Back to resultsTargeting Anhedonia in Cocaine Use Disorder
Primary Purpose
Cocaine-Related Disorders, Anhedonia
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
d-amphetamine
Contingency management
Placebo (for d-amphetamine)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cocaine-Related Disorders
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- be between 18 and 60 years of age
- meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V (DSM-5) criteria for current cocaine use disorder of at least moderate severity (≥ 4 symptoms)
- have at least 1 cocaine positive urine sample during the baseline screening period
- be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam, per the judgment of our study physician
- be able to understand the consent form and provide written informed consent
- be able to provide the names of at least 2 persons who can generally locate their whereabouts.
- if female, agree to use an acceptable method of birth control during study (surgical sterilization, approved hormonal contraceptives, barrier methods with spermicide, or intrauterine device).
Exclusion Criteria:
- current DSM-5 diagnosis for substance use disorder of least moderate severity (≥ 4 symptoms), other than cocaine, nicotine, marijuana, or alcohol
- Physical dependence on alcohol requiring medically supervised detoxification, in the judgment of the study physician
- current amphetamine use (by self-report in past 30 days or positive urine drug screen), more than 50 lifetime uses of amphetamine, or history of DSM-5 Amphetamine Use Disorder
- a current DSM-5 axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe
- significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation
- medical conditions contraindicating d-amphetamine (e.g., significant cardiovascular disease, liver or kidney disease, seizure disorder, hypotension or hypertension)
- taking medications known to have effects on the central nervous system or that could cause significant drug interactions with d-amphetamine (e.g., clonidine, prazosin)
- having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court
- impending incarceration
- pregnant or nursing for female patients
- inability to read, write, or speak English
Additional Exclusion Criteria for the functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) Sub-Study (in addition to all listed criteria above for the Main Treatment Study):
- body mass index (BMI) >30, as this may be incompatible with the magnetic resonance scanner gantry
- any retained metals in the body, including implants and metallic substances (e.g. aneurysm clips, retained metal particles in metal workers, magnetic dental implants, ferromagnetic ocular implants, iron-based facial tattoos), as this may cause adverse effects to participants and interfere with data collection in the MR magnetic field
- inability to tolerate small, enclosed spaces (such as the magnetic resonance scanner bore)
Sites / Locations
- University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
d-Amphetamine and Contingency Management
d-Amphetamine alone
Placebo and Contingency Management
Arm Description
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of treatment with 60mg of sustained release d-amphetamine with contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of treatment with 60mg of sustained release d-amphetamine but will not receive contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of of placebo treatment, paired with contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants who were Cocaine Abstinent as Assessed by Urine Screening (Measure of Treatment Efficacy)
Subjects will complete a urine drug screen each visit. Achievement of cocaine abstinence will be defined as two consecutive weeks of cocaine-negative urine samples.
Change in Consummatory Reward Composite (Anhedonia)
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether consummatory anhedonia measures (SHAPS, TEPS-Consummatory, EPRT, Corrugator and Zygomatic EMG) can be reduced into one composite representing consummatory reward functioning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Change in Motivational Reward Composite (Anhedonia)
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether motivational anhedonia measures (TEPS-Motivational, EPKT, EEfRT) can be reduced into one composite representing motivational reward functioning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Change in Reward Learning Composite (Anhedonia)
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether reward learning measures (PRT and PCT) can be reduced into one composite representing reward learning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Treatment Effectiveness Score
Subjects will complete a urine drug screen each visit. The Treatment Effectiveness Score is defined as the total number of cocaine negative urines across treatment.
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by The Emotional Picture Rating Task (EPRT)
The Emotional Picture Rating Task (EPRT) is a behavioral measure of consummatory reward where participants are asked to report positive, negative and aroused feelings while viewing emotional pictures. Valence and arousal ratings of positive pictures are the outcomes.
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Emotional Picture Keypress Task (EPKT)
The Emotional Picture Key-press Task (EPKT) is a measure of motivational reward in which participants expend effort via key-pressing to extend or reduce viewing times for emotional pictures. Key-pressing to extend time viewing positive pictures is the outcome.
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
The Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a measure of motivational reward where, on each trial, participants choose between a "hard task" requiring many key-presses but worth more money and an "easy task" requiring few key-presses but worth less money. Percent of hard task choices is the outcome.
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Score
The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is a measure of consummatory reward consisting of 14 hedonic capacity statements (e.g. "I would enjoy my favorite television program"). The sum of these scores is the outcome.
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS)
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) contains 18 statements measuring both motivational and consummatory experiences of reward. Half of those statements comprise a subscale for consummatory reward, which is the outcome.
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) Motivational Score
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) contains 18 statements measuring both motivational and consummatory experiences of reward. Half of those statements comprise a subscale for consummatory reward, which is the outcome.
Reward Learning as Assessed by the Probabilistic Classification Task (PCT)
The Probabilistic Classification Task is a measure of reward learning in which participants repeatedly guess whether an image belongs to Category A or B. For half of stimuli from each category, correct answers are rewarded with points (no change for incorrect) and for the other half incorrect guesses are punished with point removal (no change for correct). Learning rates for rewarded stimuli are the outcome.
Reward Learning as Assessed by the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT)
The Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) is a measure of reward learning consisting of trials in which participants must identify whether a cartoon face has a short or long mouth over a brief presentation. Correct identification of one category (short or long) is rewarded more often. Response bias for the rewarded category is the outcome.
Change in Consummatory Reward Activity as Assessed by fMRI
Consummatory reward will be measured by activity in nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum and psychophysiological from nucleus accumbens to ventral pallidum, orbitofrontal cortex and rostral anterior cingulate cortex during reward/positive pictures vs. non-reward/neutral pictures during the Emotional Picture fMRI Task and the delay portions of Monetary Incentive Delay Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Change in Motivational Reward Activity as Assessed by fMRI
Motivational reward will be measured by activity in nucleus accumbens, and psychophysiological interactions from accumbens to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, accumbens and amygdala during anticipation of reward vs. non-reward during the anticipation phases of the Monetary Incentive Delay Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Change in Reward Learning as Assessed by fMRI
Reward learning will be measured by Prediction Error signals in neural accumbens, and Psychophysiological Interactions from neural accumbens to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during prediction errors in the Probabilistic Classification fMRI Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Magnitude of Zygomatic Activity as a Physiological Measure of Anhedonia
Activity in the zygomatic (smile) muscle will be recorded using electromyography (EMG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure consummatory reward. Positive pictures enhance zygomatic activity. Magnitude of zygomatic responses during positive pictures is the outcome.
Magnitude of Corrugator Activity as a Physiological Measure of Anhedonia
Activity in the corrugator (frown) muscle will be recorded using electromyography (EMG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure consummatory reward. Positive pictures suppress corrugator activity. Magnitude of corrugator responses during positive pictures is the outcome.
Heart Rate Variability as a Physiological Measure of Arousal
Heart rate will be recorded using Electrocardiogram (EKG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure arousal responses to stimuli. High heart rate variability is associated with blunted arousal to positive stimuli and higher rates of depressive symptoms, but its relationship to our other measures of anhedonia, or to cocaine use, is unknown. Thus, this is included as an exploratory variable. Heart rate variability responses during positive, neutral, and negative pictures is the outcome.
Skin Conductance as a Physiological Measure of Arousal
Skin conductance measures activity in the eccrine sweat glands during the EPRT (see above). Activity in this gland serves as a measure of arousal responses to stimuli, but its relationship to our other measures of anhedonia, or to cocaine use, is unknown. Thus, this is included as an exploratory variable. The outcome measure is the skin conductance response during positive, neutral, and negative pictures.
Delay Discounting as a Measure of Impulsivity
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included impulsivity, as measured by delay discounting, as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be steepness of discounting (k).
The Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included avoidance and inflexibility as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be the scale total.
The Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included severity of withdrawal as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be the scale total.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02773212
First Posted
May 6, 2016
Last Updated
April 20, 2022
Sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02773212
Brief Title
Targeting Anhedonia in Cocaine Use Disorder
Official Title
Targeting Anhedonia in Cocaine Use Disorder - Treatment Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine anhedonia as a potential moderator of treatment outcomes for Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD). Specifically, this study will investigate how anhedonia affects outcomes in contingency management (CM) treatment for CUD and whether anhedonia mediates the effects of adjunctive treatment with a dopaminergic (DAergic) drug, d-amphetamine, on outcomes in CM for CUD, as well as investigate the contribution of anhedonia to overall CUD severity.
Detailed Description
Recent research suggests that anhedonia is a key neurobehavioral dysfunction in Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD) that contributes to treatment outcomes. Anhedonia, defined here as lack of interest or pleasure in non-drug rewards, is frequently found in CUD and is related to neural deficits, such as low striatal dopamine and deficient activation to non-drug rewards in mesocortical circuits. Interestingly, not all individuals in CUD have these deficits. Preliminary data suggests that the presence of self-reported anhedonia predicts worse outcome in contingency management (CM) treatment of CUD. Moreover, low baseline dopamine predicts failure to attain abstinence in CM while medications that enhance DA increase CM success rates and responsiveness to rewards.
This study specifically aims to test the contribution of anhedonia to overall CUD severity, the relationship of anhedonia to outcomes in CM treatment, and the mediating role of anhedonia in medication enhancement of CM in CUD. To accomplish these aims, individuals with CUD will be enrolled and will undergo 4 weeks of intensive CM treatment, either with or without treatment with the dopaminergic drug, d-amphetamine. A medication only group will be included to solely measure the effects of d-amphetamine. Anhedonia will be assessed using multi-modal subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral measures of reward functioning at baseline, and each week of treatment. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures of reward functioning will also be taken at baseline and week 4 in a subset of participants (n = 24)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cocaine-Related Disorders, Anhedonia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
d-Amphetamine and Contingency Management
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of treatment with 60mg of sustained release d-amphetamine with contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Arm Title
d-Amphetamine alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of treatment with 60mg of sustained release d-amphetamine but will not receive contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Arm Title
Placebo and Contingency Management
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in this group will receive 4 weeks of of placebo treatment, paired with contingency management treatment for cocaine use disorder.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
d-amphetamine
Other Intervention Name(s)
sustained release d-amphetamine, dexedrine
Intervention Description
Participants in this group will receive 60 mg of d-amphetamine daily for 4 weeks. There will be a 1 week run up dosing and a 1 week run-down medication period.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Contingency management
Intervention Description
Contingency management is an established cocaine use disorder treatment in which individuals receive monetary rewards for abstinence.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo (for d-amphetamine)
Intervention Description
60 mg of riboflavin and cornstarch as needed.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants who were Cocaine Abstinent as Assessed by Urine Screening (Measure of Treatment Efficacy)
Description
Subjects will complete a urine drug screen each visit. Achievement of cocaine abstinence will be defined as two consecutive weeks of cocaine-negative urine samples.
Time Frame
At end of active treatment (Treatment week 4)
Title
Change in Consummatory Reward Composite (Anhedonia)
Description
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether consummatory anhedonia measures (SHAPS, TEPS-Consummatory, EPRT, Corrugator and Zygomatic EMG) can be reduced into one composite representing consummatory reward functioning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Change in Motivational Reward Composite (Anhedonia)
Description
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether motivational anhedonia measures (TEPS-Motivational, EPKT, EEfRT) can be reduced into one composite representing motivational reward functioning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Change in Reward Learning Composite (Anhedonia)
Description
Principal components analysis will be used to determine whether reward learning measures (PRT and PCT) can be reduced into one composite representing reward learning. If this is inappropriate, we will use individual measures (see below under "Secondary Outcome Measures") with pessimistic priors to address multiplicity.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment Effectiveness Score
Description
Subjects will complete a urine drug screen each visit. The Treatment Effectiveness Score is defined as the total number of cocaine negative urines across treatment.
Time Frame
At end of active treatment (Treatment week 4)
Title
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by The Emotional Picture Rating Task (EPRT)
Description
The Emotional Picture Rating Task (EPRT) is a behavioral measure of consummatory reward where participants are asked to report positive, negative and aroused feelings while viewing emotional pictures. Valence and arousal ratings of positive pictures are the outcomes.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Emotional Picture Keypress Task (EPKT)
Description
The Emotional Picture Key-press Task (EPKT) is a measure of motivational reward in which participants expend effort via key-pressing to extend or reduce viewing times for emotional pictures. Key-pressing to extend time viewing positive pictures is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Description
The Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a measure of motivational reward where, on each trial, participants choose between a "hard task" requiring many key-presses but worth more money and an "easy task" requiring few key-presses but worth less money. Percent of hard task choices is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Score
Description
The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is a measure of consummatory reward consisting of 14 hedonic capacity statements (e.g. "I would enjoy my favorite television program"). The sum of these scores is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Consummatory Reward as Assessed by the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS)
Description
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) contains 18 statements measuring both motivational and consummatory experiences of reward. Half of those statements comprise a subscale for consummatory reward, which is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Motivational Reward as Assessed by the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) Motivational Score
Description
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) contains 18 statements measuring both motivational and consummatory experiences of reward. Half of those statements comprise a subscale for consummatory reward, which is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Reward Learning as Assessed by the Probabilistic Classification Task (PCT)
Description
The Probabilistic Classification Task is a measure of reward learning in which participants repeatedly guess whether an image belongs to Category A or B. For half of stimuli from each category, correct answers are rewarded with points (no change for incorrect) and for the other half incorrect guesses are punished with point removal (no change for correct). Learning rates for rewarded stimuli are the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Reward Learning as Assessed by the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT)
Description
The Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) is a measure of reward learning consisting of trials in which participants must identify whether a cartoon face has a short or long mouth over a brief presentation. Correct identification of one category (short or long) is rewarded more often. Response bias for the rewarded category is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Change in Consummatory Reward Activity as Assessed by fMRI
Description
Consummatory reward will be measured by activity in nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum and psychophysiological from nucleus accumbens to ventral pallidum, orbitofrontal cortex and rostral anterior cingulate cortex during reward/positive pictures vs. non-reward/neutral pictures during the Emotional Picture fMRI Task and the delay portions of Monetary Incentive Delay Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Time Frame
Measured 2 times (Baseline and week 4 of treatment)
Title
Change in Motivational Reward Activity as Assessed by fMRI
Description
Motivational reward will be measured by activity in nucleus accumbens, and psychophysiological interactions from accumbens to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, accumbens and amygdala during anticipation of reward vs. non-reward during the anticipation phases of the Monetary Incentive Delay Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Time Frame
Measured 2 times (Baseline and week 4 of treatment)
Title
Change in Reward Learning as Assessed by fMRI
Description
Reward learning will be measured by Prediction Error signals in neural accumbens, and Psychophysiological Interactions from neural accumbens to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during prediction errors in the Probabilistic Classification fMRI Task. Note: fMRI data will be collected in only 24 participants (12 in CM/Placebo arm and 12 in CM/Sustained Release-Amphetamine arm)
Time Frame
Measured 2 times (Baseline and week 4 of treatment)
Title
Magnitude of Zygomatic Activity as a Physiological Measure of Anhedonia
Description
Activity in the zygomatic (smile) muscle will be recorded using electromyography (EMG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure consummatory reward. Positive pictures enhance zygomatic activity. Magnitude of zygomatic responses during positive pictures is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Magnitude of Corrugator Activity as a Physiological Measure of Anhedonia
Description
Activity in the corrugator (frown) muscle will be recorded using electromyography (EMG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure consummatory reward. Positive pictures suppress corrugator activity. Magnitude of corrugator responses during positive pictures is the outcome.
Time Frame
Measured 5 times (Baseline and once each treatment week)
Title
Heart Rate Variability as a Physiological Measure of Arousal
Description
Heart rate will be recorded using Electrocardiogram (EKG) during the EPRT (see above) to measure arousal responses to stimuli. High heart rate variability is associated with blunted arousal to positive stimuli and higher rates of depressive symptoms, but its relationship to our other measures of anhedonia, or to cocaine use, is unknown. Thus, this is included as an exploratory variable. Heart rate variability responses during positive, neutral, and negative pictures is the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Skin Conductance as a Physiological Measure of Arousal
Description
Skin conductance measures activity in the eccrine sweat glands during the EPRT (see above). Activity in this gland serves as a measure of arousal responses to stimuli, but its relationship to our other measures of anhedonia, or to cocaine use, is unknown. Thus, this is included as an exploratory variable. The outcome measure is the skin conductance response during positive, neutral, and negative pictures.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
Delay Discounting as a Measure of Impulsivity
Description
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included impulsivity, as measured by delay discounting, as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be steepness of discounting (k).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
The Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale
Description
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included avoidance and inflexibility as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be the scale total.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
Title
The Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment
Description
In the event that our hypothesis is disconfirmed and anhedonia does not predict outcomes, we have included severity of withdrawal as another possible predictor of treatment outcome in CM. The outcome will be the scale total.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
be between 18 and 60 years of age
meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V (DSM-5) criteria for current cocaine use disorder of at least moderate severity (≥ 4 symptoms)
have at least 1 cocaine positive urine sample during the baseline screening period
be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam, per the judgment of our study physician
be able to understand the consent form and provide written informed consent
be able to provide the names of at least 2 persons who can generally locate their whereabouts.
if female, agree to use an acceptable method of birth control during study (surgical sterilization, approved hormonal contraceptives, barrier methods with spermicide, or intrauterine device).
Exclusion Criteria:
current DSM-5 diagnosis for substance use disorder of least moderate severity (≥ 4 symptoms), other than cocaine, nicotine, marijuana, or alcohol
Physical dependence on alcohol requiring medically supervised detoxification, in the judgment of the study physician
current amphetamine use (by self-report in past 30 days or positive urine drug screen), more than 50 lifetime uses of amphetamine, or history of DSM-5 Amphetamine Use Disorder
a current DSM-5 axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe
significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation
medical conditions contraindicating d-amphetamine (e.g., significant cardiovascular disease, liver or kidney disease, seizure disorder, hypotension or hypertension)
taking medications known to have effects on the central nervous system or that could cause significant drug interactions with d-amphetamine (e.g., clonidine, prazosin)
having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court
impending incarceration
pregnant or nursing for female patients
inability to read, write, or speak English
Additional Exclusion Criteria for the functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) Sub-Study (in addition to all listed criteria above for the Main Treatment Study):
body mass index (BMI) >30, as this may be incompatible with the magnetic resonance scanner gantry
any retained metals in the body, including implants and metallic substances (e.g. aneurysm clips, retained metal particles in metal workers, magnetic dental implants, ferromagnetic ocular implants, iron-based facial tattoos), as this may cause adverse effects to participants and interfere with data collection in the MR magnetic field
inability to tolerate small, enclosed spaces (such as the magnetic resonance scanner bore)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Laboratory Manager
Phone
312-639-1761
Email
addictionlab@uic.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margaret C Wardle, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Illinois at Chicago
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Illinois at Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60607
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laboratory Manager
Phone
312-639-1761
Email
addictionlab@uic.edu
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Learn more about this trial
Targeting Anhedonia in Cocaine Use Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs