, safety and duration of benefit of single PRP injection versus five weekly intra-articular injections of HA in patients with haemophilic arthropathy of knee.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemophilia, Hemophilic Arthropathy
Keywords
Platelet Rich Plasma, Hemophilia, Hemophilic arthropathy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
22 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PRP Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
single intra-articular injection of 2mL PRP (RegentKit-THT-1, RegenLab SA, Mont-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland)
Arm Title
HA Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
five weekly intra-articular injections of 2.5 mL of hyaluronate sodium (ARTZDispo, Seikagaku Corporation Japan).
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Hyaluronic Acid Viscosupplementation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
The pain intensity will be evaluated subjectively on a visual analogue scale (0-10).
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
It consists of 24 items: five pertaining to pain perception, two to stiffness, and 17 to physical function.
Individual scores were then summed to form a raw score ranging from 0 (best) to 2400 (worst). Finally, WOMAC total score normalized between 0 (best) and 100 (worst).
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Title
Short Form-36 (SF-36) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
The SF-36 is a 36-item assessment tool that measures eight general health concepts including physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health. Individual scores were then summed to form a total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Title
Ultrasonographic Synovial Thickness (mm) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
Synovial thickness (mm) by ultrasonography were evaluated from the lateral, middle, and medial aspects of the anterior suprapatellar recess
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Title
Synovial Hyperemia (Score) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
Power Doppler assessment of the selected synovial sites was performed with settings standardized to a pulse repetition frequency of 700 Hz. The power Doppler gain was adjusted to a level just below the disappearance of artifacts under the bony cortex.14,15 The intensity of blood flow in the synovium was scored on a semiquantitative scale from 0-3 (grade 0, no intraarticular colour signal; grade 1, up to 3 color signals or 2 single and 1 confluent signal in the intraarticular area; grade 2, greater than grade 1 to <50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals; grade 3, ≥50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals)
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Title
Range of Motion (ROM, Degrees) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Title
Hemarthrosis From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Description
Episode(s) of hemarthrosis in the previous one month
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
hemophilia patients with hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints for at least 6 months
painful (VAS ≥ 3) hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints after medication
Exclusion Criteria:
presence of joint infections, any surgery on the joint in preceding 12 months
intra-articular corticosteroid or HA injection within the past 6 months
treatment with systemic steroids
history of rheumatoid arthritis, or gouty arthropathy
history of chicken or egg allergy
presence of neoplasm
use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 5 days before study
platelet values < 100,000/mm3
acute hemarthrosis
paresis, or recent trauma.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection in Treating Hemophilic Arthropathy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs