search
Back to results

Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Complete Articular Distal Radial Fractures (VIPAR)

Primary Purpose

Displaced Complete Articular Distal Radius Fractures

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Open reduction and internal plate fixation
Closed reduction and plasterimmobilisation
Sponsored by
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Displaced Complete Articular Distal Radius Fractures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients from 18 - 75 years
  • AO type C displaced distal radius fracture, as classified on lateral, posterior anterior and lateral carporadial radiographs/CT-scan by a radiologist or trauma surgeon
  • Acceptable closed reduction obtained immediately after admission to the Emergency Department (<12hrs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with impaired wrist function prior to injury due to arthrosis/neurological disorders of the upper limb
  • Open distal radius fractures
  • Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16)
  • Other fractures of the affected extremity (except from ulnar styloid process)
  • Fracture of other wrist
  • Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand a rehabilitation program and other treatment information as judged by the attending physician
  • Patient suffering from disorders of bone metabolism other than osteoporosis (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia)
  • Patients suffering from connective tissue disease or (joint) hyperflexibility disorders such as Marfan's, Ehler Danlos or other related disorders

Sites / Locations

  • Academic Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Closed reduction and plasterimmobilisation

Open reduction and internal plate fixation

Arm Description

The control group will be treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of a haematoma block with 20 cc Lidocaine 1%. Closed reduction will be preferably performed according to the Robert-Jones method. This involves increasing the deformity first, then applying continuous traction and immobilizing wrist and hand in the reduced position. Additional radiographs will be performed to verify the success of the reduction. After this has been confirmed, the wrist will be immobilized initially in a split plaster and later changed into a circular cast for five to six weeks immobilization in total.

The surgery will be performed by a certified trauma surgeon. According to the current standard treatment protocol, antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered thirty minutes preoperatively. The distal radius will be approached according to Henry, which beholds an incision between the tendon of the flexor carpi radialis muscle and the radial artery. After the fracture site is exposed, the fracture will be reduced and provisionally fixed under fluoroscopy with K-Wires/reduction forceps. An appropriate volar locking plate which best suits the anatomy of the wrist and the fracture type will be selected. Fracture reduction and screw placement will be confirmed by radiographic images. Additionally, fixation can be supported by a dorsal plate or radial column plate. This will be at discretion of the surgeon and depends on the fracture configuration and the position of the fragments. Wound closure will be performed at the discretion of the surgeon using standard techniques.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Wrist pain and disability measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
Quality of life measured with the SF-36
Quality of Life assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 is a validated multipurpose, short form health survey which contains 36 questions representing eight different health domains. These domains are combined into a mental and physical component scale. From each domain, scores ranging from 0 to 100 points are derived, with lower scores indicating poorer quality of life.
Pain measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Pain as indicated on a visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. Patients will be asked to give an estimation of the type and quantity of pain medication taken during all follow-up visits.
Range of motion measured with a goniometer
Range of motion of the wrist measured on both sides with a handheld goniometer in degrees. ROM includes pronation and supination, ulnar and radial deviation and palmar and dorsal flexion of the wrist.
Grip strength measured with a dynamometer
Grip strength as measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. Grip strength will be measured as a percentage of the uninjured side.
Number of patients with loss of reduction
Radiographs will be performed to ensure that loss of reduction has not occurred. Loss of reduction is defined as <15° radial inclination, >15° of dorsal angulation or >20° of volar angulation, >3 mm shortening of ulnar variance or >2 mm of articular step-off or gap. Radial inclination, volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance and radial length will be measured digitally in the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) on standard posterior anterior (PA), lateral carporadial and lateral X-rays of the wrist. If loss of reduction occured, operative treatment will be considered, but will be at discretion of the treating surgeon.
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire based on the EQ-6D and the Standard Form Health and Labour questionnaire.
Number of complications in both treatment groups
Number of complications in both patients treated with plasterimmobilisation and ORIF. Complications include loss of reduction, cross-overs from conservative to operative treatment, fracture malunion or non-union, wound and/or plate infection, tendon irritation and/or rupture, neuropathy and the occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome.

Full Information

First Posted
January 4, 2016
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Maasstad Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Rijnland Hospital, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, BovenIJ Hospital, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Flevoziekenhuis, Ziekenhuis Rivierenland, Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Medical Center Alkmaar, Red Cross Hospital Beverwijk, Zaans Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02651779
Brief Title
Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Complete Articular Distal Radial Fractures
Acronym
VIPAR
Official Title
Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Complete Articular Distal Radial Fractures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 19, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 14, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 14, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Maasstad Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Rijnland Hospital, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, BovenIJ Hospital, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Flevoziekenhuis, Ziekenhuis Rivierenland, Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Medical Center Alkmaar, Red Cross Hospital Beverwijk, Zaans Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There is no consensus about the best treatment for patients with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures (AO type C fractures). Despite this lack of consensus and the lack of available literature on comparative data to guide treatment for this patient population, operative treatment with plate fixation has gained popularity. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome of open reduction and plate fixation with closed reduction and plaster immobilisation in adult patients (18-75 years) with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures.
Detailed Description
Distal radius fractures account for 17% of all fractures diagnosed. Two third of those fractures are displaced and need to be reduced. According to the Dutch National Guidelines, displaced distal radius fractures, after adequate reduction confirmed on X-ray, are best treated nonoperatively with cast immobilization. Moreover, the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline only suggest surgical fixation when the articular step, after reduction, exceeds 2mm. However, both recommendations are based on studies who did not differentiate between intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures. So, no clear consensus about the best treatment for patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures can be made. Despite this lack of consensus and the lack of available literature on comparative data to guide treatment for this patient population, a rise in use of volar plating has been observed. The goal of open reduction and plate fixation is to restore articular congruity and axial alignment, and to enable early post-operative movement. Several studies show good radiological and functional results using the volar locking plate in unstable displaced distal radius fractures. No studies have been carried out to assess whether operative treatment with plate fixation is superior in displaced complete articular distal radius fractures to nonoperative treatment in patients with these fracture type. Therefore, with this randomized controlled trial the investigators wish to determine the difference in functional outcome, assessed with the Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), after open reduction and plate fixation compared to nonoperative treatment with closed reduction and cast immobilization.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Displaced Complete Articular Distal Radius Fractures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Closed reduction and plasterimmobilisation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will be treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of a haematoma block with 20 cc Lidocaine 1%. Closed reduction will be preferably performed according to the Robert-Jones method. This involves increasing the deformity first, then applying continuous traction and immobilizing wrist and hand in the reduced position. Additional radiographs will be performed to verify the success of the reduction. After this has been confirmed, the wrist will be immobilized initially in a split plaster and later changed into a circular cast for five to six weeks immobilization in total.
Arm Title
Open reduction and internal plate fixation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The surgery will be performed by a certified trauma surgeon. According to the current standard treatment protocol, antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered thirty minutes preoperatively. The distal radius will be approached according to Henry, which beholds an incision between the tendon of the flexor carpi radialis muscle and the radial artery. After the fracture site is exposed, the fracture will be reduced and provisionally fixed under fluoroscopy with K-Wires/reduction forceps. An appropriate volar locking plate which best suits the anatomy of the wrist and the fracture type will be selected. Fracture reduction and screw placement will be confirmed by radiographic images. Additionally, fixation can be supported by a dorsal plate or radial column plate. This will be at discretion of the surgeon and depends on the fracture configuration and the position of the fragments. Wound closure will be performed at the discretion of the surgeon using standard techniques.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Open reduction and internal plate fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
ORIF, Surgical treatment
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Closed reduction and plasterimmobilisation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cast, Conservative treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wrist pain and disability measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
Description
The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Description
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Quality of life measured with the SF-36
Description
Quality of Life assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 is a validated multipurpose, short form health survey which contains 36 questions representing eight different health domains. These domains are combined into a mental and physical component scale. From each domain, scores ranging from 0 to 100 points are derived, with lower scores indicating poorer quality of life.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Pain measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
Pain as indicated on a visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. Patients will be asked to give an estimation of the type and quantity of pain medication taken during all follow-up visits.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Range of motion measured with a goniometer
Description
Range of motion of the wrist measured on both sides with a handheld goniometer in degrees. ROM includes pronation and supination, ulnar and radial deviation and palmar and dorsal flexion of the wrist.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Grip strength measured with a dynamometer
Description
Grip strength as measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. Grip strength will be measured as a percentage of the uninjured side.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Number of patients with loss of reduction
Description
Radiographs will be performed to ensure that loss of reduction has not occurred. Loss of reduction is defined as <15° radial inclination, >15° of dorsal angulation or >20° of volar angulation, >3 mm shortening of ulnar variance or >2 mm of articular step-off or gap. Radial inclination, volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance and radial length will be measured digitally in the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) on standard posterior anterior (PA), lateral carporadial and lateral X-rays of the wrist. If loss of reduction occured, operative treatment will be considered, but will be at discretion of the treating surgeon.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire
Description
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire based on the EQ-6D and the Standard Form Health and Labour questionnaire.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Number of complications in both treatment groups
Description
Number of complications in both patients treated with plasterimmobilisation and ORIF. Complications include loss of reduction, cross-overs from conservative to operative treatment, fracture malunion or non-union, wound and/or plate infection, tendon irritation and/or rupture, neuropathy and the occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients from 18 - 75 years AO type C displaced distal radius fracture, as classified on lateral, posterior anterior and lateral carporadial radiographs/CT-scan by a radiologist or trauma surgeon Acceptable closed reduction obtained immediately after admission to the Emergency Department (<12hrs) Exclusion Criteria: Patients with impaired wrist function prior to injury due to arthrosis/neurological disorders of the upper limb Open distal radius fractures Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16) Other fractures of the affected extremity (except from ulnar styloid process) Fracture of other wrist Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand a rehabilitation program and other treatment information as judged by the attending physician Patient suffering from disorders of bone metabolism other than osteoporosis (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia) Patients suffering from connective tissue disease or (joint) hyperflexibility disorders such as Marfan's, Ehler Danlos or other related disorders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J. Carel Goslings, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Niels W.L. Schep, MD, PhD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Maasstad Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26860090
Citation
Mulders MAM, Walenkamp MMJ, Goslings JC, Schep NWL. Internal plate fixation versus plaster in displaced complete articular distal radius fractures, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 9;17:68. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0925-y.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Complete Articular Distal Radial Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs