search
Back to results

Impact of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Expectations and Coping in Young Women Exposed to a High HBOC Risk

Primary Purpose

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
psychoeducation
Sponsored by
Centre Jean Perrin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must belong to HBOC families,
  • aged between 18 and 40 years
  • Single or couple with a desire to have a child
  • without any personal history of cancer.
  • must have consulted at the oncogenetics department of the CCC Jean Perrin
  • tested for a BRCA mutation.
  • mutation carrier in case of a known familial BRCA mutation, else exposed to a high familial HBOC risk (Eisinger score ≥ 6 or Manchester score ≥ 16)
  • must live in Auvergne region (middle France)
  • signed an informed consent before inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women
  • person who cannot answer questionnaires: language difficulties and/or cannot write in French correctly.
  • no possible connection to our web-site
  • psychiatric troubles and/or ongoing treatments preventing from a week-end stay in a SPA resort

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Jean Perrin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Psychoeducational intervention

Waiting list

Arm Description

group participating to the first psychoeducational intervention: it consists in a week-end session in a SPA center including several conferences about HBOC familial risk, cancer prevention, prophylactic possibilities (surgery), recommendations about nutrition and physical activity a risk modulators, assisted medical procreation and embryo selection, social support...). Besides conferences, Moreno role games and group sharing are organized under the supervision of a psychotherapist.

delayed intervention: group participating to the second psychoeducational intervention (6 months later). Intervention is same as in the intervention arm but it is delayed. Because questionnaires are completed before this second intervention in both arms and allocation to arms are randomized, it represents an adequate control group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

changes in expectations measured using the Hert Hope Inventory questionnaire
Hert Hope Inventory global score [Herth, 1992, 2000] is used to evaluate expectations of participants. It contains only 12 simple proposals quoted using a 4-point Likert scale ranking from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 4 = "strongly agree". Its internal structure is composed of three dimensions: temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy, and social/spiritual connectedness [Farran, 1995]. This questionnaire has been translated and validated in French by Lafrance [2013].

Secondary Outcome Measures

Dimensions of coping evaluated by the Ways of Coping Checklist (WCC) [Folkman, 1980].
The WCC French version contains 27 items quoted by Likert scales (answers within "no", "rather no", "rather yes", "yes"). Three specific dimensions are described: the focus on the problem the focus on emotions the search for social support Dimensions will be used separately using their scores as no global score can be calculated (dimensions are divergent). This questionnaire has been validated in French in 1996 by Bruchon-Schweitzer et al.
Dimensions of perceived control measured using the Internal Powerful others and Chance scale (IPC) [Levenson, 1973].
Perceived Control of IPC tests two locus of control: either in the self, or outside with two origins: fate/luck and "powerful others". Scores qualifying each locus of control will be used for statistics. This 24-item scale has been validated in French by Loas et al. [1994].
Level of Anxiety, either fundamental (as a trait of character) or superficial (depending on circumstances) evaluated by the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI A-B) [Spielberger, 1983]
The STAI A-B questionnaire evaluates anxiety in a way it cannot be confused with depressive syndrome. It comprises 40 items rated on a 4-point scale from "almost never" to "almost always". The 20 first ones evaluate the anxiety as a state, that is a labile/contextual form. The last 20 items estimate anxiety as a personality trait, independent of the environment. It has been translated and validated in French by Schweitzer & Paulhan [1990].
Score of the Self-Esteem Scale (SES) [Rosenberg, 1965]
It is a short 10-item questionnaire that evaluates the global self-worth by questioning positive and negative feelings about the self. The uni-dimensionality of the scale has been validated [Gray-Little, 1997]. The global score of the scale will be used as an indicator of self-esteem.
Subscales and global score of the WHO Quality of life questionnaire ( World Health Organization WHOQOL) [Harper, 1998].
This questionnaire is worldwidely used. It contains four main dimensions: physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment. These dimensions have been confirmed in the French version by Leplège et al. [2000]. The global QoL score (means of subscales) will also be used for statistics.

Full Information

First Posted
March 2, 2016
Last Updated
November 18, 2021
Sponsor
Centre Jean Perrin
Collaborators
Fondation de l'Avenir et la MASFIP, Paris - France
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02705924
Brief Title
Impact of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Expectations and Coping in Young Women Exposed to a High HBOC Risk
Official Title
Impact of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Expectations and Coping in Young Women (18-40 Years) Exposed to a High Familial Breast/Ovarian Cancer Risk
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
COVID19 crisis prevents from organizing the last seminar
Study Start Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 14, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 14, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Jean Perrin
Collaborators
Fondation de l'Avenir et la MASFIP, Paris - France

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Young female counselees (18-40 years) belonging to HBOC families with a known mutation on BRCA-genes or not, receive a lot of information regarding their cancer risk. Information sources are numerous and sometimes contradictory. Unfortunately, these women face these issues at a key moment of there identity construction (self, relationship, sexuality) while they are not yet concerned by health prevention measures. A special psychoeducational intervention was designed to help these women to better cope with these difficulties. Intervention consists in a week-end session in a thermal center (SPA) during which they will attend short conferences given by specialists (prevention measures, prophylactic surgery, assisted procreation, epidemiology...) and participate to role games and group sharing. Intervention will be evaluated using self-questionnaires completed before intervention and during the following year.
Detailed Description
Background: Young women exposed to a high hereditary breast/ovaries cancer (HBOC) risk are particularly vulnerable: they are ignored by health prevention measures; they are embedded in a stream of contradictory information ( medicine, media, internet); they may feel concerned by surgical prevention issues at a key moment of there identity construction (self, relationship, sexuality). A special psychoeducational intervention was designed to help these women to better cope with these difficulties. Methods/design: the study consists in a prospective randomized trial including childless young female counselees (18-40 years) of CCC Jean Perrin oncogenetics department, belonging to HBOC families either BRCA-mutated or not. They will be invited to attend a weekend group session in a SPA resort and participate to a series of short expert conferences and to focus group activities (group sharing, Moreno role game) supervised by a psychotherapist. Two sessions separated by a 6-month delay (waiting list) will enable us to evaluate the intervention effect, by comparing the evolution of questionnaires scores between inclusion and 6-month post-intervention. Main end-point is an increase of the Hert Hope Inventory of at least one standard deviation. Secondary endpoints investigate self-esteem, anxiety-trait, anxiety-state, ways of coping and quality of life. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the first or the second session so that groups are comparable. Session will be cost-free for participants.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Psychoeducational intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
group participating to the first psychoeducational intervention: it consists in a week-end session in a SPA center including several conferences about HBOC familial risk, cancer prevention, prophylactic possibilities (surgery), recommendations about nutrition and physical activity a risk modulators, assisted medical procreation and embryo selection, social support...). Besides conferences, Moreno role games and group sharing are organized under the supervision of a psychotherapist.
Arm Title
Waiting list
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
delayed intervention: group participating to the second psychoeducational intervention (6 months later). Intervention is same as in the intervention arm but it is delayed. Because questionnaires are completed before this second intervention in both arms and allocation to arms are randomized, it represents an adequate control group.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
psychoeducation
Intervention Description
Participants will attend conferences where experts present the state of the art in various domains: Latest knowledge in oncogenetics Recommendations and morbidity of prophylactic breast surgeries and annexectomy Epidemiology of HBOC and comparative mortality risks with other syndromes/life habits How to perform the periodic breast screening Assisted medical procreation and embryo selection Importance of nutrition and physical activity as risk modulator Life habits: how one can increase or lower the cancer risk (tobacco, alcohol...)? Description of the assistance program (GENAUV) to help counselees exposed to a high cancer risk follow their medical screening. The remaining time after this information, i.e. about half of the week-end, will comprise group activities, in particular role games (Moreno psychodrama approach) and group sharing under the supervision of a psychotherapist.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
changes in expectations measured using the Hert Hope Inventory questionnaire
Description
Hert Hope Inventory global score [Herth, 1992, 2000] is used to evaluate expectations of participants. It contains only 12 simple proposals quoted using a 4-point Likert scale ranking from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 4 = "strongly agree". Its internal structure is composed of three dimensions: temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy, and social/spiritual connectedness [Farran, 1995]. This questionnaire has been translated and validated in French by Lafrance [2013].
Time Frame
changes of global score from baseline to 6-month post-intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Dimensions of coping evaluated by the Ways of Coping Checklist (WCC) [Folkman, 1980].
Description
The WCC French version contains 27 items quoted by Likert scales (answers within "no", "rather no", "rather yes", "yes"). Three specific dimensions are described: the focus on the problem the focus on emotions the search for social support Dimensions will be used separately using their scores as no global score can be calculated (dimensions are divergent). This questionnaire has been validated in French in 1996 by Bruchon-Schweitzer et al.
Time Frame
inclusion - 6-month post-intervention - 1-year post-intervention
Title
Dimensions of perceived control measured using the Internal Powerful others and Chance scale (IPC) [Levenson, 1973].
Description
Perceived Control of IPC tests two locus of control: either in the self, or outside with two origins: fate/luck and "powerful others". Scores qualifying each locus of control will be used for statistics. This 24-item scale has been validated in French by Loas et al. [1994].
Time Frame
inclusion - 6-month post-intervention - 1-year post-intervention
Title
Level of Anxiety, either fundamental (as a trait of character) or superficial (depending on circumstances) evaluated by the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI A-B) [Spielberger, 1983]
Description
The STAI A-B questionnaire evaluates anxiety in a way it cannot be confused with depressive syndrome. It comprises 40 items rated on a 4-point scale from "almost never" to "almost always". The 20 first ones evaluate the anxiety as a state, that is a labile/contextual form. The last 20 items estimate anxiety as a personality trait, independent of the environment. It has been translated and validated in French by Schweitzer & Paulhan [1990].
Time Frame
inclusion - 6-month post-intervention - 1-year post-intervention
Title
Score of the Self-Esteem Scale (SES) [Rosenberg, 1965]
Description
It is a short 10-item questionnaire that evaluates the global self-worth by questioning positive and negative feelings about the self. The uni-dimensionality of the scale has been validated [Gray-Little, 1997]. The global score of the scale will be used as an indicator of self-esteem.
Time Frame
inclusion - 6-month post-intervention - 1-year post-intervention
Title
Subscales and global score of the WHO Quality of life questionnaire ( World Health Organization WHOQOL) [Harper, 1998].
Description
This questionnaire is worldwidely used. It contains four main dimensions: physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment. These dimensions have been confirmed in the French version by Leplège et al. [2000]. The global QoL score (means of subscales) will also be used for statistics.
Time Frame
inclusion - 6-month post-intervention - 1-year post-intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must belong to HBOC families, aged between 18 and 40 years Single or couple with a desire to have a child without any personal history of cancer. must have consulted at the oncogenetics department of the CCC Jean Perrin tested for a BRCA mutation. mutation carrier in case of a known familial BRCA mutation, else exposed to a high familial HBOC risk (Eisinger score ≥ 6 or Manchester score ≥ 16) must live in Auvergne region (middle France) signed an informed consent before inclusion. Exclusion Criteria: pregnant women person who cannot answer questionnaires: language difficulties and/or cannot write in French correctly. no possible connection to our web-site psychiatric troubles and/or ongoing treatments preventing from a week-end stay in a SPA resort
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yves-Jean BIGNON
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Jean Perrin
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Jean Perrin
City
Clermont-Ferrand
State/Province
Puy De Dome
ZIP/Postal Code
63011
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
answers to questionnaires
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20801945
Citation
Cousson-Gelie F, Cosnefroy O, Christophe V, Segrestan-Crouzet C, Merckaert I, Fournier E, Libert Y, Lafaye A, Razavi D. The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCC): validation in French-speaking cancer patients. J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(8):1246-56. doi: 10.1177/1359105310364438. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8873181
Citation
Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Cousson F, Quintard B, Nuissier J, Rascle N. French adaptation of the Ways of Coping Checklist. Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Aug;83(1):104-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.104.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1430629
Citation
Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992 Oct;17(10):1251-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7410799
Citation
Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Sep;21(3):219-39. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4803272
Citation
Levenson H. Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1973 Dec;41(3):397-404. doi: 10.1037/h0035357. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7978779
Citation
Loas G, Dardennes R, Dhee-Perot P, Leclerc V, Fremaux D. [Operationalization of the "locus of control" concept: translation and first validation study of the Levenson control scale (IPC: the internal powerful others and chance scale)]. Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1994 Aug-Sep;152(7):466-9. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10519466
Citation
Power M, Harper A, Bullinger M. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol. 1999 Sep;18(5):495-505. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.5.495.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11192800
Citation
Leplege A, Reveillere C, Ecosse E, Caria A, Riviere H. [Psychometric properties of a new instrument for evaluating quality of life, the WHOQOL-26, in a population of patients with neuromuscular diseases]. Encephale. 2000 Sep-Oct;26(5):13-22. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11136411
Citation
Herth K. Enhancing hope in people with a first recurrence of cancer. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Dec;32(6):1431-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01619.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30858899
Citation
Kwiatkowski F, Gay-Bellile M, Dessenne P, Laquet C, Boussion V, Beguinot M, Petit MF, Gremeau AS, Verlet C, Chaptal C, Broult M, Jouvency S, Duclos M, Bignon YJ. BRACAVENIR: an observational study of expectations and coping in young women with high hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019 Feb 27;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s13053-019-0107-7. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27769293
Citation
Kwiatkowski F, Dessenne P, Laquet C, Daures JP, Gay-Bellile M, Bignon YJ. BRACAVENIR - impact of a psychoeducational intervention on expectations and coping in young women (aged 18-30 years) exposed to a high familial breast/ovarian cancer risk: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Oct 21;17(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1642-4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Impact of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Expectations and Coping in Young Women Exposed to a High HBOC Risk

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs