search
Back to results

A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Male Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms, While Taking the Alpha Blocker for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH)

Primary Purpose

Overactive Bladder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mirabegron
Placebo
Tamsulosin
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Overactive Bladder focused on measuring Tamsulosin, Overactive bladder, Benign prostatic hypertrophy, Mirabegron

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

at Visit 1 (Screening):

  • Patient had been under treatment with tamsulosin 0.2mg for at least 4 weeks before the start of the Screening period.
  • Patient with a history of an average of at least 2 episodes of urgency per 24 hours and an average of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours during the last 3 days before the start of the Screening period (verified by interview).
  • Patient who had no wish to have children in the future (Unique to Japan).
  • Male subjects and their female spouses/partners who were of childbearing potential must be using highly effective contraception consisting of two forms of birth control (at least one of which must be a barrier method), starting at Screening, continuing throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Subject must not donate sperm, starting at Screening, continuing throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Patient was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly.
  • Subject agreed not to participate in another interventional study while receiving treatment in this study.

at Visit 2 (Baseline):

  • Subject with an average of at least 2 episodes of urgency per 24 hours and an average of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours based on a 3-day micturition diary from the Screening period.

Exclusion Criteria:

at Visit 1 (Screening):

  • Patient with suspected symptoms of OAB, with onset only transient (e.g., drug-induced, psychogenic).
  • Patient with PVR urine volume >100 mL or Q max <5 mL/sec.
  • Patient with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥4 ng/mL.
  • Patient with neurogenic bladder (e.g., spinal-cord lesions or other damage that will clearly affect urination; multiple sclerosis; Parkinson's disease) or a history of surgery that caused damage to the pelvic plexus.
  • Patient with urethral stricture or bladder-neck stenosis.
  • Patient with diabetic neuropathy complications.
  • Patient who had undergone a surgical procedure, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or hyperthermia therapy that may affect urinary tract function.
  • Patient with significant stress incontinence or postsurgical prostate incontinence, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Patient with an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization.
  • Patient with 3 or more episodes of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) within the last 6 months.
  • Patient with a UTI; prostatitis; chronic inflammation, such as interstitial cystitis; urinary calculus; or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs.
  • Patient with a concurrent malignancy or history of any malignancy (within the past 5 years), except for non-metastatic basal-cell or squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin that had been treated successfully.
  • Patient with serious heart disease, liver disease, kidney disease, immunological disease, lung disease.
  • Patient who had received intravesical injection within the last 12 months with botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, or capsaicin.
  • Patient who had received electrostimulation therapy for OAB.
  • Patient who had received a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises <28 days prior to the start of the Screening period.
  • Patient with postural hypotension or syncope, hypokalemia, or closed-angle glaucoma.
  • Patient with evidence of QT prolongation on electrocardiogram (ECG), defined as QTcF >450 msec.
  • Patient with severe uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >110 mmHg.
  • Patient with a clinically significant ECG abnormality, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Patient who had severe renal impairment, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <29 mL/min/1.73m2; end-stage renal disease; or is undergoing dialysis.
  • Patient with aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) >2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) >3 times the ULN and considered clinically significant by the Investigator.
  • Patient with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, defined as Child-Pugh Class B or C.
  • Patient with hypersensitivity to any of the components of mirabegron, other beta-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) agonists, or any of the inactive ingredients.
  • Patient with ongoing alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  • Patient with or a history of mood disorder, neurotic disorder, or schizophrenia.
  • Patient with dementia, cognitive dysfunction, or clinically significant cerebrovascular disorder.
  • Patient who had been treated with an experimental device <84 days or received an investigational agent <84 days prior to the start of the Screening period.
  • Patient had used any prohibited concomitant medication <28 days (but, <1 year for 5α-reductase inhibitors) before the start of the Screening period.
  • Patient with any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, made the subject unsuitable for study participation.
  • Patient who was involved in the conduct of the study as an employee of the Astellas group, a third party associated with the study, or the study site team.

at Visit 2 (Baseline):

  • Subject fulfills any exclusion criteria of Visit 1 at Visit 2.
  • Subject was noncompliant during the 4 week tamsulosin Screening period, defined as taking less than 80% or greater than 120% of prescribed dose of study medication.
  • Subject had an average total daily urine volume >3000 mL, as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary.

Sites / Locations

  • Site JP81046
  • Site JP81009
  • Site JP81045
  • Site JP81041
  • Site JP81042
  • Site JP81043
  • Site JP81044
  • Site JP81048
  • Site JP81004
  • Site JP81005
  • Site JP81001
  • Site JP81002
  • Site JP81003
  • Site JP81038
  • Site JP81039
  • Site JP81040
  • Site JP81024
  • Site JP81056
  • Site JP81051
  • Site JP81052
  • Site JP81047
  • Site JP81025
  • Site JP81026
  • Site JP81027
  • Site JP81028
  • Site JP81029
  • Site JP81030
  • Site JP81031
  • Site JP81032
  • Site JP81033
  • Site JP81034
  • Site JP81035
  • Site JP81036
  • Site JP81037
  • Site JP81053
  • Site JP81054
  • Site JP81006
  • Site JP81007
  • Site JP81008
  • Site JP81050
  • Site JP81010
  • Site JP81011
  • Site JP81012
  • Site JP81013
  • Site JP81014
  • Site JP81015
  • Site JP81016
  • Site JP81017
  • Site JP81018
  • Site JP81019
  • Site JP81020
  • Site JP81021
  • Site JP81022
  • Site KR00001
  • Site KR00002
  • Site KR00003
  • Site KR00004
  • Site KR00005

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Mirabegron 50 mg

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants who received mirabegron 50 mg once a day along with tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 12 weeks

Participants who received matching placebo once a day along with tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 12 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
An urgency episode was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as any episode when both urgency and incontinence occurred concurrently. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes
A nocturia episode was defined as a micturition episode initiated between night time. Night time was defined as the period between sleep onset time and the wake-up time the following day (micturitions at the same time as the wake-up time were excluded). The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)
The OABSS is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses urinary frequency. Total score was the sum total of the score of each item (ranges: 0-15). Negative change means improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in OABSS Subscale Scores
Each OABSS subscale score was based on each question in the questionnaire: Daytime Frequency ("How many times do you typically urinate from waking in the morning until sleeping at night?" where scores range from 0-2), Nighttime Frequency ("How many times do you typically wake up to urinate from sleeping at night until waking in the morning?" where scores range from 0-3), Urgency ("How often do you have a sudden desire to urinate, which is difficult to defer?" where scores range from 0-5), Urgency Incontinence ("How often do you leak urine because you cannot defer the sudden desire to urinate?" where scores range from 0-5). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
The IPSS included an 7-item questionnaire that assesses urinary frequency and incomplete voiding along with a QoL assessment. Total IPSS score was the sum total of the score (range: 0-35) of each item (Questions 1-7). Negative change means improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in IPSS Subscale Scores
IPSS subscale scores was calculated by following each formula. Storage subscale was derived as sum of scores for questions 2, 4, and 7 (range: 1-15). Voiding subscale-1 was derived as sum of scores for questions 3, 5, and 6 (range: 1-15). Voiding subscale-2 was derived as sum of voiding subscale-1 and the score for question 1 (range: 1-20). Individual scores and IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score was the score of each item (range: 1-6) (Questions 1-7 and QoL item). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Symptom Bother as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
The OAB-q was a 33-item questionnaire, which consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL items that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total health-related QoL score. Symptom Bother was derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8 (range: 0-100). Higher Symptom Bother is indicative of greater symptom bother.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total Health-Related QoL (HRQoL) Scores as Assessed by the OAB-q
The OAB-q was a 33-item questionnaire, which consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL items that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total health-related QoL score. Total HRQL score was derived as sum of HRQL subscale scores (range: 25-150). Higher total HRQL score is indicative of better HRQL.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset during the double-blind treatment period or an AE with onset during the screening period with worsening severity during the double-blind treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. Serious TEAE was an AE considered serious.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
PVR was measured by ultrasonography.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax)
Urine flow rate was volume voided per micturition (voided volume) divided by time for the micturition (flow time).

Full Information

First Posted
January 13, 2016
Last Updated
March 27, 2019
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
Collaborators
Astellas Pharma Singapore Pte. Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02656173
Brief Title
A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Male Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms, While Taking the Alpha Blocker for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH)
Official Title
A Phase 4, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Japanese and Korean Male Patients With Overactive Bladder Under Treatment With the α-Blocker Tamsulosin for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 25, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 21, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 21, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
Collaborators
Astellas Pharma Singapore Pte. Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of mirabegron versus placebo in male patients with OAB symptoms while taking the alpha blocker, tamsulosin, for BPH.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Overactive Bladder
Keywords
Tamsulosin, Overactive bladder, Benign prostatic hypertrophy, Mirabegron

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
568 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mirabegron 50 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants who received mirabegron 50 mg once a day along with tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 12 weeks
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants who received matching placebo once a day along with tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mirabegron
Other Intervention Name(s)
YM178
Intervention Description
Oral tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Oral tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tamsulosin
Intervention Description
Oral tablet
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Description
A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Description
A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 4, 8 and 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An urgency episode was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as any episode when both urgency and incontinence occurred concurrently. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes
Description
A nocturia episode was defined as a micturition episode initiated between night time. Night time was defined as the period between sleep onset time and the wake-up time the following day (micturitions at the same time as the wake-up time were excluded). The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Description
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by participants on a 3-day micturition diary before each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)
Description
The OABSS is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses urinary frequency. Total score was the sum total of the score of each item (ranges: 0-15). Negative change means improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in OABSS Subscale Scores
Description
Each OABSS subscale score was based on each question in the questionnaire: Daytime Frequency ("How many times do you typically urinate from waking in the morning until sleeping at night?" where scores range from 0-2), Nighttime Frequency ("How many times do you typically wake up to urinate from sleeping at night until waking in the morning?" where scores range from 0-3), Urgency ("How often do you have a sudden desire to urinate, which is difficult to defer?" where scores range from 0-5), Urgency Incontinence ("How often do you leak urine because you cannot defer the sudden desire to urinate?" where scores range from 0-5). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Description
The IPSS included an 7-item questionnaire that assesses urinary frequency and incomplete voiding along with a QoL assessment. Total IPSS score was the sum total of the score (range: 0-35) of each item (Questions 1-7). Negative change means improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in IPSS Subscale Scores
Description
IPSS subscale scores was calculated by following each formula. Storage subscale was derived as sum of scores for questions 2, 4, and 7 (range: 1-15). Voiding subscale-1 was derived as sum of scores for questions 3, 5, and 6 (range: 1-15). Voiding subscale-2 was derived as sum of voiding subscale-1 and the score for question 1 (range: 1-20). Individual scores and IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score was the score of each item (range: 1-6) (Questions 1-7 and QoL item). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Symptom Bother as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
Description
The OAB-q was a 33-item questionnaire, which consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL items that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total health-related QoL score. Symptom Bother was derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8 (range: 0-100). Higher Symptom Bother is indicative of greater symptom bother.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Total Health-Related QoL (HRQoL) Scores as Assessed by the OAB-q
Description
The OAB-q was a 33-item questionnaire, which consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL items that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total health-related QoL score. Total HRQL score was derived as sum of HRQL subscale scores (range: 25-150). Higher total HRQL score is indicative of better HRQL.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset during the double-blind treatment period or an AE with onset during the screening period with worsening severity during the double-blind treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. Serious TEAE was an AE considered serious.
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug up to Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Description
PVR was measured by ultrasonography.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax)
Description
Urine flow rate was volume voided per micturition (voided volume) divided by time for the micturition (flow time).
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: at Visit 1 (Screening): Patient had been under treatment with tamsulosin 0.2mg for at least 4 weeks before the start of the Screening period. Patient with a history of an average of at least 2 episodes of urgency per 24 hours and an average of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours during the last 3 days before the start of the Screening period (verified by interview). Patient who had no wish to have children in the future (Unique to Japan). Male subjects and their female spouses/partners who were of childbearing potential must be using highly effective contraception consisting of two forms of birth control (at least one of which must be a barrier method), starting at Screening, continuing throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration. Subject must not donate sperm, starting at Screening, continuing throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration. Patient was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly. Subject agreed not to participate in another interventional study while receiving treatment in this study. at Visit 2 (Baseline): Subject with an average of at least 2 episodes of urgency per 24 hours and an average of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours based on a 3-day micturition diary from the Screening period. Exclusion Criteria: at Visit 1 (Screening): Patient with suspected symptoms of OAB, with onset only transient (e.g., drug-induced, psychogenic). Patient with PVR urine volume >100 mL or Q max <5 mL/sec. Patient with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥4 ng/mL. Patient with neurogenic bladder (e.g., spinal-cord lesions or other damage that will clearly affect urination; multiple sclerosis; Parkinson's disease) or a history of surgery that caused damage to the pelvic plexus. Patient with urethral stricture or bladder-neck stenosis. Patient with diabetic neuropathy complications. Patient who had undergone a surgical procedure, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or hyperthermia therapy that may affect urinary tract function. Patient with significant stress incontinence or postsurgical prostate incontinence, as determined by the Investigator. Patient with an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization. Patient with 3 or more episodes of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) within the last 6 months. Patient with a UTI; prostatitis; chronic inflammation, such as interstitial cystitis; urinary calculus; or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs. Patient with a concurrent malignancy or history of any malignancy (within the past 5 years), except for non-metastatic basal-cell or squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin that had been treated successfully. Patient with serious heart disease, liver disease, kidney disease, immunological disease, lung disease. Patient who had received intravesical injection within the last 12 months with botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, or capsaicin. Patient who had received electrostimulation therapy for OAB. Patient who had received a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises <28 days prior to the start of the Screening period. Patient with postural hypotension or syncope, hypokalemia, or closed-angle glaucoma. Patient with evidence of QT prolongation on electrocardiogram (ECG), defined as QTcF >450 msec. Patient with severe uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >110 mmHg. Patient with a clinically significant ECG abnormality, as determined by the Investigator. Patient who had severe renal impairment, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <29 mL/min/1.73m2; end-stage renal disease; or is undergoing dialysis. Patient with aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) >2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) >3 times the ULN and considered clinically significant by the Investigator. Patient with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, defined as Child-Pugh Class B or C. Patient with hypersensitivity to any of the components of mirabegron, other beta-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) agonists, or any of the inactive ingredients. Patient with ongoing alcohol and/or drug abuse. Patient with or a history of mood disorder, neurotic disorder, or schizophrenia. Patient with dementia, cognitive dysfunction, or clinically significant cerebrovascular disorder. Patient who had been treated with an experimental device <84 days or received an investigational agent <84 days prior to the start of the Screening period. Patient had used any prohibited concomitant medication <28 days (but, <1 year for 5α-reductase inhibitors) before the start of the Screening period. Patient with any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, made the subject unsuitable for study participation. Patient who was involved in the conduct of the study as an employee of the Astellas group, a third party associated with the study, or the study site team. at Visit 2 (Baseline): Subject fulfills any exclusion criteria of Visit 1 at Visit 2. Subject was noncompliant during the 4 week tamsulosin Screening period, defined as taking less than 80% or greater than 120% of prescribed dose of study medication. Subject had an average total daily urine volume >3000 mL, as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Inc
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site JP81046
City
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81009
City
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81045
City
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81041
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81042
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81043
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81044
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81048
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81004
City
Gunma
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81005
City
Gunma
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81001
City
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81002
City
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81003
City
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81038
City
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81039
City
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81040
City
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81024
City
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81056
City
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81051
City
Kochi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81052
City
Kochi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81047
City
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81025
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81026
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81027
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81028
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81029
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81030
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81031
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81032
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81033
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81034
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81035
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81036
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81037
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81053
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81054
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81006
City
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81007
City
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81008
City
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81050
City
Shizuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81010
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81011
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81012
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81013
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81014
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81015
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81016
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81017
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81018
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81019
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81020
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81021
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site JP81022
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site KR00001
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR00002
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR00003
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR00004
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR00005
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the trial, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for trials conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33245533
Citation
Kakizaki H, Lee KS, Katou D, Yamamoto O, Sumarsono B, Uno S, Yamaguchi O. Mirabegron Add-On Therapy to Tamsulosin in Men with Overactive Bladder: Post Hoc Analyses of Efficacy from the MATCH Study. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):739-757. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01517-5. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=263
Description
Link to results on the Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Male Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms, While Taking the Alpha Blocker for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs