search
Back to results

DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND)

Primary Purpose

Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Diagnostic imaging
Observation
Sponsored by
Helsinki University Central Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Appendicitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis
  • Equivocal appendicitis defined by Adult Appendicitis Score: Score ≥11 and ≤15.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • C-reactive protein >99 mg/l
  • Time from symptom onset over 24 hours
  • Pregnancy
  • Antibiotics given within last 24 hours
  • Suspicion of other disease than appendicitis, that would require immediate interventions such as surgery, diagnostic imaging or gynecologic consultation
  • Missing written informed consent
  • Patient randomized earlier to the study

Sites / Locations

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Observation

Diagnostic imaging

Arm Description

Clinical follow-up for at least 6-8 hours, after follow-up repeated laboratory tests and repeated clinical examination is done. Adult Appendicitis Score is calculated after observation to determine further actions. Observation is continued in patients with decreasing score. Patients with the same or higher score undergo diagnostic imaging (score 11-15) or laparoscopy (score 16 or higher). Diagnostic imaging is abdominal ultrasound first and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis abdominal computed tomography is done. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for those patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.

Patients undergo abdominal ultrasound and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis patients will have abdominal computed tomography. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Complicated appendicitis
Perforated appendicitis or appendiceal abscess
Delayed appendicitis diagnosis
Diagnosis is delayed if appendicitis is diagnosed later than 24 hours from randomization
Number of diagnostic imaging studies needed
Number of abdominal ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography per patient
Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention
Negative appendectomy
Laparoscopy done for suspected appendicitis, but patient does not have appendicitis
Number of re-admissions to emergency unit
Any reason for re-admission are accounted
Number of other clinically relevant findings
Findings unrelated to appendicitis
Number of patients requiring of gynecological consultation
Applicable only in female patients
Time for decision
The time from randomization to either decision to operate in appendicitis patients or to discharge in non-appendicitis patients.

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2016
Last Updated
August 24, 2021
Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02742402
Brief Title
DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis
Acronym
DIAMOND
Official Title
DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 9, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 30, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate whether patients with early equivocal appendicitis can be observed instead of immediate diagnostic imaging. Half of the patients are randomly assigned to observation group, while the other half will undergo diagnostic imaging. The hypothesis is that resolving appendicitis is common in these patients. Thus, in observation group there will be fewer patients with appendicitis diagnosis and observation reduces the use of diagnostic imaging and surgery.
Detailed Description
For the study equivocal appendicitis is defined as clinical suspicion of appendicitis with Adult Appendicitis Score between 11 and 15. The estimated prevalence of appendicitis in such patients is around 50%. Diagnostic imaging is done using conditional computed tomography i.e. abdominal ultrasound first and computed tomography only after negative or inconclusive appendicitis after ultrasound. In observation group repeated clinical examination is done after 6-8 hours interval with repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score. Patients with decreasing score value continue observation without imaging, whereas patients with the same score value or higher (but below 16) undergo diagnostic imaging as in other group. Laparoscopy is done without imaging in patients with high score (16 or higher). Antibiotics are not allowed, but prophylactic antibiotics during induction of anesthesia are allowed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Appendicitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
185 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Observation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Clinical follow-up for at least 6-8 hours, after follow-up repeated laboratory tests and repeated clinical examination is done. Adult Appendicitis Score is calculated after observation to determine further actions. Observation is continued in patients with decreasing score. Patients with the same or higher score undergo diagnostic imaging (score 11-15) or laparoscopy (score 16 or higher). Diagnostic imaging is abdominal ultrasound first and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis abdominal computed tomography is done. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for those patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.
Arm Title
Diagnostic imaging
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergo abdominal ultrasound and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis patients will have abdominal computed tomography. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Diagnostic imaging
Intervention Description
Abdominal ultrasound, followed by abdominal computed tomography when necessary
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Observation
Intervention Description
Observation for 6 to 8 hours. After observation period repeated clinical examination and repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score is done.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complicated appendicitis
Description
Perforated appendicitis or appendiceal abscess
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Title
Delayed appendicitis diagnosis
Description
Diagnosis is delayed if appendicitis is diagnosed later than 24 hours from randomization
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Title
Number of diagnostic imaging studies needed
Description
Number of abdominal ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography per patient
Time Frame
30 days from randomization and within 1 year after randomization
Title
Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention
Time Frame
within 1 year after randomization
Title
Negative appendectomy
Description
Laparoscopy done for suspected appendicitis, but patient does not have appendicitis
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Title
Number of re-admissions to emergency unit
Description
Any reason for re-admission are accounted
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of other clinically relevant findings
Description
Findings unrelated to appendicitis
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Title
Number of patients requiring of gynecological consultation
Description
Applicable only in female patients
Time Frame
30 days from randomization
Title
Time for decision
Description
The time from randomization to either decision to operate in appendicitis patients or to discharge in non-appendicitis patients.
Time Frame
30 days from randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis Equivocal appendicitis defined by Adult Appendicitis Score: Score ≥11 and ≤15. Exclusion Criteria: C-reactive protein >99 mg/l Time from symptom onset over 24 hours Pregnancy Antibiotics given within last 24 hours Suspicion of other disease than appendicitis, that would require immediate interventions such as surgery, diagnostic imaging or gynecologic consultation Missing written informed consent Patient randomized earlier to the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Panu J Mentula, M.D. Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00029
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24970111
Citation
Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35482016
Citation
Lastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-230X-14-114
Description
Original publication of Adult Appendicitis Score
URL
http://www.appendicitisscore.com/
Description
Online calculator for Adult Appendicitis Score

Learn more about this trial

DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs