search
Back to results

Phase 3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab in Patients With Cancer Pain Due to Bone Metastasis Who Are Taking Background Opioid Therapy

Primary Purpose

Bone Metastasis, Cancer Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tanezumab
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Metastasis focused on measuring Metastatic cancer bone pain, Multiple myeloma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Personally signed and dated informed consent document.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
  • Male or female, ≥18 years of age
  • Weight ≥40 kg at Screening
  • Cancer diagnosed as having metastasized to bone or multiple myeloma.
  • Imaging confirmation of bone metastasis at Screening or within 120 days prior to the Screening visit.
  • Expected to require daily opioid medication throughout the course of the study.
  • Willing to not use prohibited medications (including NSAIDs) throughout the duration of the study.
  • Average Pain Score ≥5 at Screening for the index bone metastasis cancer pain site.
  • Patient's Global Assessment of Cancer Pain of "fair", "poor" or "very poor" at Screening.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Screening.
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function at Screening.
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR) or prothrombin time (PT) <1.5 x ULN at Screening unless being treated with anticoagulant medication.
  • Females must either be not of childbearing potential or, if of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy, must be willing to use at least one highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 112 days (16 weeks) after the last dose of assigned subcutaneous study medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain related to an oncologic emergency.
  • Brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis.
  • Presence of hypercalcemia at Screening.
  • Pain primarily classified as not predominantly related to a bone metastasis.
  • Systemic treatment for the primary malignancy or bone metastasis started within 30 days of the Baseline Assessment Period.
  • Chemotherapies associated with peripheral neuropathy (ie, paclitaxel, docetaxel, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, vincristine, thalidomide or bortezomib) are prohibited during the study from 30 days prior to the first day of the Baseline Assessment Period to Week 48.
  • Receipt of radiopharmaceutical treatment or radiotherapy for treatment of bone metastasis within 30 days of the Baseline Assessment Period.
  • Concurrent adjuvant analgesics unless started at least 30 days prior to the start of the Baseline Assessment Period and maintained at a stable dose.
  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip or findings consistent with osteoarthritis in the shoulder.
  • History of significant trauma or surgery to a major joint within one year prior to Screening.
  • History of osteonecrosis or osteoporotic fracture.
  • X-ray evidence at Screening of: 1) rapidly progressive osteoarthritis, 2) atrophic or hypotrophic osteoarthritis, 3) subchondral insufficiency fracture, 4) spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SPONK), 5) osteonecrosis, or 6) pathologic fracture.
  • Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease.
  • Evidence of orthostatic hypotension at Screening or at Baseline prior to randomization.
  • Diagnosis of a transient ischemic attack in the 6 months prior to Screening or diagnosis of stroke with significant residual deficits.
  • History, diagnosis, or signs and symptoms of clinically significant neurological disease.
  • Total impact score of >7 on the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) at Screening.
  • Past history of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with signs or symptoms of CTS in the one year prior to Screening.
  • History of significant alcohol, analgesic, or narcotic substance abuse within the six months prior to Screening.
  • Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study.
  • Considered unfit for surgery or not willing to undergo joint replacement surgery if required.
  • Known hypersensitivity to opioids or an underlying medical condition contraindicating opioid use.
  • History of allergic or anaphylactic reaction to a therapeutic or diagnostic monoclonal antibody or IgG-fusion protein.
  • Previous exposure to exogenous nerve growth factor or to an anti-nerve growth factor antibody.
  • Presence of drugs of abuse, prescription medications without a valid prescription or other illegal drugs at Screening.
  • Positive Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) tests at Screening indicative of current infection.
  • Investigational site staff members and their family members, or Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial.
  • Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) within 30 days (or 90 days for investigational biologics) before Baseline Assessment Period and/or during study participation.
  • Pregnant female subjects; breastfeeding female subjects; female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use one (1) highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 112 days after last dose of investigational product.
  • Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality.

Sites / Locations

  • Instituto de Oncologia de Rosario
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Landesklinikum Krems
  • Nuhr Medical Center
  • Associacao Hospital de Caridade de Ijui
  • INCA - Instituto Nacional do Cancer / Hospital do Cancer HCIII
  • Fundação Pio XII-Hospital de Cancer de Barretos
  • Centro de Ensino e Pesquisa da Fundacao Amaral Carvalho
  • Fundacao do ABC - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - CEPHO
  • Centro de Novos Tratamentos Itajai - Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral
  • Fundacao do ABC-Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
  • Hospital AC Camargo_Fundacao Antonio Prudente
  • Centro de Pesquisa Clinica do IBCC - Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Cancer
  • Hospital AC Camargo_Fundacao Antonio Prudente
  • James Lind Centro de lnvestigacion del Cancer
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Department of Medical Oncology
  • The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital
  • Daping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery Third Military Medical University
  • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital/Oncology Department
  • Henan Cancer Hospital/Respiration internal medicine
  • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology/Cancer Center
  • Hubei Cancer Hospital
  • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
  • Oncology Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
  • Tianjin Cancer Hospital
  • Urocentrum Plzen Research Site s.r.o.
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze, Fakultni poliklinika, Centrum pro lecbu bolesti
  • Veszprem Megyei Tudogyogyintezet Farkasgyepu
  • CRU Hungary Ltd., MISEK Hematology Department-CRU Co.
  • CRU Hungary Ltd., MISEK-CRU
  • Josa Andras Hospital, Clinical Research Department
  • Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
  • Help-MR Diagnosztika Kft.
  • HaEmek Medical Center
  • Rambam Health Care Campus
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center
  • National Hospital Organization Toyohashi Medical Center
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East
  • Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
  • Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital
  • The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
  • Saga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan
  • National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center
  • Clinical Trial Pharmacy, National Cancer Center
  • Imaging Facilities, National Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Center
  • Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
  • Clinical Trial Pharmacy, Severance Hospital
  • Imaging Facilities, Severance Hospital
  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
  • Samsung Medical Center
  • Powiatowy Zespol Zakladow Opieki Zdrowotnej Oddzial Opieki Paliatywnej
  • NZOZ Vitamed im. Edyty Jakubow
  • Poradnia Otropedyczno-Urazowa; Gabient RTG
  • Pracownia RTG Helimed
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej, Zespol Medyczno-Opiekunczy Alicja Kluczna
  • Hospicjum im. Ks. Eugeniusza Dutkiewicza SAC w Gdansku
  • Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciol Chorych Hospicjum w Gliwicach NZOZ Hospicjum Milosierdzia Bozego
  • Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciol Chorych Hospicjum w Gliwicach, NZOZ Hospicjum Milosierdzia Bozego
  • Regionalny Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Dr. Wl.Bieganskiego, Oddzial Onkologii Klinicznej
  • SCANiX Sp.z o.o
  • NZOZ "Vegamed"
  • Helimed Diagnostic Imaging Sp. z o.o., Sp. komandytowa
  • Helimed Diagnostic Imaging Sp. z.o.o., Sp. komandytowa
  • Centrum Diagnostyki Obrazowej EPIONE
  • NZOZ Neuromed M. i M. Nastaj Sp. P.
  • SK Przemienienia Panskiego UM im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu,
  • Klinika Nowotworow Piersi i Chirurgii Rekonstrukcyjnej w Centrum Onkologii -Instytucie
  • Szpital LUX MED
  • SC Oncolab SRL
  • S.C. Oncocenter Oncologie Clinica S.R.L.
  • Spitalul Clinic C.F. 2 Bucuresti. Departament Oncologie, Sectia Medicala 2
  • Narodny onkologicky ustav
  • DEMOMED s.r.o.
  • MUDr. Viliam Cibik, PhD, s.r.o.
  • Fakultna Nemocnica S Poliklinikou Zilina
  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche Servicio de Farmacia
  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche
  • Hospital Can Misses
  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
  • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
  • Hospital La Moraleja
  • Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
  • NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital
  • NHS Lothian

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Description

Tanezumab 20 mg subcutaneously

Placebo matched to active treatment subcutaneously

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Score (NRS) in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Week 8
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on interactive response technology (IRT) diaries. Baseline daily average pain intensity value was mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Week 8 daily average pain intensity value was the mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the Week 8.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline daily average pain intensity value was mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24 daily average pain intensity value was the mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Change From Baseline in the Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site is assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants describe their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline daily worst pain intensity was mean of daily worst pain intensity NRS score during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 daily worst pain intensity value was the mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in Non-Index Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Weekly average pain intensity in the non-index cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. Non-index cancer pan sites were the most painful cancer pain sites other than the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. The participants described their weekly pain at the painful site by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline weekly average pain intensity was weekly average pain intensity NRS score recorded on any day during the baseline assessment period. Five days prior to dosing was considered as baseline assessment period. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weekly average pain intensity value was the weekly average pain intensity NRS scores recorded on any day from the span of 7 days prior to specified week.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in Non-Index Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Weekly worst pain intensity in the non-index cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), higher scores signified more severity of pain. Non-index cancer pan sites were the most painful cancer pain sites other than the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. The participants describe their weekly worst pain at the painful site by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline weekly worst pain intensity was weekly worst pain intensity NRS score recorded on any day during the baseline assessment period. Five days prior to dosing was considered as baseline assessment period. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weekly worst pain intensity value was the weekly worst pain intensity NRS scores which was recorded on any day from the span of 7 days prior to specified week.
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Non-Index Visceral Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Daily average pain intensity in the non-index visceral cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants described their pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline is defined as the mean average daily pain intensity NRS score during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value is the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores for the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Change From Baseline in the Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Non-Index Visceral Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline pain intensity value was mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value is the mean of the daily worst pain intensity scores for the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction of >=30, 50, 70 and 90 Percent (%) From Baseline in Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores = more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value = mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores for the 7 days prior to the each week. Number of participants with cumulative reduction of >= 30, 50, 70, and 90 % in daily average pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 were reported. Participants might be reported more than once in the specified rows for a time point. Rows with only non-zero data for cumulative reduction at specified time points, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Number of Participants With Reduction of >=30, 50, 70 and 90% From Baseline in Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores = more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value = mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores for the 7 days prior to the each week. Number of participants with cumulative reduction of >= 30, 50, 70, and 90 % in daily worst pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 were reported. Participants might be reported more than once in the specified rows for a time point. Rows with only non-zero data for cumulative reduction at specified time points, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Cancer Pain (PGA-CP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Participants at specified time points, answered to the following question, "Considering all the ways your cancer pain affects you, how are you doing today?" on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, on IRT diaries. Scores: 1= very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores signified worsening of condition.
Number of Participants With Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline in PGA-CP Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Participants at specified time points, answered to the following question, "Considering all the ways your cancer pain affects you, how are you doing today?" on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, on IRT diaries. Scores:1= very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores signified worsening of condition.
Average Daily Total Opioid Consumption at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
In this outcome measure average daily opioid consumption was reported in milligram of morphine equivalent dose (mg of MED).
Average Number of Doses of Rescue Opioid Consumption at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
In this outcome measure average number of doses of rescue opioid consumption at specified time points were reported.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24
OR-SDS: questionnaire evaluated opioid-related 12 symptoms. For each symptom, participants assigned integer scores to assess severity (none =0 to very severe =4), distress (none =0 to very much =5), and frequency (none =0 to almost constantly =4; participants reported number of retching/vomiting episodes (none =0, 1-2 episodes =1, 3-4 episodes =2, 5-6 episodes =3, >6 episodes =4). Frequency composite score: mean of frequency scores from all symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (almost constantly); higher scores = worse condition. Severity composite score: mean of severity scores from all 12 symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (maximum severity); higher scores = worse condition. Distress composite score: mean of distress scores from all 12 symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 5 (maximum distress); higher scores = worse condition. Multi domain average (MDA): average of each symptom for frequency, severity, and distress; ranged from 0 (none) to 4.34 (worse); higher scores = worse condition.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 24 weeks post last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and all non-serious AEs. Participants were followed up to 24 weeks after study drug last dose.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Normal Baseline)
Laboratory abnormality criteria included: hemoglobin (HGB); hematocrit; erythrocytes < 0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN); erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume/HGB/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*upper limit of normal (ULN); platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75* ULN; leukocytes<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; lymphocytes, neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; bilirubin >1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; urea nitrogen, creatinine, cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Urine: glucose, ketones, protein, HGB, bilirubin, nitrite >=1.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Abnormal Baseline)
Laboratory abnormality criteria included: HGB; hematocrit; erythrocytes < 0.8* LLN; erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume/HGB/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*upper limit of normal (ULN); platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75* ULN; leukocytes <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; lymphocytes, neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time >1.1*ULN; bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate AT, alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; urea nitrogen, cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN.
Number of Participants With Categorical Change From Baseline to Last Post-Baseline in Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure During Treatment Period
Change categories for sitting systolic blood pressure measured in millimeter of mercury (mm Hg) were as follows: change <=-40, change >-40 to -30, change >-30 to -20, change >-20 to -10, change >-10 to 0, change >0 to <10, change >=10 to <20, change >=20 to <30, change >=30 to <40 and change >=40. Change categories for sitting diastolic blood pressure measured in mm Hg were as follow: change <=-30, change >-30 to -20, change >-20 to -10, change >-10 to 0, change >0 to <10, change >=10 to <20, change >=20 to <30 and change >=30. Rows with only non-zero data/values, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Number of Participants With Categorical Summary of Electrocardiogram (ECG) (QTC) Data
Electrocardiogram assessment included QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB), both had following categories: 450<=Value<480 millisecond (msec), 480<=Value<500 msec and Value>=500 msec.
Number of Participants With Confirmed Orthostatic Hypotension
Orthostatic hypotension was defined as postural change (supine to standing) that met the following criteria: for systolic blood pressure (BP) less than or equal to (<=) 150 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) (mean supine): reduction in systolic BP >=20 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP >=10 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. For systolic BP greater than (>) 150 mmHg (mean supine): reduction in systolic BP >=30 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP >=15 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. If the 1 minute or 3 minute standing BP in a sequence met the orthostatic hypotension criteria, then that sequence was considered positive. If 2 of 2 or 2 of 3 sequences were positive, then orthostatic hypotension was considered confirmed.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Weight Measurement, Counted as an AE
The number of participants with clinically significant findings in weight measurement and were counted as an AE in the study were reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination at Screening
Physical examination included assessment of general, head, eyes, ears, nose, neck, thyroid, lungs, heart, abdomen, extremities, skin, throat and other. Investigator judged abnormality in physical examinations.
Number of Participants With Individual Adjudicated Joint Safety Outcome/Event
Joint-related safety events resulting in total joint replacement and/or discontinuation from the study as well as adverse events were reviewed by the External Adjudication Committee to confirm the potential events as adjudicated join safety event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with any of the joint safety adjudication outcomes of primary osteonecrosis, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (OA) (type 1 and type 2), subchondral insufficiency fracture (or SPONK), or pathological fracture were reported. Other adjudication outcomes included normal progression of OA and other joint outcome.
Number of Participants With At Least 1 Total Joint Replacements (TJR)
Number of participants with joint replacement surgery were reported.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibodies (NAb)
Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using a semi quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Number of participants with presence of anti-tanezumab antibodies and neutralizing anti-drug antibodies are reported.

Full Information

First Posted
October 26, 2015
Last Updated
January 25, 2023
Sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02609828
Brief Title
Phase 3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab in Patients With Cancer Pain Due to Bone Metastasis Who Are Taking Background Opioid Therapy
Official Title
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB (PF-04383119) IN SUBJECTS WITH CANCER PAIN PREDOMINANTLY DUE TO BONE METASTASIS RECEIVING BACKGROUND OPIOID THERAPY
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 28, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 17, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 25, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tanezumab is effective in the treatment of cancer pain due to bone metastasis in patients already taking background opioid therapy.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group Phase 3 study in cancer subjects requiring treatment with background opioids for pain due to bone metastasis. Approximately 144 subjects will be randomized to one of 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio (approximately 72 subjects per group). Subjects will receive a total of 3 subcutaneous injections, separated by 8 weeks in addition to background opioids administered throughout the study. Treatment groups will include: 1. Placebo SC (matching tanezumab SC) in addition to background opioid therapy. 2. Tanezumab 20 mg SC in addition to background opioid therapy. The study consists of three periods: Pre-Treatment (up to 37 days), Double-Blind Treatment (24 weeks) and Safety Follow-up (24 weeks).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Metastasis, Cancer Pain
Keywords
Metastatic cancer bone pain, Multiple myeloma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
156 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tanezumab 20 mg subcutaneously
Arm Title
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo matched to active treatment subcutaneously
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tanezumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
PF-04383119
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous study treatment (tanezumab 20 mg or matched placebo) dosed at 8 week intervals.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Score (NRS) in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Week 8
Description
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on interactive response technology (IRT) diaries. Baseline daily average pain intensity value was mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Week 8 daily average pain intensity value was the mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the Week 8.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline daily average pain intensity value was mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24 daily average pain intensity value was the mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site is assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants describe their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline daily worst pain intensity was mean of daily worst pain intensity NRS score during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 daily worst pain intensity value was the mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores recorded for each of the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in Non-Index Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Weekly average pain intensity in the non-index cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. Non-index cancer pan sites were the most painful cancer pain sites other than the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. The participants described their weekly pain at the painful site by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline weekly average pain intensity was weekly average pain intensity NRS score recorded on any day during the baseline assessment period. Five days prior to dosing was considered as baseline assessment period. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weekly average pain intensity value was the weekly average pain intensity NRS scores recorded on any day from the span of 7 days prior to specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in Non-Index Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Weekly worst pain intensity in the non-index cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), higher scores signified more severity of pain. Non-index cancer pan sites were the most painful cancer pain sites other than the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. The participants describe their weekly worst pain at the painful site by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline weekly worst pain intensity was weekly worst pain intensity NRS score recorded on any day during the baseline assessment period. Five days prior to dosing was considered as baseline assessment period. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weekly worst pain intensity value was the weekly worst pain intensity NRS scores which was recorded on any day from the span of 7 days prior to specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Non-Index Visceral Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily average pain intensity in the non-index visceral cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants described their pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline is defined as the mean average daily pain intensity NRS score during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value is the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores for the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Non-Index Visceral Cancer Pain Sites at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores signified more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. Baseline pain intensity value was mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores during the baseline assessment period prior to randomization. Baseline assessment period was up to 5 days prior to dosing. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value is the mean of the daily worst pain intensity scores for the 7 days prior to the each specified week.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction of >=30, 50, 70 and 90 Percent (%) From Baseline in Daily Average Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores = more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily average pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value = mean of the daily average pain intensity NRS scores for the 7 days prior to the each week. Number of participants with cumulative reduction of >= 30, 50, 70, and 90 % in daily average pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 were reported. Participants might be reported more than once in the specified rows for a time point. Rows with only non-zero data for cumulative reduction at specified time points, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Reduction of >=30, 50, 70 and 90% From Baseline in Daily Worst Pain Intensity NRS Score in the Index Bone Metastasis Cancer Pain Site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
Daily worst pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site was assessed by participants on an 11 point pain intensity NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores = more severity of pain. The participants recorded their daily worst pain at the painful site during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10 on IRT diaries. The Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 pain intensity value = mean of the daily worst pain intensity NRS scores for the 7 days prior to the each week. Number of participants with cumulative reduction of >= 30, 50, 70, and 90 % in daily worst pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 were reported. Participants might be reported more than once in the specified rows for a time point. Rows with only non-zero data for cumulative reduction at specified time points, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Cancer Pain (PGA-CP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Description
Participants at specified time points, answered to the following question, "Considering all the ways your cancer pain affects you, how are you doing today?" on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, on IRT diaries. Scores: 1= very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores signified worsening of condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline in PGA-CP Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Description
Participants at specified time points, answered to the following question, "Considering all the ways your cancer pain affects you, how are you doing today?" on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, on IRT diaries. Scores:1= very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores signified worsening of condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24
Title
Average Daily Total Opioid Consumption at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
In this outcome measure average daily opioid consumption was reported in milligram of morphine equivalent dose (mg of MED).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Average Number of Doses of Rescue Opioid Consumption at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
In this outcome measure average number of doses of rescue opioid consumption at specified time points were reported.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24
Description
OR-SDS: questionnaire evaluated opioid-related 12 symptoms. For each symptom, participants assigned integer scores to assess severity (none =0 to very severe =4), distress (none =0 to very much =5), and frequency (none =0 to almost constantly =4; participants reported number of retching/vomiting episodes (none =0, 1-2 episodes =1, 3-4 episodes =2, 5-6 episodes =3, >6 episodes =4). Frequency composite score: mean of frequency scores from all symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (almost constantly); higher scores = worse condition. Severity composite score: mean of severity scores from all 12 symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (maximum severity); higher scores = worse condition. Distress composite score: mean of distress scores from all 12 symptoms, ranged from 0 (none) to 5 (maximum distress); higher scores = worse condition. Multi domain average (MDA): average of each symptom for frequency, severity, and distress; ranged from 0 (none) to 4.34 (worse); higher scores = worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 24 weeks post last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and all non-serious AEs. Participants were followed up to 24 weeks after study drug last dose.
Time Frame
Day 1 of dosing up to 24 weeks post last dose (maximum up to Week 48)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Normal Baseline)
Description
Laboratory abnormality criteria included: hemoglobin (HGB); hematocrit; erythrocytes < 0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN); erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume/HGB/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*upper limit of normal (ULN); platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75* ULN; leukocytes<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; lymphocytes, neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; bilirubin >1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; urea nitrogen, creatinine, cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Urine: glucose, ketones, protein, HGB, bilirubin, nitrite >=1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing) up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Abnormal Baseline)
Description
Laboratory abnormality criteria included: HGB; hematocrit; erythrocytes < 0.8* LLN; erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume/HGB/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*upper limit of normal (ULN); platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75* ULN; leukocytes <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; lymphocytes, neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time >1.1*ULN; bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate AT, alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; urea nitrogen, cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing) up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Categorical Change From Baseline to Last Post-Baseline in Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure During Treatment Period
Description
Change categories for sitting systolic blood pressure measured in millimeter of mercury (mm Hg) were as follows: change <=-40, change >-40 to -30, change >-30 to -20, change >-20 to -10, change >-10 to 0, change >0 to <10, change >=10 to <20, change >=20 to <30, change >=30 to <40 and change >=40. Change categories for sitting diastolic blood pressure measured in mm Hg were as follow: change <=-30, change >-30 to -20, change >-20 to -10, change >-10 to 0, change >0 to <10, change >=10 to <20, change >=20 to <30 and change >=30. Rows with only non-zero data/values, for at least 1 reporting arm, are reported below.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing) up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Categorical Summary of Electrocardiogram (ECG) (QTC) Data
Description
Electrocardiogram assessment included QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB), both had following categories: 450<=Value<480 millisecond (msec), 480<=Value<500 msec and Value>=500 msec.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing) up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Confirmed Orthostatic Hypotension
Description
Orthostatic hypotension was defined as postural change (supine to standing) that met the following criteria: for systolic blood pressure (BP) less than or equal to (<=) 150 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) (mean supine): reduction in systolic BP >=20 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP >=10 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. For systolic BP greater than (>) 150 mmHg (mean supine): reduction in systolic BP >=30 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP >=15 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. If the 1 minute or 3 minute standing BP in a sequence met the orthostatic hypotension criteria, then that sequence was considered positive. If 2 of 2 or 2 of 3 sequences were positive, then orthostatic hypotension was considered confirmed.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing), Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Weight Measurement, Counted as an AE
Description
The number of participants with clinically significant findings in weight measurement and were counted as an AE in the study were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Day 1 of dosing up to maximum of Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination at Screening
Description
Physical examination included assessment of general, head, eyes, ears, nose, neck, thyroid, lungs, heart, abdomen, extremities, skin, throat and other. Investigator judged abnormality in physical examinations.
Time Frame
Screening (up to 37 days prior to Day 1)
Title
Number of Participants With Individual Adjudicated Joint Safety Outcome/Event
Description
Joint-related safety events resulting in total joint replacement and/or discontinuation from the study as well as adverse events were reviewed by the External Adjudication Committee to confirm the potential events as adjudicated join safety event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with any of the joint safety adjudication outcomes of primary osteonecrosis, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (OA) (type 1 and type 2), subchondral insufficiency fracture (or SPONK), or pathological fracture were reported. Other adjudication outcomes included normal progression of OA and other joint outcome.
Time Frame
During the study, maximum up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With At Least 1 Total Joint Replacements (TJR)
Description
Number of participants with joint replacement surgery were reported.
Time Frame
During the study, maximum up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibodies (NAb)
Description
Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using a semi quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Number of participants with presence of anti-tanezumab antibodies and neutralizing anti-drug antibodies are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, before dosing) up to Week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Personally signed and dated informed consent document. Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures. Male or female, ≥18 years of age Weight ≥40 kg at Screening Cancer diagnosed as having metastasized to bone or multiple myeloma. Imaging confirmation of bone metastasis at Screening or within 120 days prior to the Screening visit. Expected to require daily opioid medication throughout the course of the study. Willing to not use prohibited medications (including NSAIDs) throughout the duration of the study. Average Pain Score ≥5 at Screening for the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. Patient's Global Assessment of Cancer Pain of "fair", "poor" or "very poor" at Screening. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Screening. Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function at Screening. International Normalized Ratio (INR) or prothrombin time (PT) <1.5 x ULN at Screening unless being treated with anticoagulant medication. Females must either be not of childbearing potential or, if of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy, must be willing to use at least one highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 112 days (16 weeks) after the last dose of assigned subcutaneous study medication. Exclusion Criteria: Pain related to an oncologic emergency. Brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis. Presence of hypercalcemia at Screening. Pain primarily classified as not predominantly related to a bone metastasis. Systemic treatment for the primary malignancy or bone metastasis started within 30 days of the Baseline Assessment Period. Chemotherapies associated with peripheral neuropathy (ie, paclitaxel, docetaxel, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, vincristine, thalidomide or bortezomib) are prohibited during the study from 30 days prior to the first day of the Baseline Assessment Period to Week 48. Receipt of radiopharmaceutical treatment or radiotherapy for treatment of bone metastasis within 30 days of the Baseline Assessment Period. Concurrent adjuvant analgesics unless started at least 30 days prior to the start of the Baseline Assessment Period and maintained at a stable dose. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip or findings consistent with osteoarthritis in the shoulder. History of significant trauma or surgery to a major joint within one year prior to Screening. History of osteonecrosis or osteoporotic fracture. X-ray evidence at Screening of: 1) rapidly progressive osteoarthritis, 2) atrophic or hypotrophic osteoarthritis, 3) subchondral insufficiency fracture, 4) spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SPONK), 5) osteonecrosis, or 6) pathologic fracture. Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease. Evidence of orthostatic hypotension at Screening or at Baseline prior to randomization. Diagnosis of a transient ischemic attack in the 6 months prior to Screening or diagnosis of stroke with significant residual deficits. History, diagnosis, or signs and symptoms of clinically significant neurological disease. Total impact score of >7 on the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) at Screening. Past history of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with signs or symptoms of CTS in the one year prior to Screening. History of significant alcohol, analgesic, or narcotic substance abuse within the six months prior to Screening. Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study. Considered unfit for surgery or not willing to undergo joint replacement surgery if required. Known hypersensitivity to opioids or an underlying medical condition contraindicating opioid use. History of allergic or anaphylactic reaction to a therapeutic or diagnostic monoclonal antibody or IgG-fusion protein. Previous exposure to exogenous nerve growth factor or to an anti-nerve growth factor antibody. Presence of drugs of abuse, prescription medications without a valid prescription or other illegal drugs at Screening. Positive Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) tests at Screening indicative of current infection. Investigational site staff members and their family members, or Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial. Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) within 30 days (or 90 days for investigational biologics) before Baseline Assessment Period and/or during study participation. Pregnant female subjects; breastfeeding female subjects; female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use one (1) highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 112 days after last dose of investigational product. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Instituto de Oncologia de Rosario
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa FE
ZIP/Postal Code
S2000KZE
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
East Bentleigh
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3165
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Landesklinikum Krems
City
Krems
ZIP/Postal Code
3500
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Nuhr Medical Center
City
Senftenberg
ZIP/Postal Code
3541
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Associacao Hospital de Caridade de Ijui
City
Ijui
State/Province
RIO Grande DO SUL
ZIP/Postal Code
98700-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
INCA - Instituto Nacional do Cancer / Hospital do Cancer HCIII
City
Rio de Janeiro
State/Province
RJ
ZIP/Postal Code
20560-120
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Fundação Pio XII-Hospital de Cancer de Barretos
City
Barretos
State/Province
SAO Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
14.784-400
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Centro de Ensino e Pesquisa da Fundacao Amaral Carvalho
City
Jau
State/Province
SAO Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
17210-120
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Fundacao do ABC - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - CEPHO
City
Santo Andre
State/Province
SAO Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
09060-650
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Centro de Novos Tratamentos Itajai - Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral
City
Itajai
State/Province
SC
ZIP/Postal Code
88.301-220
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Fundacao do ABC-Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
City
Santo Andre
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
09060-870
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital AC Camargo_Fundacao Antonio Prudente
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
01509-900
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Centro de Pesquisa Clinica do IBCC - Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Cancer
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
03102-006
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital AC Camargo_Fundacao Antonio Prudente
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
01509-900
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
James Lind Centro de lnvestigacion del Cancer
City
Araucania
ZIP/Postal Code
4800827
Country
Chile
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Department of Medical Oncology
City
Hefei
State/Province
Anhui
ZIP/Postal Code
230022
Country
China
Facility Name
The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100071
Country
China
Facility Name
Daping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery Third Military Medical University
City
Chongqing
State/Province
Chongqing
ZIP/Postal Code
400042
Country
China
Facility Name
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital/Oncology Department
City
Harbin
State/Province
Heilongjiang
ZIP/Postal Code
150081
Country
China
Facility Name
Henan Cancer Hospital/Respiration internal medicine
City
Zhengzhou
State/Province
Henan
ZIP/Postal Code
450008
Country
China
Facility Name
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology/Cancer Center
City
Wuhan
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
430030
Country
China
Facility Name
Hubei Cancer Hospital
City
Wuhan
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
430079
Country
China
Facility Name
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200233
Country
China
Facility Name
Oncology Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
City
Chengdu
State/Province
Sichuan
ZIP/Postal Code
610041
Country
China
Facility Name
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
City
Hangzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
310022
Country
China
Facility Name
Tianjin Cancer Hospital
City
Tianjin
ZIP/Postal Code
300060
Country
China
Facility Name
Urocentrum Plzen Research Site s.r.o.
City
Plzen
ZIP/Postal Code
30100
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze, Fakultni poliklinika, Centrum pro lecbu bolesti
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Veszprem Megyei Tudogyogyintezet Farkasgyepu
City
Farkasgyepu
ZIP/Postal Code
8582
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
CRU Hungary Ltd., MISEK Hematology Department-CRU Co.
City
Miskolc
ZIP/Postal Code
3529
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
CRU Hungary Ltd., MISEK-CRU
City
Miskolc
ZIP/Postal Code
3529
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Josa Andras Hospital, Clinical Research Department
City
Nyiregyhaza
ZIP/Postal Code
4400
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
City
Nyiregyhaza
ZIP/Postal Code
4400
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Help-MR Diagnosztika Kft.
City
Szekesfehervar
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
HaEmek Medical Center
City
Afula
ZIP/Postal Code
1834111
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Rambam Health Care Campus
City
Haifa
ZIP/Postal Code
3109601
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
City
Ramat Gan
ZIP/Postal Code
52621
Country
Israel
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Toyohashi Medical Center
City
Toyohashi
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
440-8510
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Cancer Center Hospital East
City
Kashiwa
State/Province
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
277-8577
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
City
Ota
State/Province
Gunma
ZIP/Postal Code
373-8550
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital
City
Nishinomiya
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
663-8014
Country
Japan
Facility Name
The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
City
Nishinomiya
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
663-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Saga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan
City
Saga
ZIP/Postal Code
840-8571
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
152-8902
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Clinical Trial Pharmacy, National Cancer Center
City
Goyang-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
10408
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Imaging Facilities, National Cancer Center
City
Goyang-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
10408
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
National Cancer Center
City
Goyang-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
10408
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
42601
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Clinical Trial Pharmacy, Severance Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Imaging Facilities, Severance Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Samsung Medical Center
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
06351
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Powiatowy Zespol Zakladow Opieki Zdrowotnej Oddzial Opieki Paliatywnej
City
Bedzin
ZIP/Postal Code
42-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Vitamed im. Edyty Jakubow
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-215
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Poradnia Otropedyczno-Urazowa; Gabient RTG
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-437
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pracownia RTG Helimed
City
Czeladz
ZIP/Postal Code
41-250
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej, Zespol Medyczno-Opiekunczy Alicja Kluczna
City
Dabrowa Gornicza
ZIP/Postal Code
41-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Hospicjum im. Ks. Eugeniusza Dutkiewicza SAC w Gdansku
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-208
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciol Chorych Hospicjum w Gliwicach NZOZ Hospicjum Milosierdzia Bozego
City
Gliwice
ZIP/Postal Code
44-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciol Chorych Hospicjum w Gliwicach, NZOZ Hospicjum Milosierdzia Bozego
City
Gliwice
ZIP/Postal Code
44-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regionalny Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Dr. Wl.Bieganskiego, Oddzial Onkologii Klinicznej
City
Grudziadz
ZIP/Postal Code
86-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
SCANiX Sp.z o.o
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-057
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ "Vegamed"
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-060
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Helimed Diagnostic Imaging Sp. z o.o., Sp. komandytowa
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-760
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Helimed Diagnostic Imaging Sp. z.o.o., Sp. komandytowa
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-760
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Diagnostyki Obrazowej EPIONE
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-872
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Neuromed M. i M. Nastaj Sp. P.
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-064
Country
Poland
Facility Name
SK Przemienienia Panskiego UM im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu,
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-245
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Klinika Nowotworow Piersi i Chirurgii Rekonstrukcyjnej w Centrum Onkologii -Instytucie
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Szpital LUX MED
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-801
Country
Poland
Facility Name
SC Oncolab SRL
City
Craiova
State/Province
Dolj
ZIP/Postal Code
200385
Country
Romania
Facility Name
S.C. Oncocenter Oncologie Clinica S.R.L.
City
Timisoara
State/Province
Timis
ZIP/Postal Code
300166
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Spitalul Clinic C.F. 2 Bucuresti. Departament Oncologie, Sectia Medicala 2
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
011464
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Narodny onkologicky ustav
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
833 10
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
DEMOMED s.r.o.
City
Nove Zamky
ZIP/Postal Code
94001
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
MUDr. Viliam Cibik, PhD, s.r.o.
City
Pruske
ZIP/Postal Code
018 52
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Fakultna Nemocnica S Poliklinikou Zilina
City
Zilina
ZIP/Postal Code
012 07
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Elche Servicio de Farmacia
City
Elche
State/Province
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03203
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Elche
City
Elche
State/Province
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03203
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Can Misses
City
Ibiza
State/Province
Islas Baleares
ZIP/Postal Code
07800
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
City
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital La Moraleja
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28050
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28050
Country
Spain
Facility Name
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Tooting
State/Province
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW17 0QT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
Scotland
ZIP/Postal Code
EH16 4SA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
Scotland
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
NHS Lothian
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
Scotland
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A4091061&StudyName=A%20Phase%203%20Randomized%2C%20Double-blind%2C%20Placebo-controlled%2C%20Multicenter%20Study%20Of%20The%20Analgesic%20Efficacy%20And%20Safety%20Of%20The%20Subcutaneous%20Administration%20Of%20Tanezumab%20%28pf-04383119%29%20In%20Subjects%20With%20Cancer%20Pain%20Predominantly%20Due%20To%20Bone%20Metastasis%20Receiving%20Background%20Opioid%20Therapy
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Phase 3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab in Patients With Cancer Pain Due to Bone Metastasis Who Are Taking Background Opioid Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs