search
Back to results

Comparison of Outcomes Between the Use of Silverlon® Dressing and AQUACEL® AG Dressing Post Cardiac Device Implant

Primary Purpose

Infections, Wounds and Injuries

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Silverlon®
AQUACEL® AG
Sponsored by
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Infections focused on measuring Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device, Implant

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are scheduled for a CIED implant, generator change, or upgrade at the University of Kansas Hospital
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are already on antibiotics for another reasons
  • Immunocompromised patients such as those on immunosuppressant's and HIV positive patients
  • Patients who are post device explant for lead infection
  • Patients with an allergy to adhesive, silver or an allergy to the dressing(s) or their components

Sites / Locations

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Silverlon®

AQUACEL® AG

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive Silverlon® dressing postoperative.

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive AQUACEL® AG dressing postoperative.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pocket Hematoma, Moderate-Severe
A pocket hematoma is an accumulation of blood in or near the surgical incision which occurs because of a defect in hemostasis such as injury to blood vessels. Pocket hematoma is associated with local discomfort, an increased risk of infection, and may require surgical intervention or lead to lengthier hospital stays. Mild - Ecchymosis or mild effusion in the pocket, no swelling or pain to device-pocket (watchful waiting) Moderate - Large effusion in the pocket leading to swelling and causing functional impairment or pain to device-pocket Severe - Any pocket hematoma requiring: Reoperation and/or resulting in prolongation of hospitalization (defined as extended hospitalization or rehospitalization for >24 hours, postindex surgery, primarily due to hematoma) and/or requiring interruption of OAC (defined as reversal or intentional withholding, in response to pocket hematoma, resulting in subtherapeutic anticoagulation for >24 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Wound Drainage
Number of participants with wound drainage
Pocket Dehiscence
Pocket (Wound) Dehiscence: Dehiscence is a partial or total separation of previously approximated wound edges, due to a failure of proper wound healing. It may be just the surface layer or the whole wound.This scenario typically occurs 5 to 8 days following surgery when healing is still in the early stages.
Rash After Removal
Number of participants with rash after dressing removal
Site Itching/Burning
Number of participants with Site itching/burning
Skin Erythema
Number of participants with skin erythema

Full Information

First Posted
May 20, 2016
Last Updated
March 8, 2023
Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02781779
Brief Title
Comparison of Outcomes Between the Use of Silverlon® Dressing and AQUACEL® AG Dressing Post Cardiac Device Implant
Official Title
Comparison of Outcomes Between the Use of Silverlon® Dressing and AQUACEL® AG Dressing Post Cardiac Device Implant
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn how effective each of the two dressings, Silverlon® and AQUACEL® AG, are in preventing post cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedure wound infections.
Detailed Description
This is a single center, prospective, 2-arm randomized, non-blinded study. A total of 100 participants will be assigned to the Silverlon arm and 100 to the AQUACEL AG arm. The number of procedures to implant CIED has risen in recent years. With this rise has also brought a rise in post-procedure infections. Infections will happen and there is a continued need to improve all aspects of the surgery and post-operative care. Wound coverage with appropriate dressings is one aspect that needs to be studied in CIED implant patients. Silverlon and AQUACEL AG are two options of dressings available for these patients. This study will look to see if one of the two is a better option for post-operative CIED implant patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infections, Wounds and Injuries
Keywords
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device, Implant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
147 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Silverlon®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive Silverlon® dressing postoperative.
Arm Title
AQUACEL® AG
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive AQUACEL® AG dressing postoperative.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Silverlon®
Intervention Description
Silverlon wound dressings
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AQUACEL® AG
Intervention Description
AQUACEL® AG wound dressings
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pocket Hematoma, Moderate-Severe
Description
A pocket hematoma is an accumulation of blood in or near the surgical incision which occurs because of a defect in hemostasis such as injury to blood vessels. Pocket hematoma is associated with local discomfort, an increased risk of infection, and may require surgical intervention or lead to lengthier hospital stays. Mild - Ecchymosis or mild effusion in the pocket, no swelling or pain to device-pocket (watchful waiting) Moderate - Large effusion in the pocket leading to swelling and causing functional impairment or pain to device-pocket Severe - Any pocket hematoma requiring: Reoperation and/or resulting in prolongation of hospitalization (defined as extended hospitalization or rehospitalization for >24 hours, postindex surgery, primarily due to hematoma) and/or requiring interruption of OAC (defined as reversal or intentional withholding, in response to pocket hematoma, resulting in subtherapeutic anticoagulation for >24 hours)
Time Frame
7-10 days post implant
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wound Drainage
Description
Number of participants with wound drainage
Time Frame
At time of dressing removal, up to 10 days post operative
Title
Pocket Dehiscence
Description
Pocket (Wound) Dehiscence: Dehiscence is a partial or total separation of previously approximated wound edges, due to a failure of proper wound healing. It may be just the surface layer or the whole wound.This scenario typically occurs 5 to 8 days following surgery when healing is still in the early stages.
Time Frame
At time of dressing removal, up to 10 days post operative
Title
Rash After Removal
Description
Number of participants with rash after dressing removal
Time Frame
At time of dressing removal, up to 10 days post operative
Title
Site Itching/Burning
Description
Number of participants with Site itching/burning
Time Frame
At time of dressing removal, up to 10 days post operative
Title
Skin Erythema
Description
Number of participants with skin erythema
Time Frame
At time of dressing removal, up to 10 days post operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who are scheduled for a CIED implant, generator change, or upgrade at the University of Kansas Hospital Able to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are already on antibiotics for another reasons Immunocompromised patients such as those on immunosuppressant's and HIV positive patients Patients who are post device explant for lead infection Patients with an allergy to adhesive, silver or an allergy to the dressing(s) or their components
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Kansas Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Outcomes Between the Use of Silverlon® Dressing and AQUACEL® AG Dressing Post Cardiac Device Implant

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs