search
Back to results

Study of Prognostic Factors of the Distal Epiphysis of the Tibia Fracture Prognosis

Primary Purpose

Tibial Fractures, Epiphyseal Fracture

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Closed reduction
Open reduction
Sponsored by
Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tibial Fractures focused on measuring Distal tibia, fractures, epiphyses, children

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 16 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The fresh fractures, within 7 days
  • Closed fracture
  • Type S-H I or II
  • Unilateral limb fracture, no other parts of the fractures or damage
  • On the other side of the lower extremity was normal
  • Epiphysis is not closed and Risser sign 0-IV degrees
  • No metabolic, genetic sex diseases etc.
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Old fracture, more than 8 days.
  • Open injury
  • Type S-H III or IV or V
  • Multiple fractures and injuries
  • The contralateral limb was abnormal
  • Epiphyseal closure or Risser sign V degree
  • There are metabolic or genetic diseases
  • Do not agree to sign informed consent, not on time to follow-up.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Placebo Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Less or equal to 2mm

    Between 2-4mm

    Greater than 4mm

    Arm Description

    the residual displacement is less than or equal to 2mm

    the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm

    the residual displacement is greater than 4mm

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Evaluation criteria of OVADIA and the change over time
    Excellent, Joint function restore basic consistent with that of the healthy side, without any symptoms, or joint flexion range is more than 75% of the healthy side, mild sore and swollen after walking, restore normal work; Good, joint flexion range is 50% - 70% of the healthy side, joint is mild soreness, markedly swollen after walking, unable to attend the heavy physical work; Can, joint flexion range is 25% - 50% of the healthy side, joint is obvious swelling and pain, difficulty walking, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end; Poor, joint range is less than 25% of the healthy side, joint is markedly swollen, pain, stiffness, unable to walk, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Early closure of epiphysis
    Yes/No
    Limb shortening
    The length difference between the two tibia
    Ankle joint function and the change over time
    Use AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale to score

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 18, 2016
    Last Updated
    March 24, 2016
    Sponsor
    Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02723825
    Brief Title
    Study of Prognostic Factors of the Distal Epiphysis of the Tibia Fracture Prognosis
    Official Title
    A Multi Center Study of Prognostic Factors of the Distal Epiphysis of the Tibia Fracture
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    March 2016 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Background: Epiphysis of distal end of tibia fracture is quite common in children epiphysis injury, because of the complex damage mechanism and often leads to growth retardation and joint deformity, the patient's physical and mental damage larger; also epiphysis injury restoration requires higher standard and more difficult to fixed, and methods are being actively explored to improve the curative effect and prevent the sequelae. Our hospital pediatric department of orthopedics expects to conduct prospective study through multi center to study the influence of factors such as the tibia epiphysis fracture of distal injury's mechanism and initial and residual displacement and treatment etc. on patients' prognosis of late growth disorders, joint deformity and ankle function. Methods and analysis: To join the multi center research collaboration group of the south pediatric department of orthopedics (including Pediatric Department of orthopedics of Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan Tongji Hospital, Hunan Children's Hospital, Wuhan women and children's Hospital, Foshan Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine, Shenzhen children's Hospital, Guangzhou city women and children's Medical Center), the formation of multi center research network, writing program, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria, grouping and follow-up time, method. Participating in the working group meeting, listening to the expert's opinions to improve research programs, formulate the tracking table of distal tibial epiphyseal fracture, and starting to implement after approved by the medical ethics committee of each hospital. The hospital is responsible for supervision in the whole process of project implementation, and building the real-time reporting system, and it is the responsible person of pediatric department of orthopedics of Foshan Hospital of TCM to do the random inspection. After the completion of data collection, data entry and statistical analysis conducted by the pediatric department of orthopedics in Foshan Hospital of TCM. Ethics and promotion: The research is approved by the hospital medical ethics committee of the south pediatric orthopedics multi center cooperative research group. Single blind method is performed for children in the course of the study. Research data is shared by all participating units and joints promotion of research results. Registration: To register and update the study on the United States NIH ClinicalTrials.gov website.
    Detailed Description
    Introduction Epiphyseal and Epiphyseal plate are all immature skeletal growth mechanism, the epiphyseal plate injury also known as epiphyseal injuries, fracture line through the epiphyseal plate can also spread to the epiphysis or metaphysis. Epiphyseal plate's connection is weaker than normal tendon, ligament, or joint capsule, so the children of epiphyseal injuries are common. Distal tibial epiphyseal injuries accounted for about 25%- 38% of the epiphyseal injuries. Because after the injury of the distal epiphysis of the tibia injury often leads to growth retardation and joint deformity, the patient's physical and mental damage larger. Because of the complexity of the pathogenesis of this disease, and there are many related factors. The research of related factors of the disease is benefit to evaluate the prognosis, and conducive to early intervention, benefit to avoid the occurrence or development of severe sequelae, has positive significance in clinical practice. Because the disease is related to many factors, and the serious cases of this disease are less, the multi center cooperation is conducive to the collection of sufficient cases to analyze and achieve the objective and effective results, so establish the multi center topic. Design and overview In epiphyseal growth stage, the epiphyseal plate connects weaker than normal tendons, ligaments, or joint capsule, so epiphyseal plate is more vulnerable to be injured. Every epiphyseal complex is composed of each epiphysis and epiphyseal plate, its growth and blood supply are interdependent, which any damage may reinforce each other. The Ranvier district around the epiphysis has the ability to ossify. It is easy to form a bone bridge and growth arrest and angular deformity after injury. Epiphyseal fracture is belongs to intra-articular fractures, such as not timely reset, prone to complications. About 15% of children with fractures involving the epiphyseal injuries, the number of boys are more than girls, as the chance of injury is more, this is because men's epiphyseal plate closure time later than women's. X-ray manifestation of epiphyseal injuries, while more complex, but the epiphyseal and backbone of the corresponding position of the dislocation and epiphyseal line broadening is the most important, a slight shift and (or) epiphyseal line broadening is the most easy to be ignored, should X-ray the healthy side at the same time. In theory, fracture involving the epiphyseal growth plate and articular surface is easily occurred in two kinds of complications: first distal tibia epiphyseal premature closure causes valgus or varus malleolus and limb shortening; the second is the distal tibial articular surface damage causes the ankle joint degenerative changes and bone arthritis. According to Salter Harris bone epiphysis injury types were divided into five types, and in the distal tibial epiphysis injury I, II type are common in clinic. Therefore, the biggest problem is the formation of the bone bridge, early epiphyseal closure, resulting in growth arrest, angular deformity. From the current literature, the most important related factors are in injured mechanism and degree of displacement Leary JT's research shows: the initial fracture displacement and damage mechanism for determining development of PPC after the fracture of epiphysis of distal end of tibia may have a significant predictive value. Ankle fracture Lauge - Hansen parting is ankle fracture classification system put forward by Lauge - Hansen doctors in 1950 according to the damage position and violence that cause deformity, able to quickly assess the damage mechanism of 90% - 95% cases, and has been widely used. Its clinical significance lies in: 1 find fracture and classify injury and be able to make the diagnosis of ligament injury. 2 guide manipulative reduction. The general principle is: closed manipulative reduction and fracture have the opposite force mechanism.3 for the distal tibial epiphysis fracture, can also understand the severity of the injury and the existence of the risk of soft tissue embedded. Therefore, we think, it is necessary to research on the lauge Hansen classification and correlation of prognosis. The relationship between the fracture displacement and correlation of prognosis is in the extent of the shift, the vast majority of doctors think less than 2mm shift can be accepted, and to shift more than 2mm, there are different opinions. Gonc U et al think ankle joint fracture usually involving the tibia and fibular epiphyses in children and adolescents. Although they do not occur with growth arrest, but may still lead to traumatic arthritis. Therefore, for more than 2 mm of residual displacement there is a need for surgical treatment. And David podeszwa Da thinks is greater than 3mm residual displacement often means embedded with soft tissue, may increase early closure of epiphysis of probability. Russo F the most pessimistic, he thinks a shift of the S - H type Ⅱ tibial distal epiphyseal fracture is a challenging problem. Rate of epiphyseal early closure is very high (> 43%). Even if incision and anatomical repositioning, removal of embedded organization, also cannot reduce the incidence of PPC, and may increase the risk of subsequent surgery. Considered in the design, what JOHN A.O GDEN points out "epiphyseal separation should be reset as soon as possible, each delay 1 d will increase the difficulty as it repair soon. For type II epiphyseal injuries after more than 10 d, if you don't use excessive force can not make manual reduction success, however it could damage the cartilage epiphyseal plate and damage the early osteotylus, therefore, for type II epiphyseal injuries that see a doctor later (after (7-10 d) ,had better let it be malunion, and cannot use powerful technique or surgical repositioning, lest cause obvious epiphyseal growth stopped, heals the residual deformities can then use the appropriate correction osteotomy". This view is widely agreed. In the inclusion criteria we chose cases that injury within 7 days. In addition, the Risser ilium epiphyseal ossification sign is a commonly used method for determination of the bone age, JiShiJun's pediatric bone science thinks " ossification of the crista iliaca is usually in conformity with the stop of limbs' longitudinal growth", this is the important index for determining growth potential in include and exclude criteria in this topic, so there is reason to believe that when a Risser sign V degrees distal tibial epiphyseal growth stopped, fixed limb length and Angle. Grouping Divide the patients into groups according to the residual displacement of the fracture after the first manual reduction. Group A: the residual displacement is less than or equal to 2mm, select closed reduction and external fixation (such as splint, plaster or traction, frame of external fixation, etc.) Group B: the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm, the cooperation of each unit to choose closed reduction. Group C: the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm, the cooperation of each unit to choose closed reduction. Group D: residual displacement is greater than 4mm, open reduction and internal fixation. Evaluation criteria According to OVADIA et al' evaluation criteria: excellent, Joint function restore basic consistent with that of the healthy side, without any symptoms, or joint flexion range is more than 75% of the healthy side, mild sore and swollen after walking, restore normal work; Good, joint flexion range is 50% - 70% of the healthy side, joint is mild soreness, markedly swollen after walking, unable to attend the heavy physical work; Can, joint flexion range is 25% - 50% of the healthy side, joint is obvious swelling and pain, difficulty walking, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end; Poor, joint range is less than 25% of the healthy side, joint is markedly swollen, pain, stiffness, unable to walk, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end. Data collection To hospital after conventional laboratory tests, X-ray the anteroposterior and lateral film of the affected side, the contralateral tibiofibula (including ankle) and posteroanterior radiograph of pelvis, scan the affected ankle with CT (fracture displacement measurement, tibial epiphyseal radius vector and the transverse diameter and cross section). Select cases according to the inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria Divide the patients into groups according to the X-ray films of the affected side, the degree of displacement after measuring residual displacement after the first manual reduction. Treated according to the grouping, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1-5 years after surgery follow-up.Between 3 to 12 months, each time X-ray films were taken on both ankles, observe whether there are the early closure of epiphysis; 1 to 5 years, each time we measure whether the tibia shortening or angle, OVADIA efficacy assessment and ankle function evaluation (using the table of "AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale "), until 5 years long and the distal tibial epiphyseal closure of the other side. Organization and implementation The projects will be written by Foshan Hospital of TCM pediatric orthopaedic and submitted to the south pediatric orthopaedic multicenter study group. The project design will be discussed, modified by the hospital experts. The projects will be submitted for approval by the hospital medical ethics committee. Then the various units sign a cooperation agreement after the experts determine and clear scientific, the feasibility of this topic, and the study will be registered on the United States NIH ClinicalTrials.gov website and updated according to the situation. In the process of implementation, the southern pediatric orthopaedic multicenter study group will communicate and consult with each other to timely solve the problems and difficulties appeared in the research through the email, WeChat and phone, even on a business trip and other means of collaboration, besides the plenary meeting each quarter, to ensure the implementation of this project. Data collection and management Statistic analysis Foshan Hospital of TCM pediatric orthopaedic formulated the tibial distal epiphyseal fracture tracking table and send it every cooperative unit to record whether there is patients epiphyseal closed early, and if there is, record the shortening length of the affected limb and angle of angulation deformity, and record the ankle limb function (valgus, varus and back stretch, plantar flexion), assess the pain index and rank according to the evaluation criteria of OVADIA etc. During the implementation of the project, the data should be filled in the table timely, accurately and objectively by cooperative unit, to keep a record of each item shall be seriously not omissions, and regular follow-up. At the same time, set up the monitor, regularly or randomly go to the test center to check and ensure that the original data is real and effective. Accounting personnel chose by Foshan Hospital of TCM to do the double entry, ensure the data entry is correct. If in doubt, the monitor will investigate then return the data. Use the SPSS16.0 to input the data, and describe normal measurement data with mean + / - standard deviation, average between the group by t test, counting data, with chi-square, finally with Logistic regression model to analysis multi-factor.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Tibial Fractures, Epiphyseal Fracture
    Keywords
    Distal tibia, fractures, epiphyses, children

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    200 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Less or equal to 2mm
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    the residual displacement is less than or equal to 2mm
    Arm Title
    Between 2-4mm
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm
    Arm Title
    Greater than 4mm
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    the residual displacement is greater than 4mm
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Closed reduction
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Manipulative reduction and External fixation
    Intervention Description
    Treated with Manipulatio, using plywood, gypsum or external fixation support to fixed
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Open reduction
    Intervention Description
    Open reduction and internal fixation
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Evaluation criteria of OVADIA and the change over time
    Description
    Excellent, Joint function restore basic consistent with that of the healthy side, without any symptoms, or joint flexion range is more than 75% of the healthy side, mild sore and swollen after walking, restore normal work; Good, joint flexion range is 50% - 70% of the healthy side, joint is mild soreness, markedly swollen after walking, unable to attend the heavy physical work; Can, joint flexion range is 25% - 50% of the healthy side, joint is obvious swelling and pain, difficulty walking, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end; Poor, joint range is less than 25% of the healthy side, joint is markedly swollen, pain, stiffness, unable to walk, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end.
    Time Frame
    1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year(We think that develops gradually of limb shortening or angle because of early epiphyseal closure will result in a lowered grad of OVADIA)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Early closure of epiphysis
    Description
    Yes/No
    Time Frame
    3 months,6 months,9months,12months
    Title
    Limb shortening
    Description
    The length difference between the two tibia
    Time Frame
    1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year
    Title
    Ankle joint function and the change over time
    Description
    Use AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale to score
    Time Frame
    1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year(We think that develops gradually of limb shortening or angle because of early epiphyseal closure will also result in a lower score of AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale)

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    10 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    16 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: The fresh fractures, within 7 days Closed fracture Type S-H I or II Unilateral limb fracture, no other parts of the fractures or damage On the other side of the lower extremity was normal Epiphysis is not closed and Risser sign 0-IV degrees No metabolic, genetic sex diseases etc. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Old fracture, more than 8 days. Open injury Type S-H III or IV or V Multiple fractures and injuries The contralateral limb was abnormal Epiphyseal closure or Risser sign V degree There are metabolic or genetic diseases Do not agree to sign informed consent, not on time to follow-up.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Yueming Guo, benco
    Phone
    0086-13827710333
    Email
    guo_yueming2008@126.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Zhiyuan Wang, master
    Phone
    0086-18928613202
    Email
    milo-8008@126.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Yueming Guo, benco
    Organizational Affiliation
    Director of pediatric orthopaedic
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23752150
    Citation
    Russo F, Moor MA, Mubarak SJ, Pennock AT. Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal tibia: does surgical management reduce the risk of premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(5):524-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182880279.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19461377
    Citation
    Leary JT, Handling M, Talerico M, Yong L, Bowe JA. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia: predictive factors of premature physeal closure and growth arrest. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun;29(4):356-61. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181a6bfe8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22588106
    Citation
    Podeszwa DA, Mubarak SJ. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia and fibula (Salter-Harris Type I, II, III, and IV fractures). J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S62-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318254c7e5.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15187469
    Citation
    Gonc U, Kayaalp A. [Ankle fractures in children and adolescents]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38 Suppl 1:127-37. Turkish.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Study of Prognostic Factors of the Distal Epiphysis of the Tibia Fracture Prognosis

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs