search
Back to results

Effect of Personalized Robotic Therapy

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS)
Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) - automatically personalized
Sponsored by
Wearable Robotics srl.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring automatic, personalized, robotic therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stroke patients
  • right and left hand dominant
  • cerebral lesion onset between 2-8 weeks
  • able to participate in a session of about 30-60 minutes
  • right-hemiplegic with at least 10° of motion in the treated joints (shoulder and elbow)
  • age: more than 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects with an active implantable device or wearing an active device (e.g., pacemakers, metallic objects in the brain, infusion pumps, etc.)
  • persistent delirium or disturbed vigilance
  • moderate or severe language comprehension deficits
  • skull breach
  • new stroke lesions during rehabilitation
  • patients incapable of discernment
  • subjects with reduced mobility due to previous injuries or abnormalities unrelated with the cerebral accident

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital of Geneva

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Conventional therapy

Traditional robotic rehabilitation with ALEx RS

Automatic personalized robotic rehabilitation with ALEx RS

Arm Description

The control group of patients will perform a conventional therapy without the use of the exoskeleton. The conventional therapy will consist in a traditional treatment of occupational therapy or physiotherapy without the use of the robotic device. The therapist will provide a specific conventional treatment comparable with the robotic treatment in terms of session time and therapeutic goals (i.e., 45 minutes per session, about 100, 150, 200 and 250 movements respectively for the first, second, third and fourth week). The level of difficulty of the exercises will be increased by the physiotherapist according to the degree of impairment of the patients. The muscle and cerebral activity during the execution of the conventional therapy could be acquired.

The rehabilitative task will be constituted of 3D reaching movements covering a sphere of fourteen centimeter of radius in front of the patient. The initial rehabilitative task will be the same for all the patients belonging to this group and the workspace will be extended accordingly to the therapist evaluation during the following training sessions. In order not to bias the comparisons of the effects of the different rehabilitative treatments, the therapist assisting this group during the rehabilitation will be the same for all the subjects belonging to this group and he/she will not take part in the rehabilitative treatment of the other groups. Initially, the patients will execute reaching movements in different directions in the horizontal plane. If the therapist will evaluate that the movements have been sufficiently recovered, reaching movements in the other planes will be proposed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety evaluated through the number of adverse events
Efficacy evaluated through Fugl-Meyer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Efficacy of personalized therapy evaluated through Fugl-Meyer
The secondary outcome of the study is the evaluation of the differences on the outcome for a personalized vs a standard robotic rehabilitation

Full Information

First Posted
March 30, 2016
Last Updated
October 13, 2022
Sponsor
Wearable Robotics srl.
Collaborators
University Hospital, Geneva, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02770300
Brief Title
Effect of Personalized Robotic Therapy
Official Title
Effect of an Automatic Personalized Robot-assisted Rehabilitation on Cortical Organization and Clinical Recovery After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The study was prematurely terminated by the sponsor in both centers because the recruitment in the two centers was slow, and it stopped during COVID period.
Study Start Date
May 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wearable Robotics srl.
Collaborators
University Hospital, Geneva, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary goal of this project is to test the safeness and clinical effectiveness of a novel exoskeleton for the upper limb (Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station, ALEx RS) developed at Wearable Robotics srl, for the force assistance of stroke patients during robotic-rehabilitation. The secondary study aim is to design and test an automatic personalized robot-based upper limb motor rehabilitation protocol targeting the specific kinematic performance of each patient. Finally, the study also aims to define the "neuro-biomechanical state" of the patient and its evolution during the therapy by studying cortical signals and muscular synergies. This information will be used to improve the personalization of the robotic treatment by targeting not only the motor performance but also the cerebral and muscular activity of the patient. The study is longitudinally designed in order to test the safeness and clinical effectiveness of ALEx RS over time, and to monitor the clinical effectiveness of the automatic personalized robotic therapy from the beginning until the end of the treatment. Moreover, in order to estimate the long-term clinical effectiveness of the treatment, the assessment methods proposed in the clinical trial will be repeated one month after the end of the treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
automatic, personalized, robotic therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
28 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Conventional therapy
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The control group of patients will perform a conventional therapy without the use of the exoskeleton. The conventional therapy will consist in a traditional treatment of occupational therapy or physiotherapy without the use of the robotic device. The therapist will provide a specific conventional treatment comparable with the robotic treatment in terms of session time and therapeutic goals (i.e., 45 minutes per session, about 100, 150, 200 and 250 movements respectively for the first, second, third and fourth week). The level of difficulty of the exercises will be increased by the physiotherapist according to the degree of impairment of the patients. The muscle and cerebral activity during the execution of the conventional therapy could be acquired.
Arm Title
Traditional robotic rehabilitation with ALEx RS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The rehabilitative task will be constituted of 3D reaching movements covering a sphere of fourteen centimeter of radius in front of the patient. The initial rehabilitative task will be the same for all the patients belonging to this group and the workspace will be extended accordingly to the therapist evaluation during the following training sessions. In order not to bias the comparisons of the effects of the different rehabilitative treatments, the therapist assisting this group during the rehabilitation will be the same for all the subjects belonging to this group and he/she will not take part in the rehabilitative treatment of the other groups. Initially, the patients will execute reaching movements in different directions in the horizontal plane. If the therapist will evaluate that the movements have been sufficiently recovered, reaching movements in the other planes will be proposed.
Arm Title
Automatic personalized robotic rehabilitation with ALEx RS
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS)
Intervention Description
ALEx RS is a complete system specifically designed to support the rehabilitation of stroke patients. In particular, this system is equipped with a robotic arm exoskeleton conceived for the force assistance, integrated in a Virtual Reality system that allows implementing rehabilitative exercises highly interactive and engaging for the patients. It is proven that the use of this type of devices in rehabilitation can provide high intensive, repetitive, task specific, and interactive treatment of the impaired arm and an objective and reliable mean for monitoring patients' progress.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) - automatically personalized
Intervention Description
ALEx RS is a complete system specifically designed to support the rehabilitation of stroke patients. In particular, this system is equipped with a robotic arm exoskeleton conceived for the force assistance, integrated in a Virtual Reality system that allows implementing rehabilitative exercises highly interactive and engaging for the patients. It is proven that the use of this type of devices in rehabilitation can provide high intensive, repetitive, task specific, and interactive treatment of the impaired arm and an objective and reliable mean for monitoring patients' progress. The movements to be performed by the patient are automatically decided by the exoskeleton.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety evaluated through the number of adverse events
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy evaluated through Fugl-Meyer
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy of personalized therapy evaluated through Fugl-Meyer
Description
The secondary outcome of the study is the evaluation of the differences on the outcome for a personalized vs a standard robotic rehabilitation
Time Frame
2 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Neurobiomechanical state evaluated through kinematics
Description
Definition of the neurobiomechanical state of the patient and its evolution during the therapy
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Neurobiomechanical state evaluated through muscle activity measured with electromyography (EMG)
Description
Definition of the neurobiomechanical state of the patient and its evolution during the therapy
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Neurobiomechanical state evaluated through brain activity measured with electroencephalography (EEG)
Description
Definition of the neurobiomechanical state of the patient and its evolution during the therapy
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Neurobiomechanical state evaluated through brain activity measured with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Description
Definition of the neurobiomechanical state of the patient and its evolution during the therapy
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: stroke patients right and left hand dominant cerebral lesion onset between 2-8 weeks able to participate in a session of about 30-60 minutes right-hemiplegic with at least 10° of motion in the treated joints (shoulder and elbow) age: more than 18 years old Exclusion Criteria: subjects with an active implantable device or wearing an active device (e.g., pacemakers, metallic objects in the brain, infusion pumps, etc.) persistent delirium or disturbed vigilance moderate or severe language comprehension deficits skull breach new stroke lesions during rehabilitation patients incapable of discernment subjects with reduced mobility due to previous injuries or abnormalities unrelated with the cerebral accident
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adrian Guggisberg, Md
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Geneva
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmelo Chisari, Md
Organizational Affiliation
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Silvestro Micera, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital of Geneva
City
Geneva
ZIP/Postal Code
1211
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26801620
Citation
Pirondini E, Coscia M, Marcheschi S, Roas G, Salsedo F, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Micera S. Evaluation of the effects of the Arm Light Exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: a pilot study on healthy subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jan 23;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0117-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32410617
Citation
Giang C, Pirondini E, Kinany N, Pierella C, Panarese A, Coscia M, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Guggisberg A, Micera S. Motor improvement estimation and task adaptation for personalized robot-aided therapy: a feasibility study. Biomed Eng Online. 2020 May 14;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00779-y.
Results Reference
background
Citation
5th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, italy, October 16-20 2018, Evolution of cortical asymmetry with post-stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study, Miehlbradt J, Pierella C, Kinany N, Coscia M, Pirondini E, Vissani M, Mazzoni A, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Guggisberg A and Micera S.
Results Reference
background
Citation
5th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, italy, October 16-20 2018, Training muscle synergies to relearn movement: current perspectives and future trends, Coscia M, Pellegrino L, Pierella C, Pirondini E, Kinany N, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Giannoni P, Marinelli L, Guggisberg A, Casadio M and Micera S.
Results Reference
background
Citation
5th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, italy, October 16-20 2018, On the potential of EEG biomarkers to inform robot-assisted rehabilitation in stroke patients, Pirondini E, Pierella C, Kinany N, Coscia M, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Guggisberg A, Micera S, Deouell L and Van de Ville D.
Results Reference
background
Citation
5th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, italy, October 16-20 2018, personalizing exoskeleton-based upper limb rehabilitation using a statistical model: a pilot study, Pierella C, Giang C, Pirondini E, Kinany N, Coscia M, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Guggisberg A and Micera S.
Results Reference
background
Citation
5th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, italy, October 16-20 2018, Resting-state functional connectivity in stroke patients after upper limb robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study, Kinany N, Pierella C, Pirondini E, Coscia M, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Van De Ville D, Guggisberg A and Micera S.
Results Reference
background
Citation
7th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Enschede, Netherlands, August 26-29 2018. Motor intention decoding during active and robot-assisted reaching. Pastore A*, Pierella C*, Artoni F, Pirondini E, Coscia M, Casadio M, Micera S.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32516757
Citation
Pierella C, Pirondini E, Kinany N, Coscia M, Giang C, Miehlbradt J, Magnin C, Nicolo P, Dalise S, Sgherri G, Chisari C, Van De Ville D, Guggisberg A, Micera S. A multimodal approach to capture post-stroke temporal dynamics of recovery. J Neural Eng. 2020 Jul 10;17(4):045002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9ada.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.wearable-robotics.com/kinetek/
Description
Website of Wearable Robotics srl

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Personalized Robotic Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs