Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus
Primary Purpose
Tinnitus
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus focused on measuring Tinnitus treatment, Internet-intervention, CBT
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Attending either Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Milton Keynes University Hospital or Hinchingbrooke Hospitals as recruitment is via these hospitals
- The ability to read and type in English
- No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
- Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
- Commitment to completing the programme
- Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
- Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
- Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same
Exclusion Criteria:
- Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
- Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
- Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
- Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study
Sites / Locations
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
- Hinchingbrooke Hospital
- Milton Keynes University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Experimental group: iCBT
Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
Arm Description
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Receive individual face-to-face tinnitus care, and follow-up appointments as required.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Tinnitus Functional Index
A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus
Secondary Outcome Measures
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome
Total score used, not sub scales
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Patient Health Questionnaire
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Hotal score used, not sub scales
Hearing Handicap Inventory
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Insomnia Severity Index
Measure of sleep problems Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02665975
First Posted
January 22, 2016
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Sponsor
Anglia Ruskin University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02665975
Brief Title
Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus
Official Title
Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus: A Multi-study Randomised Control Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Anglia Ruskin University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention with face to face standard clinical care for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom.
Detailed Description
Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK) compared to standard face-to-face clinical care.
Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress. Participants placed in the experimental group will receive iCBT and those in the control group will undergo standard face-to-face hospital based clinical care.
Setting: This will be an multi-center study, recruiting from three tinnitus clinics in the East of England, UK; namely: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Trust, Milton Keynes University Hospital and Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
Participants: Recruitment will be undertaken from 3 separate clinical settings. Adult patients seen by ENT Consultants or Audiologist at these centers who mention being significantly bothered by tinnitus, and who would normally be referred for tinnitus services will be considered for the study. 80 Participants will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to either receiving face-to-face clinical clinical care consisting or or internet-based intervention (iCBT).
Intervention:
i) iCBT group: This group will undergo a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
ii) Standard clinical care group: receive individual face-to-face tinnitus appointment providing the care deemed most important to this individual and follow-up appointments as required.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. These will be measured at baseline, 3 months post- intervention and 6-months post- intervention, to assess the intervention effects over time.
Hypothesis: If iCBT proves feasible and is effective compared to standard clinical care, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus
Keywords
Tinnitus treatment, Internet-intervention, CBT
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
92 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Experimental group: iCBT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Arm Title
Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Receive individual face-to-face tinnitus care, and follow-up appointments as required.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
Other Intervention Name(s)
iCBT
Intervention Description
Tinnitus e-learning programme
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
Intervention Description
Hospital tinnitus counselling
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Tinnitus Functional Index
Description
A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus
Time Frame
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Description
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported
Title
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Description
Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome
Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Title
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Description
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire
Description
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Title
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Description
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Title
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Description
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Hotal score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Title
Hearing Handicap Inventory
Description
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Title
Insomnia Severity Index
Description
Measure of sleep problems Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Attending either Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Milton Keynes University Hospital or Hinchingbrooke Hospitals as recruitment is via these hospitals
The ability to read and type in English
No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
Commitment to completing the programme
Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same
Exclusion Criteria:
Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allen Peter
Organizational Affiliation
Anglia Ruskin University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
City
Norwich
State/Province
Norfolk
ZIP/Postal Code
NR4 7UY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Hinchingbrooke Hospital
City
Huntingdon
ZIP/Postal Code
PE29 6NT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Milton Keynes University Hospital
City
Milton Keynes
ZIP/Postal Code
MK6 5LD
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34417217
Citation
Rodrigo H, Beukes EW, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for tinnitus: secondary analysis to examine predictors of outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 20;11(8):e049384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049384.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30286238
Citation
Beukes EW, Andersson G, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Baguley DM. Effectiveness of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Face-to-Face Clinical Care for Treatment of Tinnitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec 1;144(12):1126-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2238.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28431551
Citation
Beukes EW, Baguley DM, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Andersson G. Guided Internet-based versus face-to-face clinical care in the management of tinnitus: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 21;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1931-6.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs