search
Back to results

Simulines Non-Inferiority Pivotal Study

Primary Purpose

Skin Laxity

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ulthera System with standard transducer
Ulthera System with prototype 2 simulines transducer
Sponsored by
Ulthera, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Skin Laxity

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age 30 to 70 years.
  • Subject in good health.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≤30.
  • Skin laxity in the area(s) to be treated as determined by trained physician assessors.
  • Willingness to avoid excessive or prolonged exposure to sunlight, tanning booths, sun lamps, or ultraviolet (UV) light sources.
  • Willingness to apply study provided sunscreen (Neocutis Micro-Day Rejuvenating Cream) daily until study exit to help limit sun exposure.
  • Willingness to avoid or periodically stop use of Sunless Tanners (washout period of two weeks prior to each study visit is required).
  • Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated through the follow-up period
  • Willingness to avoid non-emergent dental procedures in the 3 weeks prior to/ post treatment.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study.
  • Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result and must not be lactating at the Screening Visit and be willing and able to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g. barrier methods used with a spermicidal agent, hormonal methods, intrauterine device (IUD), surgical sterilization, abstinence) during the study. Women will not be considered of childbearing potential if one of the following conditions is documented on the medical history:

    a. Postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study; b. Without a uterus and/or both ovaries; or c. Bilateral tubal ligation at least six months prior to study enrollment.

  • Absence of physical or psychological conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
  • Willingness to refrain from use of aspirin, Ibuprofen, Naproxen or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prior to study treatment and chronic use during the entire post-treatment study period. Washout period, if chronic user, for 4 weeks prior to the study treatment. After study treatment is completed, limited acute NSAID use, i.e., a maximum of 2-3 doses in any 2 week period, is allowed if needed.
  • Willingness and ability to provide written consent for study-required photography and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup).
  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to performance of any study-related procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing.
  • History of Bell's Palsy.
  • History of chronic or frequently recurring episodic (recurrent episode in past 12 months) autoimmune diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis, Crohn's Disease, Psoriasis, Myasthenia Gravis, Lambert-Eaton Syndrome that has required immune suppressant therapy (such as biologic drug or corticosteroid treatment).
  • Palpable thyroid lesion, lymphadenopathy, or other pathological changes within the treatment area.
  • History of skin cancer in the areas to be treated, basal cell nevus syndrome, or jaw cysts.
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to Ibuprofen.
  • Severe solar elastosis.
  • BMI > 30.
  • Significant changes in weight (e.g. more than 5 pounds) over the past 6 months or anticipated significant changes in weight or diet over the course of the study.
  • Pregnant within the past year.
  • Excessive subcutaneous fat in the area(s) to be treated.
  • Excessive skin laxity in the area(s) to be treated as determined by trained physician assessors.
  • Significant scarring in the area(s) to be treated that would interfere with assessing results.
  • Open wounds or lesions in the area(s) to be treated.
  • Severe or cystic acne on the area(s) to be treated.
  • Active implants (e.g., pacemakers or defibrillators), or metallic implants in the treatment areas (dental implants not included).
  • Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent.
  • Microdermabrasion, or prescription level glycolic acid treatment to the treatment area(s) within two weeks prior to study participation or during the study.
  • Marked asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, or thick sebaceous skin in the area(s) to be treated.
  • History of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study device.
  • Subjects who anticipate the need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
  • Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, noncompliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.
  • Concurrent enrollment in any study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
  • Current smoker or history of smoking in the last five years.
  • Current user of any nicotine-containing products, e.g., e-cigarettes, Nicorette gum, nicotine patches, etc.
  • History of the following cosmetic treatments in the area(s) to be treated:

    1. Any energy based device (radio-frequency (RF), micro-focused ultrasound (MFU), etc.) procedure for skin tightening within the past year;
    2. Injectable filler of any type within the past:

    i. 12 months for Hyaluronic acid fillers (e.g. Restylane)

ii. 12 months for Ca Hydroxylapatite fillers (e.g. Radiesse)

iii. 24 months for Long Lasting Hyaluronic acid (e.g. Voluma) and Poly-L-Lactic acid fillers (e.g. Sculptra)

iv. Ever for permanent fillers (e.g. Silicone, ArteFill)

c. Neurotoxins within the past six months (neuromodulators are allowed in the glabella and forehead, not allowed in the temples, crow's fee or anywhere below the lateral canthus);

d. Fractional and fully ablative resurfacing laser treatment within the past two years;

e. Nonablative, rejuvenative laser or light treatment within the past six months;

f. Surgical dermabrasion or deep facial peels within the past two years;

g. Facelifts, neck surgery (e.g. thyroid, neck lifts, neck liposuction, etc.) within the past two years;

h. Micro needling within the past year;

i. Kybella, Coolsculpting, or Mesotherapy within the past two years; or

j. Any history of contour threads.

  • History (in the prior year) or current use of the following prescription medications:

    1. Accutane or other systemic retinoids within the past six months;
    2. Initiation of topical retinoids within the past 6 months or throughout the course of the study;
    3. Antiplatelet agents/Anticoagulants (Coumadin, Heparin, Plavix);
    4. Systemic steroids including prednisone;
    5. Dermal regulators of collagen;
    6. Initiation of bioidentical hormones or human growth hormone (HGH) within the past 6 months or throughout the course of the study; or
    7. Psychiatric drugs that in the investigators opinion would impair the subject from understanding the protocol requirements or understanding and signing the informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills
  • Roseville Facial Plastic Surgery
  • Laser and Skin Surgery Center
  • Dermatology Cosmetic Laser Medical Associates of La Jolla
  • AboutSkin Dermatology
  • Maryland Laser Skin and Vein Dermatology
  • Wilmington Dermatology Center
  • Premier Clinical Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Group A, Ulthera System with standard transducers

Group B, Ulthera System with prototype 2 simulines transducers

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to Group A will receive an Ultherapy® treatment to the lower face and neck with a total minimum pulse count of 672 pulses (+5%) at the 4.5mm and 3.0mm depths using standard transducers. Energy levels for each transducer will be set to EL2: Deep-See (DS) 4-4.5 at 0.9 Joules (J) with pitch of 1.5mm and 17 Thermal Coagulation Points (TCP)s per line DS 7-3.0 at 0.30J with pitch of 1.1mm and 23 TCPs per line

Subjects randomized to Group B will receive a Ultherapy® treatment with a total minimum pulse count of 336 pulses (+5%) using the prototype 2 simulines transducers at the 4.5mm and 3.0mm depths. Energy levels for each transducer will be set to EL2: Deep-See 4-4.5 Simulines (DS 4-4.5S) at 1.23J with pitch of 1.5mm and 17 TCPs per line DS 4-3.0S at 0.88J with pitch of 1.3mm and 20 TCPs per line

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 90
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 90-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Achieved >=20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 180
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 180-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 365
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 180-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 90
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 180
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 365
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3 D Imaging System at Day 90
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3D Imaging System at Day 180
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3D Imaging System at Day 365
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Number of Participants With Some Level of Improvement and Satisfaction on Day 90
Participants completed a patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) at the 90-day visit. The PSQ has 5 improvement and satisfaction categories ranging from "worse" to "much improved" and "dissatisfied' to "very satisfied".
Mean Treatment Times
Mean treatment time was based on a comparison of average time to complete treatment using each transducer type. The time to complete the study treatment for each group was recorded on the system treatment logs as treatment start time (time treatment started on the Ulthera system) and stop time (time treatment ended on the Ulthera system).
Mean Pain Scores to Assess Participant's Treatment Related Comfort Level Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Participant's treatment-related pain scores were obtained using a validated 11-point NRS with 0: no pain; 5: moderate pain; and 10: worst possible pain. Pain scores were obtained following each region treated (submandibular/submental and cheeks) and for each transducer used during treatment. Average pain score was calculated for each arm by adding all the scores of all participants in each arm to obtain the mean NRS score.
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at Day 90
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by SGAIS at Day 180
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by SGAIS at Day 365
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (CGAIS) at Day 90
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by CGAIS at Day 180
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by CGAIS at Day 365
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).

Full Information

First Posted
April 4, 2016
Last Updated
February 7, 2020
Sponsor
Ulthera, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02736825
Brief Title
Simulines Non-Inferiority Pivotal Study
Official Title
Non-Inferiority Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Ultherapy® Using Standard Versus Simulines Transducers at a Reduced Energy Level for Patient Comfort
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The study data to date show the required primary study endpoint will not be met.
Study Start Date
April 11, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 20, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 25, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ulthera, Inc

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Up to 260 subjects presenting with skin laxity on the face and neck will be randomized to one of two treatment groups. Subjects meeting all entrance criteria will receive study treatment, then complete two post treatment phone contacts and follow-up study visits at 90, 180 and 365 days post treatment. Study images will be obtained pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at each follow-up visit for qualitative and quantitative assessments of efficacy.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, parallel arm, non-inferiority, pivotal clinical trial to demonstrate the efficacy of the Ultherapy treatment with prototype 2 simulines transducers (4-3.0 Smm and 4-4.5 Smm) at energy level (EL) 2 is non-inferior to treatment with standard transducers (7-3.0 mm and 4-4.5mm) at EL 2 for lifting the lower face and neck and to demonstrate the safety of treatment with prototype 2 simulines transducers is similar to treatment with standard transducers. Changes from baseline in quantitative measures of neck and submental lift will be assessed at study follow-up visits. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, Merz Jawline Grading Scale scores, 3D volumetric changes from baseline to post treatment, patient satisfaction and patient-reported improvement will be obtained.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Skin Laxity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
262 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A, Ulthera System with standard transducers
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to Group A will receive an Ultherapy® treatment to the lower face and neck with a total minimum pulse count of 672 pulses (+5%) at the 4.5mm and 3.0mm depths using standard transducers. Energy levels for each transducer will be set to EL2: Deep-See (DS) 4-4.5 at 0.9 Joules (J) with pitch of 1.5mm and 17 Thermal Coagulation Points (TCP)s per line DS 7-3.0 at 0.30J with pitch of 1.1mm and 23 TCPs per line
Arm Title
Group B, Ulthera System with prototype 2 simulines transducers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to Group B will receive a Ultherapy® treatment with a total minimum pulse count of 336 pulses (+5%) using the prototype 2 simulines transducers at the 4.5mm and 3.0mm depths. Energy levels for each transducer will be set to EL2: Deep-See 4-4.5 Simulines (DS 4-4.5S) at 1.23J with pitch of 1.5mm and 17 TCPs per line DS 4-3.0S at 0.88J with pitch of 1.3mm and 20 TCPs per line
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Ulthera System with standard transducer
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ultherapy
Intervention Description
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin using commercially available transducer to deliver one line of treatment at a time
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Ulthera System with prototype 2 simulines transducer
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ultherapy
Intervention Description
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin using new transducer to deliver two lines of treatment simultaneously
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 90
Description
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 90-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.
Time Frame
Day 90
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 180
Description
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 180-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=20 mm^2 Reduction in Submental Area at Day 365
Description
Participant response was defined as >=20 mm^2 reduction in 2D submental area from baseline. Submandibular and Submental quantitative measurements were calculated comparing participants using prototype 2 simulines versus standard transducers. The standard 2D photographic images were obtained. Utilizing the lateral profile view of pre-and 180-day post treatment photos of each participant, quantitative results were calculated by using 5 evenly spaced points on the neck. Area was calculated between each of the 5 points and then sum of the 5 calculations was the total area of the region of interest. The delta area between the pre-and post-treatment area of the chin and neck determined the amount of tissue lift in the area.
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 90
Description
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Time Frame
Day 90
Title
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 180
Description
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin at Day 365
Description
Improvement was determined by qualitative assessment of photographs by a masked physician.
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3 D Imaging System at Day 90
Description
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Time Frame
Day 90
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3D Imaging System at Day 180
Description
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume as Assessed by Quantificare 3D Imaging System at Day 365
Description
Additional images were obtained using a 3D digital photo system. QuantifiCare 3D imaging was used to assess the volumetric changes. Four views (Face, UnderRight, UnderLeft, and Neck) were compared for each participant.
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Number of Participants With Some Level of Improvement and Satisfaction on Day 90
Description
Participants completed a patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) at the 90-day visit. The PSQ has 5 improvement and satisfaction categories ranging from "worse" to "much improved" and "dissatisfied' to "very satisfied".
Time Frame
Day 90
Title
Mean Treatment Times
Description
Mean treatment time was based on a comparison of average time to complete treatment using each transducer type. The time to complete the study treatment for each group was recorded on the system treatment logs as treatment start time (time treatment started on the Ulthera system) and stop time (time treatment ended on the Ulthera system).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Mean Pain Scores to Assess Participant's Treatment Related Comfort Level Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
Participant's treatment-related pain scores were obtained using a validated 11-point NRS with 0: no pain; 5: moderate pain; and 10: worst possible pain. Pain scores were obtained following each region treated (submandibular/submental and cheeks) and for each transducer used during treatment. Average pain score was calculated for each arm by adding all the scores of all participants in each arm to obtain the mean NRS score.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at Day 90
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 90
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by SGAIS at Day 180
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by SGAIS at Day 365
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by participants using SGAIS. Each participant completed a SGAIS. The SGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (CGAIS) at Day 90
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 90
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by CGAIS at Day 180
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Number of Participants With Overall Aesthetic Improvement as Assessed by CGAIS at Day 365
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed by the clinician using a CGAIS. The CGAIS was 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse).
Time Frame
Day 365

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female, age 30 to 70 years. Subject in good health. Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≤30. Skin laxity in the area(s) to be treated as determined by trained physician assessors. Willingness to avoid excessive or prolonged exposure to sunlight, tanning booths, sun lamps, or ultraviolet (UV) light sources. Willingness to apply study provided sunscreen (Neocutis Micro-Day Rejuvenating Cream) daily until study exit to help limit sun exposure. Willingness to avoid or periodically stop use of Sunless Tanners (washout period of two weeks prior to each study visit is required). Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated through the follow-up period Willingness to avoid non-emergent dental procedures in the 3 weeks prior to/ post treatment. Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study. Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result and must not be lactating at the Screening Visit and be willing and able to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g. barrier methods used with a spermicidal agent, hormonal methods, intrauterine device (IUD), surgical sterilization, abstinence) during the study. Women will not be considered of childbearing potential if one of the following conditions is documented on the medical history: a. Postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study; b. Without a uterus and/or both ovaries; or c. Bilateral tubal ligation at least six months prior to study enrollment. Absence of physical or psychological conditions unacceptable to the investigator. Willingness to refrain from use of aspirin, Ibuprofen, Naproxen or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prior to study treatment and chronic use during the entire post-treatment study period. Washout period, if chronic user, for 4 weeks prior to the study treatment. After study treatment is completed, limited acute NSAID use, i.e., a maximum of 2-3 doses in any 2 week period, is allowed if needed. Willingness and ability to provide written consent for study-required photography and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup). Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to performance of any study-related procedure. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing. History of Bell's Palsy. History of chronic or frequently recurring episodic (recurrent episode in past 12 months) autoimmune diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis, Crohn's Disease, Psoriasis, Myasthenia Gravis, Lambert-Eaton Syndrome that has required immune suppressant therapy (such as biologic drug or corticosteroid treatment). Palpable thyroid lesion, lymphadenopathy, or other pathological changes within the treatment area. History of skin cancer in the areas to be treated, basal cell nevus syndrome, or jaw cysts. Known allergy or sensitivity to Ibuprofen. Severe solar elastosis. BMI > 30. Significant changes in weight (e.g. more than 5 pounds) over the past 6 months or anticipated significant changes in weight or diet over the course of the study. Pregnant within the past year. Excessive subcutaneous fat in the area(s) to be treated. Excessive skin laxity in the area(s) to be treated as determined by trained physician assessors. Significant scarring in the area(s) to be treated that would interfere with assessing results. Open wounds or lesions in the area(s) to be treated. Severe or cystic acne on the area(s) to be treated. Active implants (e.g., pacemakers or defibrillators), or metallic implants in the treatment areas (dental implants not included). Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent. Microdermabrasion, or prescription level glycolic acid treatment to the treatment area(s) within two weeks prior to study participation or during the study. Marked asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, or thick sebaceous skin in the area(s) to be treated. History of chronic drug or alcohol abuse. Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study device. Subjects who anticipate the need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study. Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, noncompliance with medical treatment, or unreliability. Concurrent enrollment in any study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs. Current smoker or history of smoking in the last five years. Current user of any nicotine-containing products, e.g., e-cigarettes, Nicorette gum, nicotine patches, etc. History of the following cosmetic treatments in the area(s) to be treated: Any energy based device (radio-frequency (RF), micro-focused ultrasound (MFU), etc.) procedure for skin tightening within the past year; Injectable filler of any type within the past: i. 12 months for Hyaluronic acid fillers (e.g. Restylane) ii. 12 months for Ca Hydroxylapatite fillers (e.g. Radiesse) iii. 24 months for Long Lasting Hyaluronic acid (e.g. Voluma) and Poly-L-Lactic acid fillers (e.g. Sculptra) iv. Ever for permanent fillers (e.g. Silicone, ArteFill) c. Neurotoxins within the past six months (neuromodulators are allowed in the glabella and forehead, not allowed in the temples, crow's fee or anywhere below the lateral canthus); d. Fractional and fully ablative resurfacing laser treatment within the past two years; e. Nonablative, rejuvenative laser or light treatment within the past six months; f. Surgical dermabrasion or deep facial peels within the past two years; g. Facelifts, neck surgery (e.g. thyroid, neck lifts, neck liposuction, etc.) within the past two years; h. Micro needling within the past year; i. Kybella, Coolsculpting, or Mesotherapy within the past two years; or j. Any history of contour threads. History (in the prior year) or current use of the following prescription medications: Accutane or other systemic retinoids within the past six months; Initiation of topical retinoids within the past 6 months or throughout the course of the study; Antiplatelet agents/Anticoagulants (Coumadin, Heparin, Plavix); Systemic steroids including prednisone; Dermal regulators of collagen; Initiation of bioidentical hormones or human growth hormone (HGH) within the past 6 months or throughout the course of the study; or Psychiatric drugs that in the investigators opinion would impair the subject from understanding the protocol requirements or understanding and signing the informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kari Larson, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
Ulthera, Inc
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Roseville Facial Plastic Surgery
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
Laser and Skin Surgery Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95816
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Cosmetic Laser Medical Associates of La Jolla
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92121
Country
United States
Facility Name
AboutSkin Dermatology
City
Greenwood Village
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Maryland Laser Skin and Vein Dermatology
City
Cockeysville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wilmington Dermatology Center
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premier Clinical Research
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
92202
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Simulines Non-Inferiority Pivotal Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs