Back to resultsStudy of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (KTE-X19) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) (ZUMA-2)
Primary Purpose
Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
brexucabtagene autoleucel
Cyclophosphamide
Fludarabine
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Up to 5 prior regimens for MCL. Prior therapy must have included:
- Anthracycline or bendamustine-containing chemotherapy and
- Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy and
- Ibrutinib or acalabrutinib
At least 1 measurable lesion
Platelet count ≥ 75,000/uL
Creatinine clearance (as estimated by Cockcroft Gault) > or = to 60 mL/min
Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50%, no evidence of pericardial effusion as determined by an echocardiogram (ECHO), and no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
Baseline oxygen saturation >92% on room air.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (HBsAG positive) or hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV positive). A history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C is permitted if the viral load is undetectable per standard serological and genetic testing
- History of a seizure disorder, cerebrovascular ischemia/hemorrhage, dementia, cerebellar disease, cerebral edema, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, or any autoimmune disease with central nervous system (CNS) involvement
- Presence of fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection that is uncontrolled or requiring IV antimicrobials for management.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Sites / Locations
- Banner MD Anderson
- City of Hope
- University California Los Angeles (UCLA)
- Stanford University
- Sarah Cannon
- University of Miami
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
- University of Chicago
- Loyola University Chicago
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
- Hackensack University Medical Center
- University of Rochester Medical Center
- Duke University Medical Center
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation
- Ohio State University
- Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center
- Fox Chase Cancer Center
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- Swedish Cancer Institute
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU)
- Hospital Saint Louis
- Hopital Haut-Leveque
- Universitätsklinik Dresden
- Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Erasmus Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19)
Arm Description
Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 1
OR: complete metabolic response(CMR),complete radiological response(CRR),partial MR response(PMR),partial RR(PRR).CMR:score 1(no uptake above background)/2(uptake ≤ mediastinum)/3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver)with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale;no new lesions.CRR:target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest transverse diameter of lesion(LDi);no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion(NMLs);organ enlargement regress to normal;no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR:score 4(uptake moderately > liver)/5(uptake markedly > liver, new lesions)with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass;no new lesions;responding disease at interim/residual disease at end of treatment (EOT).PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters(SPD)of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs;spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 2
OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi; no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites; bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4(uptake moderately > liver) /5 (uptake markedly > liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites; absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 1
DOR: time from the first OR to progressive disease (PD)/death. It is determined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver)/ 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi > 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and perpendicular diameter (PPD) nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by > 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 2
DOR: time from the first OR to PD/death. It is determined using KM estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver)/5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi > 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and PPD nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by > 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1
BOR consists of (Complete response [CR], Partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD] and unknown). CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; PR: 50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and >= 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; PD: appearance of any new lesions or >= 50% increase in SPD of more than one node or >= 50% increase in longest diameter of a previously identified node or >50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previous lesions; SD: failure to attain CR/PR or PD.
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2
BOR consists of CR (CMR/CRR), PR (PMR/PRR), SD, PD and not done. CMR/CRR and PMR/PRR are defined in Outcome Measure (OM) 1. PD is defined in OM 3. SD/no metabolic response (NMR): a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than [>] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/ or new lesions) with no significant change in FDG uptake compared to baseline (screening), at an interim time point or end of treatment; no new sites of disease should be observed.Not done: no assessment at the time of analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1
OR: CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative); variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG avidity unknown (all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size); spleen and/or liver should be normal size and not be palpable; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: 50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; no increase in size of nodes, liver, or spleen and no new sites of disease; splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; if participant has persistent bone marrow involvement and otherwise meets criteria for CR, will then be considered a PR; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (the post-treatment PET scan should be positive in at least 1 previously involved site.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2
OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi ;no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) /5 (uptake markedly > liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 1
PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 2
PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Overall Survival in Cohort 1
Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Overall Survival in Cohort 2
Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Percentage of Participants With Anti-CD19 CAR Antibodies
Peak Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell (Brexucabtagene Autoleucel) Level (Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration) in Blood
Peak Serum Levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Blood
Peak Serum Levels of C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 (CXCL10), Granzyme B, Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ), Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8,IL-10, IL-15, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) in Blood
Peak Serum Levels of Ferritin, Interleukin-2 Receptor Alpha (IL-2Rα), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1), Perforin, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in Blood
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Mobility Scale Score
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Self-Care Scale Score
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Usual Activity Scale Score
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Pain / Discomfort Activity Scale Score
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Anxiety / Depression Activity Scale Score
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The Percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Change Over Time in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
EQ-5D is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ5D-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. EQ-5D-VAS: range 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better self-reported health status. A positive change indicates an improvement.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02601313
First Posted
November 6, 2015
Last Updated
March 22, 2023
Sponsor
Kite, A Gilead Company
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02601313
Brief Title
Study of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (KTE-X19) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2)
Acronym
ZUMA-2
Official Title
A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of KTE-X19 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
November 9, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 24, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kite, A Gilead Company
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to test how well the study drug, brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19), works in participants with relapsed/refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Detailed Description
Study KTE-C19-102 enrolled participants with r/r MCL who have been treated with up to 5 prior regimens including a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. However, to fulfill FDA Postmarketing Requirement, Cohort 3 is added to the study. It will include participants with r/r MCL who have been treated with up to 5 prior regimens but have not received prior therapy with a BTKi.
The primary analysis in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 is already completed. Data for Cohort 3 will be analyzed separately. Therefore, details for Cohort 3 were registered separately (NCT04880434) on ClinicalTrials.gov as this cohort will not be part of the main study analysis.
After the end of KTE-C19-102, subjects who received an infusion of anti-CD19 CAR T cells will complete the remainder of the 15-year follow-up assessments in a separate long-term follow-up study, KT-US-982-5968
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
105 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
brexucabtagene autoleucel
Other Intervention Name(s)
KTE-X19, TECARTUS™
Intervention Description
A single infusion of brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) anti-CD 19 CAR T cells
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cyclophosphamide
Intervention Description
Administered intravenously
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fludarabine
Intervention Description
Administered intravenously
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
Intervention Description
A single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel anti-CD 19 CAR T cells
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 1
Description
OR: complete metabolic response(CMR),complete radiological response(CRR),partial MR response(PMR),partial RR(PRR).CMR:score 1(no uptake above background)/2(uptake ≤ mediastinum)/3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver)with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale;no new lesions.CRR:target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest transverse diameter of lesion(LDi);no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion(NMLs);organ enlargement regress to normal;no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR:score 4(uptake moderately > liver)/5(uptake markedly > liver, new lesions)with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass;no new lesions;responding disease at interim/residual disease at end of treatment (EOT).PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters(SPD)of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs;spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 2
Description
OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi; no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites; bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4(uptake moderately > liver) /5 (uptake markedly > liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites; absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 1
Description
DOR: time from the first OR to progressive disease (PD)/death. It is determined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver)/ 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi > 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and perpendicular diameter (PPD) nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by > 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 2
Description
DOR: time from the first OR to PD/death. It is determined using KM estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver)/5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi > 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and PPD nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by > 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1
Description
BOR consists of (Complete response [CR], Partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD] and unknown). CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; PR: 50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and >= 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; PD: appearance of any new lesions or >= 50% increase in SPD of more than one node or >= 50% increase in longest diameter of a previously identified node or >50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previous lesions; SD: failure to attain CR/PR or PD.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2
Description
BOR consists of CR (CMR/CRR), PR (PMR/PRR), SD, PD and not done. CMR/CRR and PMR/PRR are defined in Outcome Measure (OM) 1. PD is defined in OM 3. SD/no metabolic response (NMR): a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than [>] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/ or new lesions) with no significant change in FDG uptake compared to baseline (screening), at an interim time point or end of treatment; no new sites of disease should be observed.Not done: no assessment at the time of analysis.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1
Description
OR: CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative); variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG avidity unknown (all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size); spleen and/or liver should be normal size and not be palpable; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: 50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; no increase in size of nodes, liver, or spleen and no new sites of disease; splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; if participant has persistent bone marrow involvement and otherwise meets criteria for CR, will then be considered a PR; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (the post-treatment PET scan should be positive in at least 1 previously involved site.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2
Description
OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi ;no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) /5 (uptake markedly > liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by > 50% in length beyond normal.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 1
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 2
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Overall Survival in Cohort 1
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Overall Survival in Cohort 2
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Anti-CD19 CAR Antibodies
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Peak Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell (Brexucabtagene Autoleucel) Level (Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration) in Blood
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Peak Serum Levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Blood
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Peak Serum Levels of C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 (CXCL10), Granzyme B, Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ), Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8,IL-10, IL-15, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) in Blood
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Peak Serum Levels of Ferritin, Interleukin-2 Receptor Alpha (IL-2Rα), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1), Perforin, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in Blood
Time Frame
Up to 15 years
Title
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Mobility Scale Score
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
Title
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Self-Care Scale Score
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
Title
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Usual Activity Scale Score
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
Title
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Pain / Discomfort Activity Scale Score
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
Title
Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Anxiety / Depression Activity Scale Score
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The Percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
Title
Change Over Time in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Description
EQ-5D is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ5D-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. EQ-5D-VAS: range 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better self-reported health status. A positive change indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Up to 5 prior regimens for MCL. Prior therapy must have included:
Anthracycline or bendamustine-containing chemotherapy and
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy and
Ibrutinib or acalabrutinib
At least 1 measurable lesion
Platelet count ≥ 75,000/uL
Creatinine clearance (as estimated by Cockcroft Gault) > or = to 60 mL/min
Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50%, no evidence of pericardial effusion as determined by an echocardiogram (ECHO), and no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
Baseline oxygen saturation >92% on room air.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (HBsAG positive) or hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV positive). A history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C is permitted if the viral load is undetectable per standard serological and genetic testing
History of a seizure disorder, cerebrovascular ischemia/hemorrhage, dementia, cerebellar disease, cerebral edema, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, or any autoimmune disease with central nervous system (CNS) involvement
Presence of fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection that is uncontrolled or requiring IV antimicrobials for management.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kite Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Kite, A Gilead Company
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Banner MD Anderson
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
City of Hope
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Facility Name
University California Los Angeles (UCLA)
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford University
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80218
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loyola University Chicago
City
Maywood
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60153
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fox Chase Cancer Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Cancer Institute
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU)
City
Bordeaux
Country
France
Facility Name
Hospital Saint Louis
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Haut-Leveque
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
44035
Country
France
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik Dresden
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg
City
Wuerzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
97080
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Academisch Medisch Centrum
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25113753
Citation
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA; Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium; Italian Lymphoma Foundation; European Organisation for Research; Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group; Grupo Espanol de Medula Osea; German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group; German Hodgkin's Study Group; Japanese Lymphorra Study Group; Lymphoma Study Association; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Nordic Lymphoma Study Group; Southwest Oncology Group; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Locke F, Wang M, Siddiqi T, Castro J, Shah B, Lee H, et al. ZUMA-2: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of KTE-C19 (Anti-CD19 CAR T cells) in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (r/r MCL). American Society Of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting 2016.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang M, Locke F, Siddiqi T, Castro J, Shah B, Lee H, et al. ZUMA-2: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of KTE-C19 (Anti-CD19 CAR T cells) in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (r/r MCL). European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2016;Abstract 3305
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang M, Locke FL, Munoz J, Goy A, Holmes HE, Siddiqi T, et al. ZUMA-2: Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy of Kte-C19 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [Abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2018;36 (Suppl 15):TPS3102.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32242358
Citation
Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Holmes H, Jaglowski S, Flinn IW, McSweeney PA, Miklos DB, Pagel JM, Kersten MJ, Milpied N, Fung H, Topp MS, Houot R, Beitinjaneh A, Peng W, Zheng L, Rossi JM, Jain RK, Rao AV, Reagan PM. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang, Michael; Rossi, John M.; Munoz, Javier; Goy, Andre; Lundry Locke, Frederick; Michael Reagan, Patrick; Jacobson, Caron A.; Hill, Brian T; Holmes, Houston; Mary Jaglowski, Samantha; Peng, Weimin; Zheng, Lianqing; Fang, Xiang; Xue, Allen; Rao, Arati V.; Bot, Adrian
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang, Michael(1); Munoz, Javier(2); Goy, Andre(3); Locke, Frederick L.(4); Jacobson, Caron A.(5); Hill, Brian T.(6); Timmerman, John M.(7); Holmes, Houston(8); Jaglowski, Samantha(9); Flinn, Ian W.(10); McSweeney, Peter A.(11); Miklos, David B.(12); Pagel, John M.(13); José Kersten, Marie(14); Peng, Weimin(15); Zheng, Lianqing(15); Rossi, John M.(15); Jain, Rajul K.(15); Rao, Arati V.(15); Reagan, Patrick M.(16)
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang, M.(1); Munoz, J.(2); Goy, A.(3); Locke, F.(4); Jacobson, C.(5); Hill, B.(6); Timmerman, J.(7); Holmes, H.(8); Jaglowski, S.(9); Flinn, I.(10); McSweeney, P.(11); Miklos, D.(12); Pagel, J.(13); Kersten, M. J.(14)(15)
Results Reference
result
Citation
Michael Wang,1 Javier Munoz,2 Andre Goy,3 Frederick L. Locke,4 Caron A. Jacobson,5 Brian T. Hill,6 John M. Timmerman,7 Houston Holmes,8 Samantha Jaglowski,9 Ian W. Flinn,10 Peter A. McSweeney,11 David B. Miklos,12 John M. Pagel,13 Marie José Kersten,14 Noel Milpied,15 Henry Fung,16 Max S. Topp,17 Roch Houot,18 Amer Beitinjaneh,19 Weimin Peng,20 Lianqing Zheng,20 John M. Rossi,20 Rajul K. Jain,20 Arati V. Rao,20 and Patrick M. Reagan21
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Holmes H, Jaglowski S, Flinn IW, McSweeney PA,Miklos DB, Pagel JM, Kersten MJ, Peng W,Zheng L,Rossi JM, Jain RK, Rao AV, Reagan PM
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang, Michael L., MD(1); Munoz, Javier, MD(2); Goy, Andre, MD(3); Locke, Frederick L., MD(4); Jacobson, Caron A., MD, MMSc(5); Hill, Brian T., MD(6); Timmerman, John M., MD(7); Holmes, Houston, MD(8); Jaglowski, Samantha, MD, MPH(9); Flinn, Ian W., MD, PhD(10); McSweeney, Peter A., MD(11); Miklos, David B., MD, PhD(12); Pagel, John M., MD, PhD, DSc(13); Jose Kersten, Marie, MD, PhD(14); Peng, Weimin, MS(15); Zheng, Lianqing, PhD(15); Rossi, John M., MS(15); Jain, Rajul K., MD(15); Rao, Arati V., MD(15); Reagan, Patrick M, MD(16)
Results Reference
result
Citation
Wang, Michael; Lundry Locke, Frederick; Munoz, Javier; Goy, Andre; Eccleston Holmes, Houston; Siddiqi, Tanya; Flinn, Ian; McSweeney, Peter A; Michael Reagan, Patrick; Thomas Hill, Brian; Jacobson, Caron A.; Rizzieri, David A.; Heffner, Leonard T.; Mary Jaglowski, Samantha; Bernard Miklos, David; Shaughnessy, Paul; Unabia, Sherry; Rossi, John M.; Jiang, Yizhou; Jain, Rajul K.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33067318
Citation
Wang M, Jain P, Chi TL, Chen SE, Heimberger A, Weathers SP, Zheng L, Rao AV, Rossi JM. Management of a patient with mantle cell lymphoma who developed severe neurotoxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in ZUMA-2. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2):e001114. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001114.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.gileadclinicaltrials.com/study/?id=KTE-C19-102
Description
Gilead Clinical Trials Website
Learn more about this trial
Study of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (KTE-X19) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs