search
Back to results

Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer (MSSPC)

Primary Purpose

Rectal Cancer, Surgery

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F)
Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter
Sponsored by
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring Suprapubic Catheterization, Transurethral Catheterization, Rectal Cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Pathological rectal carcinoma
  • Male patients
  • Performance status of 0 or 1 on ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score class I, II, or III
  • Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery due to complication (obstruction or perforation) caused by rectal cancer
  • Preoperative T4b according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
  • Basic diseases of urinary system (urinary bladder stones and tumors, prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture) that affect voiding function
  • History of previous pelvic surgery
  • Severe mental disease

Sites / Locations

  • Fujian Provincial HospitalRecruiting
  • Fujian Provincial cancer HospitalRecruiting
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Suprapubic Catheterization

Transurethral Catheterization

Arm Description

Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F) will be performed for patients in this group.

Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter will be performed for patients in this group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Catherization time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of catheterization
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection
Pain score
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score tool from the surgery day to the fifth day after surgery.
International Prostatic Symptom Score
The International Prostatic Symptom Score is recorded from the day before surgery to the 30th day after surgery.
Time to first ambulation
Duration of hospital stay
Urinary extravasation
Hematuria
Catheter obstruction

Full Information

First Posted
March 22, 2016
Last Updated
April 25, 2018
Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Collaborators
Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02728427
Brief Title
Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Acronym
MSSPC
Official Title
Multicenter Study on Comparing Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Traditional Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Collaborators
Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Compared with traditional open proctectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated. However, the rate of urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery was about 19-38% because of mesorectal excision. The type of drainage is unclear. Some studies show that the rates of urinary tract infection, second catheterization, and urinary symptom are lower with suprapubic catheterization (SPC) than with transurethral catheterization (TUC). Moreover,SPC allows for testing the bladder voiding without drainage removal. Furthermore,SPC using central venous catheter(CVC) is less invasive. Currently, there is lack of randomized controlled trial(RCT) to compare SPC with TUC. Therefore, investigators perform this prospective randomized trial to compare SPC using CVC with TUC in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer, Surgery
Keywords
Suprapubic Catheterization, Transurethral Catheterization, Rectal Cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Suprapubic Catheterization
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F) will be performed for patients in this group.
Arm Title
Transurethral Catheterization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter will be performed for patients in this group.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F)
Other Intervention Name(s)
SPCCVC
Intervention Description
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F) will be performed for patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.Suprapubic catheterization is inserted at the end of the procedure. It will be clamped depending on surgeon's specific instruction and removed if the urinary residual is less than 50 cc.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter
Other Intervention Name(s)
TUC
Intervention Description
Traditional transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter will be performed for patients.The catheterization is removed on day 5 in patients without complication.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Catherization time
Time Frame
6 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of catheterization
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Pain score
Description
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score tool from the surgery day to the fifth day after surgery.
Time Frame
5 days
Title
International Prostatic Symptom Score
Description
The International Prostatic Symptom Score is recorded from the day before surgery to the 30th day after surgery.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Time to first ambulation
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Urinary extravasation
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Hematuria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Catheter obstruction
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age over 18 years Pathological rectal carcinoma Male patients Performance status of 0 or 1 on ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score class I, II, or III Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Emergency surgery due to complication (obstruction or perforation) caused by rectal cancer Preoperative T4b according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Basic diseases of urinary system (urinary bladder stones and tumors, prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture) that affect voiding function History of previous pelvic surgery Severe mental disease
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Guoxin Li, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+86-138-0277-1450
Email
gzliguoxin@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
jun Yan, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+86-138-2506-6546
Email
yanjunfudan@163.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guoxin Li, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group; Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fujian Provincial Hospital
City
Fuzhou
State/Province
Fujian
ZIP/Postal Code
350-001
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fangqin Xue, M.D.
Phone
+86-137-9995-9360
Email
xuefangqingsl@sina.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
fangqin xue, M.D.
Facility Name
Fujian Provincial cancer Hospital
City
Fuzhou
State/Province
Fujian
ZIP/Postal Code
350-014
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Weidong Zang, M.D.
Phone
+86-13805066578
Email
894434459@qq.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chunkang Yang, M.D.
Phone
+86-13509333116
Facility Name
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510-515
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guoxin Li, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+86-138-0277-1450
Email
gzliguoxin@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jun Yan, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+86-138-2506-6546
Email
yanjunfudan@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25830422
Citation
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15997446
Citation
Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg. 2005 Sep;92(9):1124-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4989.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11683749
Citation
Maurer CA, Z'Graggen K, Renzulli P, Schilling MK, Netzer P, Buchler MW. Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2001 Nov;88(11):1501-5. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01904.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26694925
Citation
Bouchet-Doumenq C, Lefevre JH, Bennis M, Chafai N, Tiret E, Parc Y. Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;31(3):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2471-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3304522
Citation
Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR, Turner CM, Kettlewell MG, Gough MH. Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg. 1987 Jul;74(7):624-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740731.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8876274
Citation
Ratnaval CD, Renwick P, Farouk R, Monson JR, Lee PW. Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11(4):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s003840050038.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9287924
Citation
Perrin LC, Penfold C, McLeish A. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing suprapubic with urethral catheterization in rectal surgery. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Aug;67(8):554-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb02037.x.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.fimmu.com/index_com.html
Description
Southern Medical University, China
URL
http://www.nfyy.com/
Description
Nanfang Hospital, China
URL
http://www.caca.org.cn/
Description
Chinese Anti-Cancer Association

Learn more about this trial

Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs