search
Back to results

Trial to Compare Radiation Fibrosis With Five Versus Three Fractions

Primary Purpose

Malignant Neoplasm of Breast Stage I

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arm 1 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Arm 2 800 cGY x 3 fractions
Sponsored by
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Malignant Neoplasm of Breast Stage I

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Post-menopausal women with status post segmental mastectomy defined as either 1) at least 2 years without menstrual period or 2) or patients older than 50 with serological evidence of post-menopausal status or 3) hysterectomized patients of any age with Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) confirmation of post-menopausal status.
  2. Stage 1 (pT1) breast cancer, excised with negative margins.
  3. clinically N0 or No Regional Lymph node (pN0) or sentinel node negative

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous radiation therapy to the ipsilateral breast.
  2. Presence of a proportion of Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) in the core biopsy specimen which is compatible with extensive intraductal component (EIC).

Sites / Locations

  • University of Southern California
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Brooklyn Methodist Hospital - NewYork Presbyterian
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital - Queens

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Arm 1 - 600 cGY x 5 fractions

Arm 2 - 800 cGY x 3 fractions

Arm Description

Patients will receive 600 cGY x 5 fractions of radiation therapy over 5 consecutive days.

Patients will receive 800 cGY x 3 fractions of radiation therapy every other day for 3 days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with grade 2 or 3 fibrosis between the two treatment groups will be compared.
The primary analysis will be the difference in proportions of patients with grade 2 or 3 fibrosis between the two treatment groups compared using a non-inferiority z- test. The proportions of patients by grade of fibrosis will be compared in the two treatment arms using contingency table methods and chi square tests.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recurrence rates will be documented
Rates of recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years post-randomization will be estimated with 95% confidence limits within treatment groups along with plots of Kaplan-Meier time to recurrence curves

Full Information

First Posted
August 27, 2015
Last Updated
October 24, 2023
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02755896
Brief Title
Trial to Compare Radiation Fibrosis With Five Versus Three Fractions
Official Title
Prone Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI): Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial to Compare Radiation Fibrosis With Five Versus Three Fractions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Post meno-pausal women with T1 Breast cancers will be randomized to receive either 600 centiGray (cGy) X 5 over five consecutive days (arm 1) versus 800 cGy X 3 fractions given every other day (arm 2). Patients will complete treatment in one week. All patients will be followed a month after the completion of treatment then q6 months for the first year, then yearly for the next 10 years.
Detailed Description
Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is becoming a new paradigm for breast cancer radiation. No type I or II evidence is currently available to demonstrate equivalence to standard whole breast radiotherapy, and a prospective randomized trial jointly sponsored by NSABP and Radiation therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) (NSABP B-39 and RTOG 0413) has completed accruing patients, comparing whole breast radiotherapy to PBI, either by brachytherapy or external beam techniques (EB): results of this trial are pending. Until results of this or similar trials are available, PBI remains a research domain, and it should be offered to patients only in the context of a clinical experimental protocol. Despite the fact that less extensive experience than that of brachytherapy is available, PBI delivery through an external-beam has many advantages. First of all, it is likely to be more acceptable to the patient since it is non-invasive and it does not require a surgical procedure or anesthesia. Moreover, since it is delivered after surgery, the pathological analysis of the segmental mastectomy specimen is available to inform the selection of the best candidates. In addition, EB-PBI is likely to become more widely reproducible, since it does not rely on the experience and skills of the radiation oncologist performing the brachytherapy implant. Besides, once the technique is established, it can be widely applied at any facility provided with a linear accelerator, without the risk presented by some brachytherapy approaches that cannot be completed because of the unfavorable interplay of patient's anatomy with the technical limitations of the applicator. Finally, in terms of health care economics, an external beam approach spares the costs of an extra surgical procedure and several days as inpatient (in the case of Low dose Rate (LDR) brachytherapy). A prone approach for partial breast radiation has been tested at NYU in a clinical trial sponsored by an IDEA grant of the Department of Defense (NYU 00-23). Results of the first 47 patient accrued originally demonstrated feasibility. Eligibility to this study was limited to post-menopausal women with non-palpable, mammographically detected tumors. In addition, the protocol required patients to have first refused to undergo standard six-week radiotherapy. Five fractions of 6 Gy were delivered to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) over ten days (Monday-Wednesday-Friday, Monday-Wednesday). The dose and fractionation was based on radiobiological modeling, aimed at determining a dose to deliver in five fractions that would achieve equivalence to the tumor control estimates of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, while maintaining a risk of fibrosis at the tumor bed comparable to that of a standard regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. An α/β = 4 for tumor control was used, and its validity has been recently confirmed by the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing accelerated to standard whole breast radiotherapy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Malignant Neoplasm of Breast Stage I

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
350 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1 - 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients will receive 600 cGY x 5 fractions of radiation therapy over 5 consecutive days.
Arm Title
Arm 2 - 800 cGY x 3 fractions
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients will receive 800 cGY x 3 fractions of radiation therapy every other day for 3 days.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Arm 1 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Intervention Description
Patients who are randomized to Arm 1 will receive either 600 cGY x 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Arm 2 800 cGY x 3 fractions
Intervention Description
Patients who are randomized to Arm 2 will receive 800 cGY x 3 fractions given every other day
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with grade 2 or 3 fibrosis between the two treatment groups will be compared.
Description
The primary analysis will be the difference in proportions of patients with grade 2 or 3 fibrosis between the two treatment groups compared using a non-inferiority z- test. The proportions of patients by grade of fibrosis will be compared in the two treatment arms using contingency table methods and chi square tests.
Time Frame
60 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence rates will be documented
Description
Rates of recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years post-randomization will be estimated with 95% confidence limits within treatment groups along with plots of Kaplan-Meier time to recurrence curves
Time Frame
60 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Post-menopausal women with status post segmental mastectomy defined as either 1) at least 2 years without menstrual period or 2) or patients older than 50 with serological evidence of post-menopausal status or 3) hysterectomized patients of any age with Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) confirmation of post-menopausal status. Stage 1 (pT1) breast cancer, excised with negative margins. clinically N0 or No Regional Lymph node (pN0) or sentinel node negative Exclusion Criteria: Previous radiation therapy to the ipsilateral breast. Presence of a proportion of Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) in the core biopsy specimen which is compatible with extensive intraductal component (EIC).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Silvia C Formenti, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Weill Cornell Medical College
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brooklyn Methodist Hospital - NewYork Presbyterian
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11215
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Queens
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11355
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All data and medical information obtained will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law and will not be released without the patient's written permission except as described in this paragraph. In all study forms, patients will be identified only by their initials and patient number. Patient names will not be reported in any publication; only the data obtained as a result of their participation in this study will be made public.

Learn more about this trial

Trial to Compare Radiation Fibrosis With Five Versus Three Fractions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs