search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety Analyses of Mirtazapine in NSCLC Patients With Depression

Primary Purpose

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mirtazapine
Placebo
Sponsored by
Sun Yat-sen University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung focused on measuring Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression, mirtazapine, patients health questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathology confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, undertaking palliative chemotherapy
  • Age above 18 years old
  • PHQ-9 score ≥ 8 points at baseline assessment
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0 -2
  • Orally administration of drugs without difficulties
  • Eligible bone marrow function, liver and kidney function for chemotherapy
  • Pregnancy test negative in 7 days for women of child-bearing age; willing to take contraception measures.
  • Signed Informed consent form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of depression before advanced NSCLC confirmed
  • Suicide tendency or behavior
  • Mania in past medical history
  • Received surgery or radiation therapy in 4 weeks
  • Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis or spinal compression; except no symptoms and with no cortical hormonotherapy in 4 weeks.
  • Systemically treatment with psychotropic medications, antihistamines drugs, antibiotics, cortical hormone therapy, antiepileptic drugs, immunosuppressive agents or other drugs might affect treatment in 4 weeks; or locally used of these drug in 2 weeks.
  • AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 ULN without liver metastasis; or ≥ 5 ULN with liver metastasis.
  • Serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl
  • Residual toxicity event ≥ CTCAE grade 2, except peripheral neurotoxicities.
  • Any severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases judged by investigators.
  • Any contraindication of mirtazapine.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invalid subject after randomization
  • Major protocol violations judged by investigators.
  • Poor compliance
  • Intolerable adverse events
  • Subject withdraw ICF
  • Any pregnancy events
  • No clinical benefits due to clinical adverse events, laboratory abnormalities or other medical conditions
  • Other reasons of treatment discontinuation judged by investigators.

Sites / Locations

  • Cancer Center of Sun-Yat Sen University (CCSYSU)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

mirtazapine

Placebo

Arm Description

Mirtazapine arm will be orally administered with mirtazapine 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators.

Placebo arm will be orally administered with placebo 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants responded to treatment.
Using PHQ-9 or HAMD-17 questionnaire to assess the change of depression scores at the time points above. The measure unit is questionnaire score point, remain the same at every time points. And to calculate response number of patients (patients had 50% percent of depression questionnaire score points reduction compared to baseline after treatment initiation) and recovery number of patients (patients had PHQ-9 score less than 8 points PHQ-9 score less than 8 points during the treatment).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Response duration
Regression recurrence defined as PHQ-9 score ascending above baseline level.
Number of participants had quality of life improvement
Using EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) to assess the quality of life change at the time points above. The measure unit is questionnaire score point, remain the same at every time points. And to calculate improved number of patients (patients had quality of life questionnaire score points gained compared to baseline after treatment initiation)

Full Information

First Posted
December 11, 2015
Last Updated
January 6, 2016
Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02650544
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Analyses of Mirtazapine in NSCLC Patients With Depression
Official Title
Efficacy and Safety Analyses of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Malignant Tumor Related Depression: A Phase II, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a phase II, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Study objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in advanced NSCLC patients with malignant tumor related depression. Study hypothesis is that advanced NSCLC diagnosed with depression undertaking palliative chemotherapy with mirtazapine treatment for 8 weeks will have remarkable improvement in depression compared to baseline. Eligible advanced NSCLC Patients with PHQ-9 score ≥ 8, and undertaking palliative chemotherapy will be enrolled into this study. patients will be stratified (gender, age, Numerical Rating Scale score for cancer pain 0-3/4-6/7-10) randomized (1:1) into mirtazapine or placebo treatment. Patients in mirtazapine arm will be orally administered with mirtazapine 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators. Patients in placebo arm will be orally administered with placebo 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators. During the treatment, Patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) questionnaires will be collected at baseline, 3 weeks (d22) and 8 weeks (d57), or treatment discontinuation date due to depression deteriorated or suicidal tendency and behavior. Follow-up will last up to 4 weeks after treatment end with depression assessment (questionnaires every 2 weeks). Study endpoints: primary endpoint is the anti-depression efficacy (response rate). Response defined as the PHQ-9 or HAMD-17 questionnaire score decrease ≥ 50% compared with baseline level.
Detailed Description
Major depression prevail in patients with malignant tumor with an incident rate of 20% - 40%, 2-3 times more than the prevalence of population, especially high in patients with advanced solid tumor patients as 40% - 50.6%. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) palliative care guideline recommended PHQ-9 as the diagnosis tool for depression, total scores ≥ 8 was considered the standard of malignant tumor related depression. Major depression had been proved related with malignant tumors, mirtazapine is the currently effective drug in anti-depression clinical therapy, have better tolerance and equal effect compared to Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) or noradrenaline serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NE-SNRIs). This is a phase II, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Study objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in advanced NSCLC patients with malignant tumor related depression. Study hypothesis is that advanced NSCLC diagnosed with depression undertaking palliative chemotherapy with mirtazapine treatment for 8 weeks will have remarkable improvement in depression compared to baseline. Palliative chemotherapy and mirtazapine have better efficacy, recovery rate, response duration, tolerance and quality of life improvement than palliative chemotherapy and placebo. Moreover, mirtazapine could improve patients' anxiety and chemotherapy related nausea and vomit. Eligible advanced NSCLC Patients with PHQ-9 score ≥ 8, and undertaking palliative chemotherapy will be enrolled into this study. After baseline assessment (PHQ-9, HAMD-17 and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires), 236 patients will be stratified (gender, age, NRS score for cancer pain 0-3/4-6/7-10) randomized (1:1) into mirtazapine or placebo treatment. Patients in mirtazapine arm will be orally administered with mirtazapine 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators. Patients in placebo arm will be orally administered with placebo 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators. During the treatment, PHQ-9, HAMD-17 and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires will be collected at 3 weeks (d22) and 8 weeks (d57), or treatment discontinuation date due to depression deteriorated or suicidal tendency and behavior. Follow-up will last up to 4 weeks after treatment end with depression assessment (questionnaires every 2 weeks). If anti-depression therapy is not effective after 8 weeks treatment or treatment discontinuation, patients will be unblinded and receive other treatment according to investigators. Treatment end at 8 weeks. Study endpoints: primary endpoint is the anti-depression efficacy (response rate). Response defined as the PHQ-9 or HAMD-17 questionnaire score decrease ≥ 50% compared with baseline level. Secondary endpoints included: 1.recovery rate, recovery defined as the PHQ-9 score less than 8 points. 2. Response duration, defined as the time period from treatment response to regression recurrence (PHQ-9 score ascending above baseline level). 3. Quality of life improvement, define as the best quality of life score minus baseline level. 4. Compliance to anti-depression therapy, defined as the medication count at each follow-up time points.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression
Keywords
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression, mirtazapine, patients health questionnaire (PHQ-9)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
236 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
mirtazapine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Mirtazapine arm will be orally administered with mirtazapine 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo arm will be orally administered with placebo 15mg, QD, consecutive medication for 8 weeks; along with palliative chemotherapy regimen decided by investigators.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mirtazapine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Treatment arm: mirtazapine administration
Intervention Description
Patients in mirtazapine arm will be orally administered mirtazapine as an anti-depression therapy; along with palliative chemotherapy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Comparative arm: placebo administration
Intervention Description
Patients in placebo arm will be orally administered placebo; along with palliative chemotherapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants responded to treatment.
Description
Using PHQ-9 or HAMD-17 questionnaire to assess the change of depression scores at the time points above. The measure unit is questionnaire score point, remain the same at every time points. And to calculate response number of patients (patients had 50% percent of depression questionnaire score points reduction compared to baseline after treatment initiation) and recovery number of patients (patients had PHQ-9 score less than 8 points PHQ-9 score less than 8 points during the treatment).
Time Frame
baseline, and 3 weeks (d22), and 8 weeks (d57), and follow-up (d71, d85)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response duration
Description
Regression recurrence defined as PHQ-9 score ascending above baseline level.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the date of first documented regression recurrence, assessed up to 12 weeks"
Title
Number of participants had quality of life improvement
Description
Using EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0) to assess the quality of life change at the time points above. The measure unit is questionnaire score point, remain the same at every time points. And to calculate improved number of patients (patients had quality of life questionnaire score points gained compared to baseline after treatment initiation)
Time Frame
baseline, and 3 weeks (d22), and 8 weeks (d57), and follow-up (d71, d85)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Pathology confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, undertaking palliative chemotherapy Age above 18 years old PHQ-9 score ≥ 8 points at baseline assessment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0 -2 Orally administration of drugs without difficulties Eligible bone marrow function, liver and kidney function for chemotherapy Pregnancy test negative in 7 days for women of child-bearing age; willing to take contraception measures. Signed Informed consent form (ICF) Exclusion Criteria: Clinical diagnosis of depression before advanced NSCLC confirmed Suicide tendency or behavior Mania in past medical history Received surgery or radiation therapy in 4 weeks Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis or spinal compression; except no symptoms and with no cortical hormonotherapy in 4 weeks. Systemically treatment with psychotropic medications, antihistamines drugs, antibiotics, cortical hormone therapy, antiepileptic drugs, immunosuppressive agents or other drugs might affect treatment in 4 weeks; or locally used of these drug in 2 weeks. AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 ULN without liver metastasis; or ≥ 5 ULN with liver metastasis. Serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl Residual toxicity event ≥ CTCAE grade 2, except peripheral neurotoxicities. Any severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases judged by investigators. Any contraindication of mirtazapine. Exclusion Criteria: Invalid subject after randomization Major protocol violations judged by investigators. Poor compliance Intolerable adverse events Subject withdraw ICF Any pregnancy events No clinical benefits due to clinical adverse events, laboratory abnormalities or other medical conditions Other reasons of treatment discontinuation judged by investigators.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Li Zhang, professor
Organizational Affiliation
Sun Yat-sen University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cancer Center of Sun-Yat Sen University (CCSYSU)
City
GuangZhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510060
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21799550
Citation
Reddy MS. Depression: the disorder and the burden. Indian J Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;32(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.70510. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25175478
Citation
Sharpe M, Walker J, Holm Hansen C, Martin P, Symeonides S, Gourley C, Wall L, Weller D, Murray G; SMaRT (Symptom Management Research Trials) Oncology-2 Team. Integrated collaborative care for comorbid major depression in patients with cancer (SMaRT Oncology-2): a multicentre randomised controlled effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1099-108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61231-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25559036
Citation
Stafford L, Judd F, Gibson P, Komiti A, Mann GB, Quinn M. Anxiety and depression symptoms in the 2 years following diagnosis of breast or gynaecologic cancer: prevalence, course and determinants of outcome. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2215-24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2571-y. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25175097
Citation
Walker J, Hansen CH, Martin P, Symeonides S, Gourley C, Wall L, Weller D, Murray G, Sharpe M; SMaRT (Symptom Management Research Trials) Oncology-3 Team. Integrated collaborative care for major depression comorbid with a poor prognosis cancer (SMaRT Oncology-3): a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1168-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70343-2. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25175951
Citation
Rodin G. Effective treatment for depression in patients with cancer. Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1076-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61342-8. Epub 2014 Aug 28. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25515721
Citation
Andersen BL, Rowland JH, Somerfield MR. Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an american society of clinical oncology guideline adaptation. J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):133-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002311. Epub 2014 Dec 16. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15811165
Citation
Amini H, Aghayan S, Jalili SA, Akhondzadeh S, Yahyazadeh O, Pakravan-Nejad M. Comparison of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005 Apr;30(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2004.00585.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14399272
Citation
HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23980690
Citation
Spiegel D. Minding the body: psychotherapy and cancer survival. Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;19(3):465-85. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12061. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15263042
Citation
Massie MJ. Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;(32):57-71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10673533
Citation
Hopwood P, Stephens RJ. Depression in patients with lung cancer: prevalence and risk factors derived from quality-of-life data. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):893-903. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.893.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23263699
Citation
Arrieta O, Angulo LP, Nunez-Valencia C, Dorantes-Gallareta Y, Macedo EO, Martinez-Lopez D, Alvarado S, Corona-Cruz JF, Onate-Ocana LF. Association of depression and anxiety on quality of life, treatment adherence, and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(6):1941-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2793-5. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20818875
Citation
Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25493684
Citation
de Souza BF, de Moraes JA, Inocenti A, dos Santos MA, Silva AE, Miasso AI. Women with breast cancer taking chemotherapy: depression symptoms and treatment adherence. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Oct;22(5):866-73. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.3564.2491.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24402001
Citation
Badr H, Shen MJ. Pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and dyadic adjustment influence patient and partner depression in metastatic breast cancer. Clin J Pain. 2014 Nov;30(11):923-33. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000058.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25045052
Citation
Lee Y, Lin PY, Chien CY, Fang FM. Prevalence and risk factors of depressive disorder in caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology. 2015 Feb;24(2):155-61. doi: 10.1002/pon.3619. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12007762
Citation
Theobald DE, Kirsh KL, Holtsclaw E, Donaghy K, Passik SD. An open-label, crossover trial of mirtazapine (15 and 30 mg) in cancer patients with pain and other distressing symptoms. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 May;23(5):442-7. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00381-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9090576
Citation
Burrows GD, Kremer CM. Mirtazapine: clinical advantages in the treatment of depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Apr;17 Suppl 1:34S-39S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199704001-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11607047
Citation
Anttila SA, Leinonen EV. A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine. CNS Drug Rev. 2001 Fall;7(3):249-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19381036
Citation
Ito T, Okubo Y, Roth A. [Efficacy of mirtazapine for appetite loss and nausea of the cancer patient--from clinical experience in Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 Apr;36(4):623-6. Japanese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9437474
Citation
Puzantian T. Mirtazapine, an antidepressant. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Jan 1;55(1):44-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.1.44.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21827775
Citation
Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M. Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22127301
Citation
Popoli M, Yan Z, McEwen BS, Sanacora G. The stressed synapse: the impact of stress and glucocorticoids on glutamate transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Nov 30;13(1):22-37. doi: 10.1038/nrn3138.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21245828
Citation
Huntzinger E, Izaurralde E. Gene silencing by microRNAs: contributions of translational repression and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Feb;12(2):99-110. doi: 10.1038/nrg2936.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20419051
Citation
Zeng LH, Rensing NR, Wong M. Developing Antiepileptogenic Drugs for Acquired Epilepsy: Targeting the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Pathway. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 2009 Jan 1;1(3):124-129. doi: 10.4255/mcpharmacol.09.16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22427989
Citation
Smalheiser NR, Lugli G, Rizavi HS, Torvik VI, Turecki G, Dwivedi Y. MicroRNA expression is down-regulated and reorganized in prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide subjects. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033201. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20847275
Citation
Baudry A, Mouillet-Richard S, Schneider B, Launay JM, Kellermann O. miR-16 targets the serotonin transporter: a new facet for adaptive responses to antidepressants. Science. 2010 Sep 17;329(5998):1537-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1193692.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24952960
Citation
Issler O, Haramati S, Paul ED, Maeno H, Navon I, Zwang R, Gil S, Mayberg HS, Dunlop BW, Menke A, Awatramani R, Binder EB, Deneris ES, Lowry CA, Chen A. MicroRNA 135 is essential for chronic stress resiliency, antidepressant efficacy, and intact serotonergic activity. Neuron. 2014 Jul 16;83(2):344-360. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.042. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22925464
Citation
Bocchio-Chiavetto L, Maffioletti E, Bettinsoli P, Giovannini C, Bignotti S, Tardito D, Corrada D, Milanesi L, Gennarelli M. Blood microRNA changes in depressed patients during antidepressant treatment. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Jul;23(7):602-11. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25003554
Citation
Lotrich FE. Inflammatory cytokine-associated depression. Brain Res. 2015 Aug 18;1617:113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.06.032. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety Analyses of Mirtazapine in NSCLC Patients With Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs