search
Back to results

Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Saudi Arabia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transarterial Radioembolization
Transarterial Chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads
Sponsored by
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial radioembolization, chemoembolization chemoembolization, clinical trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation).
  • The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection.
  • Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender.
  • Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2.
  • Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above (see table)
  • Patients must have adequate organ function as evidenced by:

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 109/L Platelet count ≥50 x 109/L Hg >9 g/d. AST or ALT ≤5 x ULN Serum creatinine ≤2 x ULN OR creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min (estimated by Cockcroft Gault or measured) Normal mg and K Bleeding diathesis or on Vit. K therapy.

  • Patients must fulfill Child-Pugh's Score
  • Life expectancy equal to or more than 12 weeks.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Sexually active patients, in conjunction with their partner, must practice birth control during, and for 2 months after therapy.
  • Female patients at child-bearing age must have negative pregnancy test.
  • No known HIV infection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metastases outside the liver.
  • Patients with co-morbid condition that will be aggravated by the investigational drug or by the intervention.
  • Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases (including history of stable, effort-induced or unstable angina pectoris or myocardiac infarction) and other systemic diseases under poor control.
  • Patients with active infection.
  • Patients with history of psychiatric disorder.
  • Patients with concomitant active secondary malignancies, except for surgically cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basal or adequately treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Disease-free of malignancies < 2 years before the study, are not eligible.
  • Clinically significant third space fluid accumulation (i.e., ascites requiring paracentesis despite use of diuretics) or pleural effusion that either requires thoracocentesis or is associated with shortness of breath
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of the drug (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, or small bowel resection.
  • Concurrent usage of hormonal or chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Patients who received surgery, radiotherapy except to bone, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or other investigational drug within 4 weeks before initiating study are not eligible.
  • Patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or not using appropriate birth control during the course of the study.
  • Patients with partner of child bearing age who are not willing to use appropriate contraceptives during and 8 week after therapy.
  • Non compliance.
  • Unwilling to disclose medical information.

Sites / Locations

  • King Faisal Specilist Hopsital & Researchc CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm A

Arm B

Arm Description

Intervention: Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation). The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection. Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender. Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2. Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above

Intervention: Trans-arterial chemo-embolization using Drug-eluting beads Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation). The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection. Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender. Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2. Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Progression (TTP) is the primary outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to Local Progression (TLP)
Overall survival
Overall response to therapy according to mRECIST
Toxicities and adverse events
Quality of life
Treatment-related costs, in terms of cost of therapy and number of hospitalization days.

Full Information

First Posted
February 4, 2016
Last Updated
April 5, 2016
Sponsor
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02729506
Brief Title
Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver cancer. It is the 6th most common malignancy and the 3rd killers of all tumors worldwide with an incidence of 626,000 new patients a year. The intermediate stage of HCC is controlled by radiological interventions such as Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) or Radioembolization. Although 90Y radioembolization is increasingly being used in clinical practice, there is no high quality clinical evidence to justify this. To date, no prospective studies have been performed comparing both treatment modalities (TACE vs 90Y) in a randomized setting. This randomized controlled trial is designed to prospectively compare TACE and 90Y for treatment of patients with unresectable (BCLC intermediate stage) HCC. This will be done by recruiting 75 patients in each arm from. Investigators will compare between the two groups the time to progression (TTP) as the primary outcome and also examine time to local progression (TLP) as well as other factors like overall survival, response to therapy, toxicities and adverse events, quality of life and treatment-related costs.
Detailed Description
Study Rationale: Although 90Y increasingly used in clinical practice, there is no high quality clinical evidence to justify this. Most of the comparison studies are retrospective. Three studies compared TACE with 90Y retrospectively. The first was by Kooby et al in which patients treated with TACE were retrospectively compared to those treated with 90Y suggested that both treatment modalities have similar effectiveness and safety profiles in patients with unresectable HCC. Earlier Carr et al carried out a similar retrospective analysis and concluded that Chemoembolization or Radioembolization appeared to be equivalent regional therapies for patients with unresectable, non-metastatic HCC. More recently Salem et al retrospectively compared 122 HCC patients who received chemo-embolization with 123 patients who received Radioembolization and concluded both patient groups had similar survival times. Radioembolization resulted in longer time-to-progression and less toxicity than chemo-embolization. A study on down-staging of HCC beyond Milan criteria compare 90Y with TACE of and concluded that 90Y outperforms TACE for down-staging HCC to within transplant criteria. TACE-DEB is the standardized form TACE with better efficacy and safety profile and will be ideal to use to define the position of 90Y in the of locoregional treatment of HCC. To date, no prospective studies have been performed comparing both treatment modalities in a randomized setting. This randomized controlled trial is designed to prospectively compare TACE and 90Y for treatment of patients with unresectable (BCLC intermediate stage) HCC. Known Potential Benefits: Chemo-embolization is the standard treatment for intermediate HCC with known efficacy and predicted toxicity. The arrival of TAC-DEBs made TACE more efficient, less toxic and more standardized. Y90 Radioembolization is of known efficacy and minimal toxicity base on cohort studies. Head to head comparison has never been conducted.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial radioembolization, chemoembolization chemoembolization, clinical trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation). The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection. Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender. Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2. Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above
Arm Title
Arm B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: Trans-arterial chemo-embolization using Drug-eluting beads Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation). The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection. Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender. Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2. Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transarterial Radioembolization
Intervention Description
Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y) is a relatively new technique involving the trans-arterial administration of glass or resin microspheres loaded with Yttrium-90, a β-emitting isotope, delivering selective internal radiation to the tumor.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transarterial Chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads
Intervention Description
TACE is a procedure in which a catheter is introduced into the branches of the hepatic artery supplying the tumor. Embolic material and chemotherapeutic agents are deployed through the catheter directly into the tumor vasculature. This technique potentially enhances the cytotoxic effect by inducing ischemia and retention of the therapeutic agent in the vicinity of the tumor. The drug-eluting beads (DEBs) enable standardization of TACE since DEBs act as both an occluding agent as well as a drug-loaded carrier, achieving local ischemia and cytotoxic death of the tumor with one device.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Progression (TTP) is the primary outcome.
Time Frame
12 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Local Progression (TLP)
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Overall response to therapy according to mRECIST
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Toxicities and adverse events
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Quality of life
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Treatment-related costs, in terms of cost of therapy and number of hospitalization days.
Time Frame
12 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with measurable, locally advanced HCC those are not suitable to have or have failed potentially curable intervention (Radio frequency ablation for small tumor, resection or transplantation). The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection. Patients must not be less than 18 and not more than 80 and can be either gender. Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2. Child-Pugh's A or Early B, score 8 and above (see table) Patients must have adequate organ function as evidenced by: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 109/L Platelet count ≥50 x 109/L Hg >9 g/d. AST or ALT ≤5 x ULN Serum creatinine ≤2 x ULN OR creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min (estimated by Cockcroft Gault or measured) Normal mg and K Bleeding diathesis or on Vit. K therapy. Patients must fulfill Child-Pugh's Score Life expectancy equal to or more than 12 weeks. Signed informed consent. Sexually active patients, in conjunction with their partner, must practice birth control during, and for 2 months after therapy. Female patients at child-bearing age must have negative pregnancy test. No known HIV infection. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with metastases outside the liver. Patients with co-morbid condition that will be aggravated by the investigational drug or by the intervention. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases (including history of stable, effort-induced or unstable angina pectoris or myocardiac infarction) and other systemic diseases under poor control. Patients with active infection. Patients with history of psychiatric disorder. Patients with concomitant active secondary malignancies, except for surgically cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basal or adequately treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Disease-free of malignancies < 2 years before the study, are not eligible. Clinically significant third space fluid accumulation (i.e., ascites requiring paracentesis despite use of diuretics) or pleural effusion that either requires thoracocentesis or is associated with shortness of breath Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of the drug (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, or small bowel resection. Concurrent usage of hormonal or chemotherapeutic agents. Patients who received surgery, radiotherapy except to bone, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or other investigational drug within 4 weeks before initiating study are not eligible. Patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or not using appropriate birth control during the course of the study. Patients with partner of child bearing age who are not willing to use appropriate contraceptives during and 8 week after therapy. Non compliance. Unwilling to disclose medical information.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mohamed I Al Sebayel, Prof.
Phone
+966114647272
Ext
24818
Email
msebayel@kfshrc.edu.sa
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohamed I Al Sebayel, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
King Faisal Specilaist Hopsital & Research Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
King Faisal Specilist Hopsital & Researchc Center
City
Riyadh
ZIP/Postal Code
11211
Country
Saudi Arabia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohamed I Al Sebayel, Prof
Email
msebayel@kfshrc.edu.sa
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hamad AlSuhaibani, MD, FRCP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Faisal Aba AlKhail, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ahmad M Al Zahrani, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hussien A Elsiesy, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15761078
Citation
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15508094
Citation
El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma: recent trends in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5 Suppl 1):S27-34. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.013.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17350947
Citation
Liapi E, Geschwind JF. Transcatheter and ablative therapeutic approaches for solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 10;25(8):978-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.8657.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
14762851
Citation
Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J; Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer Group. The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2004 Feb;10(2 Suppl 1):S115-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.20034.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19231618
Citation
Bruix J, Llovet JM. Major achievements in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2009 Feb 21;373(9664):614-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60381-0. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
13197542
Citation
BREEDIS C, YOUNG G. The blood supply of neoplasms in the liver. Am J Pathol. 1954 Sep-Oct;30(5):969-77. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17980314
Citation
Liapi E, Georgiades CC, Hong K, Geschwind JF. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: current technique and future promise. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Mar;10(1):2-11. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.08.008.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18796686
Citation
Buijs M, Vossen JA, Frangakis C, Hong K, Georgiades CS, Chen Y, Liapi E, Geschwind JF. Nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term toxicity in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization--single-center experience. Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):346-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071902.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19552767
Citation
Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A, Senthilnathan S, Mulcahy MF, Ryu RK, Ibrahim SM, Sato KT, Baker T, Miller FH, Omary R, Abecassis M, Salem R. A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant. 2009 Aug;9(8):1920-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02695.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20501733
Citation
Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Kulik LM, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Baker TB, Ibrahim SM, Abecassis MI, Miller FH, Sato KT, Senthilnathan S, Resnick SA, Wang E, Gupta R, Chen R, Newman SB, Chrisman HB, Nemcek AA Jr, Vogelzang RL, Omary RA, Benson AB 3rd, Salem R. Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comprehensive imaging and survival analysis in a 172-patient cohort. Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):955-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091473.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12049862
Citation
Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J; Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11981766
Citation
Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002 May;35(5):1164-71. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12091661
Citation
Camma C, Schepis F, Orlando A, Albanese M, Shahied L, Trevisani F, Andreone P, Craxi A, Cottone M. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):47-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011262.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12540794
Citation
Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21412886
Citation
Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD004787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004787.pub2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18696150
Citation
Grosso M, Vignali C, Quaretti P, Nicolini A, Melchiorre F, Gallarato G, Bargellini I, Petruzzi P, Massa Saluzzo C, Crespi S, Sarti I. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting microspheres: preliminary results from an Italian multicentre study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(6):1141-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9409-2. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17999110
Citation
Malagari K, Chatzimichael K, Alexopoulou E, Kelekis A, Hall B, Dourakis S, Delis S, Gouliamos A, Kelekis D. Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: results of an open-label study of 62 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):269-80. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9226-z. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17938995
Citation
Malagari K, Alexopoulou E, Chatzimichail K, Hall B, Koskinas J, Ryan S, Gallardo E, Kelekis A, Gouliamos A, Kelekis D. Transcatheter chemoembolization in the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for curative treatments: midterm results of doxorubicin-loaded DC bead. Abdom Imaging. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):512-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9334-x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17627902
Citation
Poon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW, Ng KK, Woo R, Tai KS, Fan ST. A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17239480
Citation
Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M, Forner A, Sala M, Brunet M, Ayuso C, Castells L, Montana X, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol. 2007 Mar;46(3):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.020. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
14562011
Citation
Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Thomson BN, Currie EJ, Parks RW, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ. Postchemoembolisation syndrome--tumour necrosis or hepatocyte injury? Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 20;89(8):1423-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601329.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19908093
Citation
Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, Pitton M, Sergent G, Pfammatter T, Terraz S, Benhamou Y, Avajon Y, Gruenberger T, Pomoni M, Langenberger H, Schuchmann M, Dumortier J, Mueller C, Chevallier P, Lencioni R; PRECISION V Investigators. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Feb;33(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9711-7. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20622645
Citation
Sangro B, Salem R, Kennedy A, Coldwell D, Wasan H. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the evidence and treatment recommendations. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug;34(4):422-31. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181df0a50.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18989675
Citation
Vente MA, Wondergem M, van der Tweel I, van den Bosch MA, Zonnenberg BA, Lam MG, van Het Schip AD, Nijsen JF. Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):951-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1211-7. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19766639
Citation
Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Ibrahim S, Atassi B, Baker T, Gates V, Miller FH, Sato KT, Wang E, Gupta R, Benson AB, Newman SB, Omary RA, Abecassis M, Kulik L. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using Yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):52-64. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20022765
Citation
Kooby DA, Egnatashvili V, Srinivasan S, Chamsuddin A, Delman KA, Kauh J, Staley CA 3rd, Kim HS. Comparison of yttrium-90 radioembolization and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20066715
Citation
Carr BI, Kondragunta V, Buch SC, Branch RA. Therapeutic equivalence in survival for hepatic arterial chemoembolization and yttrium 90 microsphere treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-cohort study. Cancer. 2010 Mar 1;116(5):1305-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24884.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21044630
Citation
Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L, Wang E, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Gupta R, Nikolaidis P, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Ibrahim SM, Senthilnathan S, Baker T, Gates VL, Atassi B, Newman S, Memon K, Chen R, Vogelzang RL, Nemcek AA, Resnick SA, Chrisman HB, Carr J, Omary RA, Abecassis M, Benson AB 3rd, Mulcahy MF. Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2011 Feb;140(2):497-507.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.049. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21374666
Citation
Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15817555
Citation
Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):843. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21191588
Citation
Barentsz MW, Vente MA, Lam MG, Smits ML, Nijsen JF, Seinstra BA, Rosenbaum CE, Verkooijen HM, Zonnenberg BA, Van den Bosch MA. Technical solutions to ensure safe yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with initial extrahepatic deposition of (99m)technetium-albumin macroaggregates. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Oct;34(5):1074-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0088-4. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20683591
Citation
Lambert B, Mertens J, Sturm EJ, Stienaers S, Defreyne L, D'Asseler Y. 99mTc-labelled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) scintigraphy for planning treatment with 90Y microspheres. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Dec;37(12):2328-33. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1566-2. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20175033
Citation
Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs