search
Back to results

Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery

Primary Purpose

Kidney Calculi, Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ureteroscopy
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Sponsored by
University of California, San Francisco
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Kidney Calculi

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a renal or proximal ureteral stone measuring 1-2 cm in size on preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography, or plain radiographic imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious illness likely to cause death within the next 5 years, so as to exclude significant metabolic derangements that might lead to adverse surgical outcome.
  • Stones with measured size larger than 2 cm or smaller than 1 cm.
  • Patients with ureteral or renal anatomy or stones located in a position judged to be unsafe for randomization.
  • Pregnancy.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California, San Francisco

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Ureteroscopy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Arm Description

Kidney stone of participants in this arm will be treated with ureteroscopy (URS). A ureteral stent will be inserted at the end of the procedure.

Kidney stone of participants in this arm will be treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). A percutaneous nephrostomy tube will be inserted at the end of the procedure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Short form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire at early postoperative period
This instrument consisted of 36 questions with response ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at early postoperative period
This instrument consisted of 38 questions in 6 non-uniformed categories with response ranging from the least (best QOL) to the most (poor QOL).

Full Information

First Posted
December 4, 2015
Last Updated
July 30, 2021
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02625051
Brief Title
Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Ureteroscopic to Percutaneous Removal for the 1-2 cm Calculus Measuring Quality of Life as the Primary Outcome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomized study, comparing quality of life in renal stone patients undergoing surgical treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
Detailed Description
In United States, the prevalence of renal stone is 8.8% with slight predomination in male than female. They can be symptomatic marked by symptoms of flank pain, hematuria or urinary tract infection, or completely asymptomatic and incidentally discovered. Three modalities are accepted as treatment options for renal stone, including shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and ureteroscopy (URS). While some standard guidelines were proposed for appropriate treatment selection with regard to stone size, no recommendations or guidelines exist for the surgical management of 1-2 cm renal stones. Both PNL and URS are equally accepted as treatment options for stones at this size. The selection of either procedure currently is left to the treating surgeon can be influenced by anatomical or stone factors as well as patient preference. For URS, frequent requirement for postoperative ureteral stents may result in significant morbidity and a detriment to quality of life owing to irritating bladder symptoms caused by the stent itself. PNL rarely requires postoperative ureteral stent but it may bring longer operative time and hospitalization. PNL therefore may be a treatment option that preserves quality of life compared to URS for patients presenting with the 1-2 cm sized kidney or ureteral stone. One reasonable way to evaluate efficacy of treatment options is to assess patient's quality of life resultant from the selected modality. Quality of life for renal stone formers is an important but under-studied facet of nephrolithiasis management that should be incorporated into clinical decision making. The short form-36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a patient-reported survey of health status. It has been validated and is commonly used to determine the efficacy of a given health treatment in many settings, including urologic intervention. The Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) is a validated and widely accepted instrument to evaluate the impact of ureteral stents on quality of life. The investigators plan to use these two questionnaires as a standard outcome measurement to compare impact on quality of life in patients randomized to undergo two different modalities (PNL versus URS) of stone treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Kidney Calculi, Quality of Life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ureteroscopy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Kidney stone of participants in this arm will be treated with ureteroscopy (URS). A ureteral stent will be inserted at the end of the procedure.
Arm Title
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Kidney stone of participants in this arm will be treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). A percutaneous nephrostomy tube will be inserted at the end of the procedure.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ureteroscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
URS
Intervention Description
Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy position. All procedures are performed under direct videoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Fluoroscopic screening is utilized using a mobile multidirectional C-arm fluoroscopy unit. A safety guide-wire is then placed into renal pelvis, followed by a ureteral access sheath to maintain low intra-renal pressure, and to facilitate the procedures. Using flexible ureteroscope, renal or proximal ureteral stone is identified and fragmented with a holmium laser. Basket extraction of residual fragments is done until visual complete clearance of stone fragments is achieved.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
PNL
Intervention Description
Under general anesthesia, an open-ended 5 french ureteral exchange catheter is placed into the ipsilateral ureter under cystoscopic guidance. The patient is then safely turned and secured in the prone position. Percutaneous renal access is obtained under ultrasonographic or fluoroscopic guidance. Either a 24 or 30 french sheath is advanced in the kidney and nephroscopy is performed with a rigid offset nephroscope. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using a dual CyberWand lithotripter or holmium laser lithotripsy. Flexible nephroscopy is performed to look for possible residual fragments and basket extraction is done for complete clearance of stone.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Short form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire at early postoperative period
Description
This instrument consisted of 36 questions with response ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score at 1 week after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at early postoperative period
Description
This instrument consisted of 38 questions in 6 non-uniformed categories with response ranging from the least (best QOL) to the most (poor QOL).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score at 1 week after surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Short form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire at late postoperative period
Description
This instrument consisted of 36 questions with response ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score at 3 months after surgery
Title
Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at late postoperative period
Description
This instrument consisted of 38 questions in 6 non-uniformed categories with response ranging from the least (best QOL) to the most (poor QOL).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score at 3 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with a renal or proximal ureteral stone measuring 1-2 cm in size on preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography, or plain radiographic imaging Exclusion Criteria: Serious illness likely to cause death within the next 5 years, so as to exclude significant metabolic derangements that might lead to adverse surgical outcome. Stones with measured size larger than 2 cm or smaller than 1 cm. Patients with ureteral or renal anatomy or stones located in a position judged to be unsafe for randomization. Pregnancy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Chi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California, San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22498635
Citation
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15711292
Citation
Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC; Urologic Diseases of America Project. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):848-57. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11713390
Citation
Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M; Working Party on Lithiasis, European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):362-71. doi: 10.1159/000049803.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25066869
Citation
Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16479208
Citation
Duvdevani M, Chew BH, Denstedt JD. Minimizing symptoms in patients with ureteric stents. Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Mar;16(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000193375.29942.0f.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18076928
Citation
Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.026.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23483226
Citation
Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013 Jun;41(3):241-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24708396
Citation
Perez-Fentes DA, Gude F, Blanco B, Freire CG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: short- and long-term effects on health-related quality of life. J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):13-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0081.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24765679
Citation
Barnes KT, Bing MT, Tracy CR. Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial. BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):605-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12541.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1285753
Citation
Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17523905
Citation
Staios D, Andrews HO, Shaik T, Buchholz NN. Quality of life after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticulum and secluded lower-pole renal stones. J Endourol. 2007 May;21(5):515-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0432.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12576846
Citation
Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1060-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs