search
Back to results

Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study

Primary Purpose

Dermatitis, Eczematous

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Metal Allergen Epicutaneous Patch
Sponsored by
Allerderm
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Dermatitis, Eczematous

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years of age or older.
  2. Past positive patch test result within the past 10 years (to one of the dilution series metals being tested on this study) or strong suspicion of metal contact allergy based on results of the Qualification Questionnaire.
  3. Unable to become pregnant or willing to use an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy if female of childbearing potential; (Inability to become pregnant includes all male subjects and female subjects who are postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile- have had a hysterectomy, bilateral ovariectomy, uterine ablation or bilateral tubal ligation. Acceptable methods of contraception include: 1) systemic birth control; 2) double barrier method; 3) intrauterine device; 4) vasectomized partner; or 5) abstinence from sexual intercourse. Subject must agree to use acceptable contraception for the duration of the entire study.)
  4. Understands and signs the approved Informed Consent form which is consistent with all institutional, local and national regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Breastfeeding or pregnant (as determined by urine pregnancy test) or intending to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  2. Topical treatment with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents on or near the test area during the 14 days prior to inclusion in this study.
  3. Systemic treatment with corticosteroids (equivalent to > 10 mg prednisone) or other immunosuppressive agents during the 14 days prior to inclusion in this study. Inhaled treatments are permitted. NOTE: Steroidal nose or eye drops are permitted.
  4. Treatment with ultraviolet (UV) light (including tanning) during the 3 weeks prior to inclusion in this study.
  5. Acute dermatitis outbreak or dermatitis on or near the test area on the back.
  6. Conditions such as; fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, depression, cognitive impairment, flu-like symptoms, diarrhea and/or headache without at least one of the symptoms related to metal exposure listed in Section 10.1 under physical examination
  7. Inability to comply with patch test study requirements including multiple return visits and activity restrictions (e.g., protecting test panels from excess moisture due to showering or vigorous activity).
  8. Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational drug, treatment or device during this study or 3 weeks prior to inclusion in this study.
  9. An opinion of the Investigator that deems the potential subject to be non-compliant, unable to return for study visits or complete the study as detailed in the protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • National Jewish Health, University of Colorado Denver
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen
  • University of Milano
  • Fujita Health University School of Medicine
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
  • Tokushima University Graduate School
  • VU University Medical Center
  • University Hospital Basel Allergology Unit

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Metal Allergen Epicutaneous Patch

Arm Description

8 allergens were tested. Not all subjects tested each allergen. Section reports number of subjects with positive responses to each allergen.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Patch Test Responses
Allergen patch test sites were scored at Visit 3 (day 3-4) Visit 4 (day 7-8) Visit 5 (day 10-14) and Visit 6 Day 19-23). Determination of positive or negative test response for each allergen dose was assessed by the investigator following the final visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects With Panel Adhesion
Panel Adhesion was measured at Visit 2 (day 2) prior to panel removal according to the following scale: Excellent- Skin contact good; all tape edges adherent; all allergens in contact with the skin, Good- Skin contact acceptable; some tape edges lifting; all allergens in contact with the skin, Poor- Little to no skin contact with panel; one or more allergens not in contact with the skin, Detached- Panel completely off the skin; none of the allergens in contact with the skin
Tape Irritation
Tape irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated tape irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Chip Irritation
Chip irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated Chip irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.

Full Information

First Posted
November 23, 2015
Last Updated
August 12, 2020
Sponsor
Allerderm
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02615249
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Aluminum, Copper, Manganese, Molybdenum, Tin, Titanium, Vanadium and Zinc Dose Response Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 5, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 15, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Allerderm

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
48-hour application of metal allergen patches to test for potential allergic responses.
Detailed Description
A 48-hour application (approximate) of investigational allergen panels, excipient controls and corresponding reference allergens will be applied to the skin of human subjects to test for potential positive allergic responses. Test sites will be evaluated at 3-4, 7-8, 10-14 and 19-23 days after application. Ascending allergen dosages will be randomized within each panel into three different configurations which will be randomly assigned to subjects as they enter the study. The investigators and subjects will be aware of the allergens and the patch test doses but will not be aware of the location of individual allergens within each panel.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dermatitis, Eczematous

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
122 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Metal Allergen Epicutaneous Patch
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
8 allergens were tested. Not all subjects tested each allergen. Section reports number of subjects with positive responses to each allergen.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Metal Allergen Epicutaneous Patch
Intervention Description
48 hour application of metal allergen patch to diagnose contact dermatitis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Patch Test Responses
Description
Allergen patch test sites were scored at Visit 3 (day 3-4) Visit 4 (day 7-8) Visit 5 (day 10-14) and Visit 6 Day 19-23). Determination of positive or negative test response for each allergen dose was assessed by the investigator following the final visit.
Time Frame
21 days post patch application
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects With Panel Adhesion
Description
Panel Adhesion was measured at Visit 2 (day 2) prior to panel removal according to the following scale: Excellent- Skin contact good; all tape edges adherent; all allergens in contact with the skin, Good- Skin contact acceptable; some tape edges lifting; all allergens in contact with the skin, Poor- Little to no skin contact with panel; one or more allergens not in contact with the skin, Detached- Panel completely off the skin; none of the allergens in contact with the skin
Time Frame
Day 2, visit 2 prior to panel removal
Title
Tape Irritation
Description
Tape irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated tape irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Time Frame
Visit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6
Title
Chip Irritation
Description
Chip irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated Chip irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Time Frame
Visit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years of age or older. Past positive patch test result within the past 10 years (to one of the dilution series metals being tested on this study) or strong suspicion of metal contact allergy based on results of the Qualification Questionnaire. Unable to become pregnant or willing to use an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy if female of childbearing potential; (Inability to become pregnant includes all male subjects and female subjects who are postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile- have had a hysterectomy, bilateral ovariectomy, uterine ablation or bilateral tubal ligation. Acceptable methods of contraception include: 1) systemic birth control; 2) double barrier method; 3) intrauterine device; 4) vasectomized partner; or 5) abstinence from sexual intercourse. Subject must agree to use acceptable contraception for the duration of the entire study.) Understands and signs the approved Informed Consent form which is consistent with all institutional, local and national regulations. Exclusion Criteria: Breastfeeding or pregnant (as determined by urine pregnancy test) or intending to become pregnant during the course of the study. Topical treatment with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents on or near the test area during the 14 days prior to inclusion in this study. Systemic treatment with corticosteroids (equivalent to > 10 mg prednisone) or other immunosuppressive agents during the 14 days prior to inclusion in this study. Inhaled treatments are permitted. NOTE: Steroidal nose or eye drops are permitted. Treatment with ultraviolet (UV) light (including tanning) during the 3 weeks prior to inclusion in this study. Acute dermatitis outbreak or dermatitis on or near the test area on the back. Conditions such as; fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, depression, cognitive impairment, flu-like symptoms, diarrhea and/or headache without at least one of the symptoms related to metal exposure listed in Section 10.1 under physical examination Inability to comply with patch test study requirements including multiple return visits and activity restrictions (e.g., protecting test panels from excess moisture due to showering or vigorous activity). Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational drug, treatment or device during this study or 3 weeks prior to inclusion in this study. An opinion of the Investigator that deems the potential subject to be non-compliant, unable to return for study visits or complete the study as detailed in the protocol.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia L Norris, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland USA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karin Pacheco, MD
Organizational Affiliation
National Jewish Health School of Medicine, Colorado USA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andreas Bircher, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paolo Pigatto, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Milano, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Rustemeyer, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
VU University Medical Center, Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Thomas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maki Hosoki, DDS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Risa Tamagawa-Mineoka, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Akiko Yagami, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Japan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Jewish Health, University of Colorado Denver
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen
City
Munich
ZIP/Postal Code
80337
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Milano
City
Milan
ZIP/Postal Code
20161
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fujita Health University School of Medicine
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
470-1192
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
City
Kyoto
ZIP/Postal Code
602-8566
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokushima University Graduate School
City
Tokushima
ZIP/Postal Code
770-8504
Country
Japan
Facility Name
VU University Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
NL1081
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
University Hospital Basel Allergology Unit
City
Basel
ZIP/Postal Code
CH-4031
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs