search
Back to results

Surgical Site Infection in Caesarean Section Using Alexis O Compared to Metal Retractors

Primary Purpose

Surgical Site Infection

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alexis O Retractor
Metal Retractor
Sponsored by
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Surgical Site Infection

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Elective Caesarean Section
  • First Caesarean Section

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diabetes
  • Chronic auto immune diseases
  • Lupus
  • Immune deficiency diseases
  • HIV
  • known bleeding disorders
  • full anti-coagulation therapy
  • wound healing problems
  • previous Caesarean Section
  • major abdominal surgery
  • laparotomy
  • active phase of labor
  • suspected chorioamnionitis
  • confirmed chorioamnionitis

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Alexis O Retractor

    Metal Retractor

    Arm Description

    Group 1 received the Alexis-O-Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section

    Group 2 received the traditional self retaining metal Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Incidence of surgical site infection in low risk women having a first time planned Caesarean Section using the Alexis O Retractor compared to the traditional Metal Retractor.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Application Satisfaction Scale Scores
    Removal Satisfaction Scale Scores
    Post Operative Pain Scale Scores at Discharge
    Post Operative Pain at 6 Weeks
    Patients with Wound Dehisence at Discharge
    Patients with either open wounds, infected wounds, bleeding wounds or painful wound at 6 Weeks
    Blood Loss Volume
    Visual Field Satisfaction Scores
    Freedom of Movement Satisfaction Scores
    No. Patients with Prolapsing Bowel in the operative field at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients needing repositioning of prolapsing bowel at the time of Caesarean
    No. of Patients with bowel injury sustained at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients sustaining bladder injury at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients where bowel packing with abdominal swabs was performed at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients where suction of Blood and Liquor from the parabolic gutters was necessary at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients where the Uterus was exteriorized at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients with Rectus Sheath Fascial Tears at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients with Rectus Muscle Tearing at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients where Rectus Muscle Suturing was performed at the time of Caesarean
    No. of Patients where Subcutaneous Electro-Coagulation was performed at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients with lacerations to the skin wound edges at the time of Caesarean Section
    No. of Patients where the Baby was cut at the time of Caesarean Section
    Wound Healing Satisfaction at 6 Weeks
    Time to Discharge

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 8, 2016
    Last Updated
    February 14, 2016
    Sponsor
    Charite University, Berlin, Germany
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02685696
    Brief Title
    Surgical Site Infection in Caesarean Section Using Alexis O Compared to Metal Retractors
    Official Title
    To Investigate the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Low Risk Women Having a First Time Planned Caesarean Section Using the Alexis O Retractor and the Traditional Metal Retractor
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    October 2013 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    February 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    February 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Charite University, Berlin, Germany

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Objective: To investigate if the use of the newly designed Alexis O Retractor leads to improved intra-operative and post-operative surgical outcomes in the setting of planned elective Caesarean Sections. Study Design: This ethically approved study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial in planned, first time Caesarean Sections with 200 patients randomized to either the Alexis-O Retractor group or the conventional group. Patients with wound healing problems, connective tissue disorders, insulin dependent diabetes, bleeding disorders, previous major abdominal surgery and chorioamnionitis are excluded. Outcomes include surgical site infection, intraoperative parameters such as tissue damage, postoperative analgesia requirements and patient satisfaction scores.
    Detailed Description
    Main Hypothesis: Does the use of the newly designed Alexis O Retractor lead to improved Surgical Site Infection rates intra-operative and post-operative surgical outcomes in the setting of planned elective first time Caesarean Sections in patients compared to the traditional self-retaining metal retractor? Secondary Hypotheses: Does the Alexis O Retractor lead to improved intra-operative and post-operative surgical outcomes in the setting of planned elective Caesarean Sections? Study Design: The Study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial with 100 patients randomized to the Alexis O Retractor group and 100 patients to the conventional group. All patients will be recruited following a thorough discussion about the purpose and methodology of the study and full documented consent will be obtained prior to randomization. Patients with wound healing problems, connective tissue disorders, diabetes, bleeding disorders, previous abdominal surgery apart from laparoscopy and chorioamnionitis will be excluded. All surgical operators are thoroughly trained in the use and application of the Alexis O Retractor prior to the start of the study and supported by regular teaching demonstrations. The Obstetric Theatre Team is informed and trained in use and application of the Alexis O Retractor within the Study Design. Ethical Approval: Ethical Approval has already been obtained from the Ethics committee at the Charité University Hospital Committee and in keeping with ethical standards. Statistics: Data analysis and statistical comparisons will be performed by the appropriate robust statistical methodology. Comparisons to be investigated Subjective Assessment of the Ease of Application of Retractor Instrument Incision to Delivery Time Incision to Skin Suture Time Subjective Assessment of Visualized Operative Field Subjective Assessment of Freedom of Surgical Movement Interference from Descending Bowel or Adnexal Tissue Bowel and Bladder Trauma Need for Bowel Packing Need for Paracolic Cleaning of Blood and Amniotic Fluid Need for Uterus Exteriorization Intraoperatively Fascial Trauma Muscle Trauma Muscle Suturing Coagulation of the Subcutaneous Tissue Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness Skin Lacerations Trauma to the Baby Estimated Blood Loss Ease of Retractor Removal Analgesia Requirements Post Operative Wound Healing Problems on Discharge and at 6 Weeks (Telephone Interview) Wound Infections (As defined by Centers for Disease Control) Time to Hospital Discharge 6-Week Scar Pain Scores (Telephone Interview) Patient Satisfaction with Wound Healing (Telephone Interview)

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Surgical Site Infection

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    200 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Alexis O Retractor
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Group 1 received the Alexis-O-Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section
    Arm Title
    Metal Retractor
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Group 2 received the traditional self retaining metal Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Alexis O Retractor
    Intervention Description
    A newly developed abdominal wall retractor for Caesarean Section is the Alexis O Ring which is formed of 2 rings and a interconnecting plastic polyurethane sheath where the flexible inner ring is placed into the abdomen and where the rigid outer ring is rolled to create tension on the plastic sheath providing 360° abdominal wound retraction with simultaneously a tamponade effect whilst covering the abdominal wound during the Caesarean Section and delivery of the baby.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Metal Retractor
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Collins
    Intervention Description
    The traditional self-retaining metal Collins Caesarean Wound Retractor.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Incidence of surgical site infection in low risk women having a first time planned Caesarean Section using the Alexis O Retractor compared to the traditional Metal Retractor.
    Time Frame
    6-8 Weeks after Surgery
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Application Satisfaction Scale Scores
    Time Frame
    Immediate Postoperative
    Title
    Removal Satisfaction Scale Scores
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    Post Operative Pain Scale Scores at Discharge
    Time Frame
    On the day of discharge (3-5 days)
    Title
    Post Operative Pain at 6 Weeks
    Time Frame
    6 weeks post operative
    Title
    Patients with Wound Dehisence at Discharge
    Time Frame
    On the day of discharge (3-5 days)
    Title
    Patients with either open wounds, infected wounds, bleeding wounds or painful wound at 6 Weeks
    Time Frame
    6 weeks post operative
    Title
    Blood Loss Volume
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    Visual Field Satisfaction Scores
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    Freedom of Movement Satisfaction Scores
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. Patients with Prolapsing Bowel in the operative field at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients needing repositioning of prolapsing bowel at the time of Caesarean
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients with bowel injury sustained at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients sustaining bladder injury at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where bowel packing with abdominal swabs was performed at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where suction of Blood and Liquor from the parabolic gutters was necessary at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where the Uterus was exteriorized at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients with Rectus Sheath Fascial Tears at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients with Rectus Muscle Tearing at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where Rectus Muscle Suturing was performed at the time of Caesarean
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where Subcutaneous Electro-Coagulation was performed at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients with lacerations to the skin wound edges at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    No. of Patients where the Baby was cut at the time of Caesarean Section
    Time Frame
    On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
    Title
    Wound Healing Satisfaction at 6 Weeks
    Time Frame
    6 weeks post operative.
    Title
    Time to Discharge
    Time Frame
    3-5 Days

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Women Elective Caesarean Section First Caesarean Section Exclusion Criteria Diabetes Chronic auto immune diseases Lupus Immune deficiency diseases HIV known bleeding disorders full anti-coagulation therapy wound healing problems previous Caesarean Section major abdominal surgery laparotomy active phase of labor suspected chorioamnionitis confirmed chorioamnionitis
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Larry Hinkson, MBBS,MRCOG
    Organizational Affiliation
    Charité University Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23490472
    Citation
    Klingel ML, Patel SV. A meta-analysis of the effect of inspired oxygen concentration on the incidence of surgical site infection following cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Apr;22(2):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20849290
    Citation
    Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K, Sakaguchi S, Shono Y, Tsubakihara H, Tabuse K, Kinoshita Y. A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;11(6):501-3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2009.072. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Surgical Site Infection in Caesarean Section Using Alexis O Compared to Metal Retractors

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs