search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Men With OAB Symptoms While Taking Tamsulosin Hydrochloride for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) (PLUS)

Primary Purpose

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mirabegron
Placebo
Tamsulosin Hydrochloride
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia focused on measuring Myrbetriq, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder, Betmiga, Mirabegron, Tamsulosin Hydrochloride

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 1 (Screening):

  • Men ≥40 years of age with history of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms (frequency of ≥8 micturitions per day and urgency episodes of ≥2 per day) while taking tamsulosin hydrochloride for at least 2 months to treat LUTS due to BPH.
  • Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with or without incontinence) for ≥3 months prior to Screening.
  • Subject has an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score ≥8.
  • Subject has Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) <4 ng/mL or ≥4 but < 10 ng/mL with a prostate biopsy that is negative for cancer in the past 2 years.
  • Subject is willing and able to complete the 3-day diary (including urine volumes, vital signs measurements), and Quality of Life questionnaires.
  • Subject and the subject's spouses/partners who are of childbearing potential must be using a highly effective birth control, which includes established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception, placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). Birth control must be practiced from Screening and continue throughout the study and for 30 days after the final study drug administration. In addition, sperm donation will not be allowed throughout the study and for 30 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.

Inclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline) based on the 3-day diary:

  • Subject continues to meet all inclusion criteria of Visit 1 (Screening).
  • Subject must experience an average of 8 or more micturitions per day over the 3-day diary period.
  • Subject must experience an average of 2 episodes of urgency per day (grade 3 or 4) over the 3-diary period

Exclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 1 (Screening):

  • Subject has post-void residual volume (PVR) >200 mL.
  • Subject has maximum urinary flow (Qmax) <5.0 mL/second with a minimum voided volume of 125 mL.
  • Subject has hematuria >3 rbc/hpf that has not been fully evaluated.
  • Subject has evidence of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Urine culture and sensitivity will be performed for positive leukocytes, nitrites, or turbidity and will be confirmed with a culture greater than 100,000 cfu/mL. If a subject has a UTI, at Screening (Visit 1) the subject may be rescreened after successful treatment of the UTI (confirmed by a laboratory result of negative urine culture).
  • Subject has neurogenic bladder (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, etc.).
  • Subject has diabetic neuropathy.
  • Previous open, robotic or minimally invasive prostate surgery (including transurethral procedures). Planned (scheduled) pelvic or prostate surgery during the study period.
  • Planned (scheduled) cataract surgery.
  • Subject with significant stress incontinence
  • Subject with clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction.
  • Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization.
  • Subject has experienced 3 or more episodes of recurrent urinary tract infection within the last 12 months.
  • Subject has a symptomatic urinary tract infection, prostatitis, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs (i.e., within the confines of the pelvis including the bladder, prostate and rectum; organs of the lower gastrointestinal tract are not necessarily considered pelvic organs such as the distal ascending colon, the full transverse colon and proximal portion of the descending colon are in the abdomen).
  • Subject has received intravesical injection in the past 12 months with botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, or capsaicin.
  • Subject has ever received electro-stimulation therapy for OAB (e.g. sacral nerve stimulation or Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation [PTNS]).
  • Subject began or has changed a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises less than 30 days prior to Screening.
  • Subject has postural hypotension or syncope or postural orthostatic tachycardia.
  • Subject has moderate or severe hepatic impairment defined as Child-Pugh Class B or C.
  • Subject has severe renal impairment defined as estimated creatinine clearance less than 29 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by hospital laboratory calculation of eGFR. A subject with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) or undergoing dialysis is also not a candidate for the study.
  • Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg.
  • Subject has baseline resting pulse rate <60 BPM or >90 BPM.
  • Subject has evidence of QT prolongation on Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2) electrocardiogram (ECG) defined as QTcF >450 msec.
  • Subject has any clinically significant ECG abnormality.
  • Subject has AST or ALT >2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or γ-GT >3x ULN and considered clinically significant.
  • Subject has a hypersensitivity to any components of mirabegron, tamsulosin hydrochloride, or any of the inactive ingredients.
  • Subject has a history of angioedema.
  • Subject has any clinical significant condition which makes the subject unsuitable for study participation.
  • Subject has been treated with an experimental device within 28 days or received an investigational agent within 28 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Screening.
  • Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of any malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully.
  • Subject has ongoing alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  • Subject is using prohibited medications within 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) through Follow-Up Phone Call (Visit 6).
  • Subject has stopped, started or changed the dose of a restricted medication within the 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) through Follow-Up Phone Call (Visit 6)
  • Subject has participated in an interventional trial within 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1).
  • Subject is involved in the conduct of the study as an employee of the Astellas group, third party associated with the study, or the study site team.
  • Subject has previously received mirabegron in the 6 months prior to Screening (Visit 1).

Exclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline):

  • Subject was non-compliant during the 4-week tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in period, defined as taking less than 80% or greater than 120% of study medication.
  • Subject had an average total daily urine volume >3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day diary.

Sites / Locations

  • Site US01009
  • Site US01005
  • Site US01012
  • Site US01070
  • Site US01081
  • Site US01021
  • Site US01068
  • Site US01064
  • Site US01097
  • Site US01026
  • Site US01025
  • Site US01027
  • Site US01034
  • Site US01094
  • Site US01041
  • Site US01016
  • Site US01003
  • Site US01060
  • Site US01067
  • Site US01061
  • Site US01029
  • Site US01031
  • Site US01015
  • Site US01019
  • Site US01069
  • Site US01079
  • Site US01072
  • Site US01042
  • Site US01056
  • Site US01075
  • Site US01078
  • Site US01063
  • Site CA15008
  • Site CA15003
  • Site CA15001
  • Site CA15005
  • Site CA15011
  • Site CA15002
  • Site CA15009
  • Site CA15014
  • Site CZ42004
  • Site CZ42006
  • Site CZ42005
  • Site CZ42003
  • Site CZ42001
  • Site FR33004
  • Site FR33002
  • Site DE49002
  • Site DE49001
  • Site DE49006
  • Site DE49004
  • Site DE49005
  • Site DE49003
  • Site DE49007
  • Site IT39002
  • Site IT39003
  • Site IT39010
  • Site IT39004
  • Site IT39005
  • Site IT39006
  • Site IT39001
  • Site IT39008
  • Site PL48006
  • Site PL48001
  • Site PL48004
  • Site PL48007
  • Site PL48005
  • Site ES34007
  • Site ES34009
  • Site ES34001
  • Site ES34003
  • Site ES34002
  • Site ES34006
  • Site ES34004
  • Site GB44005
  • Site GB44011
  • Site GB44004
  • Site GB44002
  • Site GB44006

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Mirabegron

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants received initial dose of 25 mg of mirabegron which was increased to 50 mg after 4 weeks. In addition to mirabegron participants received 0.4 mg of oral tamsulosin hydrochloride daily throughout the study.

Participants received matching placebo in addition to oral tamsulosin hydrochloride daily throughout the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per Day
Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per Day
Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The mean volume voided per micturition during 3 days of the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per Day
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per Day
Urgency was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. An urgency episode was defined as any micturition or incontinence episode with a severity of grade 3 or 4, assessed by participants based on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), where 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. The mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 and/or 4) per day was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency episode (grade 3 and/or 4) with or without incontinence per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The IPSS total score classification ranges from mild (0 to 7) to moderate (8 to 19) or severe (20 to 35). Higher IPSS scored indicated more severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in IPSS Subscale Voiding Score
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 voiding symptoms questions (incomplete emptying, intermittency, weak stream, and straining). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 20 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and EoT in IPSS Subscale Storage Score
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale storage score is the sum of the responses to 3 storage symptoms questions (frequency, urgency, and nocturia). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 15 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in IPSS Subscale Quality of Life (QoL) Score
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The QoL assessment was a single question asking the participant how he would feel about tolerating his current level of symptoms for the rest of his life. The lowest and highest possible score ranges from 0 to 6 (very pleased to terrible). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per Day
Urgency Incontinence was defined as the complaint of involuntary leakage accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Symptom Bother Score
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the Symptom Bother Scale of the Overactive Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q). The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 questions, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). Lower scores on OAB-q symptom bother indicate a better response.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Coping Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Coping subscale ranges from 8 to 48. The Coping score was calculated by adding the 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Concern Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Concern subscale ranges from 7 to 42. The Concern score was calculated by adding the 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Sleep Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Sleep subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Sleep score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Social Interaction Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Social Interaction subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Social Interaction score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions and 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire) Utilities
The EQ-5D-5L is an international standardized non-disease specific generic instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has a multidimensional measure of health-related QoL, capable of being expressed as a single index value and specifically designed to complement other health status measures. The EQ-5D-5L has five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems/unable to perform the activity). Health-state utility (HSU) data are estimates of the preference for a given state of health on a cardinal numeric scale, where a value of 1.0 represents full health, 0.0 represents dead, and negative values represent states worse than death. Missing EoT values were imputed using LOCF method.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale that asks participants to rate their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems. A higher score indicated a worse perception of bladder condition.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Total Urgency and Frequency Score (TUFS)
The TUFS was calculated by adding the PPIUS scores of every void in a participant's 3-day diary, and dividing this by the number of days recorded in the diary. Due to a programming failure in the e-diary data for the number of pads used was not collected.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night one or more time to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the date/time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the date/time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). A night time episode of incontinence is not considered a nocturia episode. The mean number of nocturia episodes per day (24 hours) was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Treatment Satisfaction Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale that asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, completely).

Full Information

First Posted
April 15, 2016
Last Updated
April 17, 2020
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02757768
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Men With OAB Symptoms While Taking Tamsulosin Hydrochloride for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Acronym
PLUS
Official Title
A Phase 4, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Men With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms While Taking the Alpha Blocker Tamsulosin Hydrochloride for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 13, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 14, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 11, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mirabegron versus placebo in men with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms while taking tamsulosin hydrochloride for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
Detailed Description
At Screening (Visit 1), participants entered into a 4-week open label tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg QD run-in period prior to being randomized into the 12-week double-blind treatment period (Visit 2). At conclusion of the 4-week tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in period, participants completed a 3-day diary just prior to Baseline (Visit 2). Approximately 7 days prior to Visit 2 participants received a phone call reminding them about the diary and to answer any questions. If participants met all entry criteria at the end of the tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in period, participants were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups (mirabegron or placebo) for 12 weeks of treatment in addition to the continuation of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg QD. Those participants randomized to Mirabegron started at 25 mg and increased to 50 mg after 4 weeks. Those participants randomized to placebo started blinded product matched to the mirabegron 25 mg tablet and increased to blinded product matched to 50 mirabegron after 4 weeks. Once a participant increased dose, the participant remained on that dose for the remainder of the study unless for safety reasons was required to discontinue study drug. A training diary was completed in the first 2 weeks of the tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in period. During this evaluation period at least one telephone contact took place with the participant. Diaries were completed at home, using the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) device, for 3 consecutive days prior to each visit: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4), and Week 12/End of Treatment (Visit 5). Site staff contacted the participant approximately 7 days prior to the scheduled visit to remind the participant to complete the electronic diary, review completion instruction and review changes to concomitant medications and adverse events (if applicable). Three days before Visits 2 (Baseline), 3 (Week 4), 4 (Week 8), and 5 (Week 12), participants completed a 3-day diary, using the ePRO device in which the participant recorded micturition frequency, urgency (PPIUS), incontinence and volume voided. In addition, the diary captured morning and evening blood pressure and pulse rate measurements via Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM). At Visit 1, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was completed. At Visits 2, 3, 4, and 5, participants completed the IPSS, EQ-5D-5L, OAB-q, PPBC, and TS-VAS. Maximum urinary flow (Qmax) was measured at Visit 1 (Screening/tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in) and Visit 5 (Week 12/End of Treatment). Post-void residual volume (PVR) was assessed at Screening/tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in (Visit 1), Baseline (Visit 2) and at Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4), and Week 12/End of Treatment (Visit 5). A follow-up phone call (Visit 6) was conducted 4-weeks after End of Treatment (Visit 5). Total study participation was approximately 20 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder
Keywords
Myrbetriq, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder, Betmiga, Mirabegron, Tamsulosin Hydrochloride

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
715 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mirabegron
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received initial dose of 25 mg of mirabegron which was increased to 50 mg after 4 weeks. In addition to mirabegron participants received 0.4 mg of oral tamsulosin hydrochloride daily throughout the study.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received matching placebo in addition to oral tamsulosin hydrochloride daily throughout the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mirabegron
Other Intervention Name(s)
Myrbetriq, Betmiga, YM178
Intervention Description
Participants received initial dose of 25 mg of mirabegron (oral tablet) which was increased to 50 mg after 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants received initial dose of 25 mg of matching placebo (oral tablet) which was increased to 50 mg after 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tamsulosin Hydrochloride
Other Intervention Name(s)
Flomax, Omnic
Intervention Description
Participants received once daily treatment with tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg (oral tablet) throughout the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per Day
Description
Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per Day
Description
Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Description
The mean volume voided per micturition during 3 days of the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per Day
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per Day
Description
Urgency was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. An urgency episode was defined as any micturition or incontinence episode with a severity of grade 3 or 4, assessed by participants based on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), where 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. The mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 and/or 4) per day was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency episode (grade 3 and/or 4) with or without incontinence per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
Description
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The IPSS total score classification ranges from mild (0 to 7) to moderate (8 to 19) or severe (20 to 35). Higher IPSS scored indicated more severe symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in IPSS Subscale Voiding Score
Description
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 voiding symptoms questions (incomplete emptying, intermittency, weak stream, and straining). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 20 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and EoT in IPSS Subscale Storage Score
Description
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale storage score is the sum of the responses to 3 storage symptoms questions (frequency, urgency, and nocturia). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 15 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in IPSS Subscale Quality of Life (QoL) Score
Description
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The QoL assessment was a single question asking the participant how he would feel about tolerating his current level of symptoms for the rest of his life. The lowest and highest possible score ranges from 0 to 6 (very pleased to terrible). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per Day
Description
Urgency Incontinence was defined as the complaint of involuntary leakage accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Symptom Bother Score
Description
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the Symptom Bother Scale of the Overactive Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q). The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 questions, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). Lower scores on OAB-q symptom bother indicate a better response.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Coping Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Coping subscale ranges from 8 to 48. The Coping score was calculated by adding the 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Concern Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Concern subscale ranges from 7 to 42. The Concern score was calculated by adding the 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Sleep Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Sleep subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Sleep score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Social Interaction Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Social Interaction subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Social Interaction score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions and 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire) Utilities
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is an international standardized non-disease specific generic instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has a multidimensional measure of health-related QoL, capable of being expressed as a single index value and specifically designed to complement other health status measures. The EQ-5D-5L has five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems/unable to perform the activity). Health-state utility (HSU) data are estimates of the preference for a given state of health on a cardinal numeric scale, where a value of 1.0 represents full health, 0.0 represents dead, and negative values represent states worse than death. Missing EoT values were imputed using LOCF method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Description
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale that asks participants to rate their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems. A higher score indicated a worse perception of bladder condition.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Total Urgency and Frequency Score (TUFS)
Description
The TUFS was calculated by adding the PPIUS scores of every void in a participant's 3-day diary, and dividing this by the number of days recorded in the diary. Due to a programming failure in the e-diary data for the number of pads used was not collected.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night one or more time to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the date/time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the date/time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). A night time episode of incontinence is not considered a nocturia episode. The mean number of nocturia episodes per day (24 hours) was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and EoT in Treatment Satisfaction Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Description
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale that asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, completely).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 1 (Screening): Men ≥40 years of age with history of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms (frequency of ≥8 micturitions per day and urgency episodes of ≥2 per day) while taking tamsulosin hydrochloride for at least 2 months to treat LUTS due to BPH. Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with or without incontinence) for ≥3 months prior to Screening. Subject has an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score ≥8. Subject has Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) <4 ng/mL or ≥4 but < 10 ng/mL with a prostate biopsy that is negative for cancer in the past 2 years. Subject is willing and able to complete the 3-day diary (including urine volumes, vital signs measurements), and Quality of Life questionnaires. Subject and the subject's spouses/partners who are of childbearing potential must be using a highly effective birth control, which includes established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception, placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). Birth control must be practiced from Screening and continue throughout the study and for 30 days after the final study drug administration. In addition, sperm donation will not be allowed throughout the study and for 30 days after the final study drug administration. Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment. Inclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline) based on the 3-day diary: Subject continues to meet all inclusion criteria of Visit 1 (Screening). Subject must experience an average of 8 or more micturitions per day over the 3-day diary period. Subject must experience an average of 2 episodes of urgency per day (grade 3 or 4) over the 3-diary period Exclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 1 (Screening): Subject has post-void residual volume (PVR) >200 mL. Subject has maximum urinary flow (Qmax) <5.0 mL/second with a minimum voided volume of 125 mL. Subject has hematuria >3 rbc/hpf that has not been fully evaluated. Subject has evidence of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Urine culture and sensitivity will be performed for positive leukocytes, nitrites, or turbidity and will be confirmed with a culture greater than 100,000 cfu/mL. If a subject has a UTI, at Screening (Visit 1) the subject may be rescreened after successful treatment of the UTI (confirmed by a laboratory result of negative urine culture). Subject has neurogenic bladder (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, etc.). Subject has diabetic neuropathy. Previous open, robotic or minimally invasive prostate surgery (including transurethral procedures). Planned (scheduled) pelvic or prostate surgery during the study period. Planned (scheduled) cataract surgery. Subject with significant stress incontinence Subject with clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction. Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization. Subject has experienced 3 or more episodes of recurrent urinary tract infection within the last 12 months. Subject has a symptomatic urinary tract infection, prostatitis, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs (i.e., within the confines of the pelvis including the bladder, prostate and rectum; organs of the lower gastrointestinal tract are not necessarily considered pelvic organs such as the distal ascending colon, the full transverse colon and proximal portion of the descending colon are in the abdomen). Subject has received intravesical injection in the past 12 months with botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, or capsaicin. Subject has ever received electro-stimulation therapy for OAB (e.g. sacral nerve stimulation or Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation [PTNS]). Subject began or has changed a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises less than 30 days prior to Screening. Subject has postural hypotension or syncope or postural orthostatic tachycardia. Subject has moderate or severe hepatic impairment defined as Child-Pugh Class B or C. Subject has severe renal impairment defined as estimated creatinine clearance less than 29 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by hospital laboratory calculation of eGFR. A subject with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) or undergoing dialysis is also not a candidate for the study. Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg. Subject has baseline resting pulse rate <60 BPM or >90 BPM. Subject has evidence of QT prolongation on Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2) electrocardiogram (ECG) defined as QTcF >450 msec. Subject has any clinically significant ECG abnormality. Subject has AST or ALT >2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or γ-GT >3x ULN and considered clinically significant. Subject has a hypersensitivity to any components of mirabegron, tamsulosin hydrochloride, or any of the inactive ingredients. Subject has a history of angioedema. Subject has any clinical significant condition which makes the subject unsuitable for study participation. Subject has been treated with an experimental device within 28 days or received an investigational agent within 28 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Screening. Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of any malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully. Subject has ongoing alcohol and/or drug abuse. Subject is using prohibited medications within 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) through Follow-Up Phone Call (Visit 6). Subject has stopped, started or changed the dose of a restricted medication within the 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) through Follow-Up Phone Call (Visit 6) Subject has participated in an interventional trial within 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1). Subject is involved in the conduct of the study as an employee of the Astellas group, third party associated with the study, or the study site team. Subject has previously received mirabegron in the 6 months prior to Screening (Visit 1). Exclusion Criteria assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline): Subject was non-compliant during the 4-week tamsulosin hydrochloride run-in period, defined as taking less than 80% or greater than 120% of study medication. Subject had an average total daily urine volume >3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day diary.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Medical Affairs, Americas
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site US01009
City
Homewood
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01005
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35749
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01012
City
Anchorage
State/Province
Alaska
ZIP/Postal Code
99503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01070
City
Hawaiian Gardens
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01081
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90035
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01021
City
Murrieta
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92562
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01068
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01064
City
Valley Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01097
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01026
City
Pompano Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01025
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01027
City
Wellington
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33449
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01034
City
West Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50266
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01094
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01041
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01016
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02131
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01003
City
Watertown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02472
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01060
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64116
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01067
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01061
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01029
City
Edison
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08837
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01031
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01015
City
Garden City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01019
City
Plainview
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01069
City
Cary
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
25711
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01079
City
Maiden
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28650
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01072
City
Bristol
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37620
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01042
City
Clarksville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01056
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01075
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01078
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37938
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US01063
City
Newport News
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site CA15008
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2V 1P9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15003
City
Barrie
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4M 7G1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15001
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6T 4S5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15005
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15011
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1N 4V3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15002
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15009
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1L 0H8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15014
City
Victoriaville
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G6P 6P6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CZ42004
City
Benesov
ZIP/Postal Code
256 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42006
City
Domazlice
ZIP/Postal Code
339 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42005
City
Prague 10
ZIP/Postal Code
101 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42003
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42001
City
Sternberk
ZIP/Postal Code
78501
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site FR33004
City
Colmar Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
68024
Country
France
Facility Name
Site FR33002
City
Pierre Benite Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
Facility Name
Site DE49002
City
Duisburg
ZIP/Postal Code
47051
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49001
City
Hagenow
ZIP/Postal Code
19230
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49006
City
Halle (Saale)
ZIP/Postal Code
06132
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49004
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
D-22303
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49005
City
Hettstedt
ZIP/Postal Code
06333
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49003
City
Lutherstadt Eisleben
ZIP/Postal Code
06295
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49007
City
Sangerhausen
ZIP/Postal Code
06526
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site IT39002
City
Avellino
ZIP/Postal Code
83100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39003
City
Catanzaro
ZIP/Postal Code
88100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39010
City
Chieti
ZIP/Postal Code
66013
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39004
City
Florence
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39005
City
Latina
ZIP/Postal Code
04100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39006
City
Pisa
ZIP/Postal Code
56124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39001
City
Treviglio
ZIP/Postal Code
24047
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39008
City
Vasto
ZIP/Postal Code
66054
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site PL48006
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-611
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48001
City
Piaseczno
ZIP/Postal Code
05-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48004
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-797
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48007
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
53-329
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48005
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
53-114
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site ES34007
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34009
City
Lugo
ZIP/Postal Code
27003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34001
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28031
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34003
City
Miranda de Ebro
ZIP/Postal Code
09200
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34002
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34006
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34004
City
Vigo
ZIP/Postal Code
36211
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site GB44005
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS10 5NB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44011
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS48 3HA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44004
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE7 7DN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44002
City
Reading
ZIP/Postal Code
RG1 5AN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44006
City
York
ZIP/Postal Code
YO31 8HE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Links:
URL
https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/hcp/study.aspx?ID=341
Description
Link to results on the Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirabegron in Men With OAB Symptoms While Taking Tamsulosin Hydrochloride for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs