search
Back to results

Radiofrequency Ablation Using Octopus Electrodes for Treatment of Focal Liver Malignancies: Follow-up Study

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Separable clustered electrodes
Sponsored by
Seoul National University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring RFA

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • HCC diagnosed on biopsy OR typical imaging features of HCC on CT or MRI according to AASLD guidelines
  • 1-3 HCCs equal to or smaller than 5cm in the liver
  • no direct contact with or invasion into the hepatic hilar structures or inferior vena cava
  • treatment-naive HCC

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • patients with Child-Pugh classification C
  • patients with tumor invasion into the portal vein or hepatic vein
  • extrahepatic spread

Sites / Locations

  • Seoul National University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Separable clustered electrodes

Historical control group

Arm Description

Enrolled patients in the prospective study (RFA using separable clustered electrodes (Octopus®)) for treatment-naive HCC (n=79)

Patients who received RFA according to routine protocol in our center (multiple internally-cooled electrodes) for treatment-naive HCC from Jan 2011 to July 2013 in our institution (n=74) .

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cumulative 1-year local tumor progression (LTP) rate
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in a year after RFA
Cumulative 2-year LTP rate
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in two years after RFA
Cumulative 3-year LTP rate
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in three years after RFA

Secondary Outcome Measures

1-year Recurrence free survival rate
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups
2-year Recurrence free survival rate
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups
3-year Recurrence free survival rate
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups

Full Information

First Posted
April 5, 2016
Last Updated
April 16, 2016
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02745483
Brief Title
Radiofrequency Ablation Using Octopus Electrodes for Treatment of Focal Liver Malignancies: Follow-up Study
Official Title
Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Separable Cluster Electrode in Patients With Focal Liver Malignancies
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic outcomes and safety of the study patients who received radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using separable clustered electrodes with those of a matched historical control group who had received RFA using multiple internally-cooled electrodes.
Detailed Description
Although RFA is widely used as a curative treatment option for a variety of liver malignancies, it is generally limited for treating tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter with a sufficient tumor-free margin. Thus, various strategies are employed to create a sufficient ablation zone such as internally cooled-electrodes, expandable electrodes and adaptation of switching mono/bipolar controllers. Despite that these attempts have created larger ablative zones in clinical and preclinical studies, the efficacy should be validated in terms of clinical outcome. In this study, investigators evaluated the therapeutic outcomes and safety of RFA using separable clustered electrodes for treatment-naive hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in comparison with RFA using multiple internally-cooled electrodes. The study group is a subgroup of our prospective study cohort (NCT02683538) and a control group is a matched historical group received RFA in our institution using multiple internally-cooled electrodes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
RFA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
153 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Separable clustered electrodes
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enrolled patients in the prospective study (RFA using separable clustered electrodes (Octopus®)) for treatment-naive HCC (n=79)
Arm Title
Historical control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients who received RFA according to routine protocol in our center (multiple internally-cooled electrodes) for treatment-naive HCC from Jan 2011 to July 2013 in our institution (n=74) .
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Separable clustered electrodes
Other Intervention Name(s)
Octopus®
Intervention Description
patients who signed informed consent, RFA was performed using separable clustered electrodes (Octopus®) in which, inter-tine distances can be flexibly adjusted by an operator.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative 1-year local tumor progression (LTP) rate
Description
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in a year after RFA
Time Frame
12 months after RFA
Title
Cumulative 2-year LTP rate
Description
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in two years after RFA
Time Frame
24 months after RFA
Title
Cumulative 3-year LTP rate
Description
Comparison of rates of LTP in two groups in three years after RFA
Time Frame
36 months after RFA
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
1-year Recurrence free survival rate
Description
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups
Time Frame
12 months after RFA
Title
2-year Recurrence free survival rate
Description
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups
Time Frame
24 months after RFA
Title
3-year Recurrence free survival rate
Description
comparison of survival rate without disease progression in two groups
Time Frame
36 months after RFA
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Major complication rate after RFA
Description
Description and comparison of the type and incidence of major complication after RFA are assessed according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) grading system in two groups.
Time Frame
30 days after RFA
Title
Technical success rate
Description
comparison of rates of sufficient ablative zone creation which covers the whole tumor on post-RFA computed tomography (CT) in each group
Time Frame
1 day after RFA

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria HCC diagnosed on biopsy OR typical imaging features of HCC on CT or MRI according to AASLD guidelines 1-3 HCCs equal to or smaller than 5cm in the liver no direct contact with or invasion into the hepatic hilar structures or inferior vena cava treatment-naive HCC Exclusion criteria patients with uncontrolled coagulopathy patients with Child-Pugh classification C patients with tumor invasion into the portal vein or hepatic vein extrahepatic spread
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeong Min Lee, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Seoul National University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27575787
Citation
Choi JW, Lee JM, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Suh KS, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Yu SJ, Han JK. Switching Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Separable Cluster Electrode in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 30;11(8):e0161980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161980. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Radiofrequency Ablation Using Octopus Electrodes for Treatment of Focal Liver Malignancies: Follow-up Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs