search
Back to results

Developing a COMputerised Bone Age Tool (COMBAT1)

Primary Purpose

Bone Diseases, Developmental

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Left hand DXA
Sponsored by
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Bone Diseases, Developmental focused on measuring Bone age, Greulich & Pyle, TW3, Radiography, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 16 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Eligibility:

  1. Both female and male participants are being studied
  2. Minimum age 1 year
  3. Maximum age 15 years and 364 days
  4. Healthy volunteers will not be recruited

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children having a left hand radiograph performed to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need
  2. Children and families who have given fully informed consent/assent
  3. Children and families capable of reading and/or writing English

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Participants who might not adequately understand verbal explanations or written information given in English, or who have special communication needs

Sites / Locations

  • Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Recruited children

Arm Description

Children aged below 16 years attending the Radiology Department for a left hand radiograph in order to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need. There will be one male and one female from each of five age groups (< 5 years; 5 to 7 years; 8 to 10 years; 11 to 13 years; 14 to 16 years). Bone age will be assessed according to the Greulich & Pyle and TW3 methods by 3 observers on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Recruited children will have intervention in the form of a left hand DXA which will be anonymised and from which the same 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Observer Agreement Between Bone Age as Assessed From Left Hand and Wrist DXA Compared to Radiographs
Bone age was assessed from DXA and conventional radiographs of the left hand and wrist based on the Greulich and Pyle and Tanner and Whitehouse methods of bone age assessment. Interclass correlation was calculated to determine observer agreement between radiographs and DXA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 23, 2015
Last Updated
January 13, 2020
Sponsor
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Sheffield
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02617901
Brief Title
Developing a COMputerised Bone Age Tool
Acronym
COMBAT1
Official Title
COMBAT 1: COMputerised Bone Age Tool (Phase 1: Feasibility of Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Bone Age Assessment in Children)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Sheffield

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Greulich and Pyle technique (G&P) is that most commonly used to assess bone age in children, particularly in the context of suspected skeletal dysplasia. However it has been shown not to be applicable to children of Asian and African ethnicity and may not be applicable to United Kingdom (UK) Caucasian children, who are now relatively more mature and larger than children of the mid 1930's (when G&P was developed). It is generally agreed that updated standards are required for rapid and reliable bone age assessment. The development of such standards requires irradiation of normal children. To do this ethically, radiation exposure must be kept as low as possible. Two recent studies suggest that bone age assessment can be reliably achieved from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. As far as the investigators are aware, the Tanner & Whitehouse (TW3) method, which is preferred by some (e.g. endocrinologists and nutritionists), has not been assessed from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans - although not the main focus of this study, because of its popularity amongst certain specialties, the investigators shall be assessing the TW3 method also. Modern techniques should not only be available as textbooks, but should also be available in digital (on-line) format and where possible integrated with hospital PACS systems. The investigators believe that their team has the required experience and expertise to successfully carry out such a project. Before conducting the required large cross-sectional study, the investigators must first confirm that DXA can in fact replace radiographs for bone age assessment in children; which is the objective of this current study.
Detailed Description
This is a small prospective feasibility study to be performed over a 12-month period. Children booked for a left hand radiograph for bone age assessment (either in isolation or as part of a dysplasia skeletal survey) will be recruited. This will require a purposive sample of 2 males and 2 females from each of the following 5 age groups (<5; 5 to 7; 8 to 10; 11 to 13; 14 to 16 years). There will therefore be a total of 20 children (10 males). Because the aim of the study is to compare results of DXA with those of radiographs in corresponding children, ethnicity of individual children will not be an issue; in other words the investigators are assessing the reliability of DXA not the reliability of G&P or TW3. Relevant clinicians will identify patients from appropriate clinics at Sheffield Children's Hospital. Only patients having a left hand radiograph for bone age assessment on the basis of clinical need will be approached. Age appropriate information sheets will be given to them, and the study briefly discussed. When they arrive at the Radiology Department for their left hand radiograph, an appropriately certified radiographer will seek informed consent and provided the left hand radiograph is actually performed, they will then also have DXA of the left hand and those over 6 years old will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire. Researcher 1 will anonymise hand radiographs and DXA scans, such that corresponding patient images are not identifiable. Researcher 1 will also document patient age and sex, ethnicity and body weight and height (no other clinical information is required for the purposes of this feasibility study). Researchers 2, 3 and 4 will independently assess all images using both G&P and TW3. All observers will interpret a random selection of half the images (again independently) on a second occasion at least 2 months after the first; on both occasions the Images will be interpreted in random and varied order. Images will be read in two batches of 10 radiographs and 10 (non-corresponding) DXA scans for the first read and 5 radiographs and 5 (non-corresponding) DXA scans for the second read. Statistical analysis is largely irrelevant for this small feasibility study. The investigators' main aim is to assess whether or not G&P and TW3 can be reliably assessed from hand DXA images. The concordance between 1) independent readings of the three observers for radiographs and for DXA (i.e. comparing modalities) and 2) individual observers for both occasions (i.e. comparing observer reliability for each modality) will be evaluated using interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients. The investigators will calculate the mean and standard deviation of the differences between DXA and radiographs and between observers. Statistical analyses will be performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21 for Mac (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Diseases, Developmental
Keywords
Bone age, Greulich & Pyle, TW3, Radiography, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Recruited children
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children aged below 16 years attending the Radiology Department for a left hand radiograph in order to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need. There will be one male and one female from each of five age groups (< 5 years; 5 to 7 years; 8 to 10 years; 11 to 13 years; 14 to 16 years). Bone age will be assessed according to the Greulich & Pyle and TW3 methods by 3 observers on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Recruited children will have intervention in the form of a left hand DXA which will be anonymised and from which the same 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Left hand DXA
Other Intervention Name(s)
DXA of left hand and wrist
Intervention Description
All recruited children will have a left hand DXA scan which will be anonymised and from which 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Observer Agreement Between Bone Age as Assessed From Left Hand and Wrist DXA Compared to Radiographs
Description
Bone age was assessed from DXA and conventional radiographs of the left hand and wrist based on the Greulich and Pyle and Tanner and Whitehouse methods of bone age assessment. Interclass correlation was calculated to determine observer agreement between radiographs and DXA
Time Frame
18 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility: Both female and male participants are being studied Minimum age 1 year Maximum age 15 years and 364 days Healthy volunteers will not be recruited Inclusion Criteria: Children having a left hand radiograph performed to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need Children and families who have given fully informed consent/assent Children and families capable of reading and/or writing English Exclusion Criteria: 1. Participants who might not adequately understand verbal explanations or written information given in English, or who have special communication needs
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amaka Offiah
Organizational Affiliation
Investigator
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
City
Sheffield
State/Province
Sheffield (South Yorkshire District)
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2TH
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11641458
Citation
Mora S, Boechat MI, Pietka E, Huang HK, Gilsanz V. Skeletal age determinations in children of European and African descent: applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards. Pediatr Res. 2001 Nov;50(5):624-8. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200111000-00015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11685448
Citation
van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Robben SG, Hop WC, van Kuijk C. Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today? Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Oct;31(10):748-52. doi: 10.1007/s002470100531.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22237478
Citation
Soudack M, Ben-Shlush A, Jacobson J, Raviv-Zilka L, Eshed I, Hamiel O. Bone age in the 21st century: is Greulich and Pyle's atlas accurate for Israeli children? Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Mar;42(3):343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2302-1. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Developing a COMputerised Bone Age Tool

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs