Rainbow Extension Study (RainbowExt)
Primary Purpose
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranibizumab
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) focused on measuring open-label,, long-term,, extension study,, intravitreal ranibizumab,, laser ablation therapy,, retinopathy of prematurity,, preterm infants,, RAINBOW
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient successfully completed the core study CRFB002H2301
- The patient received study treatment in both eyes at baseline of study CRFB002H2301
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient has a medical condition or personal circumstance which precludes study participation or compliance with study procedures, as assessed by the Investigator
- Patient has been discontinued from the core study CRFB002H2301 at any time
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Sites / Locations
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Ranibizumab 0.2 mg
Ranibizumab 0.1 mg
Laser therapy
Arm Description
1 intravitreal injection in both eyes on Day 1 (Baseline), with up to 2 re-treatments allowed for each eye if required
1 intravitreal injection in both eyes on Day 1 (Baseline), with up to 2 re-treatments allowed for each eye if required
Laser therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Visual Acuity (VA) of the Better-seeing Eye at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit - Comparison Between Treatment Arms
The VA assessment at the child's 5th birthday visit was performed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) methodology. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 3 meters using Lea Symbols charts. Scores represented the number of optotypes (Lea symbols) the participant identified and ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity. VA was tested in each eye, using the child's current refractive index. The better-seeing eye was defined as the eye with the higher ETDRS score at the 5th birthday visit. If both eyes had the same ETDRS score, then the right eye was assigned as the better-seeing eye.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) Regardless of Study Treatment or Procedure Relationship by Preferred Term
Number of participants with ocular AEs starting during the core study and ongoing at extension baseline, or starting on/after extension baseline were reported.
Number of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (AEs) Regardless of Study Treatment or Procedure Relationship (Greater Than or Equal to 3% in Any Arm) by Preferred Term
Number of participants with non-ocular adverse events regardless of study treatment or procedure relationship (greater than or equal to 3% in any arm) by preferred term were reported.
Visual Acuity (VA) of the Worse-seeing Eye at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit - Comparison Between Treatment Arms
The VA assessment at the child's 5th birthday visit was performed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) methodology. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 3 meters using Lea Symbols charts. Scores represented the number of optotypes (Lea symbols) the participant identified and ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity. VA was tested in each eye, using the child's current refractive index. The worse-seeing eye was the eye with a lower ETDRS score at the 5th birthday visit. If both eyes had the same ETDRS score, then the left eye was assigned as the worse-seeing eye.
Number of Participants With Absence of Active Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) at 40 Weeks Post Core Baseline Visit
The absence of active ROP in both eyes is defined by the absence of all of the following features: (1) Vessel dilatation of plus disease in at least 2 quardrants (some persisting tortuosity is allowed), (2) Extra-retina vessels extending from the retina into the vitreous and judged to be a sign of active ROP disease.
Number of Participants With Absence of Active Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) at 52 Weeks Post Core Baseline Visit
The absence of active ROP in both eyes is defined by the absence of all of the following features: (1) Vessel dilatation of plus disease in at least 2 quardrants (some persisting tortuosity is allowed), (2) Extra-retina vessels extending from the retina into the vitreous and judged to be a sign of active ROP disease.
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis, (7) Optic disc pallor, (8) Optic disc swelling, (9) Pigmentary disturbance in the macula, (10) Atrophic changes in the macula
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age Visit
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age Visit
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis, (7) Optic disc pallor, (8) Optic disc swelling, (9) Pigmentary disturbance in the macula, (10) Atrophic changes in the macula
Number of Participants With Recurrence of ROP up to 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit in the Core Study
Recurrence of ROP was defined as ROP receiving any post-baseline intervention after the 1st study treatment in the core study. In the ranibizumab arms, post-baseline interventions were ranibizumab retreatment or switch to laser. In the laser arm, post-baseline interventions were supplementary laser treatments after 11 days post-baseline, or switch to ranibizumab; supplementary laser treatment within 11 days post-baseline was not counted as recurrence.
Number of Participants With Recurrence of ROP up to 52 Weeks Post Baseline Visit in the Core Study
Recurrence of ROP was defined as ROP receiving any post-baseline intervention after the 1st study treatment in the core study. In the ranibizumab arms, post-baseline interventions were ranibizumab retreatment or switch to laser. In the laser arm, post-baseline interventions were supplementary laser treatments after 11 days post-baseline, or switch to ranibizumab; supplementary laser treatment within 11 days post-baseline was not counted as recurrence. Beyond Week 40, participants did not receive any study intervention and no new data was collected after 40 weeks post core baseline visit.
Number of Ranibizumab Injections Received Per Participant Over the Whole Safety Observation Period
Number of ranibizumab injections received in the treatment of participants with ROP up to and including 40 weeks post baseline visit in the core study were reported.
Refraction Status: Summary of Participants at Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age
Summary of participants was reported to evaluate the refraction in each eye at the participant's 2 years corrected age
Refraction Status: Summary of Participants at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
Summary of participants was reported to evaluate the refraction in each eye at the participant's 2 years' corrected age
Change From Baseline in Weight
Subject´s weight was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Change From Baseline in Head Circumference
Subject´s head circumference was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
Subject´s Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure
Subject´s Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Number of Participants With the Summary of Respiratory Function Status
Number of participants with respiratory function status was reported
Number of Participants With Hearing Impairment of Any Type
Number of participants with hearing function status was reported
Duration of Hospitalization
Duration of hospitalization (from birth to first hospital discharge home) was reported to evaluate the health status of the subject
Weight at the Time of First Hospital Discharge
Weight (gram) at the time of first hospital discharge was reported to evaluate the health status of the subject
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02640664
First Posted
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02640664
Brief Title
Rainbow Extension Study
Acronym
RainbowExt
Official Title
RAINBOW Extension Study: an Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of RAnibizumab Compared With Laser Therapy for the Treatment of INfants BOrn Prematurely With Retinopathy of Prematurity
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 16, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 21, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 21, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with laser ablation therapy in patients who were treated for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the core study CRFB002H2301 (NCT02375971)
Detailed Description
This was a multicenter, open-label extension study where the Visual Acuity (VA) assessment at the child's 5th birthday visit was performed. The study had 2 distinct periods (Epochs). Treatment with study ranibizumab (either as retreatment after ranibizumab had already been injected in the same eye or as switch ranibizumab treatment from study laser therapy administered in the core study) was permitted for eligible eyes with recurrence/worsening of ROP up to and including Week 40 from the baseline visit in the core study (Epoch 1). The remainder of the extension study up to the 5th birthday visit (Epoch 2) was observational, with no study treatment planned to be administered.
In the core study, patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment arms (ranibizumab 0.2 mg, ranibizumab 0.1 mg, and laser). Treatment arm assignment and patient identifier in the extension study remained the same as in the core study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Keywords
open-label,, long-term,, extension study,, intravitreal ranibizumab,, laser ablation therapy,, retinopathy of prematurity,, preterm infants,, RAINBOW
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ranibizumab 0.2 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1 intravitreal injection in both eyes on Day 1 (Baseline), with up to 2 re-treatments allowed for each eye if required
Arm Title
Ranibizumab 0.1 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1 intravitreal injection in both eyes on Day 1 (Baseline), with up to 2 re-treatments allowed for each eye if required
Arm Title
Laser therapy
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Laser therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab
Intervention Description
1 intravitreal injection in both eyes on Day 1 (Baseline), with up to 2 re-treatments allowed for each eye if required
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Acuity (VA) of the Better-seeing Eye at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit - Comparison Between Treatment Arms
Description
The VA assessment at the child's 5th birthday visit was performed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) methodology. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 3 meters using Lea Symbols charts. Scores represented the number of optotypes (Lea symbols) the participant identified and ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity. VA was tested in each eye, using the child's current refractive index. The better-seeing eye was defined as the eye with the higher ETDRS score at the 5th birthday visit. If both eyes had the same ETDRS score, then the right eye was assigned as the better-seeing eye.
Time Frame
at the participant's fifth birthday visit (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) Regardless of Study Treatment or Procedure Relationship by Preferred Term
Description
Number of participants with ocular AEs starting during the core study and ongoing at extension baseline, or starting on/after extension baseline were reported.
Time Frame
throughout the study, approximately 5 years
Title
Number of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (AEs) Regardless of Study Treatment or Procedure Relationship (Greater Than or Equal to 3% in Any Arm) by Preferred Term
Description
Number of participants with non-ocular adverse events regardless of study treatment or procedure relationship (greater than or equal to 3% in any arm) by preferred term were reported.
Time Frame
throughout the study, approximately 5 years
Title
Visual Acuity (VA) of the Worse-seeing Eye at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit - Comparison Between Treatment Arms
Description
The VA assessment at the child's 5th birthday visit was performed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) methodology. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 3 meters using Lea Symbols charts. Scores represented the number of optotypes (Lea symbols) the participant identified and ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity. VA was tested in each eye, using the child's current refractive index. The worse-seeing eye was the eye with a lower ETDRS score at the 5th birthday visit. If both eyes had the same ETDRS score, then the left eye was assigned as the worse-seeing eye.
Time Frame
at the participant's fifth birthday visit (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of Active Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) at 40 Weeks Post Core Baseline Visit
Description
The absence of active ROP in both eyes is defined by the absence of all of the following features: (1) Vessel dilatation of plus disease in at least 2 quardrants (some persisting tortuosity is allowed), (2) Extra-retina vessels extending from the retina into the vitreous and judged to be a sign of active ROP disease.
Time Frame
at 40 weeks post core baseline visit
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of Active Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) at 52 Weeks Post Core Baseline Visit
Description
The absence of active ROP in both eyes is defined by the absence of all of the following features: (1) Vessel dilatation of plus disease in at least 2 quardrants (some persisting tortuosity is allowed), (2) Extra-retina vessels extending from the retina into the vitreous and judged to be a sign of active ROP disease.
Time Frame
at 52 weeks post core baseline visit
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit
Description
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Time Frame
at or before 40 weeks post baseline visit
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
Description
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Time Frame
at or before the participant's fifth birthday visit (up to maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit
Description
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis
Time Frame
at or before 40 weeks post baseline visit
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
Description
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis, (7) Optic disc pallor, (8) Optic disc swelling, (9) Pigmentary disturbance in the macula, (10) Atrophic changes in the macula
Time Frame
at or before the participant's fifth birthday visit (up to maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of All Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age Visit
Description
The absence of all ocular structural abnormalities is defined by the absence of all of the following fundus features in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula
Time Frame
at or before participant's 2 years corrected age visit (up to 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Absence of Individual Ocular Structural Abnormalities at or Before Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age Visit
Description
Number of participants with absence of each structural abnormality in both eyes at or before the given time point: (1) Substantial temporal retinal vessel dragging causing abnormal structural features/macular Ectopia, (2) Retrolental membrane obscuring the view of the posterior pole, (3) Posterior retinal fold involving the macula, (4) Retinal detachment involving the macula, (5) Retinal detachment not involving the macula, (6) Pre-retinal fibrosis, (7) Optic disc pallor, (8) Optic disc swelling, (9) Pigmentary disturbance in the macula, (10) Atrophic changes in the macula
Time Frame
at or before participant's 2 years corrected age visit (up to 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Recurrence of ROP up to 40 Weeks Post Baseline Visit in the Core Study
Description
Recurrence of ROP was defined as ROP receiving any post-baseline intervention after the 1st study treatment in the core study. In the ranibizumab arms, post-baseline interventions were ranibizumab retreatment or switch to laser. In the laser arm, post-baseline interventions were supplementary laser treatments after 11 days post-baseline, or switch to ranibizumab; supplementary laser treatment within 11 days post-baseline was not counted as recurrence.
Time Frame
up to 40 weeks post baseline visit in the core study
Title
Number of Participants With Recurrence of ROP up to 52 Weeks Post Baseline Visit in the Core Study
Description
Recurrence of ROP was defined as ROP receiving any post-baseline intervention after the 1st study treatment in the core study. In the ranibizumab arms, post-baseline interventions were ranibizumab retreatment or switch to laser. In the laser arm, post-baseline interventions were supplementary laser treatments after 11 days post-baseline, or switch to ranibizumab; supplementary laser treatment within 11 days post-baseline was not counted as recurrence. Beyond Week 40, participants did not receive any study intervention and no new data was collected after 40 weeks post core baseline visit.
Time Frame
up to 52 weeks post baseline visit in the core study
Title
Number of Ranibizumab Injections Received Per Participant Over the Whole Safety Observation Period
Description
Number of ranibizumab injections received in the treatment of participants with ROP up to and including 40 weeks post baseline visit in the core study were reported.
Time Frame
up to and including 40 weeks post baseline visit in the core study
Title
Refraction Status: Summary of Participants at Participant's 2 Years Corrected Age
Description
Summary of participants was reported to evaluate the refraction in each eye at the participant's 2 years corrected age
Time Frame
at participant's 2 years corrected age (maximum 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Refraction Status: Summary of Participants at the Participant's Fifth Birthday Visit
Description
Summary of participants was reported to evaluate the refraction in each eye at the participant's 2 years' corrected age
Time Frame
at the participant's fifth birthday visit (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Change From Baseline in Weight
Description
Subject´s weight was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Time Frame
Baseline of the core study, at the subject's 2 years' corrected age (maximum 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit) and at the subjects' fifth birthday (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Change From Baseline in Head Circumference
Description
Subject´s head circumference was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Time Frame
Baseline of the core study and at the subject's 2 years' corrected age (maximum 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
Description
Subject´s Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Time Frame
Baseline of the core study and at the subject's 2 years' corrected age (maximum 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure
Description
Subject´s Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure was reported to evaluate the physical development.
Time Frame
Baseline of the core study and at the subject's 2 years' corrected age (maximum 2 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With the Summary of Respiratory Function Status
Description
Number of participants with respiratory function status was reported
Time Frame
at the participants' fifth birthday visit (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Number of Participants With Hearing Impairment of Any Type
Description
Number of participants with hearing function status was reported
Time Frame
at the participants' fifth birthday visit (maximum 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit)
Title
Duration of Hospitalization
Description
Duration of hospitalization (from birth to first hospital discharge home) was reported to evaluate the health status of the subject
Time Frame
From baseline of the core study up to 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit
Title
Weight at the Time of First Hospital Discharge
Description
Weight (gram) at the time of first hospital discharge was reported to evaluate the health status of the subject
Time Frame
From baseline of the core study up to 5 years and 4 months post core baseline visit
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s), in compliance with local requirements
The patient successfully completed the core study H2301, as defined by providing assessments at the Visit 112 (the last scheduled visit in the core study) or, if appropriate, at the last of the additional assessment visits as per protocol in H2301, whichever was latest
The patient received study treatment in both eyes at baseline of study H2301
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient had a medical condition or personal circumstance which precluded study participation or compliance with study procedures, as assessed by the Investigator
Patient had been discontinued from the core study H2301 at any time
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
A-8036
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brugge
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 4 - Podoli
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
14700
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ostrava
State/Province
Poruba
ZIP/Postal Code
708 52
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha
ZIP/Postal Code
12808
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Koebenhavn Ø
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Alexandria
ZIP/Postal Code
21131
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10138
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13915
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ampelokipi
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
115 27
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
564 03
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
115 27
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1125
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380016
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
400 008
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Coimbatore
State/Province
Tamil Nadu
ZIP/Postal Code
641014
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madurai
State/Province
Tamil Nadu
ZIP/Postal Code
625020
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vanchiyoor
State/Province
Thiruvanantapuram
ZIP/Postal Code
695035
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110029
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Firenze
State/Province
FI
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Perugia
State/Province
PG
ZIP/Postal Code
06100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fiumicino
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00054
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
453-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
466 8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Yachiyo-city
State/Province
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
276-8524
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fukuoka city
State/Province
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
812-8582
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fukuoka city
State/Province
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
814 0180
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kurume city
State/Province
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
830-0011
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sapporo-city
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zentsuji-city
State/Province
Kagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
765-8507
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Shimajiri-Gun
State/Province
Okinawa
ZIP/Postal Code
901-1303
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Izumi-city
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
594-1101
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ohtsu-city
State/Province
Shiga
ZIP/Postal Code
520-2192
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fuchu-city
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
183-8561
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ota-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
143 8541
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Setagaya-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
157-8535
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sumida-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
130-8575
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toshima-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
170-8476
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kaunas
State/Province
LTU
ZIP/Postal Code
LT 50161
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kota Kinabalu
State/Province
Sabah
ZIP/Postal Code
88996
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kuala Lumpur
State/Province
Wilayah Persekutuan
ZIP/Postal Code
50586
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brasov
ZIP/Postal Code
500025
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
020395
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Timisoara
ZIP/Postal Code
300041
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cheboksary
ZIP/Postal Code
428028
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420012
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
127486
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
194100
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Riyadh
ZIP/Postal Code
11211
Country
Saudi Arabia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
833 40
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
10002
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taoyuan
ZIP/Postal Code
33305
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Istanbul
State/Province
Bakirkoy
ZIP/Postal Code
34140
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Meselik
State/Province
Eskisehir
ZIP/Postal Code
26480
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Soguksu / Antalya
ZIP/Postal Code
07100
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Portsmouth
ZIP/Postal Code
PO6 3LY
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34391532
Citation
Marlow N, Stahl A, Lepore D, Fielder A, Reynolds JD, Zhu Q, Weisberger A, Stiehl DP, Fleck B; RAINBOW investigators group. 2-year outcomes of ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW extension study): prospective follow-up of an open label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Oct;5(10):698-707. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00195-4. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Rainbow Extension Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs