search
Back to results

Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD)

Primary Purpose

Crohn Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vedolizumab
Adalimumab
Methotrexate
Sponsored by
Takeda
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Crohn Disease focused on measuring Drug Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Has an initial diagnosis of CD established within 24 months prior to screening with involvement of the ileum and/or colon that can be assessed by ileocolonoscopy.
  2. Has moderate to severely active CD during Screening defined by a centrally assessed simple endoscopic score for Crohn disease (SES-CD) score >=7 (or >=4 if isolated ileal disease).

Exclusion Criteria:

Gastrointestinal (GI) Exclusion Criteria

  1. Has a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis.
  2. Has clinical evidence of a current abdominal abscess or a history of prior abdominal abscess.
  3. Has a known perianal fistula with abscess. (The participant may have a perianal fistula without abscess.)
  4. Has a known fistula (other than perianal fistula).

Sites / Locations

  • Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast
  • Gastro Florida
  • Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates
  • Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC
  • Northshore University HealthSystem
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
  • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Baton Rouge
  • Louisana Research Center, LLC
  • Center for Digestive Health
  • Huron Gastroenterology Associates
  • Minnesota Gastroenterology, PA - Plymouth
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
  • Las Vegas Medical Research
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
  • Digestive Health Partners, PS
  • Carolinas HealthCare System Digestive Health
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
  • Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.
  • Options Health Research, LLC
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Pinnacle Clinical Research
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Southlake
  • Tyler Research Institute, LLC
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Webster
  • University of Utah Health Sciences Center
  • Digestive Health Specialists
  • Covenant Health
  • PerCuro Clinical Research Ltd
  • LHSC - Victoria Hospital
  • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates Inc
  • CIUSSS de I'Estrie-CHUS

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)

Arm Description

In Triple Combination Therapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg, intravenous (IV) infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg subcutaneously (SC), once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. In Monotherapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 26
Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that was ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Healing at Week 26
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score ≤4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 26
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 26
The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Negative change indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Deep Remission at Week 26
Deep remission was defined as Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score <150 and SES-CD score from 0-2. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 26
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI was scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Weeks 10 and 26
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Weeks 10 and 26
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26
The change between the CRP levels were collected at Weeks 10 and 26 relative to Baseline. Negative change indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
The change between the fecal calprotectin concentrations collected at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102 relative to Baseline were reported. Baseline is defined as the last observation prior to the first dose of the study drug.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and CRP level <5 mg/L in participants with elevated CRP level at Baseline. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102
Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who had discontinued corticosteroids and were in clinical remission at weeks 10, 26, and 102 were reported. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Remission at Week 102
Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicated more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Deep Remission at Week 102
Deep remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and SES-CD score 0-2. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Healing at Week 102
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score <=4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Response at Week 102
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 102
Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI is scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total is sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.
Percentage of Participants With First Exacerbation of CD
First exacerbation of CD after 26 weeks was defined as either: 1) a CDAI increase of >70 from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, objective evidence of disease activity by colonoscopy or CRP above normal OR 2) fecal calprotectin >250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) alone. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.

Full Information

First Posted
May 5, 2016
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Sponsor
Takeda
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02764762
Brief Title
Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD)
Official Title
An Open-Label, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination Therapy With Vedolizumab IV, Adalimumab SC, and Oral Methotrexate in Early Treatment of Subjects With Crohn's Disease Stratified at Higher Risk for Developing Complications
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 18, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 22, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 5, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Takeda

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of triple combination therapy with an anti-integrin (vedolizumab intravenous [IV]), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (adalimumab subcutaneously [SC]), and an immunomodulator (oral methotrexate) on endoscopic remission in participants with newly-diagnosed CD stratified at higher risk for complications.
Detailed Description
The drug being tested in this study is called vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people who have CD. This study will look at the endoscopic remission and mucosal healing of gastrointestinal tract of people who take vedolizumab as triple combination therapy with adalimumab and methotrexate. The study will enroll approximately 60 participants. Participants will receive triple combination therapy which includes: Vedolizumab 300 mg (intravenous) Adalimumab 160/80/40 mg (subcutaneous) Methotrexate 15 mg (oral) All participants will receive vedolizumab intravenous infusion on Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 along with adalimumab 160 mg, subcutaneous injection at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with methotrexate tablets orally, once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. In monotherapy phase, all participants will receive vedolizumab intravenous infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102. This multi-center trial will be conducted in the United States and Canada. The overall time to participate in this study is 128 weeks. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, plus a final visit 18 weeks after last dose of study drug for a safety follow-up assessment. Participants will also participate in a long-term safety questionnaire, by phone, at 26 weeks (6 months) from the last dose of study drug.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Crohn Disease
Keywords
Drug Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
55 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In Triple Combination Therapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg, intravenous (IV) infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg subcutaneously (SC), once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. In Monotherapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vedolizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Entyvio, MLN0002 IV
Intervention Description
Vedolizumab intravenous infusion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Humira
Intervention Description
Adalimumab injection for subcutaneous use.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Intervention Description
Methotrexate oral tablets.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 26
Description
Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that was ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Time Frame
Week 26
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Healing at Week 26
Description
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score ≤4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 26
Description
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 26
Description
The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Negative change indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 26
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Deep Remission at Week 26
Description
Deep remission was defined as Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score <150 and SES-CD score from 0-2. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 26
Description
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI was scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Weeks 10 and 26
Description
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 10 and 26
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Weeks 10 and 26
Description
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 10 and 26
Title
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26
Description
The change between the CRP levels were collected at Weeks 10 and 26 relative to Baseline. Negative change indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10 and 26
Title
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Description
The change between the fecal calprotectin concentrations collected at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102 relative to Baseline were reported. Baseline is defined as the last observation prior to the first dose of the study drug.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78 and 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Description
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and CRP level <5 mg/L in participants with elevated CRP level at Baseline. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 52, 78 and 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102
Description
Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who had discontinued corticosteroids and were in clinical remission at weeks 10, 26, and 102 were reported. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 10, 26 and 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Description
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 78 and 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Description
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 78 and 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Remission at Week 102
Description
Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicated more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Deep Remission at Week 102
Description
Deep remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and SES-CD score 0-2. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Healing at Week 102
Description
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score <=4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Time Frame
Week 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Response at Week 102
Description
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Time Frame
Week 102
Title
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 102
Description
Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI is scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total is sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.
Time Frame
Week 102
Title
Percentage of Participants With First Exacerbation of CD
Description
First exacerbation of CD after 26 weeks was defined as either: 1) a CDAI increase of >70 from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, objective evidence of disease activity by colonoscopy or CRP above normal OR 2) fecal calprotectin >250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) alone. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.
Time Frame
After 26 Weeks up to Week 120

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Has an initial diagnosis of CD established within 24 months prior to screening with involvement of the ileum and/or colon that can be assessed by ileocolonoscopy. Has moderate to severely active CD during Screening defined by a centrally assessed simple endoscopic score for Crohn disease (SES-CD) score >=7 (or >=4 if isolated ileal disease). Exclusion Criteria: Gastrointestinal (GI) Exclusion Criteria Has a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis. Has clinical evidence of a current abdominal abscess or a history of prior abdominal abscess. Has a known perianal fistula with abscess. (The participant may have a perianal fistula without abscess.) Has a known fistula (other than perianal fistula).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast
City
Dothan
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastro Florida
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342-5000
Country
United States
Facility Name
Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northshore University HealthSystem
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research
City
Topeka
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Baton Rouge
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70809
Country
United States
Facility Name
Louisana Research Center, LLC
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Digestive Health
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48098
Country
United States
Facility Name
Huron Gastroenterology Associates
City
Ypsilanti
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48197
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minnesota Gastroenterology, PA - Plymouth
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55446
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Mississippi Medical Center
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Las Vegas Medical Research
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Digestive Health Partners, PS
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas HealthCare System Digestive Health
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Options Health Research, LLC
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pinnacle Clinical Research
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Southlake
City
Southlake
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76092
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tyler Research Institute, LLC
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Webster
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77598
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Digestive Health Specialists
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Covenant Health
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6L 6K3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
PerCuro Clinical Research Ltd
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V8V 3M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
LHSC - Victoria Hospital
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5W9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto Digestive Disease Associates Inc
City
Vaughan
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4L 4Y7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CIUSSS de I'Estrie-CHUS
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1G 2E8
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/

Learn more about this trial

Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs