Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. (ASCLEPIOS II)
Primary Purpose
Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
Teriflunomide capsule
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis focused on measuring Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years at Screening
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with disease activity
- Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years OR a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization
- Disability status at Screening with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
- Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Sites / Locations
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
OMG 20 mg
TER 14 mg
Arm Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide-matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Secondary Outcome Measures
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Participants With Confirmed Relapse
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
9-Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02792231
First Posted
June 2, 2016
Last Updated
October 21, 2021
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02792231
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Acronym
ASCLEPIOS II
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 26, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 10, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 22, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Detailed Description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparatorcontrolled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used, i.e., all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
Keywords
Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
955 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
OMG 20 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1
,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide-matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Arm Title
TER 14 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection
Intervention Description
Ofatumumab 20 mg prefilled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
Intervention Description
Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Teriflunomide capsule
Intervention Description
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Description
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Description
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
Description
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Time Frame
Month 3, 12 and 24
Title
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Description
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Time Frame
Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Title
Participants With Confirmed Relapse
Description
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Description
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Description
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
Description
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
Description
9-Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
Description
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Description
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Time Frame
Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Title
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Description
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Title
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
Description
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Title
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
Description
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
Description
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Title
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2.5 years
Title
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Time Frame
Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Title
Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Description
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Time Frame
Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Title
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Description
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years at Screening
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with disease activity
Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years OR a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization
Disability status at Screening with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233-0271
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cullman
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35058
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Basalt
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
81621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Centennial
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80907
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fort Collins
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80528
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fort Collins
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
907-280528
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fairfield
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06824
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Maitland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32751
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Oldsmar
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34677
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32174
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Palm Coast
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32164
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34243
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tallahassee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32312
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Suwanee
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Anderson
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46011
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46256
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wellesley
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02481
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Golden Valley
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55422
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Great Falls
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87131-0001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Akron
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Westerville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43081
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29650
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cordova
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38018
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37922
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greenville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sherman
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75092
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Orem
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84058
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kirkland
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Waukesha
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53188
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Caba
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1428AQK
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
S2000DSW
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tucuman
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Liverpool
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2170
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1010
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Edegem
State/Province
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aalst
ZIP/Postal Code
9300
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1113
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1413
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5A5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greenfield Park
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J4V 2J2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Osijek
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brno
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
656 91
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Havirov
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
736 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Teplice
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
415 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ostrava-Poruba
ZIP/Postal Code
708 52
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Turku
ZIP/Postal Code
20520
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nice
State/Province
Cedex1
ZIP/Postal Code
06001
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bordeaux Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63000
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris Cedex 13
ZIP/Postal Code
75651
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rennes Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67098
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44791
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45147
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22179
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Homburg
ZIP/Postal Code
66421
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Koln
ZIP/Postal Code
50935
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Minden
ZIP/Postal Code
32429
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Siegen
ZIP/Postal Code
57076
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Unterhaching
ZIP/Postal Code
82008
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
State/Province
HUN
ZIP/Postal Code
1204
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Esztergom
State/Province
HUN
ZIP/Postal Code
2500
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hyderabad
State/Province
Andhra Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
500018
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Delhi
State/Province
Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110 060
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
400008
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
400012
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pune
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
411004
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ludhiana
State/Province
Punjab
ZIP/Postal Code
141008
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400016
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Padova
State/Province
PD
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00178
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Riga
State/Province
LV
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1005
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV 1002
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1038
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kaunas
State/Province
LTU
ZIP/Postal Code
LT 50161
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-08661
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31238
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Drammen
ZIP/Postal Code
1086
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cercado De Lima
State/Province
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
01
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Isidro
State/Province
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
27
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
LIMA 13
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Glogow
ZIP/Postal Code
36-060
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rzeszow
ZIP/Postal Code
35 055
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02 957
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
51-685
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zabrze
ZIP/Postal Code
41-800
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Matosinhos
State/Province
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4454509
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amadora
ZIP/Postal Code
2720-276
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Braga
ZIP/Postal Code
4710243
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Coimbra
ZIP/Postal Code
3000-075
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1169-050
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1500 650
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1600190
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Loures
ZIP/Postal Code
2674514
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4000001
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Santa Maria da Feira
ZIP/Postal Code
4520 211
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ekaterinburg
ZIP/Postal Code
620109
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420021
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Krasnoyarsk
ZIP/Postal Code
660049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
127015
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nizhny Novgorod
ZIP/Postal Code
603137
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630087
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197022
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197110
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197376
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
813 69
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Martin
ZIP/Postal Code
036 59
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ruzomberok
ZIP/Postal Code
03426
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0041
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rosebank
ZIP/Postal Code
2196
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Malaga
State/Province
Andalucia
ZIP/Postal Code
29010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sevilla
State/Province
Andalucia
ZIP/Postal Code
41017
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pozuelo de Alarcon
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28223
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Baracaldo
State/Province
Vizcaya
ZIP/Postal Code
48903
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Sebastian
ZIP/Postal Code
20014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lugano
ZIP/Postal Code
6900
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tainan
ZIP/Postal Code
70403
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Haseki / Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34096
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Izmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35340
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mersin
ZIP/Postal Code
33079
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Trabzon
ZIP/Postal Code
61080
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Luton
State/Province
Beds
ZIP/Postal Code
LU4 0DZ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE5 9RS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW17 0QT
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35266417
Citation
Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32757523
Citation
Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs