search
Back to results

Neurofeedback-enhanced Mindfulness Meditation in Traumatic Brain Injury

Primary Purpose

Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EEG neurofeedback-assisted meditation
Non-EEG feedback-assisted meditation
Sponsored by
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Traumatic Brain Injury focused on measuring traumatic brain injury

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. history of mild-moderate traumatic brain injury
  2. impaired attention or concentration
  3. >1 year since traumatic brain injury
  4. ability to participate in neurofeedback and mindfulness meditation
  5. daily access to a smart phone
  6. on stable dosage of neuropsychological medications with no significant changes planned for the duration of the study
  7. no prior history of a meditation practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. severe mental illness or psychological symptoms (severe depression, suicidality, disabling anxiety, PTSD, psychosis, dissociation)
  2. significant pre-morbid learning disability
  3. current or recent (in past year) history of significant drug or alcohol abuse
  4. medical illness severe enough to result in an attentional disorder
  5. neurodegenerative disease
  6. non-fluency in English.

Sites / Locations

  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

EEG neurofeedback-assisted meditation

Non-EEG feedback-assisted meditation

Arm Description

EEG neurofeedback assisted meditation using the MUSE device and auditory feedback.

Non-EEG neurofeedback assisted meditation. Subjects will have auditory instruction from the MUSE device without the EEG neurofeedback.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
Measures common symptoms after head injury. This scales ranges from 0-4 on 22 items, for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 88. Higher scores mean a greater severity of symptoms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span
Tests participants digit span, repeating forward sequences of digits from 2 to 8. Scale ranges from 0 to 16. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Symbol Coding
A subject is provided with a key matching nine numbers to nine unique symbols. Numbers are then provided in random order and subjects have 120 seconds to match as many numbers with symbols as possible. All correct responses are scored. Scores range from 0 to 135. Scores are later scaled from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Trail Making Test
Subjects are asked to sequence numbers and letters represented on a page as quickly as then can. Results are measured in seconds, ranging from 0 (hypothetically) to an infinite number (hypothetically). Results are scaled from 1 to 19. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory
Subjects rate on a 0-3 likert scales responses to questions about anxiety. Scores range from 0-63. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II
Subjects respond to questions on a Likert scale from 0-3 regarding depressive symptoms. There are 21 items. Scores range from 0-63. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised
Subjects answer questions regarding mindfulness on a Likert Scale from 1-4. There are twelve questions total. Scores range from 4-48. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change in Percentage of EEG Activity Associated With Alpha, Beta, and Theta Rhythms as Measured by Surface Electrodes on the MUSE Device
Change in "percent Calm" as determined by Muse device. Equations behind this algorithm to determine "Calm" are proprietary and were not shared by the device manufacturer. Ranges from 0% to 100%. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
November 18, 2015
Last Updated
March 16, 2020
Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
InteraXon, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02615535
Brief Title
Neurofeedback-enhanced Mindfulness Meditation in Traumatic Brain Injury
Official Title
Neurofeedback-enhanced Mindfulness Meditation for the Treatment of Affective and Attentional Disturbances in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
InteraXon, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital is conducting a research study evaluating the effectiveness of the brain-training product, MUSE, an EEG-guided neurofeedback device designed to assist in cultivating a relaxed, attentive state of mind during meditation. The investigators study aims to evaluate whether such a tool could be useful in treating persistent traumatic brain injury symptoms such as inattention, impulsivity, irritability, or dysregulated mood.
Detailed Description
Twenty subjects in total will participate in this study. Subjects will be randomized to focused-attention meditation training with or without the neurofeedback device, MUSE. Subjects will be asked to practice ~10 min of daily meditation for 6-8 weeks. Neuropsychological testing will be performed at the beginning of the study and after six weeks of training. At this time point, those randomized to the non-MUSE group will be given a device and asked to train for an additional two weeks. At the conclusion of the study, all subjects will also undergo a brief telephone or in-person exit interview regarding their experiences using the MUSE device. Primary endpoint: change in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Secondary endpoints: change in the following: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span and Symbol-Digit Coding, Trail-Making Test, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised, percentage of EEG activity associated with alpha, beta, or theta activity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Traumatic Brain Injury
Keywords
traumatic brain injury

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
25 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
EEG neurofeedback-assisted meditation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
EEG neurofeedback assisted meditation using the MUSE device and auditory feedback.
Arm Title
Non-EEG feedback-assisted meditation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Non-EEG neurofeedback assisted meditation. Subjects will have auditory instruction from the MUSE device without the EEG neurofeedback.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
EEG neurofeedback-assisted meditation
Other Intervention Name(s)
MUSE
Intervention Description
meditation with auditory feedback regarding EEG status
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Non-EEG feedback-assisted meditation
Other Intervention Name(s)
MUSE without EEG feedback
Intervention Description
meditation without auditory feedback regarding EEG status
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
Description
Measures common symptoms after head injury. This scales ranges from 0-4 on 22 items, for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 88. Higher scores mean a greater severity of symptoms.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span
Description
Tests participants digit span, repeating forward sequences of digits from 2 to 8. Scale ranges from 0 to 16. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Symbol Coding
Description
A subject is provided with a key matching nine numbers to nine unique symbols. Numbers are then provided in random order and subjects have 120 seconds to match as many numbers with symbols as possible. All correct responses are scored. Scores range from 0 to 135. Scores are later scaled from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Trail Making Test
Description
Subjects are asked to sequence numbers and letters represented on a page as quickly as then can. Results are measured in seconds, ranging from 0 (hypothetically) to an infinite number (hypothetically). Results are scaled from 1 to 19. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory
Description
Subjects rate on a 0-3 likert scales responses to questions about anxiety. Scores range from 0-63. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II
Description
Subjects respond to questions on a Likert scale from 0-3 regarding depressive symptoms. There are 21 items. Scores range from 0-63. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised
Description
Subjects answer questions regarding mindfulness on a Likert Scale from 1-4. There are twelve questions total. Scores range from 4-48. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and six weeks
Title
Change in Percentage of EEG Activity Associated With Alpha, Beta, and Theta Rhythms as Measured by Surface Electrodes on the MUSE Device
Description
Change in "percent Calm" as determined by Muse device. Equations behind this algorithm to determine "Calm" are proprietary and were not shared by the device manufacturer. Ranges from 0% to 100%. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
baseline and at six weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: history of mild-moderate traumatic brain injury impaired attention or concentration >1 year since traumatic brain injury ability to participate in neurofeedback and mindfulness meditation daily access to a smart phone on stable dosage of neuropsychological medications with no significant changes planned for the duration of the study no prior history of a meditation practice Exclusion Criteria: severe mental illness or psychological symptoms (severe depression, suicidality, disabling anxiety, PTSD, psychosis, dissociation) significant pre-morbid learning disability current or recent (in past year) history of significant drug or alcohol abuse medical illness severe enough to result in an attentional disorder neurodegenerative disease non-fluency in English.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mel B Glenn, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
City
Charlestown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02129
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
If participants request their outcome data, we will provide this to them with a brief discussion of its meaning and limitations on interpretation.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24109463
Citation
Brandmeyer T, Delorme A. Meditation and neurofeedback. Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 7;4:688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00688. eCollection 2013. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21183265
Citation
Chiesa A, Calati R, Serretti A. Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;31(3):449-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21440699
Citation
Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20350028
Citation
Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-83. doi: 10.1037/a0018555.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32783645
Citation
Polich G, Gray S, Tran D, Morales-Quezada L, Glenn M. Comparing focused attention meditation to meditation with mobile neurofeedback for persistent symptoms after mild-moderate traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2020 Aug 23;34(10):1408-1415. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802781. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Neurofeedback-enhanced Mindfulness Meditation in Traumatic Brain Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs