search
Back to results

Efficacy of Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Intervention

Primary Purpose

Pain, Shoulder Injury

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Single Shot
Postoperative Interscalene Block- Single Shot
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Catheter
Postoperative Interscalene Block - Catheter
Sponsored by
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring pain, pain management, shoulder repair, nerve blockade, regional anesthesia, pediatrics

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 21 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is male or female;
  • The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
  • The subject is age 10 years to 21 years (inclusive);
  • The subject is scheduled for the following
  • Unilateral shoulder repair under general anesthesia on an out- patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
  • Agreement of the surgeon for subject participation in study.
  • The subject or legally authorized representative has consented to an intra- scalene block for the procedure and the consent for the block has been obtained by an clinician (MD, DO, CRNA or APN) authorized to obtain consent who is independent of the study team
  • The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II;
  • The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
  • The subject is ASA classification > II;
  • The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
  • The subject receives sedation preoperatively;
  • The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
  • The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study, including but not limited preexisting neuropathy.

Sites / Locations

  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Preemptive Interscalene Block - Single Shot

Postoperative Interscalene Block - Single Shot

Preemptive Interscalene Block - Catheter

Postoperative Interscalene Block - Catheter

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Efficacy of Nerve Blockades
The primary outcome will be the worst pain score observed in the PACU using 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) verbal Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain by the study staff during the first post-operative hour.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 26, 2016
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02666118
Brief Title
Efficacy of Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Intervention
Official Title
Randomized Prospective Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Shoulder Repair
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
February 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Nerve blocks, or pain medication injected next to the nerve while patients are asleep, are commonly used for pain management after shoulder surgery and are considered highly effective in decreasing post-operative pain. There are several different ways to give a nerve block. All are effective and safe. The purpose of this research is to determine if one of the available ways to give a nerve block is more effective than the others.
Detailed Description
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade is commonly performed to provide relief of postoperative pain following surgical shoulder repair. This has proven to be a reliable means of reducing the required doses of intraoperative and postoperative opiates and effectively delaying postoperative pain, as well as hastening patient discharge and increasing patient satisfaction. Neural blockade has traditionally been performed prior to surgery with the hope that preemptive analgesia will most effectively abate postoperative pain. Recently, however, it has been argued that sensitization to pain can be attributed to many factors, not solely the nociceptive battery associated with incision and subsequent intraoperative events. The duration of action and effectiveness of the treatment modality thus appear play a more important role than the actual timing of the treatment delivered. The safety and efficacy of performing interscalene brachial plexus blockade under general anesthesia has recently been reported as being not only safe, but perhaps more effective than when performed in an awake patient. We propose a randomized prospective evaluation of the analgesic efficacy comparing interscalene brachial plexus blockade performed prior to surgery with interscalene brachial plexus blockade performed following the completion of of surgery in healthy ASA I and II adolescent patients undergoing unilateral shoulder reconstruction on an outpatient basis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Shoulder Injury
Keywords
pain, pain management, shoulder repair, nerve blockade, regional anesthesia, pediatrics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
144 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Single Shot
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Postoperative Interscalene Block - Single Shot
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Catheter
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Postoperative Interscalene Block - Catheter
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Single Shot
Intervention Description
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the induction of anesthesia, but prior to the start of surgery. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Postoperative Interscalene Block- Single Shot
Intervention Description
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the completion of surgery with the patient still under general anesthesia. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Catheter
Intervention Description
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. A continuous peripheral nerve catheter will then be placed under ultrasound-guidance for continuous infusion postoperatively. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the induction of anesthesia, but prior to the start of surgery. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Postoperative Interscalene Block - Catheter
Intervention Description
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. A continuous peripheral nerve catheter will then be placed under ultrasound-guidance for continuous infusion postoperatively. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the completion of surgery with the patient still under general anesthesia. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Efficacy of Nerve Blockades
Description
The primary outcome will be the worst pain score observed in the PACU using 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) verbal Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain by the study staff during the first post-operative hour.
Time Frame
60 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The subject is male or female; The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups; The subject is age 10 years to 21 years (inclusive); The subject is scheduled for the following Unilateral shoulder repair under general anesthesia on an out- patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures; Agreement of the surgeon for subject participation in study. The subject or legally authorized representative has consented to an intra- scalene block for the procedure and the consent for the block has been obtained by an clinician (MD, DO, CRNA or APN) authorized to obtain consent who is independent of the study team The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II; The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate. Exclusion Criteria: Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently; The subject is ASA classification > II; The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics; The subject receives sedation preoperatively; The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent; The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study, including but not limited preexisting neuropathy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jamie Furstein, CRNA
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21965352
Citation
Katz J, Clarke H, Seltzer Z. Review article: Preventive analgesia: quo vadimus? Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1242-53. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9a59. Epub 2011 Sep 30. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2011 Dec;113(6):1475.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21455081
Citation
Lavand'homme P. From preemptive to preventive analgesia: time to reconsider the role of perioperative peripheral nerve blocks? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):4-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820305b8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20708419
Citation
Misamore G, Webb B, McMurray S, Sallay P. A prospective analysis of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed under general anesthesia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.043. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20048655
Citation
Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Analgesic effectiveness of a continuous versus single-injection interscalene block for minor arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c771bd. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):226. Fredrickson, Michel J [corrected to Fredrickson, Michael J].
Results Reference
background
Citation
Hadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14673442
Citation
Angelo RL. Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: arthroscopic versus open bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties--are they necessary? Arthroscopy. 2003 Dec;19 Suppl 1:224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.005. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Intervention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs