Comparing Minimal Invasive Surgery en Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty (MIS)
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
surgery method using CR TKP
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
- patients with Osteo arthritis
- intact collateral ligaments and patella tendon
- patients willing and able to comply with the post-operative schedule
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients who require a revision TKA
- patients with TKA contralateral knee within 6 months with bad outcomes
- patients who need a TKA on contralateral side within 2 years
- intraoperative resurfacing of patella
- intraoperative eversion of patella
- patients who had prior procedure of involved knee such as high tibial osteotomy, cruciate ligament recontruction, knee fusion or patellectomy
- BMI > 30
- patients with fixed flexion contracture> 15 degrees
- patients with deformity greater than 20 degrees of varus or 15 degrees of valgus
- Patient with Mediolateral stability > 10 degrees patient with active or suspected malignancy
- patient with Rheumatoid arthritis
- patient with systemic disease that would effect subject's wellfare or overall outcome of the study
- patient with other severe concurrent joint involvement which can effect their outcome
- patients with an immobile hip
- patient with a history of Pulmonary embolism or Deep venous thrombosis
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
MIS
conventional approach
Arm Description
Minimal invasive surgery for placement total knee prosthesis
conventional "open" surgery for placement total knee prosthesis.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
range of motion
measurement of flexion and extension in degrees
blood loss
measurement of milliliters blood loss during the first 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
patient questionnaire
WOMAC pain and function score
chair rise and stair climb test
Ability of patient rise from chair and climb stairs, amount of pain on VAS 1-10 does the patient have during these activities
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02625311
First Posted
November 30, 2015
Last Updated
December 8, 2015
Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02625311
Brief Title
Comparing Minimal Invasive Surgery en Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
Acronym
MIS
Official Title
A Prospective Comparative Randomized International Multicenter Study Comparing MIS Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Randomized clinical trial comparing minimal invasive operating technique to conventional operating technique for placement of total knee prosthesis.
Clinical evaluations, patient questionnaires, X-rays and CT scans were done to compare these two techniques.
Detailed Description
Study executed with 3 centers and 69 patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
69 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
MIS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Minimal invasive surgery for placement total knee prosthesis
Arm Title
conventional approach
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
conventional "open" surgery for placement total knee prosthesis.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
surgery method using CR TKP
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cruciate retaining (CR total knee prosthesis (TKP) Stryker
Intervention Description
Operation through minimal invasive surgery or standard open surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
range of motion
Description
measurement of flexion and extension in degrees
Time Frame
pre-op vs post-op until 5 years post-op
Title
blood loss
Description
measurement of milliliters blood loss during the first 24 hours after surgery
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
patient questionnaire
Description
WOMAC pain and function score
Time Frame
pre-op vs post-op until 5 year post operative
Title
chair rise and stair climb test
Description
Ability of patient rise from chair and climb stairs, amount of pain on VAS 1-10 does the patient have during these activities
Time Frame
pre-op vs post-op until 5 years post operative
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patient requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
patients with Osteo arthritis
intact collateral ligaments and patella tendon
patients willing and able to comply with the post-operative schedule
Exclusion Criteria:
patients who require a revision TKA
patients with TKA contralateral knee within 6 months with bad outcomes
patients who need a TKA on contralateral side within 2 years
intraoperative resurfacing of patella
intraoperative eversion of patella
patients who had prior procedure of involved knee such as high tibial osteotomy, cruciate ligament recontruction, knee fusion or patellectomy
BMI > 30
patients with fixed flexion contracture> 15 degrees
patients with deformity greater than 20 degrees of varus or 15 degrees of valgus
Patient with Mediolateral stability > 10 degrees patient with active or suspected malignancy
patient with Rheumatoid arthritis
patient with systemic disease that would effect subject's wellfare or overall outcome of the study
patient with other severe concurrent joint involvement which can effect their outcome
patients with an immobile hip
patient with a history of Pulmonary embolism or Deep venous thrombosis
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26762175
Citation
Feczko P, Engelmann L, Arts JJ, Campbell D. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 13;17:19. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0872-7.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Comparing Minimal Invasive Surgery en Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs