search
Back to results

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Overactive Bladder, Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
The Geko
Sponsored by
University College, London
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Overactive Bladder focused on measuring multiple sclerosis, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, tibial nerve stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)Does not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient eligibility was based on meeting the criteria for an overactive bladder, defined by the International Continence Society with an average urinary frequency ≥ 8 voids per and ≥ 1 urgency episode (with or without incontinence) per 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included use of botulinum toxin A treatment within the previous year or neuromodulation (TNS or sacral neuromodulation), patients with sensory loss in the gaitor region (based on intact cutaneous sensation to nociception in the lower limb), presence of urinary tract infection or any other documented LUT pathology

Sites / Locations

  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Daily stimulation (30mins/day)

Weekly stimulation (30mins/week)

Arm Description

30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device

30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants reporting adverse events as recorded using a customised diary
Adverse events are recorded by patients using a compliance diary

Secondary Outcome Measures

Improvement in overactive bladder symptoms as evaluated using a Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale
The Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale assesses the response to treatment using an ordinal scale of 0 to 3, referring to none, mild, moderate or marked improvement, respectively

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2016
Last Updated
May 31, 2016
Sponsor
University College, London
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02790307
Brief Title
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome
Official Title
Single Centre Randomised Pilot Study of Two Regimens (30mins Daily or Weekly for 12 Weeks) of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University College, London

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) has been recognised as a safe and effective treatment for the management of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, acceptability and pilot efficacy of transcutaneous TNS using a novel device.
Detailed Description
In this single centre pilot study, 48 patients with OAB (24 with neurogenic and 24 with idiopathic OAB) were randomized to use a self-applicating ambulatory skin-adhering device to transcutaneously stimulate the tibial nerve for 30 minutes, either once daily or once weekly, for 12-weeks. Changes in lower urinary tract (LUT) OAB symptoms and QoL were measured at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12 using standardized validated scoring instruments (ICIQ-OAB and ICIQ-LUTSqol) and a Global Response Assessment (GRA) at week 12. Weekly phone calls and a usage diary captured patient-reported experiences with the device and compliance. The primary study outcomes were to assess safety and acceptability of the device. In addition, treatment response was assessed using the Global Response Assessment (GRA) at week-12, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder and LUTS-quality of life (ICIQ-OAB and ICIQ-LUTSqol) at baseline, week 4, 8 and 12. In the GRA patients were asked to assess their response to treatment using an ordinal scale of 0 to 3, referring to none, mild, moderate or marked improvement, respectively 1. Patients reporting moderate or marked improvement were considered to have responded to treatment 1. The ICIQ-OAB score is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses OAB symptom severity and bother whereas the ICIQ-LUTSqol score is a 20-item health related quality of life questionnaire. In both questionnaires, part A assesses symptom severity and part B reflects the accumulative bother to the patient. High scores suggests worse symptom profiles and negative impact on QoL, respectively. Patients recorded use of the device in a customized compliance diary which also included entries for their experiences in using the device and any adverse effects. Additionally, weekly phone calls were made by a member of the research team to assess compliance. Statistical analysis A feasibility sample size of 48 patients was adopted and no formal power calculation was performed as is the convention for pilot studies. All data were presented as means with SDs. Paired student t-tests were used to provide an estimate of within group responses between baseline and 12 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Overactive Bladder, Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, tibial nerve stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Daily stimulation (30mins/day)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device
Arm Title
Weekly stimulation (30mins/week)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
The Geko
Intervention Description
transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants reporting adverse events as recorded using a customised diary
Description
Adverse events are recorded by patients using a compliance diary
Time Frame
12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in overactive bladder symptoms as evaluated using a Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale
Description
The Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale assesses the response to treatment using an ordinal scale of 0 to 3, referring to none, mild, moderate or marked improvement, respectively
Time Frame
12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient eligibility was based on meeting the criteria for an overactive bladder, defined by the International Continence Society with an average urinary frequency ≥ 8 voids per and ≥ 1 urgency episode (with or without incontinence) per 24 hours Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria included use of botulinum toxin A treatment within the previous year or neuromodulation (TNS or sacral neuromodulation), patients with sensory loss in the gaitor region (based on intact cutaneous sensation to nociception in the lower limb), presence of urinary tract infection or any other documented LUT pathology
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jalesh Panicker, FRCP
Organizational Affiliation
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20171677
Citation
Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21305588
Citation
de Seze M, Raibaut P, Gallien P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Bonniaud V, Game X, Amarenco G. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treatment of the overactive bladder syndrome in multiple sclerosis: results of a multicenter prospective study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):306-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.20958. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs