search
Back to results

Ketamine as an Alternative Treatment to ECT in Major Depressive Disorder

Primary Purpose

Depressive Disorder, Major

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ketamine IV Infusion
ECT
Sponsored by
Pouya Movahed Rad
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depressive Disorder, Major focused on measuring Depressive Disorder, Major, Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects, Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine/administration & dosage*, Ketamine/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Electroconvulsive therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-85
  • Diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD, according to DSM-IV)
  • Inpatients who have been offered and have accepted ECT
  • Are eligible to participate
  • Score ≥ 20 Points on Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
  • Must be proficient in spoken and written Swedish
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-morbid conditions that could interfere with the treatment (e.g. primary psychosis)
  • Habitual difficulties to speak, hear, remember or reason
  • Treatment according to LPT (Lagen om psykiatrisk tvångsvård; Compulsory Psychiatric Care Act)
  • On-going or recent (6 months) drug abuse
  • Known allergy to the active substance
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known cardiovascular disease, including angina, acute/chronic congestive heart failure, moderly hypertension or tachyarrhythmia (because exacerbation by sympathomimetic properties of ketamine)
  • Pathological conditions in central nervous system with risk of increased intracranial pressure (increased ICP with ketamine)
  • Glaucoma (increased IOP with ketamine)
  • Porphyria or thyroid disorder (enhanced sympathomimetic properties by ketamine)
  • Ongoing severe infection

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Psychiatry

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

Ketamine IV Infusion

Arm Description

ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly. Each participating clinic decides for each patient whether the treatment is given uni- or bilateral, as well as the exact stimulation parameters. Choice of anesthetic drug (e.g. thiopental of propofol) and muscle relaxant is done by local anesthesiologist. The procedure differs in no way from how a given patient would have been treated if he or she were not included in the study.

Ketamin intra venous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5mg/kg), delivered over a period of 40 minutes thrice weekly, as ECT (Monday, Wednesday and Friday).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patients in remission in each treatment arm assessed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Primary outcome is the proportion of patients in remission in each treatment arm. Remission is defined as a MADRS ≤ 10.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to remission compared between the two treatments.
Time (days) to reach remission (defined as MADRS≤ 10) is compared between the groups.
Time to response compared between the two treatments.
Time (days) to response (defined as a drop of 50% from the pre-treatment MADRS value)) is compared between the groups.
Ketamine treatment is associated with a smaller decrease in the performance in a CANTAB cognitive test battery compared to ECT.
Cognitive function are assessed with Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
Remission from severe depression is associated with improved performance in the performance in a CANTAB cognitive test battery.
Cognitive function are assessed with Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
The antidepressant effect of ketamine is longer lasting than that of ECT, assessed by the proportion of patients in remission (defined by a maximum score of 9 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)).
The antidepressant effect will be assessed with MADRS baseline score and measured within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.
Ketamine treatment is associated with a smaller decrease in the performance in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) compared to ECT.
Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Remission from severe depression is associated with improved performance in the performance in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).
Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

Full Information

First Posted
December 7, 2015
Last Updated
December 18, 2019
Sponsor
Pouya Movahed Rad
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02659085
Brief Title
Ketamine as an Alternative Treatment to ECT in Major Depressive Disorder
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Ketamine With ECT in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Pouya Movahed Rad

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Developing more effective and faster acting antidepressant is of outmost clinical importance. Available antidepressant therapies have a delayed therapeutic effect. It typically takes several weeks before symptom relief is evident. Furthermore, antidepressants are relatively ineffective - as many as 30% of patients do not respond to any medication at all. In this study the investigators evaluate the NMDA-receptor antagonist ketamine as a potentially new antidepressant treatment for severely depressed patients and compare its effectiveness with that of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Detailed Description
In line with the PICO model, patient selection and procedures for experimental and control treatments and outcome measures are rigorously defined. Inpatients, aged 18-85, diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD, according to DSM-IV), that have been offered and have accepted ECT, are eligible to participate. Patients must be proficient in spoken and written Swedish, and score ≥ 20 points on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Exclusion criteria are known allergy to the active substance; co-morbid conditions that could interfere with the treatment (e.g. primary psychosis); habitual difficulties to speak, hear, remember or reason; on-going or recent (6 months) drug abuse; treatment according to LPT (Lagen om psykiatrisk tvångsvård; Compulsory Psychiatric Care Act); and a number of cardiovascular conditions. Patients randomized to the experimental treatment receive intravenous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), delivered over a period of forty minutes thrice weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday). Patients in the control group receive ECT in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly. ECT was chosen as the reference treatment as it is the most effective treatment for patients suffering from moderate to severe depression. Primary outcome is the proportion of patients in remission after 4 weeks of treatment in each arm. Remission is defined as a MADRS ≤ 10. The study uses a non-inferiority design. Demonstrating superiority of ketamine was not an option based on the number of patients needed to gain sufficient power with such a design. Also, the investigators do not believe that ketamine treatment needs to be more effective, at least not in terms of the primary outcome. ECT is associated with side effects (in particular amnesia during the treatment period, but some patients also report persistent memory problems) and patients need to be anaesthetised under the supervision of a anaesthesiologist. The treatment is thus fairly demanding and expensive. A significant amount of patients are also unwilling to undergo ECT. Given non- inferiority of ketamine regarding the primary outcome, and given that it is associated with fewer side effects or shorter time to remission and does not involve the need for anaesthesia, in a risk-benefit analysis the scale might be tipped in favour of ketamine, even if it is not superior per se. Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients in re mission and /or response and symptomatic relief at follow-up time points (3, 6 and 12 months after treatment cessation). Also addressed is how the two treatments affect cognition. A computerized test battery, the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is administered prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, shortly after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment. See figure for specification and description of cognitive tests. Blood samples are drawn before the first treatment and 2-3 months after finishing treatment. Apart from plasma and serum samples (which will be used for later analysis of potential biomarkers such as IL 6 and D-serine), additional blood is collected for genomic DNA analysis. A total of 4 x 6 mL are taken at each occasion. Blood samples are stored at the regional biobank. Time to response will be analysed with parametric survival analysis (for changes in MADRS score) or with non-parametric analysis of two-way ordinal data with repeated measurements34 (for ordinal data). Cognitive data and biological samples will be analysed with t-tests (paired or unpaired as appropriate) or with analysis of variance ANOVA. Study sample size was calculated based on actual or assumed remission rates, the primary outcome parameter of the study. A remission rate of 60% was set for the reference treatment (ECT). A non-inferiority limit of 40% was set for the experimental intervention (ketamine). This is an arbitrary level, based on an assumption of fewer and milder side effects, faster antidepressant effect and the fact that the patients do not need to be anaesthetized and given muscle relaxants. With the above limits, a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 97 patients are required in each arm, according to: n = (2 * 8,4 * p(1-p) / difference2), where "2" and "8,4" are derived from significance and power levels, p are the (actual and assumed) levels for the proportion of patients reaching remission for ECT and ketamine (60% and 40% respectively). The size of the cohort is calculated to be sufficiently large to detect ECT-associated cognitive side effects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depressive Disorder, Major
Keywords
Depressive Disorder, Major, Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects, Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine/administration & dosage*, Ketamine/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Electroconvulsive therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
198 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly. Each participating clinic decides for each patient whether the treatment is given uni- or bilateral, as well as the exact stimulation parameters. Choice of anesthetic drug (e.g. thiopental of propofol) and muscle relaxant is done by local anesthesiologist. The procedure differs in no way from how a given patient would have been treated if he or she were not included in the study.
Arm Title
Ketamine IV Infusion
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ketamin intra venous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5mg/kg), delivered over a period of 40 minutes thrice weekly, as ECT (Monday, Wednesday and Friday).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine IV Infusion
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Intervention Description
Patients randomized to the experimental treatment receive intravenous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), delivered over a period of forty minutes thrice weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) under supervision.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ECT
Intervention Description
ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients in remission in each treatment arm assessed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Description
Primary outcome is the proportion of patients in remission in each treatment arm. Remission is defined as a MADRS ≤ 10.
Time Frame
Follow up of one year after treatment cessation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to remission compared between the two treatments.
Description
Time (days) to reach remission (defined as MADRS≤ 10) is compared between the groups.
Time Frame
The MADRS score is measured for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Title
Time to response compared between the two treatments.
Description
Time (days) to response (defined as a drop of 50% from the pre-treatment MADRS value)) is compared between the groups.
Time Frame
The MADRS score is measured for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Title
Ketamine treatment is associated with a smaller decrease in the performance in a CANTAB cognitive test battery compared to ECT.
Description
Cognitive function are assessed with Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
Time Frame
Assessed prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.
Title
Remission from severe depression is associated with improved performance in the performance in a CANTAB cognitive test battery.
Description
Cognitive function are assessed with Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
Time Frame
Assessed prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.
Title
The antidepressant effect of ketamine is longer lasting than that of ECT, assessed by the proportion of patients in remission (defined by a maximum score of 9 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)).
Description
The antidepressant effect will be assessed with MADRS baseline score and measured within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.
Time Frame
Within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after remission
Title
Ketamine treatment is associated with a smaller decrease in the performance in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) compared to ECT.
Description
Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time Frame
Assessed prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.
Title
Remission from severe depression is associated with improved performance in the performance in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).
Description
Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time Frame
Assessed prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, within one week after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18-85 Diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD, according to DSM-IV) Inpatients who have been offered and have accepted ECT Are eligible to participate Score ≥ 20 Points on Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Must be proficient in spoken and written Swedish American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) 1-3 Exclusion Criteria: Co-morbid conditions that could interfere with the treatment (e.g. primary psychosis) Habitual difficulties to speak, hear, remember or reason Treatment according to LPT (Lagen om psykiatrisk tvångsvård; Compulsory Psychiatric Care Act) On-going or recent (6 months) drug abuse Known allergy to the active substance Pregnant or breastfeeding women Known cardiovascular disease, including angina, acute/chronic congestive heart failure, moderly hypertension or tachyarrhythmia (because exacerbation by sympathomimetic properties of ketamine) Pathological conditions in central nervous system with risk of increased intracranial pressure (increased ICP with ketamine) Glaucoma (increased IOP with ketamine) Porphyria or thyroid disorder (enhanced sympathomimetic properties by ketamine) Ongoing severe infection
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pouya Movahed Rad, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine Lund University, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Psychiatry
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
221 85
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Ketamine as an Alternative Treatment to ECT in Major Depressive Disorder

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs