search
Back to results

Tumour and HEalthy Tissues DOse-response and Radiosensitivity Assay (THEODORA)

Primary Purpose

Sarcoma, Rectal Carcinoma, Esophagus Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard treatment
Sponsored by
Centre Leon Berard
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Sarcoma focused on measuring radiation therapy, radiosensitivity, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, Adverse Event post radiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

I1. Patients (male or female) ≥ 18 years of age. I2. Adult patients with a suspected, non-treated, non-metastatic retroperitoneal or limb soft tissue sarcoma, esophagus cancer or rectum cancer to be treated by pre-operative radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy I3. At least one measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 I4. Documented negative serology tests (HVB, HIV, HVC) I5. PS ECOG 0 to 1 I6. Patient able and willing to provide informed consent. I7. Ability to understand and willingness for follow-up visits. I8. Covered by a medical insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

E1. Contra-indication to radiotherapy E2. Contra-indication to skin biopsy

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Francois Baclesse
  • Infirmerie Protestante
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
  • ICL - Institut de Cancérologie de la Lorraine
  • Hopital Nord Ouest Villefranche Sur Saone

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Standard treatment

Arm Description

The patients will receive standard treatment according to international recommendations depending on their type of cancer.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Calibration of the correlation between the clinical tumor response and the results of A/MS bioassays using tumor samples
The calibration stage will be performed using data from the first 40 patients enrolled. All the potential correlations between the clinical and radiobiological parameters will be tested. The links between clinical tumor response parameters and radiobiological parameters derived from MS/A bioassays using tumor samples.
Validation of the correlation between the clinical tumor response and the results of A/MS bioassays using tumor samples
The validation stage will be performed using data from the remaining 60 patients enrolled. This stage will assess whether or not the prediction of tumor response derived from the A/MS bioassays fits with the observed tumor response after RT.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Validation of the correlation between the healthy tissue response (i.e. AE reported as per CTCAE v4) and the results of MS/A bioassays using skin biopsies

Full Information

First Posted
June 8, 2016
Last Updated
March 23, 2020
Sponsor
Centre Leon Berard
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02797405
Brief Title
Tumour and HEalthy Tissues DOse-response and Radiosensitivity Assay
Acronym
THEODORA
Official Title
Evaluation of Individual Radiosensitivity of Cancer Patients to be Treated by Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy Per-operative
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Withdrawal of analysis study Partner.
Study Start Date
October 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 13, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 13, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Leon Berard

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
THEODORA is a prospective pilot clinical trial aiming at first to evaluate and validate the predictive value of the A & MS bioassays on tumor control by radiotherapy.
Detailed Description
For that purpose, this project is composed of 3 stages: A Calibration stage that will allow to evaluate the correlation between the clinical tumor response parameters (i.e. TV/AP features) and the radiobiological parameters issued from the A/MS bioassays in order to develop a mathematic model defining the UTCR parameter A Validation stage in order to assess the validity of A/MS bioassays towards clinical tumour response parameters (i.e. both TV/AP features and UTCR). A Precision stage will be performed either to improve the precision of the predictive performance of the A and MS bioassays or to establish a new mathematical model describing the correlation between clinical and radiobiological parameters. The objective of this precision stage will depend of the results of the calibration stage (see below). This prospective clinical study will be conducted in a population of patients with different tumor types in order to explore a large range of tumor radiosensitivity including sarcomas, rectal carcinoma and esophagus tumor.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sarcoma, Rectal Carcinoma, Esophagus Cancer
Keywords
radiation therapy, radiosensitivity, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, Adverse Event post radiotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
97 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard treatment
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The patients will receive standard treatment according to international recommendations depending on their type of cancer.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Standard treatment
Intervention Description
Sarcoma patients will undergo radiotherapy followed by surgery Rectum cancer patients will undergo radio-chemotherapy followed by surgery Esophagus cancer patients will undergo radio-chemotherapy followed by surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Calibration of the correlation between the clinical tumor response and the results of A/MS bioassays using tumor samples
Description
The calibration stage will be performed using data from the first 40 patients enrolled. All the potential correlations between the clinical and radiobiological parameters will be tested. The links between clinical tumor response parameters and radiobiological parameters derived from MS/A bioassays using tumor samples.
Time Frame
2.5 years (after 100 patients enrolled )
Title
Validation of the correlation between the clinical tumor response and the results of A/MS bioassays using tumor samples
Description
The validation stage will be performed using data from the remaining 60 patients enrolled. This stage will assess whether or not the prediction of tumor response derived from the A/MS bioassays fits with the observed tumor response after RT.
Time Frame
2.5 years (after 100 patients enrolled )
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Validation of the correlation between the healthy tissue response (i.e. AE reported as per CTCAE v4) and the results of MS/A bioassays using skin biopsies
Time Frame
2.5 years (after 100 patients enrolled )

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: I1. Patients (male or female) ≥ 18 years of age. I2. Adult patients with a suspected, non-treated, non-metastatic retroperitoneal or limb soft tissue sarcoma, esophagus cancer or rectum cancer to be treated by pre-operative radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy I3. At least one measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 I4. Documented negative serology tests (HVB, HIV, HVC) I5. PS ECOG 0 to 1 I6. Patient able and willing to provide informed consent. I7. Ability to understand and willingness for follow-up visits. I8. Covered by a medical insurance. Exclusion Criteria: E1. Contra-indication to radiotherapy E2. Contra-indication to skin biopsy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie-Pierre SUNYACH, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Leon Berard
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Francois Baclesse
City
Caen
Country
France
Facility Name
Infirmerie Protestante
City
Caluire-et-Cuire
ZIP/Postal Code
69641
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Georges-François Leclerc
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21079
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Léon Bérard
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
Facility Name
ICL - Institut de Cancérologie de la Lorraine
City
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54519
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Nord Ouest Villefranche Sur Saone
City
Villefranche-sur-Saône
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16080176
Citation
Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005 Sep 15;104(6):1129-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21324. Erratum In: Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;107(3):660.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16086915
Citation
Bentzen SM, Heeren G, Cottier B, Slotman B, Glimelius B, Lievens Y, van den Bogaert W. Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Jun;75(3):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.007. Epub 2005 Mar 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22325993
Citation
Lievens Y, Grau C. Health economics in radiation oncology: introducing the ESTRO HERO project. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Apr;103(1):109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.026. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11730991
Citation
Dorr W, Hendry JH. Consequential late effects in normal tissues. Radiother Oncol. 2001 Dec;61(3):223-31. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00429-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23735818
Citation
Bodgi L, Granzotto A, Devic C, Vogin G, Lesne A, Bottollier-Depois JF, Victor JM, Maalouf M, Fares G, Foray N. A single formula to describe radiation-induced protein relocalization: towards a mathematical definition of individual radiosensitivity. J Theor Biol. 2013 Sep 21;333:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22919036
Citation
Foray N, Colin C, Bourguignon M. 100 years of individual radiosensitivity: how we have forgotten the evidence. Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):627-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112560. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18246480
Citation
Joubert A, Zimmerman KM, Bencokova Z, Gastaldo J, Chavaudra N, Favaudon V, Arlett CF, Foray N. DNA double-strand break repair defects in syndromes associated with acute radiation response: at least two different assays to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity? Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Feb;84(2):107-25. doi: 10.1080/09553000701797039.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21333944
Citation
Granzotto A, Joubert A, Viau M, Devic C, Maalouf M, Thomas C, Vogin G, Malek K, Colin C, Balosso J, Foray N. [Individual response to ionising radiation: What predictive assay(s) to choose?]. C R Biol. 2011 Feb;334(2):140-57. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.018. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12679524
Citation
Rothkamm K, Lobrich M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5057-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830918100. Epub 2003 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26867874
Citation
COPERNIC project investigators; Granzotto A, Benadjaoud MA, Vogin G, Devic C, Ferlazzo ML, Bodgi L, Pereira S, Sonzogni L, Forcheron F, Viau M, Etaix A, Malek K, Mengue-Bindjeme L, Escoffier C, Rouvet I, Zabot MT, Joubert A, Vincent A, Dalla Venezia N, Bourguignon M, Canat EP, d'Hombres A, Thebaud E, Orbach D, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Radji A, Dore E, Pointreau Y, Bourgier C, Leblond P, Defachelles AS, Lervat C, Guey S, Feuvret L, Gilsoul F, Berger C, Moncharmont C, de Laroche G, Moreau-Claeys MV, Chavaudra N, Combemale P, Biston MC, Malet C, Martel-Lafay I, Laude C, Hau-Desbat NH, Zioueche A, Tanguy R, Sunyach MP, Racadot S, Pommier P, Claude L, Baleydier F, Fleury B, de Crevoisier R, Simon JM, Verrelle P, Peiffert D, Belkacemi Y, Bourhis J, Lartigau E, Carrie C, De Vathaire F, Eschwege F, Puisieux A, Lagrange JL, Balosso J, Foray N. Influence of Nucleoshuttling of the ATM Protein in the Healthy Tissues Response to Radiation Therapy: Toward a Molecular Classification of Human Radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):450-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26907628
Citation
Bodgi L, Foray N. The nucleo-shuttling of the ATM protein as a basis for a novel theory of radiation response: resolution of the linear-quadratic model. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92(3):117-31. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2016.1135260.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10701504
Citation
Zaider M, Minerbo GN. Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Feb;45(2):279-93. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/303.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19097774
Citation
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3056288
Citation
Gerard A, Buyse M, Nordlinger B, Loygue J, Pene F, Kempf P, Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Arnaud JP, Desaive C, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Ann Surg. 1988 Nov;208(5):606-14. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15496622
Citation
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21654259
Citation
Fleming FJ, Pahlman L, Monson JR. Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jul;54(7):901-12. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820eeb37.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17023775
Citation
Movsas B, Diratzouian H, Hanlon A, Cooper H, Freedman G, Konski A, Sigurdson E, Hoffman J, Meropol NJ, Weiner LM, Coia L, Lanciano R, Stein J, Kister D, Eisenberg B. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation with a hyperfractionated radiation boost in locally advanced rectal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct;29(5):435-41. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000227480.41414.f2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9747819
Citation
Wagman R, Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Guillem JG, Paty PP. Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis: long term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Aug 1;42(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00180-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8622034
Citation
Pisters PW, Harrison LB, Leung DH, Woodruff JM, Casper ES, Brennan MF. Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):859-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.859.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9440743
Citation
Yang JC, Chang AE, Baker AR, Sindelar WF, Danforth DN, Topalian SL, DeLaney T, Glatstein E, Steinberg SM, Merino MJ, Rosenberg SA. Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):197-203. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.197.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19679403
Citation
Koshy M, Rich SE, Mohiuddin MM. Improved survival with radiation therapy in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a SEER analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.051. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14596510
Citation
Strander H, Turesson I, Cavallin-Stahl E. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in soft tissue sarcomas. Acta Oncol. 2003;42(5-6):516-31. doi: 10.1080/02841860310014732.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19261927
Citation
Stacchiotti S, Collini P, Messina A, Morosi C, Barisella M, Bertulli R, Piovesan C, Dileo P, Torri V, Gronchi A, Casali PG. High-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: tumor response assessment--pilot study to assess the correlation between radiologic and pathologic response by using RECIST and Choi criteria. Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):447-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081403. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19670096
Citation
Stahl R, Wang T, Lindner LH, Abdel-Rahman S, Santl M, Reiser MF, Issels RD. Comparison of radiological and pathohistological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) and study of response dependence on the applied thermal parameters in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Int J Hyperthermia. 2009 Jun;25(4):289-98. doi: 10.1080/02656730902873616.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12103287
Citation
O'Sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R, Bell R, Catton C, Chabot P, Wunder J, Kandel R, Goddard K, Sadura A, Pater J, Zee B. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2235-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09292-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10235156
Citation
Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA Jr, Al-Sarraf M, Byhardt R, Russell AH, Beitler JJ, Spencer S, Asbell SO, Graham MV, Leichman LL. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1623-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12860946
Citation
Ishikura S, Nihei K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Hironaka S, Mera K, Muto M, Ogino T, Yoshida S. Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2697-702. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.055.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19327900
Citation
Morota M, Gomi K, Kozuka T, Chin K, Matsuura M, Oguchi M, Ito H, Yamashita T. Late toxicity after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.075. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19403881
Citation
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Tumour and HEalthy Tissues DOse-response and Radiosensitivity Assay

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs