Concurrent Chemotherapy for the Intermediate Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Era
Primary Purpose
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IMRT
Cisplatin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma focused on measuring Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, intermediate risk, intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (according to WHO histologically type.
- Tumor staged as T1-2N1/T2-3N0(according to the 7th AJCC edition).
- No evidence of distant metastasis (M0).
- Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
- Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4000/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 120g/L for male, ≥ 120g/L for female , and platelet count ≥ 100000/μL.
- Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin ≤ ULN.
- Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min.
- Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neck lymph node with extracapsular spread. Maximal axial diameter of neck lymph node ≥30mm, positive neck lymph node at level IV and/or Vb.
- Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA level ≥4000 copy/ml.
- WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
- Age > 65 or < 18.
- Treatment with palliative intent.
- Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
- Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
- History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume).
- Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
- Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance
Sites / Locations
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
RT group
CCRT group
Arm Description
intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) alone: Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) alone
IMRT and concurrent cisplatin Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Failure-free survival
The failure-free survival rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever is first. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall survival
The overall survival rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to death from any cause. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Locoregional failure-free survival
The locoregional failure-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to the first locoregional failure. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Distant failure-free survival
The distant failure-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to the first remote failure. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Rates of participants with adverse events
Acute and late toxicities will be documented according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and/or the Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Rates of the toxicities will be estimated using a binomial distribution along and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02633202
First Posted
December 3, 2015
Last Updated
December 11, 2018
Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborators
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Guilin Medical University, China
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02633202
Brief Title
Concurrent Chemotherapy for the Intermediate Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Era
Official Title
Prospective Non-inferior Clinical Trial Comparing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy or Radiotherapy Alone in Patients With Intermediate Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Era
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborators
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Guilin Medical University, China
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Currently, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without sequential chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for intermediate risk NPC (stage II and T3N0M0) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. However these recommendations were based on the evidence in the two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT) era. The introduction of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in NPC treatment has brought substantial better treatment outcomes than 2DCRT. It has been questioned whether additional concurrent chemotherapy is still necessary for intermediate risk NPC within the excellent framework of IMRT. Thus, the investigators jointly conduct the first non-inferior randomized trial to determine the value of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin for intermediate risk NPC patients treated with IMRT. Given the results of clinical studies mentioned above,the investigators decide to adopt the concurrent regimen to be cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 22, 43
Detailed Description
Currently, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without sequential chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for intermediate risk NPC (stage II and T3N0M0) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. However these recommendations were based on the evidence in the two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT) era. The introduction of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in NPC treatment has brought substantial better treatment outcomes than 2DCRT. It has been questioned whether additional concurrent chemotherapy is still necessary for intermediate risk NPC within the excellent framework of IMRT. Thus, the investigators jointly conduct the first non-inferior randomized trial to determine the value of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin for intermediate risk NPC patients treated with IMRT. Given the results of clinical studies mentioned above, the investigators decide to adopt the concurrent regimen to be cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 22, 43
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Keywords
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, intermediate risk, intensity-modulated radiotherapy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
338 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
RT group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) alone: Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) alone
Arm Title
CCRT group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
IMRT and concurrent cisplatin Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
IMRT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Intervention Description
Intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is given as 2.0-2.30 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Concurrent cisplatin regimen
Intervention Description
concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles during IMRT
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Failure-free survival
Description
The failure-free survival rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever is first. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Time Frame
3 Year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Description
The overall survival rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to death from any cause. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Time Frame
3 Year
Title
Locoregional failure-free survival
Description
The locoregional failure-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to the first locoregional failure. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Time Frame
3 Year
Title
Distant failure-free survival
Description
The distant failure-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm from randomization to the first remote failure. Their differences will be compared between treatment arms using the log-rank test.
Time Frame
3 Year
Title
Rates of participants with adverse events
Description
Acute and late toxicities will be documented according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and/or the Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Rates of the toxicities will be estimated using a binomial distribution along and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
Time Frame
3 Year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (according to WHO histologically type.
Tumor staged as T1-2N1/T2-3N0(according to the 7th AJCC edition).
No evidence of distant metastasis (M0).
Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4000/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 120g/L for male, ≥ 120g/L for female , and platelet count ≥ 100000/μL.
Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin ≤ ULN.
Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min.
Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Neck lymph node with extracapsular spread. Maximal axial diameter of neck lymph node ≥30mm, positive neck lymph node at level IV and/or Vb.
Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA level ≥4000 copy/ml.
WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
Age > 65 or < 18.
Treatment with palliative intent.
Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume).
Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lei Chen, M.D.
Phone
+86-20-87343096
Email
chenlei@sysucc.org.cn
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lei Chen, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Sun Yat-sen University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510060
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lei Chen, M.D.
Phone
+86-20-87343096
Email
chenlei@sysucc.org.cn
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12833458
Citation
Chua DT, Sham JS, Kwong DL, Au GK. Treatment outcome after radiotherapy alone for patients with Stage I-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2003 Jul 1;98(1):74-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11485.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19231110
Citation
Xiao WW, Han F, Lu TX, Chen CY, Huang Y, Zhao C. Treatment outcomes after radiotherapy alone for patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 15;74(4):1070-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.008. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22056739
Citation
Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18216741
Citation
Song CH, Wu HG, Heo DS, Kim KH, Sung MW, Park CI. Treatment outcomes for radiotherapy alone are comparable with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):663-70. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181626cfe.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16750333
Citation
Chua DT, Ma J, Sham JS, Mai HQ, Choy DT, Hong MH, Lu TX, Au GK, Min HQ. Improvement of survival after addition of induction chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of two Phase III trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Aug 1;65(5):1300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21459659
Citation
Xu T, Hu C, Wang X, Shen C. Role of chemoradiotherapy in intermediate prognosis nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011 May;47(5):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20643517
Citation
Lai SZ, Li WF, Chen L, Luo W, Chen YY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22995588
Citation
Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24630534
Citation
Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan LL, Hung WM, Chan CC, Sze HC, Chan OS, Chang AT, Yeung RM. Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer--success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21035959
Citation
Su SF, Han F, Zhao C, Chen CY, Xiao WW, Li JX, Lu TX. Long-term outcomes of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20395788
Citation
Tham IW, Lin S, Pan J, Han L, Lu JJ, Wee J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy without concurrent chemotherapy for stage IIb nasopharyngeal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;33(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d2edab.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23720240
Citation
Luo S, Zhao L, Wang J, Xu M, Li J, Zhou B, Xiao F, Long X, Shi M. Clinical outcomes for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma with predominantly WHO II histology treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy in nonendemic region of China. Head Neck. 2014 Jun;36(6):841-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.23386. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26611462
Citation
Zhang F, Zhang Y, Li WF, Liu X, Guo R, Sun Y, Lin AH, Chen L, Ma J. Efficacy of Concurrent Chemotherapy for Intermediate Risk NPC in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era: a Propensity-Matched Analysis. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 27;5:17378. doi: 10.1038/srep17378. Erratum In: Sci Rep. 2016;6:20748.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35997729
Citation
Tang LL, Guo R, Zhang N, Deng B, Chen L, Cheng ZB, Huang J, Hu WH, Huang SH, Luo WJ, Liang JH, Zheng YM, Zhang F, Mao YP, Li WF, Zhou GQ, Liu X, Chen YP, Xu C, Lin L, Liu Q, Du XJ, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Ma J. Effect of Radiotherapy Alone vs Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Survival Without Disease Relapse in Patients With Low-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):728-736. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13997.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Concurrent Chemotherapy for the Intermediate Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Era
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs