Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (ASCLEPIOS I)
Primary Purpose
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
Teriflunomide capsule
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 to 55 years of age
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS)
- At least 1 relapse during the previous 1 year or 2 relapses during the previous 2 years or a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan in previous year
- Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary progressive MS
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Sites / Locations
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
OMB 20 mg
TER 14 mg
Arm Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide- matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Secondary Outcome Measures
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Number of Gd-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Relapse
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening.
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
9 Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Annual Rate of Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02792218
First Posted
June 2, 2016
Last Updated
September 3, 2021
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02792218
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Acronym
ASCLEPIOS I
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 20, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 5, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 20, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Detailed Description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years.
Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used i.e. all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
930 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
OMB 20 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide- matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Arm Title
TER 14 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection
Intervention Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
Intervention Description
Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Teriflunomide capsule
Intervention Description
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of Gd-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Description
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Description
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
Description
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Time Frame
Month 3, 12 and 24
Title
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Description
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Time Frame
Baseline, months 12 and 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Relapse
Description
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Description
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
Description
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
Description
9 Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Description
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Time Frame
Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Title
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Description
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Title
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
Description
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Title
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
Description
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
Description
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Annual Rate of Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Time Frame
Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Title
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Description
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 to 55 years of age
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS)
At least 1 relapse during the previous 1 year or 2 relapses during the previous 2 years or a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan in previous year
Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Exclusion Criteria:
Primary progressive MS
Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Berkeley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Atlantis
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33462-6608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33445
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hollywood
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Loxahatchee Groves
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33470
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
North Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33408
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pensacola
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Port Charlotte
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33952
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sunrise
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33351
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32960
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Northbrook
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60062
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50314-2611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Alexandria
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70810
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Clinton Township
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48035
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Golden Valley
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55422
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chesterfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ozark
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65721
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Latham
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Johnson City
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37604
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37920
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
El Paso
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79935
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Round Rock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78681
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23456
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Green Bay
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
54311
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Neenah
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
54956
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
S2000BZL
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
1061
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
X5004CDT
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Lambton Heights
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2305
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brasschaat
ZIP/Postal Code
2930
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brugge
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pelt
ZIP/Postal Code
3900
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1309
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6T 1Z3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gatineau
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J9J 0A5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A 2B4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1J 1Z4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rijeka
State/Province
HRV
ZIP/Postal Code
51000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 4 Krc
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
140 59
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hradec Kralove
State/Province
CZE
ZIP/Postal Code
500 05
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Olomouc
State/Province
CZE
ZIP/Postal Code
775 20
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
JIhlava
ZIP/Postal Code
586 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
532 03
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 5
ZIP/Postal Code
150 06
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aarhus
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Odense C
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10617
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
51014
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nancy
State/Province
Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
54035
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lille Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nantes Cedex 1
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nimes Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
30029
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barsinghausen
ZIP/Postal Code
30890
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bayreuth
ZIP/Postal Code
95445
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bielefeld
ZIP/Postal Code
D 33647
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20249
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35043
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenchen
ZIP/Postal Code
80377
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenchen
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Neuburg an der Donau
ZIP/Postal Code
86633
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Potsdam
ZIP/Postal Code
14471
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89073
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wiesbaden
ZIP/Postal Code
65191
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
115 25
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
115 28
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
GR 54636
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
State/Province
HUN
ZIP/Postal Code
1135
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1106
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kistarcsa
ZIP/Postal Code
2143
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Szeged
ZIP/Postal Code
6725
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Delhi
State/Province
Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110017
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangalore
State/Province
Karnataka
ZIP/Postal Code
560054
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kochi
State/Province
Kerala
ZIP/Postal Code
682 026
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chandigarh
State/Province
Punjab
ZIP/Postal Code
160012
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kolkata
State/Province
West Bengal
ZIP/Postal Code
700068
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mangalore
ZIP/Postal Code
575018
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ashkelon
ZIP/Postal Code
78278
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Haifa
ZIP/Postal Code
310 9601
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sefad
ZIP/Postal Code
13100
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
6423906
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00189
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gallarate
State/Province
VA
ZIP/Postal Code
21013
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mexico
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
03100
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sittard-Geleen
State/Province
BG
ZIP/Postal Code
6162 BG
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-796
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80 952
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-462
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-803
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40 571
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kielce
ZIP/Postal Code
25 726
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90 324
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Guaynabo
ZIP/Postal Code
00968
Country
Puerto Rico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125367
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nizhny Novgorod
ZIP/Postal Code
603155
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630007
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
194044
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saransk
ZIP/Postal Code
430032
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sestroretsk
ZIP/Postal Code
197706
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tyumen
ZIP/Postal Code
625000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Banska Bystrica
ZIP/Postal Code
97517
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
82606
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
83305
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nitra
ZIP/Postal Code
94901
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Trnava
ZIP/Postal Code
917 75
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cadiz
State/Province
Andalucia
ZIP/Postal Code
11009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Cataluna
ZIP/Postal Code
08026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Cataluna
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Catalunya
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
L Hospitalet De Llobregat
State/Province
Catalunya
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salt
State/Province
Cataluña
ZIP/Postal Code
17190
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
El Palmar
State/Province
Murcia
ZIP/Postal Code
30120
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Goeteborg
ZIP/Postal Code
413 45
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
102 35
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Basel
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Khon Kaen
State/Province
THA
ZIP/Postal Code
40002
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34147
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Izmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35040
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kocaeli
ZIP/Postal Code
41380
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Samsun
ZIP/Postal Code
55139
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Headington
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 9DU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G51 4TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E1 1BB
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35266417
Citation
Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32757523
Citation
Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs