Interest of Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome by Constant CPAP and Auto CPAP (PREDIVARIUS)
Primary Purpose
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Automatic continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients > 18 with severe OSAS (AHI > 30/h)
- Patients naive of any previous OSAS treatment
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
- with more than 20% of central events at the initial polygraphic recording
- previously treated by CPAP
- previously treated for OSAS by any surgical procedure involving upper airways
- < 18
- with cardiac insufficiency
- with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or obesity-hypoventilation syndrome
- without health insurance
- pregnant or lactating
- presumed uncooperativeness or legal incapacity
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
A combined score that takes into account the residual apnea hypopnea index (AHI) under CPAP associated with the value of the Epworth score after 3 months of treatment.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the ability to predict the mode of CPAP to use (APAP vs constant CPAP) in the treatment of OSAS patients, according to their own level of efficient pressure and its variability obtained on CPAP report after the first 7 days of use in an initial and systematic APAP mode. This prediction will be evaluated by using the association of the residual AHI value under CPAP and the Epworth score value obtained after 3 months of treatment, in each group of CPAP mode (constant vs APAP) used during the study. This combined criteria will be used according an ordinal scale with six levels of severity. It will be evaluated in each group (constant CPAP vs APAP) according to the level of P90 or P95 and the degree of pressure variability obtained during the first 7 day-period of use.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02749812
First Posted
April 11, 2016
Last Updated
April 20, 2016
Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02749812
Brief Title
Interest of Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome by Constant CPAP and Auto CPAP
Acronym
PREDIVARIUS
Official Title
Beneficial Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) Treatment by Automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) vs Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (Constant CPAP) According to the Level of the Efficient Pressure and Its Variability. A Multicentric Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a multicentric controlled randomized trial whose goal is to evaluate the possibility of a prediction of the efficiency of APAP (automatic continuous positive airway pressure) and constant CPAP (constant positive airway pressure) in 800 severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients according to their profile of pressure variability.
Detailed Description
Multicenter open randomized clinical trial involving 800 patients with severe OSAS. After inclusion in the study, the patients will be proposed to initiate CPAP at home (ResMed S9 or PHILIPS PR1) using systematically an APAP mode between wide range of pressure variations (4 to 20 cm H2O) during the first 7day-period of time. After this first period of treatment, an analysis of the report will be released from the APAP in order evaluate the residual AHI, the duration of CPAP use and the amount of leaks in order to confirm CPAP efficiency and observance. Pressure parameters (efficient pressure and variability) will be collected. After randomization according to the further mode of ventilation to use (APAP vs constant CPAP), the patients will be treated at home for 3 months. In the constant CPAP group, efficient pressure will be determined as the P95 (ResMed) or the P90 (PHILIPS) as recommended by the manufacturers, while in the APAP group, the patients will be treated within the same range of pressure variations than during the first 7 day-period. Clinical and polygraphic evaluation will be done after 3 months of treatment, using the combined criteria previously described. In each group, results will be considered according to the efficient pressure value and its variability that were evaluated at the end of the first 7 day-period of treatment
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndromes
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
800 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Automatic continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
A combined score that takes into account the residual apnea hypopnea index (AHI) under CPAP associated with the value of the Epworth score after 3 months of treatment.
Description
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the ability to predict the mode of CPAP to use (APAP vs constant CPAP) in the treatment of OSAS patients, according to their own level of efficient pressure and its variability obtained on CPAP report after the first 7 days of use in an initial and systematic APAP mode. This prediction will be evaluated by using the association of the residual AHI value under CPAP and the Epworth score value obtained after 3 months of treatment, in each group of CPAP mode (constant vs APAP) used during the study. This combined criteria will be used according an ordinal scale with six levels of severity. It will be evaluated in each group (constant CPAP vs APAP) according to the level of P90 or P95 and the degree of pressure variability obtained during the first 7 day-period of use.
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients > 18 with severe OSAS (AHI > 30/h)
Patients naive of any previous OSAS treatment
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
with more than 20% of central events at the initial polygraphic recording
previously treated by CPAP
previously treated for OSAS by any surgical procedure involving upper airways
< 18
with cardiac insufficiency
with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or obesity-hypoventilation syndrome
without health insurance
pregnant or lactating
presumed uncooperativeness or legal incapacity
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Interest of Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome by Constant CPAP and Auto CPAP
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs