search
Back to results

Phase III Study of GSK1278863 in Japanese Non-dialysis (ND) and Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Subjects With Renal Anemia

Primary Purpose

Anaemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
1 to 4 mg tablets of GSK1278863
6 mg GSK1278863 tablet
Epoetin beta pegol
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anaemia focused on measuring Renal Anemia, Japanese, chronic kidney disease, Peritoneal dialysis, GSK1278863, Non-dialysis

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age (at the time of informed consent): >=20 years of age
  • Screening verification only: Stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ND subjects only): CKD stages 3, 4, and 5 defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Japanese Society of Nephrology-Chronic Kidney Disease Initiatives (JSN-CKDI) formula
  • Dialysis:

    • Not on dialysis for at least 12 weeks prior to screening (ND subjects)
    • On peritoneal dialysis (PD subjects)
  • Use of ESA:

    • ESA non-users: Have not used ESAs for 8 weeks prior to screening
    • ESA users: Have used the same ESA for 8 weeks prior to screening. However, in the ND subjects, the dose of darbepoetin alfa or epoetin beta pegol must be stable (administered once every 4 weeks and up to one-step dose change during 8 weeks prior to screening).
  • Hgb: Determined at the site using an Hgb analyzer

    • ESA non-users: >=8.0 g/dL and <11.0 g/dL
    • ESA users: >=9.0 g/dL and <=13.0 g/dL
  • Iron parameters: Ferritin >100 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL) or transferrin saturation (TSAT) >20% (screening verification only)
  • Gender (screening verification only): Female or male. Females: Not pregnant [demonstrated to be negative for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine or serum], not breast-feeding, and meet at least one of the following:

    1. Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as follows:

      • Pre-menopausal with at least one of the following and no plans to utilize assisted reproductive techniques (e.g., in vitro fertilization or donor embryo transfer):
      • History of bilateral tubal ligation or salpingectomy
      • History of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and postoperatively documented bilateral tubal obstruction
      • History of hysterectomy
      • History of bilateral oophorectomy
      • Postmenopausal defined as: females 60 years of age or older or ; In females <60 years of age, 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with postmenopausal follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] and estradiol concentrations is confirmatory [specified reference ranges]). Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the most effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment.
    2. Females of childbearing potential must agree to comply with one of the contraception methods listed as requirements in "GSK Listing of Most Effective Contraceptive Methods for Females of Childbearing Potential" from 28 days prior to the first dose of study medication until the completion of the follow-up visit (for subjects randomized to the GSK1278863 group) or 7 weeks after the last dose of study treatment (for subjects randomized to the Epoetin beta pegol group).
  • Informed consent: Written informed consent, including adherence to the requirements and conditions specified in the consent form and the protocol, must be obtained from each subject as specified in Protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related criteria

  • Dialysis

    • Cohort 1 and Cohort 3: Start or plan to initiate dialysis during the study
    • Cohort 2: Plan to stop peritoneal dialysis or start hemodialysis during the study
  • Kidney transplant: Planned living-related kidney transplant during the study Anemia-related criteria
  • Aplasia: History of bone-marrow hypoplasia or pure red cell aplasia
  • Other causes of anemia: pernicious anemia, thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal, or esophageal ulcer disease OR clinically significant GI bleeding within 8 weeks prior to screening or during a period from screening to Day 1.

Cardiovascular disease-related criteria

  • Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack: Diagnosed within 8 weeks prior to screening or during a period from screening to Day 1.
  • Heart failure: Class IV heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system
  • QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) (screening verification only): QTc >500 milliseconds (msec) or QTc >530 msec in subjects with bundle branch block Note: QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB) will be used, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) can be mechanically or manually read.

Other disease-related criteria

  • Liver disease (if any of the following occurs):

    • (Screening verification only) Alanine transaminase (ALT) >2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • (Screening verification only) Bilirubin >1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin is <35%)
    • Current unstable active liver or biliary disease (generally defined by the onset of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal/gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis) Note: Stable liver disease (including asymptomatic gallstones, chronic hepatitis B/C, or Gilbert's syndrome) is acceptable if the subject otherwise meets entry criteria..
  • Malignancy: History of malignancy within 2 years prior to screening, or currently receiving treatment for cancer, (PD subjects only) complex renal cystic >3 centimeters (cm) (II F, III or IV based on the Bosniak classification) Note (ND subjects and PD subjects): The only exception is squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitively treated >=8 weeks before screening.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, Hgb increase to the target range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) is medically risky.

Concomitant medication and other study treatment-related criteria

  • Iron: Planned use of intravenous iron during the screening phase or during a period from Day 1 to Week 4 Note: Oral iron is acceptable. However, the same dose regimen must be used throughout the screening phase and from Day 1 to Week 4. Antihyperphosphatemic agents containing iron (e.g., ferric citrate hydrate) are also acceptable only if used for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. However, they must be continued throughout the screening phase from Day 1 to Week 4.
  • Severe allergic reactions: History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to excipients in the investigational product or epoetin beta pegol
  • Drugs and supplements: Use or planned use of any prescription or non-prescription drugs or dietary supplements that are prohibited during the study period (prohibited medications: strong inducers and inhibitor of Cytochrome P450 2C8 [CYP2C8])
  • Prior investigational product exposure: Use of an investigational agent within 30 days or five half lives of the investigational agent (whichever is longer)
  • Prior treatment with GSK1278863: Any prior treatment with GSK1278863 for a treatment duration of >30 days

General health-related criteria

  • Other conditions: Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator (or subinvestigator) considers would put the subject at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Daprodustat in ND participants

Epoetin beta pegol in ND participants

Daprodustat in PD participants

Arm Description

Eligible ND participants will receive oral daprodustat (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 or 24 milligrams [mg] as recommended) dose once daily for 52 weeks.

Eligible ND participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) epoetin beta pegol (25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 or 250 microgram [µg] as recommended) dose once every 2 or 4 weeks for 52 weeks.

Eligible PD participants will receive oral daprodustat (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 or 24 mg as recommended) dose once daily for 52 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
The mean hemoglobin during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants was estimated by a statistical model using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period were summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Percentage of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
The percentage of ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period was summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND participants is presented.
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in PD Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at week 4 in PD participants is presented.
Number of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Percentage of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Number of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Percentage of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Epoetin Beta Pegol Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Dose of epoetin beta pegol at a scheduled visit was converted to dose per 4 weeks when the dose frequency was every 2 weeks. Epoetin beta pegol dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in PD Participants
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in ND Participants
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL.
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in PD Participants
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL.
Number of Dose Adjustments in ND Participants
Number of dose adjustments in ND participants is presented.
Number of Dose Adjustments in PD Participants
Number of dose adjustments in PD participants is presented.
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Hgb values at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented.
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Hgb values at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented.
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in ND participants is presented.
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in PD participants is presented.
Number of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Number of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Percentage of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Number of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Number of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Percentage of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in PD Participants
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in ND Participants
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb >= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in PD Participants
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb >= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in ND Participants
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in ND participants is presented.
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in PD Participants
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in PD participants is presented.
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in ND Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in ND participants is presented.
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in PD Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in PD participants is presented.
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in ND Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants is presented.
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in PD Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in PD participants is presented.
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) in ND Participants
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in TSAT in PD Participants
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in ND Participants
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in PD Participants
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in serum iron in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in serum iron in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in TIBC in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in TIBC in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in TIBC in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to 4 Hours (AUC[0-4]) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. AUC (0-4) is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. PK parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. Cmax is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.

Full Information

First Posted
June 2, 2016
Last Updated
April 27, 2021
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02791763
Brief Title
Phase III Study of GSK1278863 in Japanese Non-dialysis (ND) and Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Subjects With Renal Anemia
Official Title
A 52-week, Phase III, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of GSK1278863 in Japanese Non-dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects With Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 6, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 26, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 26, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase III, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study to compare the efficacy and safety of GSK1278863 administered for 52 weeks versus epoetin beta pegol in approximately 286 Japanese ND and 50 PD subjects with renal anemia. The study will consist of three cohorts. Cohort 1 and Cohort 3 will consist of ND subjects (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent [ESA] users and ESA non-users) randomized to receive GSK1278863 or epoetin beta pegol in a ratio of 1:1. PD subjects will be enrolled into Cohort 2 and will receive GSK1278863. This study consists of a 4-week screening phase, a 52-week treatment phase (including primary efficacy evaluation period [Weeks 40 to 52]), and a 4-week follow-up phase following the treatment phase. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of GSK1278863 to epoetin beta pegol based on mean hemoglobin (Hgb) during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND subjects. ESA non-users from Cohort 1 will be excluded from the primary efficacy analysis. Study results will be used as pivotal study data for an NDA submitted for GSK1278863 for the treatment of renal anemia in Japan.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anaemia
Keywords
Renal Anemia, Japanese, chronic kidney disease, Peritoneal dialysis, GSK1278863, Non-dialysis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
355 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Daprodustat in ND participants
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eligible ND participants will receive oral daprodustat (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 or 24 milligrams [mg] as recommended) dose once daily for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Epoetin beta pegol in ND participants
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eligible ND participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) epoetin beta pegol (25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 or 250 microgram [µg] as recommended) dose once every 2 or 4 weeks for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Daprodustat in PD participants
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eligible PD participants will receive oral daprodustat (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 or 24 mg as recommended) dose once daily for 52 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
1 to 4 mg tablets of GSK1278863
Intervention Description
7.0 millimeters (mm) round, standard biconvex, white film coated tablets containing 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg of GSK1278863 as active ingredient, to be orally administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
6 mg GSK1278863 tablet
Intervention Description
9.0 mm round, standard biconvex, white film coated tablets containing 6 mg of GSK1278863 as active ingredient, to be orally administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Epoetin beta pegol
Intervention Description
An injectable formulation containing 25 micrograms µg, 50 µg, 75 µg, 100 µg, 150 µg, 200 µg, or 250 µg of epoetin beta pegol per syringe (0.3 mL), supplied as a glass syringe prefilled with epoetin beta pegol solution (clear colorless to pale yellow). Epoetin beta pegol will be subcutaneously administered once every 2 or 4 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
Description
The mean hemoglobin during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants was estimated by a statistical model using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM).
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
Description
ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period were summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
Description
The percentage of ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period was summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND Participants
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in PD Participants
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at week 4 in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Number of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Percentage of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Number of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Percentage of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to <=-2.0, >-2.0 and <=-1.0, >-1.0 and <=0, >0 and <=1.0, >1.0 and <=2.0, >2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Description
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Title
Epoetin Beta Pegol Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Description
Dose of epoetin beta pegol at a scheduled visit was converted to dose per 4 weeks when the dose frequency was every 2 weeks. Epoetin beta pegol dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Title
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in PD Participants
Description
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Title
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in ND Participants
Description
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in PD Participants
Description
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb >13 g/dL.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Number of Dose Adjustments in ND Participants
Description
Number of dose adjustments in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Number of Dose Adjustments in PD Participants
Description
Number of dose adjustments in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Description
Hgb values at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Description
Hgb values at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Description
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Description
Number of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Description
Percentage of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Description
Number of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Description
Percentage of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time Frame
Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
Description
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in PD Participants
Description
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in ND Participants
Description
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb >= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in PD Participants
Description
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb >= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Description
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Description
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Description
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Description
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Description
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Description
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Description
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Description
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Description
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Description
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Description
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Description
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in ND Participants
Description
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in PD Participants
Description
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in ND Participants
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in PD Participants
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 52
Title
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in ND Participants
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants is presented.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in PD Participants
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in PD participants is presented.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time Frame
Up to week 52
Title
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Description
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 40 to 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in ND Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in PD Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) in ND Participants
Description
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in TSAT in PD Participants
Description
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in ND Participants
Description
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in PD Participants
Description
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100*(exponential [mean change on log scale]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in ND Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in serum iron in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in PD Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in serum iron in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) in ND Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in TIBC in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in TIBC in PD Participants
Description
Change from Baseline in TIBC in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Title
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to 4 Hours (AUC[0-4]) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. AUC (0-4) is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.
Time Frame
1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dose at Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. PK parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. Cmax is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.
Time Frame
1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dose at Weeks 12 and 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age (at the time of informed consent): >=20 years of age Screening verification only: Stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ND subjects only): CKD stages 3, 4, and 5 defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Japanese Society of Nephrology-Chronic Kidney Disease Initiatives (JSN-CKDI) formula Dialysis: Not on dialysis for at least 12 weeks prior to screening (ND subjects) On peritoneal dialysis (PD subjects) Use of ESA: ESA non-users: Have not used ESAs for 8 weeks prior to screening ESA users: Have used the same ESA for 8 weeks prior to screening. However, in the ND subjects, the dose of darbepoetin alfa or epoetin beta pegol must be stable (administered once every 4 weeks and up to one-step dose change during 8 weeks prior to screening). Hgb: Determined at the site using an Hgb analyzer ESA non-users: >=8.0 g/dL and <11.0 g/dL ESA users: >=9.0 g/dL and <=13.0 g/dL Iron parameters: Ferritin >100 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL) or transferrin saturation (TSAT) >20% (screening verification only) Gender (screening verification only): Female or male. Females: Not pregnant [demonstrated to be negative for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine or serum], not breast-feeding, and meet at least one of the following: Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as follows: Pre-menopausal with at least one of the following and no plans to utilize assisted reproductive techniques (e.g., in vitro fertilization or donor embryo transfer): History of bilateral tubal ligation or salpingectomy History of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and postoperatively documented bilateral tubal obstruction History of hysterectomy History of bilateral oophorectomy Postmenopausal defined as: females 60 years of age or older or ; In females <60 years of age, 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with postmenopausal follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] and estradiol concentrations is confirmatory [specified reference ranges]). Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the most effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment. Females of childbearing potential must agree to comply with one of the contraception methods listed as requirements in "GSK Listing of Most Effective Contraceptive Methods for Females of Childbearing Potential" from 28 days prior to the first dose of study medication until the completion of the follow-up visit (for subjects randomized to the GSK1278863 group) or 7 weeks after the last dose of study treatment (for subjects randomized to the Epoetin beta pegol group). Informed consent: Written informed consent, including adherence to the requirements and conditions specified in the consent form and the protocol, must be obtained from each subject as specified in Protocol. Exclusion Criteria: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related criteria Dialysis Cohort 1 and Cohort 3: Start or plan to initiate dialysis during the study Cohort 2: Plan to stop peritoneal dialysis or start hemodialysis during the study Kidney transplant: Planned living-related kidney transplant during the study Anemia-related criteria Aplasia: History of bone-marrow hypoplasia or pure red cell aplasia Other causes of anemia: pernicious anemia, thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal, or esophageal ulcer disease OR clinically significant GI bleeding within 8 weeks prior to screening or during a period from screening to Day 1. Cardiovascular disease-related criteria Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack: Diagnosed within 8 weeks prior to screening or during a period from screening to Day 1. Heart failure: Class IV heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) (screening verification only): QTc >500 milliseconds (msec) or QTc >530 msec in subjects with bundle branch block Note: QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB) will be used, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) can be mechanically or manually read. Other disease-related criteria Liver disease (if any of the following occurs): (Screening verification only) Alanine transaminase (ALT) >2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (Screening verification only) Bilirubin >1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin is <35%) Current unstable active liver or biliary disease (generally defined by the onset of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal/gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis) Note: Stable liver disease (including asymptomatic gallstones, chronic hepatitis B/C, or Gilbert's syndrome) is acceptable if the subject otherwise meets entry criteria.. Malignancy: History of malignancy within 2 years prior to screening, or currently receiving treatment for cancer, (PD subjects only) complex renal cystic >3 centimeters (cm) (II F, III or IV based on the Bosniak classification) Note (ND subjects and PD subjects): The only exception is squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitively treated >=8 weeks before screening. In the opinion of the investigator, Hgb increase to the target range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) is medically risky. Concomitant medication and other study treatment-related criteria Iron: Planned use of intravenous iron during the screening phase or during a period from Day 1 to Week 4 Note: Oral iron is acceptable. However, the same dose regimen must be used throughout the screening phase and from Day 1 to Week 4. Antihyperphosphatemic agents containing iron (e.g., ferric citrate hydrate) are also acceptable only if used for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. However, they must be continued throughout the screening phase from Day 1 to Week 4. Severe allergic reactions: History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to excipients in the investigational product or epoetin beta pegol Drugs and supplements: Use or planned use of any prescription or non-prescription drugs or dietary supplements that are prohibited during the study period (prohibited medications: strong inducers and inhibitor of Cytochrome P450 2C8 [CYP2C8]) Prior investigational product exposure: Use of an investigational agent within 30 days or five half lives of the investigational agent (whichever is longer) Prior treatment with GSK1278863: Any prior treatment with GSK1278863 for a treatment duration of >30 days General health-related criteria Other conditions: Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator (or subinvestigator) considers would put the subject at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
453-8566
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
455-8530
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
457-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
486-8510
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
260-8712
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
278-0004
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ehime
ZIP/Postal Code
790-0024
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukui
ZIP/Postal Code
910-8526
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
802-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
820-8505
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukushima
ZIP/Postal Code
963-8052
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gifu
ZIP/Postal Code
500-8523
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gifu
ZIP/Postal Code
500-8717
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima
ZIP/Postal Code
720-0838
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
007-0803
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-0033
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
065-8611
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
073-0022
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
073-0196
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
302-0022
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
306-0433
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
310-0015
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ishikawa
ZIP/Postal Code
920-0353
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ishikawa
ZIP/Postal Code
920-8530
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Iwate
ZIP/Postal Code
020-0066
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima
ZIP/Postal Code
890-0073
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima
ZIP/Postal Code
893-0024
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima
ZIP/Postal Code
899-5431
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
210-0852
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
234-8503
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
242-0018
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
251-8550
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto
ZIP/Postal Code
861-8520
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto
ZIP/Postal Code
862-8505
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyoto
ZIP/Postal Code
604-8845
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyoto
ZIP/Postal Code
611-0041
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyoto
ZIP/Postal Code
612-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagano
ZIP/Postal Code
396-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagano
ZIP/Postal Code
399-8292
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oita
ZIP/Postal Code
874-0011
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
530-0012
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
530-8480
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
555-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
558-8558
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
586-8521
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
591-8025
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
330-8553
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
335-0023
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shiga
ZIP/Postal Code
523-0082
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
425-8505
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokushima
ZIP/Postal Code
770-0011
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
141-8625
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tottori
ZIP/Postal Code
683-0002
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toyama
ZIP/Postal Code
932-8503
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toyama
ZIP/Postal Code
937-0042
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toyama
ZIP/Postal Code
938-8502
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (copy the URL below to your browser)
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
https://clinicalstudydatarequest.com/Posting.aspx?ID=20805
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36005278
Citation
Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33561857
Citation
Nangaku M, Hamano T, Akizawa T, Tsubakihara Y, Nagai R, Okuda N, Kurata K, Nagakubo T, Jones NP, Endo Y, Cobitz AR. Daprodustat Compared with Epoetin Beta Pegol for Anemia in Japanese Patients Not on Dialysis: A 52-Week Randomized Open-Label Phase 3 Trial. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(1):26-35. doi: 10.1159/000513103. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Phase III Study of GSK1278863 in Japanese Non-dialysis (ND) and Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Subjects With Renal Anemia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs